簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 徐馬丁
Martin - Pasu
論文名稱: Evaluation of stiffness parameter of Hardening Soil model through laboratory experiment
Evaluation of stiffness parameter of Hardening Soil model through laboratory experiment
指導教授: 歐章煜
Chang-Yu Ou
口試委員: 葛宇甯
Louis Ge
熊彬成
Benson
謝佑明
Yo-Ming Hsieh
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工程學院 - 營建工程系
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 120
中文關鍵詞: triaxial test
外文關鍵詞: triaxial test, stress path test
相關次數: 點閱:162下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Numerical analysis has become the important tool to assist geotechnical engineering project or case. Some of soil model are provided in numerical software. Hardening Soil model is advance soil model which become more widely used. Selecting the reliable parameter is a key to perform numerical simulation, thus laboratory testing such as triaxial test and oedometer test are applied to investigate the soil stiffness parameter. In addition to triaxial test and oedometer test, developing a reliable reconstitution soil method is a key to produce reliable soil sample.
    Designing and performing reconstituted soil test is the first step to obtain reliable soil sample prior to triaxial test, oedometer test and bender element test. Based on the water content test, the new design of consolidometer (reconstituted soil) to produce undisturbed soil is quite reliable. A series of triaxial tests such as CK0U_AC, CIU_AC, CIU_AD, CK0U_AE, CIU_AE and oedometer test were conducted to evaluate the stiffness parameter such as initial Young’s Modulus (E0), secant Young’s Modulus (E50), oedometer Young’s Modulus (E50), and initial Shear Modulus (G0).
    Finally, In order to verify the testing results, this study performed numerical simulation which is included back analysis of stress strain curve and parametric study of initial shear modulus (G0) and shear strain (?0.7). Based on parametric study, it can be concluded that the influence of shear strain ?0.7 is less significantly for extension test (CK0U_AE and CIU_AE) and initial shear modulus G0 for both of compression test and extension test did not influence significantly the stress strain curve.


    Numerical analysis has become the important tool to assist geotechnical engineering project or case. Some of soil model are provided in numerical software. Hardening Soil model is advance soil model which become more widely used. Selecting the reliable parameter is a key to perform numerical simulation, thus laboratory testing such as triaxial test and oedometer test are applied to investigate the soil stiffness parameter. In addition to triaxial test and oedometer test, developing a reliable reconstitution soil method is a key to produce reliable soil sample.
    Designing and performing reconstituted soil test is the first step to obtain reliable soil sample prior to triaxial test, oedometer test and bender element test. Based on the water content test, the new design of consolidometer (reconstituted soil) to produce undisturbed soil is quite reliable. A series of triaxial tests such as CK0U_AC, CIU_AC, CIU_AD, CK0U_AE, CIU_AE and oedometer test were conducted to evaluate the stiffness parameter such as initial Young’s Modulus (E0), secant Young’s Modulus (E50), oedometer Young’s Modulus (E50), and initial Shear Modulus (G0).
    Finally, In order to verify the testing results, this study performed numerical simulation which is included back analysis of stress strain curve and parametric study of initial shear modulus (G0) and shear strain (?0.7). Based on parametric study, it can be concluded that the influence of shear strain ?0.7 is less significantly for extension test (CK0U_AE and CIU_AE) and initial shear modulus G0 for both of compression test and extension test did not influence significantly the stress strain curve.

    ABSTRACT i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii Contents iv List of Tables vi List of Figures vii Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objective 1 1.3 Structure 1 Chapter 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 3 2.1 Hardening Soil model 3 2.1.1 Basic theory of Hardening Soil model 3 2.1.2 Stiffness for primary loading 4 2.1.3 Shear hardening 5 2.2 Hardening Soil model small strain 6 2.3 Application of Hardening Soil model on triaxial test 7 2.4 Application of Hardening Soil model on real case 7 2.5 Stress path test and triaxial test 8 2.6 Reconstituted soil 9 2.6.1 Moist tamping (undercompaction) 9 2.6.2 Dry funnel deposition and water sedimentation 10 2.6.3 Slurry Sedimentation 10 2.6.4 Resedimented Blue Boston Clay (RBBC) 10 2.7 One-dimensional consolidation 11 2.8 Bender Element test 12 Chapter 3 THE EQUIPMENT AND METHOD OF EXPERIMENT 14 3.1 Equipment and the procedure of triaxial test 14 3.1.1 Load Cell 14 3.1.2 Pressure Control System 14 3.1.3 Measurements in triaxial apparatus 15 3.1.4 Instrument for setting-up the specimens 16 3.1.5 Local Strain Measurement 17 3.1.6 Test material 17 3.2 Procedures of setting up the soil sample and installing mini LVDT 18 3.3 Equipment and procedure of reconstituted soil 20 3.4 The Instrument of Bender Element Test 22 Chapter 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 24 4.1 Triaxial test results 25 4.1.1 K0 Consolidation Undrained Axial Compression 26 4.1.2 Isotropic Consolidation Undrained Axial Compression 27 4.1.3 Isotropic Consolidation Drained Axial Compression 29 4.1.4 Isotropic Consolidation Undrained Axial Extension 31 4.1.5 K0 Consolidation Undrained Axial Extension 33 4.2 Numerical simulation of triaxial test 35 4.2.1 Back analysis 35 4.2.2 Parametric study of initial shear modulus G0 and shear strain ??0.7 37 4.3 Summary 37 4.4 Discussion 38 Chapter 5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 41 5.1 Conclusion 41 5.2 Recommendation 42 REFERENCE 44

    1. Germaine, J.T. (1982), Development of the Directional Shear Cell for Measuring Cross Anisotropic Clay Properties, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
    2. Jamiolkowski, M., Lancellotta, R., Lopresti, D.C.F., and Pallara, O. (1994). Stiffness of Toyoura and sand at small and intermediate strain. Proceedings, 13th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol.1, New Delhi, 169-172.
    3. Jovicic, V., Coop, M. R. and Simic, M., “Objective criteria for determining Gmax from bender element test”, Geotechnique, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 357-362 (1996).
    4. Lings, M.L., “Drained and undrained elastic parameters”, Geotechnique, Vol. 51, No. 6, pp.555-565 (2001).
    5. Brinkgreve, R. B. J. (2004), PLAXIS Manual 8.2.
    6. Ibrahim, E., and Benedetto, H.D. (2005), “New local system of measurement of axial strains for triaxial apparatus using LVDT”, Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol.28, No.5.
    7. Janbu, J. (1963), “Soil compressibility as determined by oedometer and triaxial Tests”, Proc. ECSMFE Wiesbaden, Vol. 1, pp.19-25.
    8. Jardine, R.J., Symes, M.J., and Burland J.B. (1984), “The measurement of soil stiffness in the triaxial apparatus”, Geotechnique, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp.323-340.
    9. Lim, A., Ou, C. Y., and Hsieh, P. G. (2010), “Evaluation of clay constitutive models for analysis of deep excavation undrained conditions”, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp.9-20.
    10. Skempton, A.W. (1954), “The pore-pressure coefficients A and B”, Geotechnique 4, No. 4, pp.143-147.
    11. Santagata, M.C. (1998), Factors Affecting the Initial Stiffness and Stiffness Degradation of Cohesive Soils, Dissertation (PhD), Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
    12. Seah, T.H. (1990), Anisotropy of Resedimented Boston Blue Clay, Dissertation (PhD), Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
    13. PLAXIS (2011), 2D2011-Material Models Manual.
    14. Teng, F.C. (2010), Prediction of Ground Movement Induced by Excavation Using the Numerical Method with the Consideration of Inherent Stiffness Anisotropy, Ph.D. Dissertation, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, R.O.C.
    15. Cho, W. and Finno J.R. (2010), “Stress-Strain Responses of Block samples of compressible chicago glacial clays”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, pp.178-188.
    16. Teng, F.C and Ou, C.Y. (2011), “Application of a suction control system in the method of specimen saturation in triaxial test”, Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 34, No. 6.
    17. Das, B.J. (2006), Principal of Geotechnical Engineering Fifth Edition. Thomson Learning, USA.
    18. Ou, C.Y. (2006), Deep Excavation: Theory and Practice. Taylor & Francis, Netherlands.
    19. Holtz, R.D. and Kovacs, W.D. (1981), An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 07632.
    20. Tseng, D.Y. (曾迪揚)(2012), Investigation of Stiffness Parameters of Effective Stress Undrained Analysis in Deep Excavation, MSc Thesis, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, R.O.C.
    21. Teng, F.C. (2005), The Development of small strain Anisotropic Triaxial Testing System, MSc Thesis, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, R.O.C.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2018/07/31 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2018/07/31 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE