簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李元麒
Yuan-chi Li
論文名稱: 經理人控制的公司、公司規模與公司逃漏稅之關聯性─以泰國為例
The Relationship between Manager-Controlled Companies, Firm Size and Tax Evasion- A Case Study of Thailand
指導教授: 陳崇文
Chung-Wen Chen
口試委員: 欒斌
none
張譯尹
none
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 71
中文關鍵詞: 代理理論經理人公司規模逃漏稅法律與法規上市公司失序理論
外文關鍵詞: agency theory, manager, firm size, tax evasion, law and regulation, listed company, anomie theory
相關次數: 點閱:544下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在公司的經營方式中,不同管理者控制的公司,其經營想法、方式皆不同。現代化公司的所有權與經營權分離使得經理人必須替委託人面對各種經營狀況,而外在環境的變動也會影響不同規模的公司有不同的經營困境。因此在執行決策過程中有可能包含違法活動如逃漏稅,值得實務工作者多加關注。本研究試圖探討經理人控制的公司與逃漏稅之關係,以公司是否為上市公司為調節變項,檢驗其對經理人控制的公司與逃漏稅之調節效果。再者,探討公司規模與逃漏稅之關係,以公司預測法律與法規程度為調節變項,檢驗其對公司規模與逃漏稅之調節效果。在研究方法上,本研究以WBES蒐集之泰國企業相關資料,進行研究探討,總計有422個樣本。研究結果顯示:(1)公司規模與逃漏稅之間具有負向關係;(2)公司預測法律與法規改變的程度會調節公司規模與逃漏稅之間的負向關係。意即,當公司預測法律與法規改變的程度愈高時,會弱化大型公司與逃漏稅之負向關係。


    There are a variety ways for administrators to manage the company. However, different administrators-controlled companies, that they all have different business ideas, methods to operate their company. Modernization of the company's separation of ownership and management allows managers to face a variety of operating conditions for the principal, outer change in the environment will also affect companies of different sizes have different operating difficulties. Therefore, the implementation of decision-making process may contain illegal activities such as tax evasion that practitioners should pay more attention to these issues. This study attempts to investigate the relationship between manager-controlled companies and tax evasion. This study also explores the moderating role of the company is a listed company on the above relationship.
    Furthermore, this study investigates the relationship between firm size and tax evasion, and explores the moderating role of the predictability of law and regulatory on the above relationship.
    Results from a Thailand sample of 422 of WBES indicate that (1) Firm size is negatively related to tax evasion; (2) The negatively relationship between firm size and tax evasion is moderated by the predictability of law and regulatory.

    論文摘要I ABSTRACTII 致謝III 目錄IV 圖目錄V 表目錄VI 第一章 緒論1 第一節 研究背景與動機1 第二節 研究目的4 第三節 研究流程5 第二章 文獻探討6 第一節 逃漏稅6 第二節 代理理論16 第三節 上市公司與逃漏稅之關係22 第四節 上市公司之調節效果22 第五節 公司規模與逃漏稅之關係23 第六節 法律與逃漏稅之關係24 第七節 法律與法規改變的預測程度之調節效果25 第三章 研究方法27 第一節 研究架構27 第二節 研究假說28 第三節 研究資料、對象與程序29 第四節 各研究變項之操作型定義與衡量方式30 第五節 資料分析方法33 第四章 研究結果35 第一節 樣本的基本資料35 第二節 敘述統計與相關係數分析37 第三節 研究假說之檢驗40 第五章 研究結論50 第一節 學術意涵50 第二節 實務管理意涵53 第三節 研究限制55 第四節 未來研究方向56 參考文獻57

    一、中文部份
    王建煊(1998),租稅法(第十七版)。台北:文笙書局。
    朱正雄(2004),代理成本對自願性盈餘預測影響之研究。
    陳淑惠 & 蘇子炘(2004),代理理論對組織控制機制之影響-市場導向觀點(The Effect on Agent Theory to Organizational Contorl From Market Orientation)。
    陳貴端(2004),國際租稅法律問題之研究-兼論國際租稅規避及立法管制對策(第一版),台中:哥倫比亞財稅顧問公司。
    黃盈豪(2009),關係契約下公司逃漏行為之分析,國立中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
    黃美祝 & 林世銘(2009),國稅局選案查核與企業租稅逃漏之探討。
    黃舒綺(1999),海外直接投資企業與國際性租稅規劃,碩士論文。國立中興大學企業管理研究所,台北。
    蔡篤村(2002),以內部控制強化公司治理之探討。
    盧欽滄(1985),租稅詐欺與間接證明法(第一版),台北:三民書局。
    蘇美惠(2006),供應鏈管理考量租稅因素之研究(A Study Of Supply Chain Management On Tax Factors)。
    《全球圍堵,境外不再是洗錢天堂》2008-09-01《天下》文 / 陳一姍.辜樹仁。

    二、英文部份
    Agnar Sandmo (2004). The theory of tax evasion: A retrospective view. Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration.
