帳號:guest(3.236.24.215)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目勘誤回報
作者姓名(中文):王家豪
作者姓名(英文):Chia-hao Wang
論文名稱(中文):一個創新的網路服務挑選與評估模式
論文名稱(外文):A Novel Evaluation and Selection Model for Web Services
指導教授姓名(中文):羅乃維
指導教授姓名(英文):Nai-wei Lo
口試委員姓名(中文):呂永和
賴源正
口試委員姓名(英文):Yung-ho Lu
Yuan-cheng Lai
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣科技大學
系所名稱:資訊管理系
學號:M9309005
出版年(民國):95
畢業學年度:94
學期:2
語文別:英文
論文頁數:38
中文關鍵詞:服務品質服務挑選服務導向架構網路服務
外文關鍵詞:Web ServicesQoSService SelectionSOA
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:38
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:10
  • 收藏收藏:0
  服務導向架構在近幾年甚受各國政府及民間企業的重視,使得具體實踐服務導向架構的網路服務機制受到的矚目每日愈增,導致各式各樣的網路服務如雨後春筍般相繼地推出。因為如此,具有相同或類似功能的網路服務出現百家爭鳴之態。然而,當前的網路服務架構與機制,無法判斷網路服務的品質孰優孰劣,使得服務需求者在挑選網路服務時眼花瞭亂,難以判斷何者才是最經濟實用且符合自己需求的網路服務。
  因此,我們擴展現有的網路服務架構與機制,將服務需求者依網域分群,並且提出檢查服務品質的元件,佐以網路服務品質評價機制,一方面協助服務需求者挑選適合的網路服務,另一方面則幫助服務提供者建立服務品質監測機制。
  While Web service models become increasingly popular and many service pro-viders start to offer all kinds of Web services, the quality of service (QoS) of Web ser-vices has become an important factor for service requesters to consider during the se-lection process of appropriate Web services. However, Web service brokers and other kinds of intermediaries in the current Web service architecture do not support QoS matchmaking mechanisms.
  In our research study, we present an evaluation and selection model for Web ser-vices to resolve the QoS matchmaking problem. The main purpose of our model is to support service requesters to select suitable Web services based on the QoS re-quirements from requesters and trustworthiness of Web services candidates. To achieve this goal, in our service architecture we propose a novel mechanism to moni-tor and evaluate from request clients the physical usage condition of Web services and invent computation formulas for Web services reputation.
中文摘要......................................................................................................I
Abstract........................................................................................................II
誌謝..............................................................................................................III
Table of Contents.......................................................................................IV
Chapter 1 Introduction.................................................................................1
 1.1 Background and Motivation.............................................................1
 1.2 Outline of the Thesis.........................................................................3
Chapter 2 Related Works..........................................................................4
 2.1 UDDI Registry Augmentation..........................................................4
 2.2 SOA Expansion with Add-on Components...................................6
 2.3 Hybrid Architecture...........................................................................7
Chapter 3 Research Method.....................................................................12
 3.1 Architecture Description..................................................................12
 3.2 Service Judgment Mechanism and Computation Algorithms......18
 3.3 Usage Scenario................................................................................26
Chapter 4 Comparison and Discussion...................................................31
Chapter 5 Conclusion.................................................................................36
Bibliography................................................................................................37
[1]C. M. MacKenzie, K. Laskey, F. McCabe, P. Brown, and B. A. H. Rebekah Metz, "Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0," 2006.
[2]W3Schools, "Web Services Tutorial," in http://www.w3schools.com/webservices/.
[3]S. Weerawarana, F. Curbera, F. Leymann, T. Storey, and D. F. Ferguson, Web Services Platform Architecture, 2005.
[4]A. ShaikhAli, O. F. Rana, R. Al-Ali, and D. W. Walker, "UDDIe: an extended registry for Web services," presented at Proceedings of the 2003 Symposium on Applications and the Internet Workshops (SAINT-w'03), 2003.
[5]L. Yutu, H. N. Anne, and Z. Z. Liang, "QoS computation and policing in dy-namic web service selection," in Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters, 2004.
[6]D. Gouscos, M. Kalikakis, and P. Georgiadis, "An approach to modeling Web service QoS and provision price," presented at Proceedings of the Fourth In-ternational Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering Workshops (WISEW'03), 2003.
[7]S. Degwekar, S. Y. W. Su, and H. Lam, "Constraint specification and process-ing in Web services publication and discovery," presented at Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'04), 2004.
[8]M. Tian, A. Gramm, T. Naumowicz, H. Ritter, and J. S. Freie, "A concept for QoS integration in Web services," presented at Proceedings of the Fourth In-ternational Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering Workshops (WISEW'03), 2003.
[9]M. Tian, A. Gramm, H. Ritter, and J. Schiller, "Efficient Selection and Moni-toring of QoS-Aware Web Services with the WS-QoS Framework," presented at EEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'04), 2004.
[10]E. M. Maximilien and P. S. Munindar, "Reputation and endorsement for web services," ACM SIGecom Exchanges, vol. 3, pp. 24-31, 2002.
[11]N. Thio and S. Karunasekera, "Automatic measurement of a QoS metric for Web service recommendation," presented at Proceedings of the 2005 Austra-lian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC'05), 2005.
[12]Y.-j. Mou, J. Cao, S.-s. Zhang, and J.-h. Zhang, "Interactive Web service choice-making based on extended QoS model," presented at Proceedings of the 2005 The Fifth International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT'05), 2005.
[13]Z. U. Singhera, "Extended Web services framework to meet non-functional requirements," presented at Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Applications and the Internet Workshops (SAINTW'04), 2004.
[14]S. Kalepu, S. Krishnaswamy, and S. W. Loke, "Verity: a QoS metric for se-lecting Web services and providers," presented at Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering Work-shops (WISEW'03), 2003.
[15]S. Kalepu, S. Krishnaswamy, and L. Seng Wai, "Reputation = f(user ranking, compliance, verity)," presented at Proceedings of the IEEE International Con-ference on Web Services (ICWS'04), 2004.
[16]R. Shuping, "A model for web services discovery with QoS," ACM SIGecom Exchanges, vol. 4, pp. 1-10, 2003.
[17]M. A. Serhani, R. Dssouli, A. Hafid, and H. Sahraoui, "A QoS broker based architecture for efficient Web services selection," presented at Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'05), 2005.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *