研究生: |
林洪樂 Adrian Hartono |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
Study on the Application of Piezoceramic Smart Aggregates on the Crack Damage Detection of RC Columns Study on the Application of Piezoceramic Smart Aggregates on the Crack Damage Detection of RC Columns |
指導教授: |
邱建國
Chien-Kuo Chiu |
口試委員: |
王勇智
Yung-Chih Wang 林克強 Ker-Chun Lin 鄭敏元 Min-Yuan Cheng |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工程學院 - 營建工程系 Department of Civil and Construction Engineering |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 290 |
中文關鍵詞: | Piezoceramic smart aggregate 、Piezoceramic 、reinforced concrete 、ordinary RC column 、New RC column 、structural health monitoring 、damage detection 、crack width 、damage level 、reduction factor |
外文關鍵詞: | Piezoceramic smart aggregate, Piezoceramic, reinforced concrete, ordinary RC column, New RC column, structural health monitoring, damage detection, crack width, damage level, reduction factor |
相關次數: | 點閱:267 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
In this study, the piezoceramic smart aggregates (PSAs) are used to perform structural health monitoring (SHM) and detect crack damage on the ordinary reinforced concrete (RC) and New RC column. The piezoceramic smart aggregates (PSAs) are utilized as actuators and sensors, respectively. In the ordinary RC column, the sensors are installed at two depth ranges (40-50 and 70-80 mm) beneath the surface of the column to investigate the effect of the sensor depth on the damage index, while in the study on the New RC specimen, the sensors are installed in different height to investigate the optimum locations of the sensor.
The energy and amplitude-based damage indexes are developed. Both approaches follow the same trend under various drift ratios of the specimen. However, the value of energy-based damage index is much higher than the amplitude index for all peak drift ratio of the specimen. From the study on the ordinary RC column using post-embedded PSAs, it recommends a depth of 80 mm as optimal for post-embedded smart aggregates, since it could receive more stable signals in various frequencies. According to the study on New RC column, two different heights range are recommended for installing the sensor. First is around the mid-height of the column, and second is near the top of the column. The damage indexes obtained from the sensors that are installed in these locations have highest correlation values with the maximum residual crack width.
In the proposed health monitoring approach using PSAs, the equation to predict the maximum residual crack width and damage index smart aggregates are developed. The normalized damage index equation which in this study is referred to as “crack damage index” is introduced and used to calculate the limiting value for each damage level. The suggested value of the crack damage index for each damage level is also provided. The energy, strength and stiffness reduction factors of RC column for each damage level, which correlate with the crack damage index are also presented herein. These results demonstrate that the proposed smart aggregate has the potential to be used as a tool for SHM on an RC column.
In this study, the piezoceramic smart aggregates (PSAs) are used to perform structural health monitoring (SHM) and detect crack damage on the ordinary reinforced concrete (RC) and New RC column. The piezoceramic smart aggregates (PSAs) are utilized as actuators and sensors, respectively. In the ordinary RC column, the sensors are installed at two depth ranges (40-50 and 70-80 mm) beneath the surface of the column to investigate the effect of the sensor depth on the damage index, while in the study on the New RC specimen, the sensors are installed in different height to investigate the optimum locations of the sensor.
The energy and amplitude-based damage indexes are developed. Both approaches follow the same trend under various drift ratios of the specimen. However, the value of energy-based damage index is much higher than the amplitude index for all peak drift ratio of the specimen. From the study on the ordinary RC column using post-embedded PSAs, it recommends a depth of 80 mm as optimal for post-embedded smart aggregates, since it could receive more stable signals in various frequencies. According to the study on New RC column, two different heights range are recommended for installing the sensor. First is around the mid-height of the column, and second is near the top of the column. The damage indexes obtained from the sensors that are installed in these locations have highest correlation values with the maximum residual crack width.
In the proposed health monitoring approach using PSAs, the equation to predict the maximum residual crack width and damage index smart aggregates are developed. The normalized damage index equation which in this study is referred to as “crack damage index” is introduced and used to calculate the limiting value for each damage level. The suggested value of the crack damage index for each damage level is also provided. The energy, strength and stiffness reduction factors of RC column for each damage level, which correlate with the crack damage index are also presented herein. These results demonstrate that the proposed smart aggregate has the potential to be used as a tool for SHM on an RC column.
1. Song, G., et al., Concrete structural health monitoring using embedded piezoceramic transducers. Smart Materials & Structures, 2007. 16(4): p. 959-968.
