研究生: |
蘇宇暉 Yu-Hui Su |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
網路負面口碑與企業正面報導對消費者態度改變之探討 The Effects of Online Negative Word of Mouth and Positive Corporate Publicity on Consumers' Attitudes Change |
指導教授: |
林孟彥
Meng-yen Lin |
口試委員: |
劉代洋
Dai-yang Liu 蔡瑤昇 Yao-sheng Tsai |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理系 Department of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2005 |
畢業學年度: | 93 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 96 |
中文關鍵詞: | 態度改變 、抵消 、企業正面報導 、網路負面口碑 |
外文關鍵詞: | attitude change, counterbalance, publicity, on-line negative WOM |
相關次數: | 點閱:245 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
長期以來,企業廠商對於流傳在網路上的負面口碑,只能以召開記者會方式公開說明、澄清或解釋,希望能抵消這些內容所帶來的不良效應,至於效果如何卻不得而知。究其原因,在於企業並不了解消費者在面臨負面口碑和企業正面報導先後出現時,造成消費者態度改變的判斷依據究竟有哪些,因此本研究採用質化研究的焦點群體訪談法,歸納出八大類十七項判斷標準,最後並發展出七項相關命題,希望藉此提供給企業未來在面對網路負面口碑時,做為因應之決策參考。
For years, corporations used to hold press conferences to clarify themselves against negative word-of-mouth (WOM) spread in cyber-world which definitely damage corporations’ reputation. They expect to counterbalance the side-effects of on-line negative WOM thru media publicity. However, it is hard to evaluate if this strategy effective or not.
The reason that marketers suffer these uncertainty is because that marketers have no idea about how and why consumers change their attitudes and make their judgment while facing conflicting messages of negative WOM and corporations’ positive news releases. To resolve this issue, this thesis conducts 2 focus groups interview to collect data. This thesis classifies 17 judgments into eight categories, and conducts seven related hypothesis. Suggestions about how corporations deal with online negative WOM are also provided.
一、 中文部分
1. 東森新聞報「網路追追追」消費後窗,網址:http://www.ettoday.com.tw
2. 張紹勳,民國八十九年,研究方法,台中,滄海書局。
二、 英文部分
1. Arndt, John (1967), Word of Mouth Advertising: A Review of the Literature, New York: Advertising Research Federation.
2. Bansal, Harvir S. and Peter A. Voyer (2000), “Word-of-Mouth Process within a Services Purchase Decision Context,” Journal of Service Research, Vol. 3, No. 2, 166-177.
3. Bloch, Peter H., Daniel L. Sherrell and Nancy M. Ridgeway (1986), “Consumer Search: An Extended Framework,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 13, No.1, June, 119-126.
4. Buda, Richard and Yong Zhang (2000), “Consumer Product Evalution: The Interactive Effect of Message Framing, Presentation Order and Source Credibility,” Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 9, No. 4, 229-242.
5. Cacioppo, John T. and Richard E. Petty (1980a), “Persuasiveness of Communications Is Affected by Exposure Frequency and Message Quality: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Persisting Attitude Change, “Current Issues and Research in Advertising,” eds. James H. Leigh and Claude R. Martin. Ann Arbor. MI: University of Michigan, 97-122.
6. Cacioppo, John T. and Richard E. Petty (1980b), “Sex Differences in Influence Ability: Toward Specifying the Underlying Processes,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol.6, 651-656.
7. Cacioppo, John T. and Richard E. Petty (1982), Perspectives in Cardiovascular Psychophysiology, New York: Guilford. 392-398.
8. Cacioppo, John T., Richard E. Petty, C. Kao, and R. Rodriguez (1986), “Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion: An Individual Difference Perspective,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, 1032-1043.
9. Calfee, John E. and Debra J. Ringold (1994), “Enduring Consumer Beliefs about Advertising”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol.13, No. 2; Fall, 228-239.
10. Cohen, Dorothy (1988), Advertising, Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
11. Cooper, Donald R. and William C. Emory (1996), Business Research Method . Chicago: Richard D. Irwin, 149-173.
12. Cox, Donald F. (1967) Risk-Taking Information Handling in Consumer Behavior. Boston: Harvard University.
13. Day, Ralph L. (1984), “Modeling Choices among Alternative Responses to Dissatisfaction,” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11, 31-40.
14. Engel, James F., Rogers D. Blackwell and Robert. J. Kegerreis (1968), “How Information is Used to Adopt an Innovation,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 9, 3-8.
15. Friestad, M. and Wright (1994), "The Persuasion-Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21, 1-31.
16. Gelb, Betsy and Madeline Johnson (1995), “Word-of-Mouth Communication: Causes and Consequences,” Journal of Health Care Marketing, Vol. 15, No. 3, Fall, 54-58.
