Medical tourism has been growing very rapidly in recent years. This trend causing the information about medical tourism destination will increase significantly. The information of medial tourism has been found online started from the demographic spread of the potential medical tourists and medical destination. However, the growth of information available on the web nowadays has led to information overload, hampering the user's ability to distinguish relevant information from irrelevant. This condition restricts people use information resource effectively.
Due to this fact, recommender systems have gained momentum as an efficient tool to reduce the complexity when searching for relevant information. Personalization capabilities are undoubtedly valuable for recommender system to match the user's preference against all available medical tourism resources. In designing a recommendation system, it is important to consider about construction of the main design decisions and it can be constrained by the environment of the recommender which is influence them. The recommender system is designed by using the technology of the semantic web to model the domain knowledge and as a content-based recommendation technique.
Finally, a design of recommender system for medical tourism has been proposed in this research. The system will generate recommendation of medical tourism resources all in one package to users.

Medical tourism has been growing very rapidly in recent years. This trend causing the information about medical tourism destination will increase significantly. The information of medial tourism has been found online started from the demographic spread of the potential medical tourists and medical destination. However, the growth of information available on the web nowadays has led to information overload, hampering the user's ability to distinguish relevant information from irrelevant. This condition restricts people use information resource effectively.
Due to this fact, recommender systems have gained momentum as an efficient tool to reduce the complexity when searching for relevant information. Personalization capabilities are undoubtedly valuable for recommender system to match the user's preference against all available medical tourism resources. In designing a recommendation system, it is important to consider about construction of the main design decisions and it can be constrained by the environment of the recommender which is influence them. The recommender system is designed by using the technology of the semantic web to model the domain knowledge and as a content-based recommendation technique.
Finally, a design of recommender system for medical tourism has been proposed in this research. The system will generate recommendation of medical tourism resources all in one package to users.

1. Deloitte, Medical tourism: Consumers in search of value, 2008.
2. Grail, R., The Rise of Medical Tourism, 2009.
3. Connell, J., Medical tourism: sea, sun, sand and surgery. Tourism Management, 2006. 27: p. 1093-1100.
4. Patterson, I., Information sources used by older adults for decision making about tourist and travel destinations. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 2007. 31: p. 528-533.
5. Oorni, A., Consumer objectives and the amount of search in electronic travel and tourism markets. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 2004. 17(2/3): p. 3-14.
6. Blanco-Fernández, Y., et al., Providing Entertainment by Content-based Filtering and Semantic Reasoning in Intelligent Recommender Systems. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2008a. 54(2): p. 727-735
7. Blanco-Fernández, Y., et al., Exploiting Digital TV Users' Preferences in a Tourism Recommender System based on Semantic Reasoning. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2010. 56(2).
8. Choi, C., et al. Travel Ontology for Intelligent Recommendation System. in 3rd Asia International Conference on Modelling & Simulation. 2009.
9. Li, L., et al. Visual Ontology Modeling Tool and Ontology Based Querying of Semantic Web Resources. in The Sixth Wuhan International Conference on E-Business. 2007. Wuhan.
10. Gruber, T.R., A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification, 1993. 5(199-200).
11. Picault, J., et al., How to Get the Recommender Out of the Lab?, in Recommender Systems Handbook, F. Ricci, et al., Editors. 2011, Springer Science+Business Media,.
12. Deloitte, Medical tourism: Update and implications, 2009.
13. WHO. World Health Statistics 2010. 2010 [cited 2010 September 14]; Available from: http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/2010/en/index.html.
14. Truffer, C., et al., Health Spending Projections Through 2019: The Recession’s Impact Continues. Health Affairs, 2010. 29(3): p. 522-529.
15. Census, U. Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States. 2009 [cited 2010 April 1]; Available from: http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/income_wealth/014227.html.
16. Altin, M., M. Singal, and D. Kara, Consumer Decision Components for Medical Tourism: A Stakeholder Approach, in University of Massachusett, 16th Graduate Students Research Conference in Hospital and Tourism2011. p. 1-11.
17. Crouch, G. and J. Louviere, A review of choice modelling research in tourism, hospitality and leisure. Consumer psychology of tourism, hospitality and leisure, 2001. 2: p. 67-86.
18. Ehrbeck, T., C. Guevara, and P.D. Mango, Mapping the market for medical travel, 2008.
19. Marlowe, J. and P. Sullivan, Medical tourism: the ultimate outsourcing. HR. Human Resource Planning, 2007. 30 (2): p. 8-10.
20. Fraser-Institute, Waiting Your Turn :Hospital Waiting Lists in Canada, 2009.
21. Department-of-Health, Department of Health Annual Report 2009, 2009. p. 314.
22. Vitalis, J. and G. Milton, Medical Travel-Threat or Opportunity for US Providers? It Depends on Your Perspective. Journal of The Center for Health Innovation, 2009. Winter 2009, 9.
23. Forgione, D. and P. Smith, Medical tourism and its impact on the US health care system. Journal of health care finance, 2007. 34: p. 27.
24. Adomavicius, G. and A. Tuzhilin, Toward the next generation of recommender systems:a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Transactions On Knowledge and Data Engineering,, 2005. 17(6)(734-749).
25. Riecken, D., Personalized Views of PERSONALIZATION, in Communications of the ACM 2000. p. 27–28.
26. Diaz, A., A. Garcia, and P. Gervas, User-centered versus system-centered evaluation of a personalization system. Information Processing and Management, 2008. 44: p. 1293-1307.
27. Ricci, F., Travel recommendation systems. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2002. 17 (6): p. 55-57.
28. Rabanser, U. and F. Ricci, Recommender systems: do they have a viable business model in e-tourism?, in Conference of the International Federation for IT & Travel and Tourism2005: Lausanne, Switzerland. p. 160-171.
29. Corallo, A., G. Lorenzo, and G. Solazzo. A semantic recommender engine enabling an e-tourism scenario. in Proceedings of the International Semantic 428 Web Conference. 2005.
30. Jrad, Z., M.-A. Aufaure, and M. Hadjouni, A contextual user model for Web personalization. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2007. 4832: p. 350-361.
31. W3C. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview 2004; Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.
32. Sheth, A., et al., Semantic Association Identification and Knowledge Discovery for National Security Applications. Journal Of Database Management on Database Technology for Enhancing National Security, 2005. 16(1): p. 33-35.
33. Anyanwu, K. and A. Sheth, q-Queries: enabling querying for semantic associations on the Semantic Web, in 12th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW-03)2003. p. 115-125.
34. Brickley, D. and R. Guha. RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF Schema. 2004; Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema.
35. Blanco-Fernández, Y., et al., A flexible semantic inference methodology to reason about user preferences in knowledge-based recommender systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2008b. 21: p. 305-320.
36. Blanco-Fernández, Y., et al., Exploiting synergies between semantic reasoning and personalization strategies in intelligent recommender systems: A case study. The Journal of Systems and Software, 2008c. 81: p. 2371-2385.
37. Cantador, I., P. Castells, and A. Bellogín, An Enhanced Semantic Layer for Hybrid Recommender Systems: Application to News Recommendation. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 2011. 7(1): p. 35.
38. Noy, N.F. and D.L. McGuinness, Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology, 2001, Stanford University.
39. Blanco-Fernández, Y., et al., Exploring synergies between content-based filtering and Spreading Activation techniques in knowledge-based recommender systems. Information Sciences, 2011. 181(21): p. 4823-4846.
40. Middleton, S.E., D.C.D. Roure, and N.R. Shadbolt. Capturing knowledge of user preferences: ontologies in recommender systems. in Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Knowledge capture. 2001. ACM.
41. Resnick, P. and H.R. Varian, Recommender systems, in Communications of the ACM1997. p. 56-58.
42. Adomavicius, G., et al., Incorporating contextual information in recommender systems using a multidimensional approach. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 2005. 23(1): p. 103-145.
43. Ziegler, C.-N., et al. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. in Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web. 2005. ACM.
44. Nunez-Valdez, E.R., et al., Social Voting Techniques: A Comparison of the Methods Used for Explicit Feedback in Recommendation Systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Multimedia, 2011. 1(Special Issue On Software Engineering): p. 61-66.
45. Jawaheer, G., M. Szomszor, and P. Kostkova. Comparison of implicit and explicit feedback from an online music recommendation service. in the 1st International Workshop on Information Heterogeneity and Fusion in Recommender Systems 2010. ACM.