本研究針對低滲透擬脆性類岩試體進行水力破裂試驗，以自行設計之儀設求得完整(包括峰後)之加載曲線，並結合聲射法與斑點剪切干涉術兩種非破壞檢測，試體巨觀與微觀之破壞行為。
本研究探討三個岩材液驅破壞行為之變數 : (1)液體黏滯度(2)固材滲透性(3)固材之外內徑比。以聲射法研探試體內部微裂縫之衍、化與斑點剪切干涉術量測試體外部之巨觀裂縫，以內、外及微觀、巨觀詳探裂縫之力學行為。
實驗結果顯示，在巨觀行為方面，當黏滯度提升、滲透性越低及外內徑比越高時，尖峰強度越高。在微觀尺度下，聲射事件(AE event)叢聚(Localization)時機發生於峰後，而第一條干涉條紋則產生在峰前(加載比99~100%處)，表示擬脆性材料在液驅破壞作用下，在峰前無明顯破壞徵兆。

In the past, such as the tunnels, reservoirs; exploitation of natural resources in underground drilling and carbon sequestration,and underground nuclear waste repository etc. shall be concidering fluid-driven fracture causing of the derivative of the crack to be understood. This study tested the impermeably quasi-brittle rock, in order to expand the amount of test substance for feedback control signal of fluid-driven fracture, apparatus with coupling e non-destructive testing.acoustic emission (Acoustic Emission) and speckle shearing interferometry (SSI)

1.林世聰(2009)，光電精密量測，上課講義，國立台北科技大學光電工程系，台北。
2.陳韋志(2014)，應用同步化非破壞檢測技術研探擬脆岩材受液體驅動破壞之行為，博士論文，國立台灣科技大學營建工程系，台北。
3.Bray, D. E., and McBride, D. (1992). Acoustic emission technology. John Wiley and Sons Ins., New York, 345-377.
4.Butters, J. N., and Leendertz, J. A. (1971). Holographic and video techniques applied to engineering measurement. Measurement and control, 4(12), 349-354.
5.Carpinteri, A., Corrado, M., and Lacidogna, G. (2013). Heterogeneous materials in compression: Correlations between absorbed, released and acoustic emission energies. Engineering Failure Analysis, 33, 236-250. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.05.016
6.Carpinteri, A., Lacidogna, G., Niccolini, G., and Puzzi, S. (2007). Critical defect size distributions in concrete structures detected by the acoustic emission technique. Meccanica, 43(3), 349-363. doi: 10.1007/s11012-007-9101-7
7.Chen, L.H., (2001). Failure of Rock under Normal Wedge Indentation, Ph. D. thesis, Department of Civil and Mining Engineering. University of Minnesota, USA.
8.El. Batanouny, M. K., Larosche, A., Mazzoleni, P., Ziehl, P. H., Matta, F., and Zappa, E. (2012). Identification of Cracking Mechanisms in Scaled FRP Reinforced Concrete Beams using Acoustic Emission. Experimental Mechanics, 54(1), 69-82. doi: 10.1007/s11340-012-9692-3
9.Fortin, J., Stanchits, S., Dresen, G., and Gueguen, Y. (2006). Acoustic emission and velocities associated with the formation of compaction bands in sandstone. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(B10). doi: 10.1029/2005jb003854
10.Goodman, R. E. (1989). Introduction to rock mechanics (2nd ed). John Wiley and Sons, New York.
11.Griffith, A. A. (1921). "The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids." Phil. Trans. Ray. Soc., London A221, p 163-197.
12.Hubbert, M. K., and Willis, D. G. (1957). Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing. Underground Waste Management and Environmental Implications, p 239-257
13.Hopkins, H. H., and Tiziani, H. J. (1970). Speckling in diffraction patterns and optical images formed with the laser. Paper presented at the Comptes rendus du Symposium International d'Holographie, Besancon.
14.Ito, T., and Hayashi, K. (1991). Physical background to the breakdown pressure in hydraulic fracturing tectonic stress measurements. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, 28(4), 285-293. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(91)90595-D
15.Kaiser, J. (1953). "Undersuchungen Uber Das Aufrterten Geraucchen Beim Zevgersuch." Ph.D Thesis. Technische Hochschule, Munich.
16.Lei, X., Kusunose, K., Rao, M. V. M. S., Nishizawa, O., and Satoh, T. (2000). Quasi-static fault growth and cracking in homogeneous brittle rock under triaxial compression using acoustic emission monitoring. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(B3), 6127. doi: 10.1029/1999jb900385
17.Labuz, J.F., Shah, S.P., and Dowding, C.H., 1987. The fracture process zone in granite: evidence and effect. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, 24, 235-246.
18.Leendertz, J. A., and Butters, J. N. (1973). An image-shearing speckle-pattern interferometer for measuring bending moments. Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments, 6(11), 1107.
19.Leith, E. N., and Upatnieks, J. (1962). Reconstructed wavefronts and communication theory. JOSA, 52(10), 1123-1128.
20.Maji, A. K. (1994). "Acoustic emissions from reinforced concrete" Experimental Mechanics, v 34, n 4, p 379-388.
21.Ohtsu, M. (1987). Acoustic emission characteristics in concrete and diagnostic applications. Journal of acoustic emission, 6(2), 99-108.
22.Rummel, F. (1987). Fracture mechanics approach to hydraulic fracturing stress measurements. Fracture mechanics of rock, 6, 217-239.
23.Rummel, F., and Winter, R. B. (1983). Application of laboratory fracture mechanics data to hydraulic fracturing field tests Hydraulic fracturing and geothermal energy (pp. 493-501): Springer.
24.Shah, K. R., and Labuz, J. F. (1995). Damage mechanisms in stressed rock from acoustic emission. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012), 100(B8), 15527-15539.
25.Wu, R. (2006). Some fundamental mechanisms of hydraulic fracturing. Georgia Institute of Technology.
26.Zoback, M. D., Rummel, F., Jung, R., and Raleigh, C. B. (1977). Laboratory hydraulic fracturing experiments in intact and pre-fractured rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, 14(2), 49-58. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(77)90196-6