海港-乾港系統中出口貨櫃的三階層儲存定價模型｜國立臺灣科技大學博碩士論文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	王奕翔 Yi-Hsiang Wang
論文名稱：	海港-乾港系統中出口貨櫃的三階層儲存定價模型 A tri-level storage pricing model for outbound containers in a seaport-dryport system
指導教授：	曹譽鐘 Yu-Chung Tsao
口試委員:	喻奉天 F. Yu 郭伯勳 Po-Hsun Kuo
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	管理學院 - 工業管理系 Department of Industrial Management
論文出版年：	2017
畢業學年度：	105
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	53
中文關鍵詞：	儲存定價、無水港、乾港、海港、內陸運輸、三階層模型
外文關鍵詞：	Storage pricing, Dry port, Seaport, Outbound containers, Inland logistic, Trilevel programming
相關次數：	點閱：199 下載：0
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

近年來，港口發展十分迅速且競爭激烈，因乾港有著擴大港口腹地並解決港口壅塞的特性，以至於建置乾港成為海運業的一大趨勢。此篇論文提出了一決策在海港-乾港系統出口貨櫃最佳儲存定價之模型，描述一位託運者將欲出口貨物運送經由乾港，而後運送至海港裝船出口。在託運者、乾港與海港三者之間的互動構成了三階層之模式。海港與乾港做出最佳定價決策以最大化各自之利潤，而託運者基於海港與乾港之定價做出最佳運送排程以最小化運送成本。本篇論文使用數據範例展示了求解三階層模型之過程，並探討參數對於託運者之成本，海港與乾港之利潤的影響，得到了一些與既有認知相反的發現。當乾港與海港之間運送頻率增加時，海港之利潤反而會下降；並且當海港提供免費儲存天數下降時，海港之利潤也不增反減。

Being a potential solution for seaport capacity limitation and congestion, dry port becomes more and more popular in the sea transportation industry. This paper presents a model for determining the optimal storage pricing for outbound containers in a seaport-dryport system, which describing one shipper delivers the containers to the dry port and then to the seaport. The interaction among a seaport, dry port and a shipper is modeled as a tri-level program. The seaport and the dry port determine the optimal storage price to maximize their own profit. Based on dry port’s and seaport’s decision, the shipper determines the shipment schedule to minimize its total cost. A numerical example is provided to illustrate the solution procedure and a sensitivity analysis is performed to investigate the effect of parameters on decisions of shipper’s cost, dry port’s and seaport’s profits. Contrary to intuition, the seaport’s profit may decrease with the increase of container delivery frequency from dry port to seaport when the frequency is high and the seaport’s profit may decrease when the free-time limit is too low.

摘要    Ⅰ
ABSTRACT    Ⅱ
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT    Ⅲ
CONTENTS    Ⅳ
LIST OF FIGURES    Ⅴ
LIST OF TABLES    Ⅴ
CHAPTER 1  INTRODUCTION    1
1.1    Background and Motivation    1
1.2    Research Objectives    3
1.3    Research Organization    3
CHAPTER 2  LITERATURE REVIEW    5
2.1 Storage pricing    5
2.2 Dry port system    9
CHAPTER 3  THE TRILEVEL PROGRAMMING MODEL    12
3.1    Notations and Assumptions    13
3.2    Mathematical Model    16
3.2.1    Dry port model    16
3.2.2    Seaport model    18
3.2.3    Shipper model    21
3.2.4    Trilevel model    22
3.3    Solution Approach    23
3.3.1    Shipper’s best reaction    23
3.3.2    Dry port’s optimal decision    26
3.3.2    Seaport’s optimal decision    28
CHAPTER 4  NUMERICAL ANALYSIS    30
4.1    Numerical Examples    30
4.2    Sensitivity Analysis    36
CHAPTER 5  CONCLUSION    41
5.1    Conclusions    41
5.2    Future Research    42
REFERENCE    43


LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Container flow from shipper     12
Figure 2. Inventory of containers at seaport and dry port     16
Figure 3. Profit of seaport    29
Figure 4. Graphical description of S_S and P_S    35
Figure 5. Graphical description ofS_D and P_D    35
Figure 6. Graphical description ofN_S and C    35
Figure 7. Impact of parameters on P_S    38
Figure 8. Impact of parameters on P_D    38
Figure 9. Impact of parameters on C    38
Figure 10. Impact of parameters on S_S    39
Figure 11. Impact of parameters on S_D    39
Figure 12. Impact of parameters on N_S    39

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. The input parameters    31
Table 2. Numerical result    31
Table 3. Impact of parameters on P_S    32
Table 4. Impact of parameters on P_D    32
Table 5. Impact of parameters on C    32
Table 6. Impact of parameters on S_S    33
Table 7. Impact of parameters on S_D    33
Table 8. Impact of parameters on N_S    33
Table 9. Impact of key parameters on the decisions and performances    34






                                

Bennathan, E., Walters, A.A., 1979. Port Pricing and Investment Policies for
Development Countries. Oxford University Press for the World Bank, Oxford, New York.
Beresford, A., Pettit, S., Xu, Q., Williams, S., 2012. A study of dry port development in China. Marit. Econ. Logistics 14 (1), 73–98.
Boile, M., Theofanis, S., Baveja, A., Mittal, N., 2008. Regional repositioning of
empty containers: case for inland depots. Transp. Res. Rec. 2066 (1), 31–40.
Choo Chung, K., 1993. Port performance indicators, The World Bank, Transportation,
Water and Urban Development Department, No. PS-6.
CMA-CGM. Terminal storage and demurrage. Retrieved June 29, 2012, from
http://ebusiness.cma-cgm.com, accessed 29 June 2012.
De Castilho, B., Daganzo, C.F., 1991. Optimal pricing policies for temporary storage
atports. Transp. Res. Rec. 1313, 66–74.
Dekker, S., 2005. Port investment – towards an integrated planning of port capacity, The Netherlands TRAIL Research School, Delft, TRAIL Thesis Series,
no.T2005/5.
Frankel, E.G., 1987. Port planning and development. John & Sons, New York.
Goss, R., Stevens, H., 2001. Marginal cost pricing in seaports. Int. J. Marit. Econ. 3, 128–138.
Heggie, I., 1974. Charging for port facilities. J. Transp. Econ. Pol. 8, 3–25.
Holguín-Veras, J., Jara-Díaz, S., 1999. Optimal pricing for priority services and space allocation in container ports. Transp. Res. B 33 (2), 81–106.
Holguín-Veras, J., Jara-Díaz, S., 2006. Preliminary insights into optimal pricing and
space allocation at intermodal terminals with elastic arrivals and capacity
constraint. Netw. Spat. Econ. 6, 25–38.
Huynh, N., 2008. Analysis of container dwell time on marine terminal throughput and
rehandling productivity. J. Int. Logist. Trade 6 (2), 69–89.
Kim, K.H., 1997. Evaluation of the number of rehandles in container yards. Comput. Ind. Eng. 32 (4), 701–711.
Kim, K.H., Kim, H.B., 1999. Segregating space allocation models for container inventories in port container terminals. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 59, 415–423.
Kim, K.H., Kim, K.Y., 2007. Optimal price schedules for storage of inbound containers. Transp. Res. B41, 892–905.
Lee, C.-Y., Yu, M., 2012. Inbound container storage price competition between the container terminal and a remote container yard. Flex. Serv. Manuf. 24, 320–348.
Ng, A.K.Y., Padilha, F., Pallis, A.A., 2013. Institutions, bureaucratic and logistical roles of dry ports: the Brazilian case. J. Transp. Geogr. 27, 46–55.
Qiu, X., Huang, G.Q., 2013. Storage pricing, replenishment, and delivery schedules in
a supply hub in industrial park: a bilevel programming approach. Int. J.
Prod. Res. 51 (23–24), 6950–6971.
Qiu, X., Huang, G.Q., Lam, J.S.L., 2014. A bilevel analytical model for dynamic
storage pricing in a Supply Hub in Industrial Park (SHIP). IEEE Trans. Automat.
Sci. Eng. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2014.2301838.
Roso, V., 2007. Evaluation of the dry port concept from an environmental perspective: a note. Transp. Res. Part D 12 (7), 523–527.
Roso, V., Lumsden, K., 2010. A review of dry ports. Marit. Econ. Logistics 12 (2), 196–213.
Roso, V., Woxenius, J., Lumsden, K., 2009. The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland. J. Transp. Geogr. 17 (5), 338–345.
Saurí, S., Martín, E., 2011. Space allocating strategies for improving import yard performance at marine terminals. Transp. Res. Part E47, 1038–1057.
Saurí, S., Serra, J., Martín, E., 2011. Evaluating pricing strategies for storage in import container terminals. Transp. Res. Rec. 2238, 1–16.
Schmitt, A.J., Snyder, L.V., Shen, Z-J.M., 2010. Inventory systems with stochastic
demand and supply: properties and approximations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 206,
313–328.
Wang, W.F., Yun, W.Y., 2013. Scheduling for inland container truck and train transportation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 143 (2), 349–356.
Xu, Y., 1999. A discrete choice based facility location model for inland container depots (PhD dissertation). West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA.
Zhang, C., Liu, J., Wan, Y., Murty, K., Linn, R., 2003. Storage space allocation in container terminals. Transp. Res. Part B37, 883–903.

全文公開日期 2022/08/29 (校內網路)
全文公開日期本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
全文公開日期本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館：臺灣博碩士論文系統)

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文