2. Moslehy, Y., et al., Smart aggregate based damage detection of circular RC columns under cyclic combined loading. Smart Materials & Structures, 2010. 19(6).
3. Gu, H.C., et al., Multi-functional smart aggregate-based structural health monitoring of circular reinforced concrete columns subjected to seismic excitations. Smart Materials & Structures, 2010. 19(6).
4. Liao, W.I. and Y.J. Wang, Structural health monitoring for local damages of RC walls using piezoceramic-based sensors under seismic loading, in ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. 2017: Hawaii.
5. Gu H, O.C., Araghdeep L and Mo Y L. Structural health monitoring of a reinforced concrete frame using piezoceramic based smart aggregates in World Forum on Smart Materials and Smart Structures Technology. 2007. Chongqing.
6. Liao, W.I. and C.K. Chiu, Seismic health monitoring of a space RC frame structure using piezoceramic-based sensors, in ASCE Earth and space conference. 2018: Cleveland, OH, USA.
7. Saafi, M. and T. Sayyah, Health monitoring of concrete structures strengthened with advanced composite materials using piezoelectric transducers. Composites Part B-Engineering, 2001. 32(4): p. 333-342.
8. Soh, C.K., et al., Performance of smart piezoceramic patches in health monitoring of a RC bridge. Smart Materials & Structures, 2000. 9(4): p. 533-542.
9. Okafor, A.C., K. Chandrashekhara, and Y.P. Jiang, Delamination prediction in composite beams with built-in piezoelectric devices using modal analysis and neural network. Smart Materials & Structures, 1996. 5(3): p. 338-347.
10. Liu, S.C., Application of Smart Aggregates to Damage Detection of RC Beam-Column Structures. 2017, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Master Thesis): Taipei, Taiwan.
11. Moheimani, S.O.R., A.J. Fleming, and SpringerLink (Online service), Piezoelectric Transducers for Vibration Control and Damping, in Advances in Industrial Control,. 2006, Springer-Verlag London Limited: London.
12. APC International Ltd., Piezoelectric ceramics : principles and applications. 2nd ed. 2011, Mackeyville, PA: APC International. 114 pages.
13. Sun, F.P., et al., Automated real-time structure health monitoring via signature pattern recognition. Smart Structures and Materials 1995 - Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, 1995. 2443: p. 236-247.
14. Bhalla, S. and C.K. Soh, High frequency piezoelectric signatures for diagnosis of seismic/blast induced structural damages. Ndt & E International, 2004. 37(1): p. 23-33.
15. Park, S., et al., Multiple crack detection of concrete structures using impedance-based structural health monitoring techniques. Experimental Mechanics, 2006. 46(5): p. 609-618.
16. Park, Y.J. and A.H.S. Ang, Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1985. 111(4): p. 722-739.
17. Takahashi, N., H. Shiohara, and Y. Nakano, A compatible experssion among each limit state of RC structures suffering multiple earthquakes. Journal of Structural Engineering 2006. 52B: p. 299-304.
18. Park, Y.J., A.H.S. Ang, and Y.K. Wen, Seismic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1985. 111(4): p. 740-757.
19. JBDPA, Guideline for post-earthquake damage evaluation and rehabilitation. 2001: Tokyo, Japan.
20. (AIJ), A.I.o.J., Guidelines for Performance Evaluation of Earthquake Resistant Reinforced Concrete Buildings (Draft). 2004.
21. JBDPA, Standard for seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete buildings, guidelines for seismic retrofit of existing reinforced concrete buildings, and technical manual for seismic evaluation and seismic retrofit of existing reinforced concrete buildings. 2015: Tokyo, Japan.
22. Chiu, C.K., Sung, H.F., Chi, K.N. and Hsiao, F.P. , Experimental quantification on the residual seismic capacity of damaged RC column members. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Material (to be published).
23. Gu, H., et al., Concrete early-age strength monitoring using embedded piezoelectric transducers. Smart Materials & Structures, 2006. 15(6): p. 1837-1845.
24. Wu, P.C., Study on Post-earthquake Performance of Typical Reinfoced Concrete Columns. 2017, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Master Thesis): Taiwan.
25. Chang, F.C., Study on the Confining Effect of Reinforced Concrete Columns Using High Strength Material. 2010, National Taiwan University (Master Thesis): Taipei, Taiwan.