簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊玉麟
Yu-lin Yang
論文名稱: 實行社會責任公司經營效率及其影響因素之研究
Efficiency Evaluation and its Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Companies
指導教授: 劉邦典
Pang-tien Lieu
口試委員: 徐中琦
Jon-chi Shyu
梁榮輝
Zong-fui Liang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 57
中文關鍵詞: 兩階段DEATobit迴歸企業社會責任
外文關鍵詞: Two-stage DEA, Tobit regression, Corporate Social Responsibility
相關次數: 點閱:277下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究檢驗實行企業社會責任公司的經營效率及其影響因素。第一部分,利用兩階段DEA評估企業的經營效率,並比較實行和未實行企業社會責任公司其經營效率之差異,研究結果顯示有履行社會責任之公司其獲利效率相對較高;但股票市場效率卻較為低落。第二部分,本研究使用Tobit迴歸探討實行之社會責任構面對經營效率的影響,實證結果顯示,公司治理和企業承諾構面對獲利效率和股票市場效率具有顯著正向影響;環境保護構面對股票市場效率則是具有負向顯著影響。企業履行社會責任不僅能提升獲利表現且最終能創造企業的市場價值,企業若能策略性的實行社會責任,回應各個利害關係人的需求,將企業社會責任納入營運核心中,對提升企業的競爭優勢和經營效率有正面之助益。


    This study examines the operation efficiency and its determinants of corporate social responsibility companies. First, a two-stage DEA is adopted to evaluate CSR companies’ profitability and marketability efficiency in comparison with Non-CSR companies. The empirical results show that profitability efficiency of CSR companies are higher than Non-CSR companies and marketability efficiency of CSR companies are lower than Non-CSR firms. Second, this study use Tobit Regression to explore which dimension of CSR would affect corporate efficiency. The empirical results show that the corporate governance and corporate commitment dimension are significant and positive relationship with profitability efficiency, while the environment protection dimension has a significant and negative relationship with marketability efficiency. CSR initiatives not only help enterprise get better profitability but also create market value. Enterprise implements CSR to response to the needs of stakeholders and bring CSR into business activities will have positive effects to their competitive advantages and operation efficiency.

    摘要 I 致謝 III 目錄 IV 圖表索引 V 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究範圍與內容 3 第三節 研究方法 4 第四節 研究流程與步驟 5 第五節 研究限制 6 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 企業社會責任和財務績效之關聯性 7 第二節 企業社會責任對經營效率之影響 9 第三節 兩階段DEA文獻回顧 17 第三章 實證理論模型 23 第一節 資料包絡分析法 23 第二節 兩階段DEA 31 第三節 Tobit 迴歸模型 35 第四章 實證結果與分析 37 第一節 樣本與資料 38 第二節 兩階段DEA效率值分析 39 第三節 企業社會責任相關構面之評等對經營效率的影響 43 第五章 結論與建議 46 參考文獻 48 附錄 53

    中文部分
    1. 天下雜誌,天下企業公民(來源網站:http://issue.cw.com.tw/issue/csr/index.jsp)
    2. 高強、黃旭男、末吉俊幸,2003,《管理績效評估:資料包絡分析法》,台北:華泰文化。
    3. 黃紀、王德育,2012,《質變數與受限依變數之迴歸分析》,台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    4. 吳濟華、何柏正,2008,《組織效率與生產力評估:資料包絡分析法》,台北:前程文化
    5. 王琬青,「企業社會責任,經營效率與財務績效」,碩士論文,國立勤益科技大學企業管理系(2010)。
    6. 賴筱玟,「社會責任是否影響美國電信產業績效? 」,碩士論文,元智大學會計學程(2011)。
    7. 李曉嵐, 「企業社會責任與公司績效之相關性研究-以美國半導體產業為例」,碩士論文,元智大學會計學程(2011)。
    8. 鄧肇中, 「積體電路設計產業績效評估」,碩士論文,東吳大學經濟學系 (2008)
    9. 韓慧林, 「台灣地區半導體業績效評估」。管理研究學報,2004年1月第四卷,第一期,頁71-89
    10. 許晉銘, 「台灣地區機場績效評估-兩階段資料包絡分析法之應用」,碩士論文,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所 (2008)
    11. 鐘文汝,「社會責任與公司績效之關聯性研究-非參數法之應用」,碩士論文,國防大學管理學院財務管理學系(2010)。

    英文部分
    1. Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B. and Hatfield, J. D. (1985) “An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social performance and profitability”, Academy of Management Journal, 28(2): 446-463.
    2. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. (1984) “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Journal of Management Science, 30(9): 1078–92.
    3. Belu, C., Manescu, C. (2013) “Strategic corporate social responsibility and economic performance”, Applied Economics, 45(19): 2751-2764.
    4. Botosan, C.A. (1997) “Disclosure Level and the Cost of Equity Capital”, The Accounting Review, 72(3): 323-349.
    5. Bozec, R., Dia, M. (2007) “Board structure and firm technical efficiency: Evidence from Canadian state-owned enterprises”, European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3): 1734-1750.
    6. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E. (1978) “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 2: 429-444.
    7. Chen, Y. and Zhu, J. (2004) “Measuring information technology’s indirect impact on firm performance”, Information Technology and Management Journal, 5(1–2):9–22.
    8. Cornell, B. and Shapiro, A. C. (1987) “Corporate stakeholder and corporate finance”, Financial Management ,16:5-14.
    9. Conrad, K., Morrison, C. J. (1989) “The impact of pollution abatement investment on productivity change: an empirical comparison of the US, Germany, and Canada”, Southern Economic Journal, 684-698.
    10. Debreu, G. (1951) “The Coefficient of Resource Utilization”, Journal of Econometrica, 19(3):273-292.
    11. Fama, E. F. (1980) “Agency Problems and The In formativeness of Earning”, Journal of Political Economy, 88:288-307.
    12. Fare, R. S., Grosskopf, S. and Whittaker G. (2005) “Network DEA”, Discussing Paper:Chapter 9.
    13. Farrell, M. J. (1957) “The measurement of productive efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 120(3):253–289.
    14. Friedman, M.(1970)“The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits”, N.Y. TIMES, 13:32-33.
    15. Garcia-Sanchaz, I. (2010) “The effectiveness of corporate governance: board structure and business technological efficiency is Spain”, Central European Journal of Operation Research, 18(3):311-339.
    16. Golany, B., Roll, Y. (1989) “An Application Procedure for DEA”, journal of Omega, 17 (3):237-250.
    17. Keffas, G., Olulu-Briggs, O. V. (2011) “Corporate social responsibility: how does it affect the financial performance of banks? Empirical evidence from US, UK and Japan”, Journal of Management and Corporate Governance, 3:8-26.
    18. Koopmans, T. C. (1951) “Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities”, Activity analysis of production and allocation, 13:33-37.
    19. Luo, X. (2003), “Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks:An application of data envelopment analysis”, Journal of Business Research, 56:627-635.
    20. Moskowitz, M. (1972) “Choosing socially responsible stocks”, Business and Society Review, 1:71-75.
    21. Porter, M. E. and Kramer, M. R. (2006) “Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility”, Harvard Business Review, December, 78-92.
    22. Preston, L. E. and O’Bannon, D. P. (1997) “The corporate social-financial performance relationship”, Business and Society, 36(4):419-429.
    23. Rouse, P., van Staden, C. and Tresadern, Paul. (2010) “Eco-efficiency within selected US industries using Data Envelopment Analysis”, AFAANZ Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand, 0-30.
    24. Seiford, L. M. and Zhu, J. (1999) “Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55U.S. Commercial Banks”, Management Science, 45(9):1240-1288.
    25. Sexton, T. R.,and Lewis, H. F. (2003) “Two-stage DEA: an application to major league baseball”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19(2-3):227-249.
    26. Su, R., Zhong, W. and Liu, S. (2010) “The relationship between corporate efficiency and CSR”, In Advanced Management Science (ICAMS), 2010 IEEE International Conference, 37-42.
    27. Sun, L. and Stuebs, M. (2012) “Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Productivity: Evidence from the Chemical Industry in the United States”, Journal of Business Ethics, 1-13.
    28. Tobin, J. (1958) “Estimation of Relationship for Limited Dependent Variable”, Econometrica, 26(1):24-36.
    29. Vance, S. C. (1975) “Are socially responsible corporations good investment Risk? ”, Management Review, 6(4):18-24.
    30. Vilanova, M., Lozano, J. & Arenas, D. (2009) “Exploring the nature of the relationship between CSR and competitiveness”, Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1):57-69.
    31. Vitaliano, D. F., Stella, G. P. (2006) “The cost of corporate social responsibility: The case of the Community Reinvestment Act”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 26(3):235-244.
    32. Waddock, S. A. and Graves, S. B. (1997)“The corporate social performance-
    financial performance link”, Strategic Management Journal, 8(4):303-319.
    33. Wang, J. L., Jeng, V. and Peng, J. L. (2007). “ The Impact of Corporate Governance Structure on the Efficiency Performance of Insurance Companies in Taiwan&ast”, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 32(2):264-282.

    34. WBCSD (2006), “WBCSD Annual Review 2005- From Awareness to Action”, World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
    35. Zhu, J. (2000) “Multi-Factor Performance Measure Model with an Application to Fortune 500 Companies”, European Journal of Operational Research, 123(1):105-124.
    網頁資料
    36. KLD Investments: Domini 400 Social Index (http://www.msci.com/products/esg/)
    37. Dow Jones Sustainability Index(http://www.sustainability-indices.com/)
    38. FTSE4Good(http://www.ftse.com/About_Us/FTSE_Corporate_Responsibility/FTSE4Good.jsp)

    QR CODE