在全球化、自由競爭的產業環境之下，各產業環境已日趨成熟，各產業中的組織該如何尋找立足點，創造差異化並形成競爭優勢是各組織追求的目標。
本研究透過組織生態學觀點進行探討組織如何得以擁有並可持續維持其競爭優勢。並非各組織皆能取得異於它組織的競爭優勢，意味著某些組織在該產業存在關鍵成功因素而可繼續生存。組織能認清自我、認清環境並掌握關鍵成功因素，轉化為本身所需，那在全球化競爭時代下，符合達爾文的『物競天擇，適者生存』的生態常理現象，在環境進行天擇之前，逕行已完成對環境適應的成功改變，免於被淘汰命運而順利存活，實為全球中任一產業、任一組織努力的目標。
本研究主要是以宏遠電訊公司作為個案研究的訪談對象，該公司處於資訊社會環境之下，科技的變動會影響產品，甚至於策略面的改變、突破，由於是以生物生態學原理所衍生出的組織生態學延伸應用於企業管理層面，故本研究將會提及多個概念是以生物物種自生存、繁衍、競爭到死亡的相對概念來描述組織發展歷程，如何透過培養自身組織慣例、取得資源，使組織具競爭優勢而順利存活，並從中解釋慣例與資源對於組織的發展策略及組織競爭優勢的影響，可供其它組織自個體組織生態學角度對於組織競爭策略之參考。

Various industries have become very mature and stable under the globalization and free competition environment. Therefore, it has been an ultimate objective for many organizations to find their standpoints, make something difference from others, and to being more competitive in the market. This research paper will discuss how the business environment can affect the competitive advantage through the Organizational Ecology theory.
The major purpose of this study is to discuss how the organization maintains their competitive advantages by the organizational ecology perspective. As not all organizations could make difference from others to achieve its competitive advantages, so it also means some organizations have critical success factors in the industrial market and so can survive. Therefore, if organizations can get a clear understanding of themselves and the environment , and have critical success factor in this global competition environment under the Darwin line environment described in the "marketplace competition selection, survival of the fittest " . Under the phenomenon of common sense, it is the goal of organizations to adapt to the environment before the track line has completed from the fate of being eliminated.
This study is based on Savecom telecommunications company case . And because of this company in the Information Age, technological changes will affect the company's products and strategies. Because it is based on the principle of bio-ecology extends applies in the business management stratification plane, so this research will mention many concepts of biological species from survival, multiplication, competes and death to describe the organization development course. How to cultivate organization convention and obtain beneficial resources will enable the organization to have the competitive advantage and survive smoothly. Besides, explaining how the convention and the resources influence organization's development strategy and the organization competitive advantages to being a reference of other organizations .

中文部份：
1. 陳彩繁，『策略雄心與資源槓桿運用之研究：以長谷公司為例』，碩士論文，國立中山大學，高雄(1994)。
2. 吳端容，『台灣資訊產品經銷商競爭策略之研究』，碩士論文，大葉大學，彰化(2006)。
3. 胡斌，『企業生態系統的動態演化及運作研究』，博士論文，河海大學，2006。
4. 胡偉，『組織生態進化理論進展』，博士論文，河海大學。
5. 彭璧玉，2006，『組織生態學理論述評』，經濟學期，111-117頁。
6. 林月雲、吳孟玲，『產業變遷、組織轉變、策略制定與組織成敗之關係-組織生態之觀點2/2』，行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫( NSC89-2416-H-004-084)，臺北，臺灣 (2001)。
7. 羅德興，『IC設計產業生態之競合與演化關係之研究』，碩士論文，中原大學，桃園 (2003)。
8. 廖仁川，『以生態基因說的觀點建立引進海外高階經理人才的模型-以半導體產業為例』，碩士論文，雲林科技大學，雲林(1999)。
9. 鍾啟賢，『透過產業生態學的理論建構綠色矽島之研究』，碩士論文，南華大學，嘉義(2000)。
10. 葉佳欣，『台灣CRT與TFT-LCD產業之比較分析-以產業生態與生命週期觀點』，碩士論文，大葉大學，彰化(2004)。
11. 趙英、王卉平、趙都敏，『環境因素對新企業生成的影響研究-組織生態學的觀點』，軟科學，第二十二卷，第二期，第138-141頁 (2008)。
12. 楊仲偉、江德鐘、蔡渭水，2002，『中小企業特質與企業成長階段關係之研究』，中華管理學報，第四卷．第二期：45-58頁。
13. 梁磊、邢欣，2003，『論組織生態學研究對象的層次結構』，科學研究，第二十一期:38-45頁。
14. 胡偉，2007，『組織生態進化理論進展』，經濟理論研究，第三期:105-107頁。
15. 俞慧芸、簡詩宏，『企業免疫力：再探企業核心能力，組織與管理特刊，，，第1-10頁。
16. 李慶芳，『藉由慣例活動提昇組織能力之歷程-以L營造及M建設為例』，碩士論文，國立中山大學，高雄(1994)。
17. 李寶元，『組織學習論-組織行為在社會生態學意義上的一個解說』，企業經濟，，第一期，第87-91頁 (2005)。
18. 胡漢耀、潘安成，『組織知識轉移與學習能力的系統研究』，管理科學學報，第九卷，第三期，第81-87頁 (2006)。
19. 張瑾、楊蕙馨，『組織生態學視角的組織失敗理論研究脈絡及進展』，商業研究，，，第71-73(2009)。
20. 史靜芬，『從資源基礎論及利基角色看台灣軟體公司競爭優勢 以蒙恬科技為例』，碩士論文，國立交通大學，新竹 (2005)。
21. 吳芝儀、廖梅花譯，Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. 著，2001，質性研究入門：紮根理論研究方法，嘉義:濤石文化。
22. 吳琮璠，1997，『資訊管理個案研究方法』，資訊管理學報，第四卷．第一期:7-17頁。
23. 黃日麗莉，『中國人的人際和諧與衝突:理論建構及實徵研究』，博士論文，國立台灣大學，台北(1996)。
24. 周海濤、李永賢、張蘅譯，Yin, R.著，2009，個案研究-設計與方法，台北市：五南圖書。
25. 吳思華，1994，策略九說-資源說，世界經理文摘。 
英文部份：
1. D. Charles Galunic and John R. Weeks, “Intraorganizational Ecology,” The Blackwell companion to organizations, J. Baum,, 2000, pp.1-28.
2. Campbell, D.T. “Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution,” Social change in developing areas: A reinterpretation of evolutionary theory, H.R. Barringer, G.I. Blanksten and R.W. Mack(eds.), Schenkman, Cambridge, MA, 1969, PP.19-48.
3. Chandler, A., “Strategy & structure: chapters in the history of the American enterprise,” Mass: MIT Press, 1962.
4. Porter, M. E., “What Is Strategy?, ” Harvard Business Review, 1996.
5. Porter, M. E., “ Competitive Strategy: Technique for Analyzing Industries and Competitors,” Free Press, 1980.
6. David J. Teece, Gary Pisano and Amy Shuen, 1997, Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18:7, 509-533
7. Hannan, 2005, Ecologies of Organizations Diversity and Identity, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume 19, Number 1, Winter, Pages 51-70.
8. Yves Doz and Mikko Kosonen, “The Dynamics of Strategic Agility: Nokia’s Rollercoaster Experience” , California Management Review, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 95-118 (2008)
9. Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J.H. “The population ecology of organizations,” American Journal of Sociology(82:5) 1977,p.929.
10. Aldrich, H.E. Organizations and environments, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1979.
11. Aldrich, H. E. and Pfeffer, J. “Environments of organizations,” Annual review of sociology(2:1) 1976, pp.79-105.
12. Amburgey, T.L. and Rao, H. “Organizational ecology: Past, present, and future directions,” Academy of Management Journal(39:5) 1996, pp.1265-1286.
13. Hannan, Michael T. and John Freeman, 1989, Organizational Ecology,Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
14. Baum, J.A.C. and Singh, J.V. Evolutionary dynamics of organizations ,Oxford University PRESS, New York, 1994.
15. E. Aldrich, Organizations Evolving, Sage Publications, 1999.
16. Cheng, C. L., Lu, W. H., and Shen, M. D., “An Empirical Approach: Prediction Method of Air Pressure Distribution on Building Vertical Drainage Stack” , Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 243-247 (2003)
17. Richard M. Burton, Borge Obel, “Environmental-Organizational Relations: The Effects of Deregulation”, Elsevier Science Publishers, Vol. 5, pp.23-34(1986)
18. Lawrence R. Jauch, Richard N. Osborn and William F. Glueck, ”Short Term Financial Success in Large Business Organizations: The Environment Strategy Connection”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.1, , pp.49-63(1980)
19. Baum, J.A.C. and Terry, L.A. “Organizational Ecology,” in: The Blackwell companion to organizations, J.A.C. Baum(ed), Blackwell, Malden, MA, 2002, pp.304-326.
20. Rao, H. “Interorganizational ecology,” in: The Blackwell companion to organizations, J.A.C. Baum(ed.), Blackwell, Malden, MA, 2002, PP.541-556.
21. Campbell, D.T. “Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution,” in: Social change in developing areas: A reinterpretation of evolutionary theory, H.R. Barringer, G.I. Blanksten and R.W. Mack(eds.), Schenkman, Cambridge, MA, 1969, PP.19-48.
22. Baum, J.A.C. and McKelvey, B. Variations in organizations: In honor of Donald T. Campbell Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1999.
23. Michael D. Cohen, Paul Bacdayan, “Organizational Routines Are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study,” Institute of Public Policy Studies and School of Business Administration.
24. Cohen, M. D., ”Individual learning and organizational routine: Emerging connections,” Organizaion Science, 1991, pp.135-139.
25. Argote, L., “Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge,” Boston: Kluwer Academic, 1999.
26. Fiol, M. and Lyles, M., “Organizational Learning,” Academy of Management Review, 1985, pp.803-813.
27. Macdonald, Stuart., “Learning to change: An information perspective on learning in the organization,” Organization Science, 1995, pp. 557-568.
28. Nelson, Richard R. and Winter, Sidney Gl., “An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change,” Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982.
29. Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J.H. “Structural inertia and organizational change,” American Sociological Review(49:2) 1984, pp.149-164.
30. Carror, G. R. and Hannan, M. T. “Density dependence in the evolution of populations of newspaper organizations,” American Sociological Review, 1989, pp.524-541.
31. Coleman, James S., “Social Capital in The Creation of Human Capital”, American Journal of Sociology, 1988, pp.95-120.
32. Eisenhardt, K.M. and Martin, J.A., “Dynamic capabilities:What are they?,” Strategic Management Journal, 2000, pp.1105-1121.
33. Ted Baker and Reed E. Nelson, “Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage”, Administrative Science Qualterly, , , pp. 329-366 (2005)
34. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J., 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Sage Publications.
35. Myers, M. D., “Qualitative Research in Information Systems”, MIS Quarterly, 1997, pp.241-242.
36. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J., Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Sage Publications, 1990.
37. Yin, R. K., 1994, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications.
38. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L., 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine Transaction.
39. Piore, M. J., 2006, Qualitative research: does it fit in economics?, European Management Review. 3, 17-23
40. Piore, M. J., 2006, Qualitative research: does it fit in economics,” European Management Review, 2006, pp.17-23.
41. Wimmer, R. D. and Dominick, J. R., 1995, Mass Media Research: An Introduction, Thomson Wadsworth.
42. Babbie, E., 1999, The Basics of Social Research, Thomson Wadsworth

網站部份：
1. 組織研究，http://www.rnd.ncnu.edu.tw/hdcheng/org/orgindex.htm
2. 宏遠電訊股份有限公司，http://www.savecom.net.tw/
3. IT IS智網，http://www.itis.org.tw/
4. 台灣電信產業發展協會，http://www.ttida.org.tw/
5. 網路之牆，http://www.digitalwall.com/
6. MyWoo司法院法學資料庫，http://law.mywoo.com/
7. 全國法規資料庫-電信法，http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?PCODE=K0060001