德國PREBENA公司在傳統氣動工具領域做了創新突破，創造了無線可攜式的氣動打釘機，並衍生出第二代適用於全系列及他牌氣動工具的轉接系統，此一系統解決了今日普及的有線式氣動裝置與空氣壓縮機之間距離限制與配線空間問題，同時解決蓄電式的使用時間較短、充電時間緩慢、蓄電池老化及出力不足等缺點。
該公司並且設立了充氣站，提供客戶方便的使用環境，從此客戶就不再需要投資大量資金在購置大型空氣壓縮機或充電設備，因而高壓氣瓶與高壓充氣站選址設廠的需求應運而生。

German PREBENA company in the field of conventional pneumatic tools do a new breakthrough, creating a wireless portable pneumatic nailing machine, and the derived second generation and he is suitable for the full range of pneumatic tools brand switching system, this system solves space limitations and the wiring distance between today's popular cable problem pneumatic equipment and air compressors, while addressing the storage type to use shorter, slower charging time, battery aging and inadequate contribute to other shortcomings.
The company also set up a filling station, providing customers with easy to use environment, since customers no longer need to invest a lot of money in the purchase of large air compressor or charging equipment, thus high pressure cylinders with high pressure filling station site needs to be transported and set up factories Health.

參考文獻
中文文獻
1.洪政煌，「低放射性核能廢料運送路線選擇之多目標 0-1 整數規劃」， 管理科學 學報，第十卷第一期，71∼91 頁，民國 82 年 5 月。
英文文獻
1.Current, J.R., Multiobjective Design of Transportation Networks, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Geography and Environment Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Balitimore, Maryland, 1981.
2.Current, J., ReVelle, C., and Cohon, J., “Multiobjective Design of Transportation Networks,” Operations Research Group Report Series, Johns Hopkins University, Balitimore, Maryland, 1982.
3.Current, J., ReVelle, C., and Cohon , J., “The Maximum Covering / Shortest Path Problem：A Multiobjective Network Design and Routing Formulation,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 189-199, 1985.
4.De Neufville, R., and Keeney, R., “Multiattribute Preference Analysis for Transportation System Evaluation,” Transportation Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp 63-75, 1973.
5.Drezner, Z., and Wesolowsky, G. O., “Facility Location When Demand is Time Dependent,” Naval Research Logistics, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 763-777, 1991.
6.Flynn, J., and Ratick, S., “A Multiobjective Hierarchical Covering Model for the Essential Air Services Program,” Transportation Science, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 139-147, 1988.
7.van Steen, J.F.J., “A Methodology for Aiding Hazardous Materials Transportation Decision,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 231-244, 1987.
8.Kusumoto, S. I., “On a Foundation of the Economic Theory of Location – Transport Distance vs. Technological Substitution,” Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 24, pp. 249-270, 1984.
9.Kathawala, Y., and Gholamnezhad, H., “New Approach to Facility Locations Decisions,” International Journal of Systems Science, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 389-402, 1987.
10.Love, R.F., Morris, J.G., and Wesolowsky, G.O., “Facilities Location: Models and Methods,” North-Holland, New York, 1988.
11.Moore, L., Taylor, B.W., and Lee, S., “Analysis of A Transportation Problem with Multi-Conflicting Objectives,” Computer and Operations Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp 39-46, 1978.
12.Min, H., “A Multiobjective Retail Service Location Model for Fastfood Restaurants,” OMEGA, Vol. 15, pp. 429-441, 1987.
13.ReVelle, C., “Review, Extension and Prediction in Emergency Service Siting Models,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 58-69, 1989.
14.Thisse, J.-F., “Location Theory, Regional Science, and Economics,” Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 519-528, 1987.
15.Von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O., “Theory of Games and Economic Behavior,” Princeton University Press, 1944.
16.Weber, A., Theory of the Location of Industries, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1929.
17.Wijeratne, A.B., Turnquist, M.A., and Mirchandani, P.B., “Multiobjective Routing of Hazardous Materials in Stochastic Networks,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 33-43, 1993.