研究生: |
林義承 Yih-Cheng Lin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
以消防救助觀點探討標示圖像對路徑搜尋之協助 A Study of Assistance of Lighting Indicators to assist Way-finding for Firefighting and Rescue Services |
指導教授: |
林慶元
Ching-Yuan Lin |
口試委員: |
彭雲宏
Yeng-Horng Perng 江維華 Wei-Hwa Chaing 沈子勝 Tzu-Sheng Shen 簡賢文 Shen-Wen Chien |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
設計學院 - 建築系 Department of Architecture |
論文出版年: | 2014 |
畢業學年度: | 102 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 48 |
中文關鍵詞: | 消防救助 、輔助標示 、路徑搜尋 |
外文關鍵詞: | Firefighting and Rescue, Supplementary indicator lighting, Way-finding |
相關次數: | 點閱:274 下載:1 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
既有研究中多以避難者觀點探討路徑搜尋,但卻鮮少有以消防救助觀點來探討路徑搜尋的議題。火災發生時若能減少消防隊員路徑搜尋時間,將可有效降低人命及財產損失,因此為了解析真實火場中提昇路徑搜尋效能的可能性,本研究使用全尺寸真實空間進行火災救助實驗,探討消防救助隊員路徑搜尋、行為特徵、以及增設輔助標示等相關課題,具體結果如下:
1. 既有救助模式顯示性別、搜索順序、搜救訓練三項影響路徑搜尋時間最大。
2. 增設火災位置標示後路徑搜尋時間可大幅減少,且不同背景之消防隊員亦無明顯差異。
3. 路徑搜尋順序仍是造成時間長短之主因,既有訓練計畫中應強化圖面閱讀訓練,提高擬定搜救計畫之能力。
Most existing research discusses way-finding from the view of building occupants, and seldom is the issue explored through the viewpoint of firefighting and rescue. If the time firefighters spend for way-finding can be decreased during a fire, it would reduce loss of life and properties effectively. Thus, in order to analyze possibilities for enhancing way-finding efficacy in an actual fire, this study employed a full scale real space for fire rescue experiments to investigate relevant issues such as firefighting and rescue crews’ way-finding, behavioral characteristics and addition of supplementary indicator lighting. The results are as follows:
1. Existing rescue models indicate that gender, search sequence and search and rescue training affect way-finding the most.
2. Addition of fire location indicator lighting can reduce way-finding time greatly and there is no significant difference between firefighters with varying backgrounds.
3. Way-finding sequence is the main reason for the length of rescue time, thus existing training programs should strengthen graphic reading training to increase the ability to establish search and rescue plans.
1.Piamonte, D.P.T., Understanding small graphical symbols: a cross- cultural study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27, pp. 399-404, 2001.
2.Murray, L.A., Magurno, A.B., Glover, B.L., Wogalter, M.S. Prohibitive pictorials: Evaluations of different circle-slash negation symbols. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 22, pp. 473-482, 1998.
3.Wogalter, M.S., Conzola V.C., Smith-Jackson. Research-based guidelines for warning design and evaluation. Applied Ergonomics, 33, pp. 219-230, 2002.
4.Shieh, K.K., Huang, S.M., Factors affecting preference ratings of prohibitive symbols, Applied Ergonomics, 34, pp. 581-587, 2003.
5.Petiot, J.F., Yannou, B., Measuring consumer perceptions for a better comprehension, specification and assessment of product semantics. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 33, pp. 507-525, 2003.
6.Maguire, M. C., Areview of human factors guidelines and techniques for the design of graphical human–computer interfaces. Computers and Graphics, 9 (3), pp. 221-235, 1985.
7.Ouellette MJ., Exit signs in smoke: design parameters for greater visibility. Lighting Research and Technology, 20(4), pp.155–160(1988).
8.Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. Retrieval time from semantic memory, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247. (1969).
9.Garling, T., Book, A., & Lindberg, E. Cognitive Mapping of Large-scale Environments. Environment and Behavior, 16, 3-34. (1984).
10.Passini, R., Wayfinding: backbone of graphic support systems. Visual Information for Everyday Use, London: Taylor & Francis, 1999.
11.Montello, D. R., Spatial Orientation And The Angularity Of Urban Routes A Field Study. Environment and Behavior, 23(1), pp. 47-69, 1991.
12.Evans, G. W. Environmental cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 259-287. (1980).
13.Best, G. A. Direction-finding in large buildings. In D. Canter, Ed., Architectural Psychology. London: RIBA Publications, pp.72-91(1970).
14.Nichols, F., Canete, I. & Tuladhar, S. (1992) Designing for Pedestrians: A CAD Network Analysis Approach. In Y. E. Kalay, Ed., Evaluating and Predicting Design Performance. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
15.O'Neill, M. J. Evaluation of a conceptual model of architectural legibility. Environment and Behavior, 23(3), pp.259-284(1991a).
16.O'Neill, M. J. Effects of signage and floor plan configuration on way-finding accuracy. Environment and Behavior, 23(5), pp.553-574(1991b).
17.Chieh-Hsin Tang, En-Shu Kuo, Chien-Jung Chen, Ying-Ji Chuang, Ching-Yuan Lin, A Basic Study on the Application of Emergency Icons to Emergency Exits during a Fire , Journal of Applied Fire Science, Vol. 17(3), pp. 261-275, 2007-2008. 2010 publishing.