1750年工業革命之後，二氧化碳排放以及生態的破壞與日俱增，根據國際能源總署(IEA)統計數據報告指出，2011年全球燃燒化石燃料的二氧化碳排放量已高達310億噸。而為了延緩地球的惡化，台灣環保署於1992年制訂與推行了環保標章(Green Mark)，旨在促進製造商製造綠色產品與鼓勵消費者購買。而本研究目的為探討製造商續約環保標章時，其影響續約或不續約環保標章之因素，並建構一份問卷，同時調查製造商對環保標章的意見與申請標章時對驗證機構之申請經驗回饋。
本研究結果透過315家曾申請標章之製造商，回收172份有效問卷進行信度與效度分析，建構影響續約環保標章意願之因素問卷，經由通過KMO(Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin)適切性量數以及Bartlett球形考驗衡量，強迫因素分析將題目落入本研究之面向，包括環保標章認同感、環保標章連帶效益、企業社會責任、環保標章申請流程以及環保標章線上申請系統，總計五個面向，刪題後總計27題，累積解釋變異量為67.267 %，內部一致性Cronbach’α係數值為0.923，另外藉由問卷得知九成製造商對於環保標章認同程度與環境之企業社會責任都具有正面的同意程度。二成製造商不同意環保標章之申請流程與申請系統為便利且實用。然而，提供意見的製造商中，許多意見告知系統容易當機且須重覆上傳相同文件、申請流程過於繁複、申請之規格未標準化等問題，並希望本研究所蒐集之製造商心聲能幫助環保標章日後的改善，並利用本研究設計之問卷探討製造商續約受影響之程度。

Carbon dioxide emissions and ecological damage have been dramatically increasing for the past few decades. According to International Energy Agency (IEA), the emissions have reached 31 billion tons in 2011. Facing the thorny issue, Taiwan’s Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) has been actively promoting various environmental protection policies. Launched in 1992, Taiwan’s eco-label, as is called “Green Mark”, aims to promote green products manufacturing among manufacturers and to encourage green consumptions in local market. The purpose of this study is to explore the influential factors of manufacturer’s decisions to apply for Green Mark.
A total of 315 manufacturers were contacted to fill out the questionnaire in this study and 172 of them returned the questionnaire. KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) test and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity were used to test fitness of factor analysis. Analyzed results showed that 27 out of 39 questions and five factors were considered as valid indexes. These five factors are Green Mark identity, Green Mark benefits, corporate social responsibility, Green Mark application process, and Green Mark application system. Reliability test Cronbach’s value is 0.923 and 67.267% of variance was explained, which indicates that our designed questionnaire is valid in terms of construct validity and reliable. 90% manufactures have consensuses about the use of Green Mark as an identification and it is important that corporate takes charge of its corporate social responsibility. However, the consensuses about the ease use of Green Mark application process and Green Mark application system are much lower. Additionally, manufacturers consider the Green Mark recertification processes to be too complicated and may negatively affect their decisions to reapply Green Mark.

英文文獻
1.Abeliotis, K., Koniari, C., and Sardianou, E. (2010), “The profile of the green consumer in Greece,” International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(2), 153-160.
2.Albino, V., Balice, A., and Dangelico, R. M. (2009), “Environmental strategies and green product development: An overview on sustainability-driven companies,” Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(2), 83–96.
3.Bamberg, S. and Moser, G. (2007), “Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25.
4.Barr, S. and Gilg, A. (2006), “Sustainable lifestyles: Framing environmental action in and around the home,” Geoforum, 37(6), 906-920.
5.Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the Internet.Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55, 803-832.
6.Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman (No. 3). Harper & Brothers.
7.Bronfenbrenner, U. (1960). Freudian theories of identification and their derivatives. Dimensions of Psychology, 31, 123.
8.Carson, R. (2002). Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
9.Dangelico, R. M., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2010). From green product definitions and classifications to the Green Option Matrix. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(16), 1608-1628.
10.Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
11.Dodd, E. M. (1932). For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Law Review, 1145-1163.
12.Elkington, J. and Hailes, J. (1988), The Green Consumer Shopping Guide from Shampoo to Champagne-High Street Shopping for a Better Environment, London: Victor Gollancs
13.Fraj, E. and Martinez, E. (2007), “Ecological consumer behaviour: An empirical analysis,” International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(1), 26-33.
14.Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2, 163-194.
15.Hansla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A., Garling, T., and Garling, T. (2008), “Psychological determinants of attitude towards and willingness to pay for green electricity,” Energy Policy, 36(2), 768-774.
16.Hopfenbeck, W. (1993). The green management revolution: Lessons in environmental excellence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2013). Climate change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
18.International Energy Agency. (2013). CO2 emissions from fuel combustion highlights. Retrieved March 18, 2014, from http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/CO2EmissionsFromFuelCombustionHighlights2013.pdf
19.Iyer, E. S. and Kashyap, R. K. (2007), “Consumer recycling: Role of incentives, information, and social class,” Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(1), 32-47.
20.Joel, M. (1993). New and newsworthy. Vegetarian Times, 137.
21.Kotler, P. and Keller, K. (2008), Marketing Management (13th ed.), Prentice Hall.
22.Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151-160.
23.Lai, O. K. (1993). Making sense of the greening of consumption and production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1(1), 43-47.
24.Lee, K. (2009). Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers' green purchasing behavior. Journal of consumer marketing, 26(2), 87-96.
