簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 武若君
Juo-Chun Wu
論文名稱： 綠色供應鏈之淨零排放-以半導體產業為例
Net Zero towards the Green Supply Chain in the Semiconductor Industry
指導教授： 呂志豪
Shih-Hao Lu
口試委員: 黃振皓
Chen-Hao Huang
郭人介
Ren-Jieh Kuo
呂志豪
Shih-Hao Lu
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 管理學院 - 管理學院MBA
School of Management International (MBA)
論文出版年： 2023
畢業學年度： 111
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 57
中文關鍵詞： ESG 、環境 、溫室氣體排放 、範疇三 、半導體公司 、揭露 、體制理論與策略
外文關鍵詞： ESG, environmental, GHG emissions, Scope 3, semiconductor companies, disclosure, institutional isomorphism theory and strategies
相關次數： 點閱：236  下載：18 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 本研究旨在分析範疇三溫室氣體排放中潛藏的風險和機遇，包括供應鏈或價值鏈的溫室氣體排放資訊。然而，現在的法規並沒有強制要求企業揭露範疇三中溫室氣體的排放量，而此巨量的溫室氣體排放量，平均比企業運營排放量還要高出11.4倍（CDP，2022）。

    本研究以全球趨勢與台灣政策為背景，針對不同商業模式與半導體產業案例，採用多重個案研究法進行比較。此外，研究採用制度同構理論和文獻綜述中的策略，並結合半導體產業的真實案例進行探討。

    最終研究結果指出，半導體代工廠面臨著共同的挑戰和目標，並以類似的行動與外部壓力相互作用。另一方面，半導體垂直整合製造商（IDM）在具有特殊挑戰、目標和行動之社會情境下，則有著更多差異。

    This research aims to analyze the potential risks and opportunities within the hidden Scope 3 GHG emissions, including the GHG emissions’ information of the supply chain or the value chain. However, nowadays the regulations do not force companies to disclose the GHG emissions in Scope 3, but it released the huge amount of GHG emissions, which is higher than the companies’ operation emissions 11.4 times on average (CDP, 2022).

    Under the context of global trends and Taiwan’s policies, this research focuses on the semiconductor industry cases from different business models to conduct the comparisons by using the research methodology of multiple-case studies. Also, adopt institutional isomorphism theory and the strategies in the literature review by mapping the real cases in the semiconductor industry.

    Finally, the results showed that semiconductor foundries face the common challenges and targets with the similar actions to interact with the external pressures. On the other hand, Integrated Device Manufacturer (IDM) semiconductor companies have more differences under the society with special challenges, targets, and actions.

    ABSTRACT ..........................................................................i 致謝...............................................................................ii TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................v LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................vi Chapter 1 Introduction.............................................................1 1.1 Background.....................................................................1 1.2 Research Objectives............................................................2 Chapter 2 Literature Review .......................................................4 2.1 Supply Chain Goes Green........................................................4 2.2 Standards from International Organizations.....................................6 2.2.1 ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) 14064-1.............6 2.2.2 Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI) Standards.................................8 2.2.3 Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB).............................8 2.2.4 Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)...................8 2.3 Calls from Non-Profit Organizations............................................9 2.3.1 Responsible Business Alliance (RBA).........................................10 2.3.2 CDP (Formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project) ...............................10 2.3.3 RE100.......................................................................11 2.4 The Role of Institutional Isomorphism in Green Supply Chain...................11 2.4.1 Coercive ...................................................................12 2.4.2 Mimetic.....................................................................13 2.4.3 Normative...................................................................14 2.5 Strategic Responses and Adaptations for Green Supply Chain ...................14 2.5.1 Acquiesce...................................................................15 2.5.2 Compromise..................................................................15 2.5.3 Avoid.......................................................................15 2.5.4 Defy........................................................................15 2.5.5 Manipulate..................................................................16 Chapter 3 Methodology ............................................................17 3.1 Research Framework............................................................18 3.2 Studied Cases.................................................................18 3.2.1 Main Semiconductor Foundries ...............................................18 3.2.2 Main IDM Semiconductor Companies ...........................................19 3.2.3 Research Questions .........................................................20 3.3 Data Collection Procedure ....................................................20 Chapter 4 Research Results .......................................................22 4.1 Case Studies of Main Semiconductor Foundries..................................22 4.1.1 Case 1: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TSMC).................22 4.1.2 Case 2: United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC)...........................23 4.1.3 Challenges / Targets between TSMC and UMC...................................24 4.1.4 Actions between TSMC and UMC ...............................................25 4.2 Case Studies of Main IDM Semiconductor Companies..............................29 4.2.1 Case 1: Intel, USA..........................................................29 4.2.2 Case 2: Samsung Electronics, South Korea .................................. 29 4.2.3 Challenges / Targets between Intel and Samsung Electronics..................30 4.2.4 Actions between Intel and Samsung Electronics ..............................34 Chapter 5 Discussion and .Conclusion..............................................38 5.1 Discussion....................................................................38 5.2 Theoretical Implications......................................................38 5.2.1 Examples of Institutional Isomorphism in Green Supply Chain ................39 5.2.2 Institutional Strategies in TSMC and UMC....................................40 5.2.3 Institutional Strategies in Intel and Samsung Electronics...................43 5.3 Practical Implications........................................................46 5.4 Limitations and Future Research...............................................46 References .......................................................................47

    Apple Inc. (2020). Supplier Clean Energy - 2020 Program Update. Apple Inc.. https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Supplier_Clean_Energy_Progra m_Update_2020.pdf
    Apple Inc. (2022). Environmental Social Governance Report. Apple Inc. ESG. https://s2.q4cdn.com/470004039/files/doc_downloads/2022/08/2022_Apple_ES G_Report.pdf
    Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of management journal, 43(4), 717-736.
    Ball, A., & Craig, R. (2010). Using neo-institutionalism to advance social and environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(4), 283-293.
    Beddewela, E., & Fairbrass, J. (2014). SEEKING LEGITIMACY THROUGH CSR: INSTITUTIONAL PRESSURES AND CORPORATE RESPONSES OF MULTINATIONALS IN SRI LANKA.
    Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. (2017). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: Concept evolution and theoretical challenges. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 2, 77-101
    CDP. (2022, February). Engaging the chain: Driving speed and scale. CDP Global Supply Chain Report 2021. https://cdn.cdp.net/cdp- production/cms/reports/documents/000/006/106/original/CDP_SC_Report_2021 .pdf?1644513297
    Clemens, B. W., & Douglas, T. J. (2005). Understanding strategic responses to institutional pressures. Journal of Business Research, 58(9), 1205-1213.
    CIIE. (2022). Sustainable Engineering and Management. Future Career Publishing.
    Corbett, C. J., & Kleindorfer, P. R. (2001). Environmental management and operations management: Introduction to part 1 (manufacturing and ecologistics). Production and Operations Management, 10(2), 107-111.
    CSCMP. (2013). Supply Chain Management Terms and Glossary. 187.
    DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 147-160.
    Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50(1), 25-32. Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan). (2021, April 21). Towards Net-Zero Emissions by
    2050, the Government Council Passed the Draft Amendment to the “Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act” and Amended Its Name to “Climate Change Response Act.” Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan). https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/9277F759E41CCD91/93478f1b-503e-4129-9e73- 70478a1eef68
    Feng, J., Chiu, Y., & Tsai, H. (2023, February 17). TSMC Successfully Collaborates with Suppliers to Create Eco-Friendly Hydrofluoric Acid, Deepening Environmental Sustainability. TSMC ESG. https://esg.tsmc.com/en/update/responsibleSupplyChain/caseStudy/40/index.htm l
    Gaertner, K. (2021, September 20). ‘Scope 3 Emissions’: What They Are and Why Companies Must Start Reporting Them. Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/90678059/what-are-scope-3-emissions-and-why- companies-must-start-reporting-them
    Google Trends. (Accessed 2023, April 26). “ESG” interest over time. Explore. https://trends.google.com.tw/home
    GRI. (2022, June 30). GRI Standards English Language. Global Reporting Initiative. https://www.globalreporting.org/how-to-use-the-gri-standards/gri-standards- english-language/
    Guerreiro, M. S., Rodrigues, L. L., & Craig, R. (2012). Voluntary adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards by large unlisted companies in Portugal–Institutional logics and strategic responses. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(7), 482-499.
    Hervani, A., Helms, M., & Sarkis, J. (2005). Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking: An international journal, 12(4), 330- 353.
    Hung, H. C., Chiu, Y. C., & Wu, M. C. (2017). Analysis of competition between IDM and fabless–foundry business models in the semiconductor industry. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 30(3), 254-260.
    Intel. (2021, May). Corporate Responsibility Report. Intel.
    https://csrreportbuilder.intel.com/pdfbuilder/pdfs/CSR-2021-22-Full-Report.pdf
    ISO. (2018, December). ISO 14064-1:2018. ISO - International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/66453.html
    Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of management review, 20(4), 1015-1052
    Jian, Y. (2022, July 5). What Is a Sustainability Report? Financial Supervisory Commission: These Companies Must Have in 2023! Related Guidelines and Writing Directions. Manager Today. https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/65390
    Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2000). A handbook for value chain research (Vol. 113). Brighton: University of Sussex, Institute of Development Studies.
    Karyawati, G., Subroto, B., Sutrisno, T., & Saraswati, E. (2020). Explaining the complexity relationship of CSR and financial performance using neo- institutional theory. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies.
    Ogunyemi, T., & Aktas, E. (2013). The impact of green information systems on sustainable supply chain and Organizational performance.
    O'Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2020). Shifting the focus of sustainability accounting from impacts to risks and dependencies: Researching the transformative potential of TCFD reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(5), 1113-1141.
    Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of management review, 16(1), 145-179.
    Provan, K. G., Isett, K. R., & Milward, H. B. (2004). Cooperation and compromise: A network response to conflicting institutional pressures in community mental health. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 33(3), 489-514.
    Qiu, Y. (2023, April 6). TSMC Was Also Angered! Biden’s Wafer Law Shrouded the Shadow of Failure, and the Industry Fell into Three Major Difficulties. Yahoo Finance. https://reurl.cc/ZX3DqQ
    RBA. (2022, October 4). Responsible Business Alliance Advances Climate Change Mitigation Efforts in Global Supply Chains. Responsible Business Alliance. https://www.responsiblebusiness.org/news/ghg/
    Ricardianto, P., Kholdun, A., Fachrey, K., Nofrisel, N., Agusinta, L., Setiawan, E., Abidin, Z., Purba, O., Perwitasari, E & Endri, E. (2022). Building green supply chain management in pharmaceutical companies in Indonesia. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(2), 453-462.
    Samsung Electronics. (2022). 15th Sustainability Report. Sustainability. https://www.samsung.com/global/sustainability/media/pdf/Samsung_Electronics _Sustainability_Report_2022.pdf
    Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int. J. Production Economics, 130, 1-15.
    Scott, W. R. (2005). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. Great minds in management: The process of theory development, 37(2), 460-484.
    Shahzad, M. K., Hubac, S., Siadat, A., & Tollenaere, M. (2011). An extended idm business model to ensure time-to-quality in semiconductor manufacturing industry. In ENTERprise Information Systems: International Conference, CENTERIS 2011, Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal, October 5-7, 2011, Proceedings, Part I (pp. 118-128). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    Shang, G. (2022, December). Sustainable Development Action Plans and Information Disclosure Norms for TWSE- and TPEx-Listed Companies. Financial Supervisory Commission R.O.C. (Taiwan). https://reurl.cc/pLQ0AQ
    Srivastava, S. (2007). Green supply‐chain management: a state‐of‐the‐art literature review. International journal of management reviews, 9(1), 53-80.
    Sustainability accounting standards board (SASB). (2020, September). SASB Implementation Supplement: Greenhouse Gas Emissions and SASB Standards.
    TCFD. (2022, October). 2022 Status Report.
    TCG, CIER, & ECCT-LCI. (2023). Taiwan Energy Market Briefing: Net-Zero Plan and
    Aggregated PPAs. RE100 in Taiwan. https://www.re100.org.tw/ Trowbridge, P. (2006). A case study of green supply chain management at advanced
    micro devices. Greening the Supply Chain, 307-322.
    TSMC ESG Committee. (2022, June 30). Sustainability Reports and Documents. TSMC
    ESG. https://esg.tsmc.com/en/resources/documents.html
    TSMC. (2023, April 21). TSMC Signs 20,000 GWh Renewable Energy Joint
    Procurement Contract with ARK Power. TSMC ESG.
    https://pr.tsmc.com/english/news/3018
    TSMC. (Accessed 2023, April 30). Supplier Sustainability Management. TSMC ESG. https://esg.tsmc.com/en/focus/responsibleSupplyChain/sustainabilityManagement.html
    UMC GRM & ESH Division. (2022, June). UMC Sustainability Reports. United Microelectronics Corporation. https://www.umc.com/en/Download/corporate_sustainability_reports
    UMC. (2023, May 17). UMC Circular Economy & Recycling Innovation Center Breaks Ground for a Zero Waste Future. UMC Press Center. https://www.umc.com/en/News/press_release/Content/csr/20230317
    UMC. (2022, November 9). UMC Drives Low-Carbon Supply Chain with GHG Inventory Initiative. UMC Sustainability. https://www.umc.com/en/News/csr_news/Content/csr/20221109
    WBCSD. (2015). Corporate Standard. Greenhouse Gas Protocol. https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard.
    WBCSD. (2022, June). Pathfinder Network: Enabling standardized emissions data exchange. https://www.carbon-transparency.com/media/luhii1or/pathfinder- network-vision-paper.pdf
    Wu, K., Kitchin, R., & Yu, J. (2022). Supply Change: Climate Commitments and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions by Customer Electronic Brands and Their Top Suppliers. Greenpeace. https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4- eastasia-stateless/2022/10/89382b33-supplychange.pdf
    Willy, C., Price, H., & Larry, S. (2023, January 11). TSMC Launches Carbon Inventory Workshops to Enhance Suppliers’ Sustainability. TSMC ESG. https://esg.tsmc.com/en/update/greenManufacturing/caseStudy/65/index.html
    Zeng, M. (2009). The Study of Green Supplier’s Risk Management-An Example of ODM Industry.
    Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2013). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(2), 106-117.

    QR CODE