研究生: |
龍竹茂 Chu-Mao Lung |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
MCPM應用於營造業遴選分包商決策之研究 Subcontractor Selection for Construction Company using MCPM |
指導教授: |
鄭明淵
Min-Yuan Cheng |
口試委員: |
鄭道明
none 周瑞生 none 潘南飛 none |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工程學院 - 營建工程系 Department of Civil and Construction Engineering |
論文出版年: | 2011 |
畢業學年度: | 99 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 101 |
中文關鍵詞: | 營造業 、遴商決策 、模糊偏好關係 、累積展望理論 、多目標展望模式 |
外文關鍵詞: | Construction industry, Subcontractor Selection Decision, Fuzzy Preference Relations, Cumulative Prospect Theory, Multi-Criteria Prospect Model |
相關次數: | 點閱:408 下載:13 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究探討營造業遴選分包商之決策,遴商決策的正確與否影響營造業者執行專案成敗最主要的關鍵因素之一。營造業者不能再憑以往僅以最低價格標之決標模式為遴商之標準,而必須重新思考後有更完整周延之分析與評估模式,有效地遴選出有助力之優良分包商,進而為達成專案目標及獲取應有的利潤,以期增進公司的競爭力與發展。
有鑑於此,本研究針對營造業者之實務需求,發展出「營造業遴選分包商決策模式」主要考量營建管理中工期及成本兩大構面因子為核心,其中引用相關理論包括有模糊偏好關係(Fuzzy Preference Relations,FPR)、累積展望理論(Cumulative Prospect Theory,CPT)等,使營造業者可針對承建工程之分包,運用「多目標展望模式-MCPM」(Multi-Criteria Prospect Model,MCPM),推導出營造業者對於各候選分包商之展望值(Prospect Value),以作為遴選分包商之決策依據。
營造業者應用本研究所建立之分包商遴選決策模式,可整合公司內部之所有評估資訊,對於所承建工程分包中遴選廠商所產生之預估利潤與執行專案成功機率做出最佳判斷。
This research focuses on subcontractor selection decision for construction industry. The accuracy of critical factors on subcontractor selection decision affects the operating performance on the construction industry. The construction industry can no longer make decision by directly using lowest prices. However, it must have the complete evaluation and analysis after rethinking to select an appropriate subcontractor to reach the Project goal and the profit predefined for increase the company’s competition.
Has given this, this research for create industry who of practice demand, development out " Subcontractor Selection For Construction Company " main consider construction management in the duration and the cost two large frame factor for core, which reference related theory including has (Fuzzy Preference Relations, FPR) and (Cumulative Prospect Theory, CPT) makes construction industry which can for Subcontracting of the Project, application ”Multi-Criteria Prospect Model, MCPM”, derivation out expectations (Prospect Value), to as subcontractor selection of decision making.
By using the subcontractor selection decision models, the construction industry might integrate all assessments of company internal information within the company, on the subcontractors selecting by engineering firms which make the best judgment for the profit forecasting and project success probability implementation.
1. 曾定祁、林顯雄、王超平、闕致良,「營建產業分析」,財團法人中國生產力中心,1994.01。
2. 許志諭,「營造業選擇分包商的關鍵因素分析」,碩士論文,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班,2005.06。
3. 盧威宇、林國良,「最有價值標決標制度之研擬」,2007營建管理研討會,台灣雲林,2007.07
4. 吳宗桂,「營造廠專業協力廠商評鑑模式之建立與應用」,碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學營建系研究所,2001.06.18
5. 林仁壽,「RDEU應用於建築投資業土地投標決策之研究」,碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學營建系研究所,2007.07.25
6. 尤佳偉,「工程顧問公司國際市場專案決策模式建立-應用多目標展望模式(MCPM)」,碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學營建系研究所,2009.07.14
7. Florence Yean Yng Ling; Swee Lean Chan; Edwin Chong ;and Lee Ping Ee “Predicting Performance of Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build projects”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 130, No.1, (P.75-83) February 1, 2004
8. Andreas Hartmann;Florence Yean Yng Ling;and Jane S. H. Tan, “Relative Importance of Subcontractor Selection Criteria:Evidence from Singapore” , Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 135, No. 9, (P.826-832) September 1, 2009
9. Creed S. J. Eom; Seok H. Yun;and Joon H. Paek, “Subcontractor Evaluation and Management Framework for Strategic Partnering”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 134, No. 11, (P.842-851) November 1, 2008
10. Maged E. Georgy, Luh-Maan Chang, and Lei Zhang, “Utility-Function Model for Engineering Performance Assessment” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,Vol. 131, No. 5, May 1, 2005
11. Sergios Lambropoulos “The use of time and cost utility for construction contract award under European Union Legislation”. Building and Environment 42, P.452–463 , 2007
12. Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., “Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision making model based on fuzzy preference relations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 112, pp. 277–291, 2001
13. E. Herrera-Viedma , F. Herrera, F. Chiclana, M. Luque, “Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations”, European Journal of Operational Research 154, P.98–109, 2004
14. Tien-Chin Wang , Tsung-Han Chang, “Forecasting the probability of successful knowledge management by consistent fuzzy preference relations”, Expert Systems with Applications 32, P.801–813, 2007
15. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., , “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk,” Econometrica, Vol. 47, pp. 263-291, 1979
16. Quiggin, J., “A theory of anticipated utility”, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 3, P.323-343, 1982
17. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 5, pp. 297-323, 1992
18. Tversky, A., Wakker, P.P., “Risk attitudes and decision weights,” Econometrica, Vol. 63, pp. 1255–1280, 1995
19. Tversky, A., Fox, C.R., “Weighting risk and uncertainty,” Psych. Rev., Vol. 102, pp. 269–283., 1995
20. Wu, George, and Gonzalez, R., “Curvature of the Probability Weighting Function,” Management Science, 42, 1676-1690, 1996
21. Prelec, D., “The probability weighting function,” Econometrica, Vol. 66, pp. 497–527, 1998
22. Mohammed Abdellaoui, “Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions”. Management Science, Vol.46, No.11 p.1497-1512., November 2000
23. Han Bleichrodt, Jose Luis Pinto, ”A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis”, Management Science, Vol.46, No.11, p.1485-1496., November 2000