簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李奇峰
Chi-feng Lee
論文名稱: 帷幕牆層間塞之遮煙性能研究
The study on smoke control leakage of curtain-wall through-penetration firestop
指導教授: 林慶元
Ching-Yuan Lin
口試委員: 陳柏宏
Po-Hung Chen
莊英吉
Ying-Ji Chuang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 設計學院 - 建築系
Department of Architecture
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 58
中文關鍵詞: 帷幕牆遮煙性能岩棉
外文關鍵詞: Curtain-wall, smoke control leakage, rock wool.
相關次數: 點閱:266下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 火災發生時,煙毒除從建築物開口部的流竄、擴散,是造成人命傷亡的主因外,帷幕牆防火層間塞之遮煙性亦會影響上層使用者之逃生可能性。本研究藉由實尺寸之帷幕牆層間塞之模型配合CNS15038所衍生遮煙之量測空氣洩漏量裝置進行相關遮煙性能,針對不同岩棉密度、厚度、線性開口大小及附加材質,來檢討目前帷幕牆安全設計法應用於評估層間塞之洩漏量。經試驗結果得知如下:
    1. 岩棉密度80㎏/m3比60㎏/m3洩漏量減少約為11%。
    2. 岩棉密度80㎏/m3及60㎏/m3共有三種不同厚度遮煙效果,岩棉厚度遮煙效果為15cm>10cm>5㎝。
    3. 線性開口大小與層間塞洩漏量呈正比關係。線性開口尺寸洩漏量最高為30cm>20cm>10㎝。
    4. 鋁箔岩棉比一般岩棉密度為80㎏/m3及60㎏/m3有效抵擋煙氣洩漏量減少約為42%。
    5. 岩棉在中溫狀態時洩漏量會比常溫狀態時洩漏量小。在中溫狀態下比常溫煙氣洩漏量減緩約為40%。
    6. 岩棉煙氣洩漏量的問題在於岩棉密度而不是在於岩棉與樓板銜接介面洩漏問題。
    7. 一般業界在線性開口部有施作層間塞,都會符合”IBC713.5 Penetrations in smoke barriers”及”IBC 714.6 Fire-resistant joint systems in smoke barriers”最低要求數值。


    The purpose of this study is to establish a method for smoke leakage testing of
    curtain-wall through-penetration firestop to operate in coordination with CNS 15038 conforming apparatus. There is a model with rock wool to test with leakage testing apparatus. Use variable for different density, thickness, linear dimension and attachment material of rock wool.
    This research first makes the preliminary understanding on building smoke calamity and rock wool characteristic. Using smoke simulates carries on the experiment, picking up rock wool different material smoke leakage and the destruction pattern to provide the improvement suggestion. The results from the test are listed as below:
    1. The rock wool density 80㎏/m3 compares 60㎏/m3 the smoke leakage to reduce approximately 11%
    2. The rock wool density 80㎏/m3 compares 60㎏/m3 have three different type thickness, rock wool thickness smoke barriers the smoke effect for 15cm>10cm >5㎝.
    3. The linear dimension and rock wool air leakages are direct ratio relations, the linear dimension smoke leakage is highest sequences for 30cm>20cm>10㎝.
    4. Using rock wool with aluminum compare to the single rock wool unit, rock wool of aluminum smoke barrier better single rock wool unit, which smoke leakage decreased about 42%.
    5. The rock wool leakage in medium atmospheric temperature rather than in normal atmospheric temperature air leakage decrease about 40%.
    6. The rock wool with leakage problem is for rock wool thickness, is not rock wool connects with floor interface problem.
    7. General constructions have infill rock wool of layers for fireproof, that fit “IBC standards 713.5 Penetrations in smoke barriers leakage” value and ”IBC 714.6 Fire-resistant joint systems in smoke barriers”, conforms to the lowest requirement.

    中文摘要 Ⅰ 英文摘要 II 誌謝 III 目錄 IV 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VII 符號表 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 1-1 研究動機 1 1-2 研究目的 2 1-3 研究內容與範圍 3 1-4 研究方法 3 1-5 研究流程 5 第二章 文獻回顧 6 2-1 煙生成原理 6 2-2 煙的行為模式經由建築立面內部流竄 6 2-3 煙氣流動的基本性狀 7 2-4 煙氣在建築物內的流動擴散路線 8 2-5 煙氣流動原理與驅動力 9 2-6 煙毒特性 11 2-7 局部全尺寸線性開口試驗 11 2-8 層間塞介面比較 12 2-9 各國規範比較 13 2-10 Bernoulli 定理(火災煙氣流速測定方法) 14 第三章 試驗計畫 17 3-1試驗方法與設定 17 3-1-1 試體艙 19 3-1-2 電腦設備及數據紀錄設備 21 3-1-3 試體材料 23 3-2遮煙性能試驗程序 25 3-2-1岩棉洩漏量之計算 26 3-3 試體變數 27 第四章 試驗結果與分析 32 4-1帷幕牆線性開口遮煙裝置氣密性能試驗結果之探討 32 4-2帷幕牆線性開口遮煙裝置加溫性能試驗結果之探討 32 4-3岩棉密度之比較 33 4-4岩棉厚度之比較 36 4-5線性開口尺寸洩漏量之比較 37 4-6一般岩棉與岩棉附加材質之比較 39 4-7 Bernoulli公式之探討 42 第五章 結論與建議 43 5-1 結論 43 5-2 建議 44 參考文獻 45 附錄 47 作者基本資料 58

    【1】 F.B. Clarke, “Physiological effects of smoke: Managing escape”, ASHRAE Journal, Vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 47-56, 1997
    【2】 F.B. Clarke, “Physiological effects of smoke: Managing escape”, ASHRAE Transactions. Vol. 103, no. 1, pp.411-417, 1997.
    【3】 CNS 15038, Method of test for evaluating smoke control performance of doors, 2006.
    【4】 J.H. Klote and J.A. Milke, “Design of smoke management systems”, ASHRAE and SFPE, 1992.
    【5】 田中哮義,「建築火災安全工學」,平成14 年改訂版。
    【6】 N.B. Kaye, G.R. Hunt,“smoke filling time for a room due to a small fire-The effect of ceiling height to floor width aspect ratio”, 4 December 2006.
    【7】 J. H. Klote, “Fire experiments of zoned smoke control at the plaza hotel in Washington DC” [R]. NISTIR pp.90∼4253, MD, NIST, 1990.
    【8】 “CIBSE Guide", Fire engineering ,1995.
    【9】 劉祥至,「防煙區劃之火災模式分析與實驗驗證之研究」,碩士論文,國立雲林科技大學,2001。
    【10】 V. Babrauskas,“The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering”, Third edition, chapter 2-6, “Toxicity Assessment of Combustion Products”.
    【11】 UL 1784, Air leakage tests of door Assemblies, 1990.
    【12】 UL 2079, Tests for Fire Resistance of Building Joint Systems, Oct, 2004.
    【13】 ISO5925/1, Fire Test-Evaluation of Performance of Smoke Control Door assemblies-Part 1: Ambient Temperature Test, Geneva, Switzerland, 1981.
    【14】 ISO5925/2, Fire Test-Smoke Control Door and Shutter Assemblies-Part 2:Commentary on Test Method and Test Data Application, Geneva, Switzerland, 1997.
    【15】 BS 476-31, Methods for measuring smoke penetration through door sets and shutter assemblies, 1983.
    【16】 DIN 18095-1, Smoke control doors; concepts and requirements, German, October, 1988.
    【17】 DIN 18095-2, Smoke control doors; type testing for durability and leakage, German, 1991.
    【18】 JIS A1516, Windows and door sets - air permeability test, 1998.
    【19】 2009 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE P.112.
    【20】 2009 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE P.113.
    【21】 J. H. Klote, “Smoke Control", SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 2nd Edition, Chapter 12 Section 4. 1995. P.230~245.

    QR CODE