17. Gorn, Gerald J. and Marvin E. Goldberg (1980), “Children's Responses to Repetitive Television Commercials,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.6, No. 4; p.421
18. Halstead, Diane (2002), “Negative Word of Mouth: Substitute for or Supplement to Consumer Complaints?” Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, Vol. 15, 1-12.
19. Herr, Paul M., Frank R. Kardes and John Kim(1991), “Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, 454-462.
20. Hovland, Carl I., Enid H. Campell, and Timothy C. Brock(1957), “The Effects of ‘Commitment’ on Opinion Change Following Communication,” The Order of Presentation in Persuasion, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 23-32
21. Krippendorf, K. (1980), Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22. Kruger, R. A. (1994), Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Lau, Geok Theng and Sophia Ng (2001), “Individual and Situational Factors Influencing Negative Word-of-mouth Behavior,” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 18, 163-178.
24. Lock, Jill R (1993), “Working with the Media.” Journal of Accountancy, New York: Vol. 175, No. 2; 79.
25. Lutz, J. Richard (1975), “Changing Brand Attitudes Through Modification of Cognitive Structure,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 1, 49-59.
26. Lutz, R. and P. Reilly (1973), An Exploration of the Effects of Perceived Social and Performance Risk on Consumer Information Acquisition, In Proceedings, Fourth Annual conference," The Association for Consumer Research, 393-405.
27. Marshall, Catherine and Gretchen B. Rossman (1995), Designing Qualitative Research, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
28. McCullough John L. and Thomas M. Ostrom (1974), “Repetition of Highly Similar Messages and Attitude Change,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.59, No. 3; 395-397.
29. Meyerowitz, Beth E. and Chaiken, Shelly (1987), "The Effect of Message Framing on Breast Self-Examination Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol. 52, No. 3, 500.
30. Miller, G. R. (1980), “On Being Persuaded: Some Basic Distinctions,” Persuasion: New Directions in the Theory and Research, Beverly Hill, CA. Sage. 11-28.
31. Mitchell, Andrew A. and Peter A. Dacin (1996), "The Assessment of Alternative Measures of Consumer Expertise," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 23, 219-239.
32. Mizerski, Richard W. (1982). “An Attribution Explanation of the Disproportionate Influence of Unfavorable Information,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 9, 301-310.
33. Morgan, David L. (1996), “Focus Group,” Annual Review of Sociology, Vol.22, 129-153.
34. Munch, James M., Gregory W. Boller and John L. Swasy (1993), “The Effects of Argument Structure and Affective Tagging on Product Attitude Formation,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 20, No. 2, September, 294-302.
35. Nolan, S. G. (1976). “Tourists' Use and Evaluation of Travel Information Sources: Summary and conclusions,” Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 14, 6-8.
36. Park, Jong-won and Manoj Hastak (1994), “Memory-based Product Judgments: Effects of Involvement at Encoding and Retrieval,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21, 534-547
37. Petty, Richard E. and T. John Cacioppo (1979), “Issue Involvement Can Increase or Decrease Persuasion by Enhancing Message-relevant Cognitive responses,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 37, 1915-1926.
38. Petty, Richard E. and T. John Cacioppo (1984), “Source Factors and the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion,” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11, 668-672.
39. Regan D. T. and J. B. Cheng (1973), “ Distraction and attitude change: A resolution,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 9, 138-47.
40. Richins, Marsha L. (1984), “Word of Mouth Communication as Negative Information,” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11, 697-702.
41. Roberts, Leslie (1989), “Alar: The Numbers Game,” Science, Vol. 234, March, 1430.
42. Rogers, M. Everett (1983), Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd ed., New York: Free Press.
43. Schiffman Leon G.. and Leslie Lazar. Kanuk (1997), Consumer Behavior, 8th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
44. Smith, Robert E., and Tiffany S. Meyer (1980), “Attorney Advertising: A Consumer Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 44, 56-64.
45. Still, Richard R., James H. Barnes and Mark E. Kooyman (1984), “Word-of-Mouth Communication in Low-Risk Product Decisions,” International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 3, 335-345.
46. Swan, John E. and Richard L. Oliver (1989), “Postpurchase Communications by Consumers,” Journal of Retailing, Vol. 65, 516-533
47. Technical Assistance Research Programs Institute (1981), “Consumer Complaint Handling in America: An Updated Study for the U.S. Office of Consumer Affairs,” Part II, Chapter 3, 78-85
48. Voss, Glenn B. (2003), “Formulating Interesting Research Question,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 3. No. 3, 356-359.
49. Wright, Peter (1974), “The Harassed Decision Maker: Time Pressures, Distractions, and the Use of Evidence,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 59, 555-561.