25.Makower, J., Elkington, J., & Hailes, J. (1991). The green consumer supermarket guide. Penguin Books.
26.Miller, W. L., & Crabtree, B. F. (1992). Primary care research: a multimethod typology and qualitative road map. Doing qualitative research, 3, 3-30.
27.Mostafa, M. M. (2009), “Shades of green: A psychographic segmentation of the green consumer in Kuwait using self-organizing maps,” Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8), 11030-11038.
28.Munasinghe, M. (1993). Environmental economics and sustainable development (Vol. 3). World Bank Publications.
29.Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.Peattie, K. (1992), Green Marketing, London: Pitman.
31.Peattie, K. (1995). Environmental marketing management: meeting the green challenge. London: Pitman.
32.Peter, J. P. and Olson, J. C. (1990), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy, Irwin: Homewood Company.
33.Pichert, D. and Katsikopoulos, K. (2008), “Green defaults: Information presentation and pro-environmental behavior,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 63-73.
34.Pickett-Baker, J. and Ozaki, R. (2008), “Pro-environmental products: Marketing influenceon consumer purchase decision,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(5), 281-293.
35.Riva, G., Teruzzi, T., & Anolli, L. (2003). The use of the internet in psychological research: comparison of online and offline questionnaires. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(1), 73-80.
36.Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework. California management review, 17(3).
37.Simon, F. L. (1992). Marketing green products in the triad. Columbia Journal of World Business, 27(3-4), 268-285.
38.Tang, E., Fryxell, G. E., & Chow, C. S. (2004). Visual and verbal communication in the design of eco-label for green consumer products. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 16(4), 85-105.
39.Tanner, C. and Kast, S. W. (2003), “Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers,” Psychology and Marketing, 20(10), 883-902.
40.Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., and Oates, C. J. (2010), “Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products,” Sustainable Development, 18(1), 20-31.
41.Zaltman, G., & Burger, P. C. (1975). Marketing research: Fundamentals and dynamics (pp. 500-509). Hinsdale, Illinois: Dryden Press.
中文文獻
1.內政部建築研究所網站(2014)。綠建材標章之概念。線上檢索日期: 2014年04月18日。網址: http://www.abri.gov.tw/utcpagebox/CHIMAIN.aspx?ddsPageID=CHIMPX
2.王玉民. (1998). 質化研究方法應用之探討--以大陸臺商投資實證研究為例. 淡江人文社會學刊創刊號，頁37-57
3.王俊明. (1999). 問卷與量表的編製及分析方法. 體育測驗與評價 (139-158 頁). 台北: 中華民國體育學會.
4.行政院環境保護署碳足跡資訊網(2014)。碳足跡標籤。線上檢索日期:2014年04月18日。網址: http://cfp.epa.gov.tw/carbon/ezCFM/Function/PlatformInfo/FLConcept/FLFootIntroduction.aspx
5.行政院環境保護署綠色生活資訊網(2014)。節水標章與節能標章之概念。線上檢索日期:2014年04月18日。網址: http://greenliving.epa.gov.tw/Public/GreenMark/OtherMark
6.行政院環境保護署綠色生活資訊網(2014)。環保標章之概念。線上檢索日期:2014年04月18日。網址: http://greenliving.epa.gov.tw/Public/GreenMark/Concept
7.行政院環境保護署綠色生活資訊網(2014)。環保標章申請驗證流程。線上檢索日期:2014年05月6日。網址: http://greenliving.epa.gov.tw/Public/GreenMark/ValidationProcess
8.行政院環境保護署綠色生活資訊網(2014)。環境保護產品分類。線上檢索日期:2014年04月18日。網址: http://greenliving.epa.gov.tw/Public/GreenMark/Classification#L12
9.吳明隆, 涂金堂. (2006). SPSS 與統計應用分析. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
10.吳芳瑜. (2009). 環保標章制度與企業經營績效模式的研究. 中原大學國際貿易研究所學位論文, 1-84.
11.吳貞萱，2005，量販店與連鎖便店消費者對綠色行之反應研究，碩士論文，大葉大學，事業經營研究所。
12.李堅明. (2003). 貿易自由化環境政策和產業競爭力. 永續經營雙月刊，永續產業發展雙月刊。2003年6月15日13頁
13.杜瑞澤. (2002). 產品永續設計, 台北市: 亞太圖書.
14.林承賢. (2004). 近五年來臺灣傳播學界博碩士論文使用網路問卷研究方法之后設分析. 資訊社會研究, (6), 25-57.
15.范懿文, 方毓賢, & 蔡明峰. (2012). 探討綠色產品消費意願: 環保標章之調節效果.國立中央大學資訊管理學系, Journal of e-Business, 14(2), 257-280.
16.張瀞云. (2013). 消費者對綠色產品之購買決策影響因素探討. 清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系學位論文, 1-99.
17.莊博閔. (2009). 國中生綠色消費知識, 態度與行為之調查研究-以台北縣某國中為例. 臺灣師範大學健康促進與衛生教育學系學位論文, 1-102.
18.黃美祝, & 李映茹. (2009). 最低稅負制對企業租稅負擔影響之研究--高科技產業與傳統產業之比較. 當代會計, 10(2), 189-224.
19.潘淑滿. (2003). 質性研究: 理論與應用. 台北: 心理.
20.簡茂發. (1989). 信度與效度. 楊國樞等編 社會及行為科學研究法 (上冊). 台北: 東華, 323-351.
21.簡茂發. (1991). 命題方法與試題分析.