    Asch P. & Seneca, J. Jj (1976). 'Is Collusion Profitable?', Review of Economics and Statistics, 58, 1-12.
    Basu, A., Lal, R., Srinivasan, V., & Staelin, R. (1985). Sales-force compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspective. Marketing Science, 4, 267-291.
    Baucus, M. S., & Near, J. P. (1991). Can illegal corporate behavior be predicted? An event history analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 9-36.
    Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment-an economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(March-April), 169-217.
    Bergen, M., S. Dutta, & O. C. Walker, Jr. (1992). "Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories," Journal of Marketing, 56(July), 1-24.
    Bernberg, J. G. (2002). Anomie, social change and crime. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 729-742.
    Carroll, A. B. (1975), 'Managerial Ethics: A Post-Watergate View', Business Horizons 18, 75-80.
    Chen, K. P. & Chu, C.Y. C. (2005). Internal control versus external manipulation: a model of corporate income tax evasion. RAND Journal of Economics, vol.36(1), pp. 151-164.
    Clinard, M. B. & Yeager, P. C. (1980), Corporate Crime, New York: Free Press.
    Clinard, M., & Quinney, R. (1973). Criminal behavior systems: A typology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    Cloniger, D. O J, (1985). 'An Analysis of the Effect of Illegal Activity on Share Value'. Joumal of Behavioral Economics, 14,1-13.
    Cloninger, D. O., (1982). 'Moral and Systematic Risk: A Rationale for Unfair Business Practice'. Joumal of Behavioral Economia, 11, 33—49.
    Cohen, M. A. (1992). Environmental crime and punishment: Legal/economic theory and empirical evidence on enforcement of federal environmental status. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 1054-1108.
    Crocker & Slemrod(2003). Corporate Tax Evasion with Agency Costs.
    Cullen, J. B., Parboteeah, K. P., & Hoegl, M. (2004). Cross-national differences in managers’ willingness to justify ethically suspect behaviors: A test of institutional anomie theory. Academy of management Journal, 47, 411-421.
    Curran, J. & R. A. Blackburn, (2001). Researching the Small Enterprise (Sage, London).
    Daboud, A. J., Rasheed, A. M. A., Priem, R. L., & Gray, D. A. (1995). Top management team characteristics and corporate illegal activity. Academy of Management Review, 20, 138-170.
    Dalton, D., & Kesner, I. (1988). On the dynamics of corporate size and illegal activity: An empirical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 861-870.
    Das, J. B., Chappel, F. W. and Shugart, F. W. (1993). Demand fluctuations and firm heterogeneity, Industrial Economics, XII, 51–9.
    Davidson, W. N. & D. L. Worrell, (1988). 'The Impact of Announcements of Corporate Illegalities on Shareholder Returns', Academy of Management Journal n, 195-200.
    Demski, J., & Feltham, G. (1978). Economic incentives in bud-getary control systems. Accounting Review, 53, 336-359.
    Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Douglas A. Hibbs, Jr. & Violeta Piculesco, (2005). Institutions, Corruption and Tax Evasion in the Unofficial Economy. CEFOS Working Paper 1.
    Eisenhardt, K. (1985). Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Science, 31, 134-149.
    Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), pp.57-74.
    Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), pp.57-74.
    Erich Kirchler, Boris Maciejovsky & Friedrich Schneider, (2001). ”Tax Avoidance, Tax Evasion, and Tax Fight: Do Legal Differences Matter?”, Humboldt-University Of Berlin Department Of Economics.
    Fama, E. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of political Economy, 88, 288-307.
    Flamholtz, E. G. (1986). How to make the transition from a transitionally managed firm. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Geis, G. & Meier, Rj (1977). White-Collar Crime, New York: Free Press.
    Hall, R.H. (1987). Organizations: Structures, processes, and outcomes(4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Hay, G. A., & Kelly, D. (1974). An empirical survey of price-fixing conspiracies. Journal of Law and Economics, 13: 13-38.
    Hill, C., Kelley, P., Agle, B., Hitt, M., & Hoskisson, R. (1992). An empirical examination of the causes of corporate wrongdoing in the United States. Human Relations, 45, 1055-1076.
    Hodge, B.J., Anthony, W.P. & L.M. Gales, (1996). Organizational Governance and Control. Organization Theory: A Strategic Approach. Fifth Edition.
    Jensen, Michael C. & William H. Meckling. (1976). "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure," Journal of Financial Economies, 305-360.
    Joyce, J. M. (1989). Effect of firm organizational structure on incentives to engage in price fixing. Contemporary Policy Issues, 7(4): 19-35.
    Kathleen M. Eisenhardt. (1988). Agency-and Institutional-Theory Explanations: The Case of Retail Sales Compensation. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 3 , pp. 488-511.
    Kaufmann, D., & Wei, S. J. (1999). Does grease money speed up the wheels of commerce? World Bank policy research working paper no. 2254.
    Kelly D. Martin, John B. Cullen & K. Praveen Parboteeah. (2007). Deciding To Bribe: A Cross-Level Analysis Of Firm And Home Country Influences On Bribery Activity. Academy Of Management Journal, Vol. 50 No. 6, 1401-1422.
    Kimberly, J. (1976). Organizational size and the structuralist perspective: A review, critique, and proposal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 571-597.
    Kosnik, R. (1987). Greenmail: A study in board performance in corporate governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 163-185.
    Lane, R. E. (1953). Why businessmen violate the law. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 44: 151-165.
    Lilly, J. R., Cullen, F. T., & Ball, R. A. (2002). Criminological theory: Context and consequences. Thousand Oaks, Sage.
    Luthans, F. & Hodgetts, R. M J (1976). Social Issues in Business, New York: Macmillan.
    Martin, K. D., Cullen, J. B. Johnson, J. L. & Parboteeah, K. P. (2006). Firm-level bribery and national context: a cross-level analysis of home country influences on local firms. Manuscript under review.
    Mathews, M. (1987). Codes of ethics: Organizational behavior and misbehavior. In W. Frederick (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy (pp. 107-130). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
    Mckendall, M., & Wagner, J., III. (1997). Motive, opportunity, choice, and corporate illegality. Organization Science, 8, 624-647.
    Mckendall, Sanchez & Sicilian. (1999). ”Corporate Governance And Corporate Illegality: The Effects Of Board Structure On Environmental Violations ”. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol.7, No. 3 (July), pp. 201-223.
    Melissa S. Baucus & Janet P. Near (1991). Can Illegal Corporate Behavior Be Predicted? An Event History Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34. No.1. 9-36.
    Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
    Michael C. Jensen. (Summer, 1994). “Self-interest, Altruism, Incentives, and Agency Theory”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance.
    Mills, D. E. & Schumann, L. (1985). Industry structure with fluctuating demand. American Economic Review, 75, 758–67.
    Mills, D. E. (1984). Demand fluctuations and endogeneous firm flexibility, Journal of Industrial Economics, 33, 55–71.
    Mohan-Neill, Sumaria Indra. (1995). The influence of firm's age and size on its environmental scanning activities. Journal of Small Business Management; Oct; 33, 4; Academic Research Library pg. 10.
    Morrison, A., J. Breen, and S. Ali. (2003). “Small Business Growth: Intention, Ability and Opportunity”. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(4), 417–425.
    Rosenfeld, R., & Messner, S. F. (1997). Markets, morality, and an institutional anomie theory of crime. In N. Passas & R. Agnew. (1997). The future of anomie theory. 207-224. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    Savolainen, J. (2000). Inequality, welfare state, and homicide: Further support for the institutional anomie theory, Criminology, 38: 1021-1042.
    Schrager, L., & Short, J., Jr. (1978). Toward a sociology of organizational crime. Social Problems, 25, 407-419.
    Shover, N. (1978). Defining organizational crime. In D. Ermann & R. Lundman (Eds.), Corporate and governmental deviance (pp. 37-40). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Simpson, S. S. (1986). The decomposition of antitrust: Testing a multi-level. Longitudinal model of profit-squeeze. American Sociological Review, 51, 859-875.
    Slemrod, J. & Yitzhaki, S. (2000). Tax avoidance, evasion, and administration. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 7473.
    Smith, Adam, The Wealth of Nations (1776). Modern Library, New York, 1937).
    Sonnenfeld, J. & Lawrence, P. R. (1978). 'Why Do Companies Succumb to Price-Fixing? '. Harvard Business Review 56,145-157.
    Spence, A. M., & Zeckhauser, R. (1971). Insurance, informa-tion, and individual action. American Economic Review. 61, 380-387.
    Staw, B. M. & Szwajkowski, EJ. (1975). 'The Scarcity- Munificence Component of. Organizadonal Environments and the Commission of Illegal Acts'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 345-354.
    Sutherland, E. (1949), White Collar Crime, New York: HOIL
    Vandivier, K. (1972). "Why Should My Conscience Bother Me', in R, L Heilbroner (ed.). In the Name ofProftU Profiles in Corporate Irresponsibility, New York Doubleday
    Vaugthan, D. (1982). Toward understanding unlawful organizational behavior. Michigan Law Review, 80: 1377-1402.
    Wallace N. Dacidson III, Dan L. Worrell & Chun I. Lee. (1994). Stock Market Reactions to Announced Corporate Illegalities. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 979-987.
    Yeager, P. (1986). Analyzing corporate offenses. In J. Post & L. Preston (Eds.), Research in corporate social performance and policy (pp. 93-120). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
    Yeager, P. (1986). Toward understanding unlawful organizational behavior. Michigan Law Review, 80, 1377-1402.
    Yeager, P. C. (1986). 'Analyzing Corporate Offenses: E*rogress and Prospects', in J. E. Post (ed.). Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Greenwrich, ConnJ JAI Press, Inc., 93-120.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2016/06/17 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE