簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示
| 研究生： |
李志隆 Jyh-Long Lee |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱： |
三種供應商評選方法之比較研究 A comparative study on three vendor selection methods |
| 指導教授： |
邱煥能
Huan-Neng Chiu |
| 口試委員: |
鐘崑仁
Kun-Jen Chung 藍筱蘋 Xiao-Pin Lan |
| 學位類別： |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱： |
管理學院 - 工業管理系 Department of Industrial Management |
| 論文出版年： | 2005 |
| 畢業學年度： | 93 |
| 語文別： | 中文 |
| 論文頁數： | 74 |
| 中文關鍵詞： | 並聯法 、字序法 、準則權重 、供應商 、因素分析法 、層級分析法 、串連法 |
| 外文關鍵詞： | criteria, lexicographic method, vendor selection, disjunctive method, conjunctive method, factor analysis, AHP |
| 相關次數： | 點閱：272 下載：10 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
台灣的電腦產業已經進入專業分工的時代，產品利潤不如以往豐渥，準系統製造商為求生存已將許多非關鍵技術之週邊產品，以對外採購的方式補其不足。而合適的供應商可以配合買方的生產策略適時的提供相關支援，並降低生產成本和提高產品品質。因此，選擇合適供應商對製造商生產線是否順暢、採購成本的多寡及對最終顧客之產品保證等保障均有重大的影響。
在供應商評選的過程中，製造商必須決定符合自身需求的評選準則來進行供應商評選，以評選出符合公司整體利益之合格供應商。故本研究利用因素分析法，對一些中高階主管進行供應商評選準則之問卷調查，結果萃取出重要的供應商評選準則，即品質、價格、交期、技術能力及產能等五項。此外，本研究利用層級分析法來決定五項準則的權重。接著，再對此五項評選準則發展字序法、串連法及並聯法等三種供應商評選方法來選擇合格供應商，並利用三種績效評估指標分析和比較這三種評選方法。
研究結果顯示，當製造商特別在意某幾項評選準則時，本研究建議使用字序法；若製造商在意供應商各項評選準則表現時，則建議使用串連法，因串連法所求解之合格供應商整體表現較為一致；若製造商想獲得較多合格供應商供其選擇時，則建議使用並聯法。最後，本研究以國內某知名準系統製造商為案例，驗證本研究三種評選方法之實務適用性。結果顯示，以串連法評選合格供應商之績效優於字序法與並聯法。
1.黃俊英，「多變量分析」，中國經濟企業研究出版社，華泰書局，第六版，民國八十七年。
2.Ansari, A. and Modarress, B., “JIT purchasing as a quality and productivity centre,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 26, No.1, 1980, pp. 19-26.
3.Bernard, P., “Managing vendor performance,” Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol.30, No.1, 1989, pp. 1-7.
4.Burton, T., “JIT/repetitive sourcing strategies: Tying the knot with your suppliers”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol.29, No.4, 1988, pp. 38-42
5.Browing, J. M., Zabriskie, N. B. and Huellmantel, A. B., “Strategic purchasing planning,” Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 19, No. 1,1983, pp. 19-24.
6.Chen, R. S. and Shyu, J. Z., “Selecting a weapon system using zero-one goal programming and analytic network process,” New Trends and Applications, MOPGP, April 14-16, 2004, Hammamet, Tunisia.
7.Chu, A. T. W., Kalaba, R. E. and Spingarn, K., “A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol.27, No.4, 1979, pp. 531-538.
8.Chung, S. H., Lee Amy, H. I. and Pearn, W. L., “Analytic network process approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 96, No.1, 2005, pp. 15-36.
9.De Boer, L., Labro, E. and Morlacchi, P., “A review of methods supporting supplier selection,” European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 7, No.1, 2001, pp. 75-89.
10.Dickson, G. W., “An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions,” Journal of Purchasing, Vol. 2, No.4, 1966, pp. 563-588.
11.Donaldson, B., “Supplier selection criteria on the service dimension,” European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 1, No.5, 1994, pp. 209-217.
12.Ghodsypour, S. H. and O’Brien, C., “A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 56, No. 1, 1998, pp.199-212.
13.Hinkle, C. L., Robison, P. J. and Green, P. E., “Vendor evaluation using cluster analysis,” Journal of Purchasing, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1969, pp. 49-58.
14.Houshyar, A. and David, L., “A systematic selection procedure,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol.23, No.1-4, 1992, pp.173-176.
15.Huizingh, E. K. R. E. and Vrolijk, H. C. J., Decision Support for Information Systems Management: Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM, 1995.
16.Hwang, C. L. and Yoon, K., Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981.
17.Lee, J. W. and Kim, S. H., “Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection,” Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2000, pp. 367-382.
18.Lehmann, D. R. and O'Shaughnessy, J., “Decision criteria used in buying different categories of products,” Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1982, pp. 9-14.
19.Nydick, R. L. and Hill, R. P., “Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure,” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1992, pp. 31-36.
20.Patton, W. E., “Use of human judgment models in industrial buyers’ vender selection decisions,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1996, pp. 135-139.
21.Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
22.Saaty, T. L., Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback- The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publication, 1996.
23.Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W., The Mathematical Theory of Communication, The University of Illinois Press, 1947.
24.Soukup, W. R., “Supplier selection strategies,” Journal of Purchasing and Material Management, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1987, pp. 7-13.
25.Spearman, C., The Abilities of Man：Their Nature and Measurement, MacMillan, New York, 1927.
26.Srinvasan, V. and Shocker, A. D., “Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preference,” Psychometrika, Vol. 38, No. 3, 1973, pp. 337-369.
27.Stevenson, W. J., Production Operations Management, Sixth Edition, Ch.3, 1999.
28.Wang, G.., Huang, S. H. and Dismukes, J. P., “Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 91, 2004, pp. 1-15.
29.Weber, C. A., Current, J. R. and Benton, W. C., “Vendor selection criteria and methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 50, No. 1, 1991, pp. 2-18.
30.Wilson, E. J., “The relative importance of supplier selection criteria: A review and update,” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1994, pp. 35-41.
