近年來「社會企業」在全球已蔚為風潮，社會企業目前在台灣因礙於法令的關係發展受限，相較於歐美國家而言發展尚未完全，仍屬新興的概念。而在面臨網路時代的來臨，傳統的社會企業更是面臨轉型的困境或是力求發展以順應這股潮流。
愛樂活是社會企業中，第一個想解決社會數位落差的問題，且是第一個從事IT產業的企業。愛樂活主要提供科技顧問以及行銷顧問的服務，專注於協助台灣小農與NPO組織提升行銷力與國際接軌，利用科技工具來強化公益組織之間的連結且致力推廣公平交易，並增強大眾對社會企業或是公益的認同與認知，使社會企業的成長更加茁壯。
本研究以深度訪談的方式，透過訪問愛樂活創辦人─張佑輔先生，了解愛樂活的現狀與困境，並藉由個案故事中經由實務所出現的現象，歸納出三項主要的管理意涵及應用，分別為1.網路時代的社會企業 2.愛樂活的營運模式 3.社會企業的研究方法及後續參考，並彙整其他相關的管理理論，引申出相關的問題與探討，讓未來從事同類型社會企業或是有意新創社會企業者做為參考的依據。

In recent years, social enterprise in the world has become a trend, but the development has been limited due to the laws and regulations in Taiwan. Compared to Europe and America, it hasn't fully developed here yet, so it's still an emerging concept. With the coming of the Internet era, traditional social enterprise is facing difficulties of transition or strive to develop in order to adapt to this new application.
iLohas is the first social enterprise that trying to solve the problem of the digital divide, and they're the first social enterprise in the IT industry. iLohas mainly provides technology and marketing consulting services, and focuses on assisting small farmers and NPO organizations to increase their marketing capability to be in line with the international practice. They used technology tools to strengthen the linkage between welfare organizations and committed to promoting fair trade, then allowed social enterprises growing up.
This study uses the method of in-depth interviewing to understand the current situation and difficulties through access the founder of iLohas, Mr. Chang. We organized and extracted the contents of the interviews to summarize and brought into the theory by the phenomenon that appears in the case. We summarized the three major management implications and applications, they're 1. Internet era of social enterprise 2. Business model of iLohas 3. Research Methods of social enterprises and subsequent reference. We further aggregated other related theory and extending the related issues.The study provides a basis for reference to the same type of social enterprises or someone who intends to create new social enterprises.

一、 中文參考文獻
(1)穆罕默德・尤努斯 (2008) 《新的企業模式：創造沒有貧困的世界》
(2)林淑馨 (2013) 《臺灣社會企業的現況與困境：以公益創投型社會企業為例》
(3)詹姆士•穆爾 (James F.Moore) (1996)《競爭的衰亡》
(4)鄭勝分《政策研究學報第七期》之期刊論文，P.65-107
(5)盧俊偉，(2014)《社會企業家政府：公共治理的第四條路初探》
(6)胡哲生、陳志遠，(2009) 《社會企業本質、任務與發展》，創業管理研究，4卷4期：1-28
(7)丁玉珍， (2015) 臺灣大學政府與公共事務碩士在職專班《社會企業發展政府角色之探討－以協助非營利組織朝向社會企業發展為例》
(8)官有垣、王仕圖，2013，《台灣的社會企業：特質、發展趨勢與效應》，人文社會科學研究 NPUST Humanities and Social Sciences Research，Vol. 7 No. 1：頁 102 －126
(9)謝如梅、莊為傑、方世杰 (2011)。《資源拼湊、創業經驗與新事業機會之初探性研究：社會網絡觀點》
(10)王如蘭（2001）政治大學廣播電視硏究所《 迎接寬頻時代的挑戰 : 論台灣無線電視業者內容加值服務方向》
(11)李艾玲（2005） 世新大學傳播管理硏究所 《模組化設計應用於音樂性電台數位音樂資料庫之分析》
(12)謝宏暉 (2004) 政治大學廣播電視學研究所《由模組化生產建構體育頻道的數為平台--以緯來體育台為例》
(13)鄭吉村 (2014) 國立臺灣科技大學EMBA碩士論文 《小鎮文創的社會創新模式》

二、 英文參考文獻
(1) Agard, M. (2009). Bricolage: Making do with what is at hand. Creative Nursing, 15(2), 82-84.
(2) Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. (2003). Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32, 255-276.
(3) Baldwin, C.Y.and Clark, K.B., 1997. Managing in an Age of Modularity, Harvard Business Review, 75, (5), 84-93.
(4) Cunha, M. P. (2005). Bricolage in organization ‘ FUENL Working Paper Series, No 474, Uninversidad Nova de Lisboam, Faculdada de Economia.
(5) Domenico, M. D., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Jul2010, 34(4), 681-703.
(6) DTI (London: Department of Trade and Industry), (2002.)《Social enterprise. A strategy for success.》
(7) Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind (La pensee suavage). London: Weidenfeld & Niolson.
(8) Lanzara, G. F. (1999). Between transient constructs and persistent structures: Designing systems in action. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8, 331-349.
(9) Moore K. & Cardona P. (2002). 《Modularity, strategic flexibility and firm performance: A study of the home appliance industry. 》Strategic Management Journal, 1123-1140.
(10) Prof. Yunus, Grameen, and Social Business (2011.)《Grameen Creative Lab: Accelerating the Social Business Movement.》
 
三、 網站部分
(1)愛樂活官方網站
http://www.ilohas.info/
(2)社企流
http://www.seinsights.asia/
(3)台灣農業讚官方網站
http://greenformosa.org/
(4)勞動部勞動力發展署官網
http://www.wda.gov.tw/index.jsp
(5)setoolbelt
http://www.setoolbelt.org/
(6)社團法人台灣社會企業創新創業學會
http://www.seietw.org/