簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 邱天智
Tiem-Tzu Chiu
論文名稱: 專業工程師跨國執業相互認許之研究
Research on Mutual Recognition for Professional Engineers to Cross Border
指導教授: 李得璋
Teh-Chang Lee
口試委員: 林志棟
Jyh-Dong Lin
呂守陞
Sou-Sen Leu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工程學院 - 營建工程系
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 137
中文關鍵詞: 相互認許專業工程師認證亞太工程師
外文關鍵詞: Mutual Recognition, PE Accreditation, APEC Engineer
相關次數: 點閱:217下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

中文摘要
我國已於94年6月順利加入「亞太工程師協調委員會」成為正式會員,並開始辦理亞太工程師資格審查與認證,然而由於世界各國專業工程師制度存在著相當差異,目前取得亞太工程師資格者,尚須藉由各會員經濟體間建立相互認許資格與執業方式,方能跨國移動執行業務,故如何透過與其他亞太制度會員國建立相互認許,促使我國亞太工程師與國際接軌,實為當前重要之課題。
本研究首先透過馬來西亞、泰國、菲律賓、新加坡、澳洲、紐西蘭及香港技術服務法令之蒐集與整理,瞭解各國對於外籍專業工程師進入其技術服務市場之限制。次而與澳洲及紐西蘭亞太工程師監督委員會進行技術性諮商會議,擷取其經驗並探詢相互認許之意向,再舉辦研討會,邀請相關專家學者及技師公會參與,針對我國推動與各亞太工程師制度會員國相互認許面臨之障礙,研擬建立相互認許之策略。
根據本研究就各國專業工程師之資格要求及其對外籍專業工程師開放情形之分析比較,目前各國對於外籍專業工程師跨國執業仍多所限制,如泰國完全不開放,馬來西亞、菲律賓、新加坡、紐西蘭與澳洲等國為有條件開放。本研究進一步針對國際間已簽訂之相互認許協議架構,探討其簽署模式、相互認許類科之設定、跨國執業資格要求等事項,從而研議我國推動相互認許之談判對象優先順序設定與考量事項,並提出我國於相互認許之推動策略及未來之配套措施,以供主管機關參採。


Taiwan has become the full member of the APEC Engineer Coordinating Committee in June 2005, and has been authorized to proceed with the registration and renewal assessment of Chinese Taipei APEC Engineers. However, due to the differences in qualification standard of professional engineers between member economies, the real cross border mobility for professional engineer within APEC region is not yet achieved. In the circumstances, it is indeed a primary issue for us to negotiate with other members to establish the mutual recognition systems.
In this study, relevant laws and regulations concerning engineering services in Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand and Hong Kong are collected firstly to investigate the restrictions for foreign engineers to practice in those countries. Secondly, the bilateral consultations respectively with Australia and New Zealand have been convened to explore the possibility of cross border practice of professional engineers. After then, a workshop is conducted to exchange views on the obstacles and prospect to the development of Taiwan’s mutual recognition with other APEC member economies.
According to a survey in this study, it is concluded that almost all the APEC member economies are still on their way to the destination of cross border mobility for professional engineer in this region. In Thailand, the recognition system for foreign engineers is not yet established, while in Malaysia, Philippines, New Zealand and Australia, qualified foreign engineers are conditionally recognized by the authorities. This study also makes a further comparison on the qualification and registration for foreign professional engineers in APEC member countries. The existing mutual recognition arrangements are analyzed and a bilateral framework to facilitate mobility for mutual recognition agreement of registered APEC Engineer is developed. Then, the most suitable models and qualification standards in mutual recognition arrangements for Chinese Taipei APEC Engineer Monitoring Committee are proposed. The priority rule for further negotiation with other APEC member economies and major strategies to promote mutual recognition arrangements are established consequently.

目錄 第一章 緒論 1.1研究動機與目的 1 1.2研究內容與範圍 2 1.3研究方法及進行步驟 3 第二章 國際工程師認證機制探討 5 2.1國際工程師相互認許之發展探討 6 2.2相互認許(Mutual Recognition)之探討 7 2.3 工程教育認證制度概述 9 2.3.1華盛頓協議(Washington Accord) 9 2.3.2都柏林協議(The Dublin Accord) 12 2.3.3雪梨協議(The Sydney Accord) 12 2.4工程師跨境執業相互認許制度 13 2.4.1亞太工程師(APEC Engineer) 13 2.4.2國際工程師流動論壇(Engineers Mobility Forum, EMF) 16 2.4.3歐洲聯盟國際工程師協會(FEANI) 19 2.4.4北美自由貿易協定工程師(NAFTA Engineer) 23 2.4.5東南亞國協註冊工程師(ASEAN ACPE) 25 第三章 各國專業工程師制度與開放情形研析 29 3.1馬來西亞 29 3.1.1專業工程師制度 29 3.1.2工程技術服務市場開放情形與國際認證之發展 32 3.2 泰國 35 3.2.1專業工程師制度 35 3.2.2工程技術服務市場開放情形與國際認證之發展 38 3.3 菲律賓 40 3.3.1專業工程師制度 40 3.3.2工程技術服務市場開放情形與國際認證之發展 41 3.4 新加坡 45 3.4.1專業工程師制度 45 3.4.2工程技術服務市場開放情形與國際認證之發展 47 3.5 香港 50 3.5.1專業工程師制度 50 3.5.2工程技術服務市場開放情形與國際認證之發展 52 3.6澳洲 55 3.6.1專業工程師制度 55 3.6.2工程技術服務市場開放情形與國際認證之發展 57 3.7 紐西蘭 60 3.7.1專業工程師制度 60 3.7.2工程技術服務市場開放情形與國際認證之發展 61 3.8 台灣 64 3.8.1我國專業技師制度 64 3.8.2國際工程師資格認證之發展狀況 66 3.9小結 68 第四章 推動亞太工程師相互認許之策略 71 4.1相互認許之基礎 72 4.2 國際相互認許協議之借鏡 75 4.2.1日本-澳大利亞相互認許協議架構 76 4.2.2香港-加拿大相互認許協議架構 78 4.3我國推動相互認許協議之考量重點 85 4.4我國推動與亞太制度會員國相互認許之策略 87 第五章 結論與建議 91 5.1結論 91 5.2建議 92

1.各國專業技師資格相互認許制度之研究,行政院公共工程委員會專案研究報告,91年12月。
2.徐遵慈、劉復國主編,「我國參與亞太區域合作策略之研究」,國立政治大學國際關係研究中心出版,89年1月。
3.謝季壽,「加入亞太工程師認證制度,勢在必行」,營建知訊月刊257期,93年6月。
4.台灣營建業者進入開發中國家市場之可行性研究,行政院公共工程委員會專案研究報告,91年11月。
5.陈兆根,「专业资格、工程师注册及国际资格互证」,中国水利学会2003年学术年汇报告,2003年11月
6.外商投資建設工程設計企業管理規定, 中華人民共和國對外貿易經濟合作部,2002年9月。
7.香港工程師註冊條例,1997
8.楊光華,服務貿易緊急防衛措施規範之發展及我國應有立場之芻議,經濟部貿易調查專刊第七期,92年7月。
9.羅昌發,貿易關係之法律問題,月旦出版社,1994年6月。
10.羅昌發,WTO下之「Doha發展議程與我國之參與」,台灣WTO新紀元貿易之開放與防衛,楊光華主編,2003年1月。
11.羅昌發,國際貿易法,世界貿易組織下之法律新秩序,元照出版,1999年7月。
12.經濟部,中華民國國際貿易發展概況(2003-2004),經濟部國際貿易局,92年6月。
13.ASIA-PACIFIC Economic Cooperation Human Resources Development Group “The APEC Engineer Manual”, , Version 4, 2005.11
14.APEC Engineer Register-Assessment Statement, Australia 2003
15.Kathryn Hurford,”Global Reach:Supporting Professional Mobility of Australian Engineers”, Engineers Australia, 2006
16.Resolution No.90-547,Guidelines for the Registration of Foreign Professionals Allowed by Laws to Practice the Regulated Profession in the Philippines, Republic of the Philippine Professional Regulation Commission, 1998.
17.Guide to Assessment of Eligibility for Membership for Candidates Not Holding an Accredited or Recognized Qualification and Australian Engineering Competency Standards Stage 1, Engineers Australia , 2004.
18.Chartered Professional Engineer Competency Standard, The Institution of Engineers New Zealand, 2004.
19.Chartered Professional Engineer Act 2002, New Zealand
20.Credit for Registrants from Other Jurisdictions, The Institution of Engineers New Zealand, 2005.
21.Michael Bevan,The Use of Bilateral Agreements, Engineers Australia, 2005.
22.APEC Engineer Register Assessment Statement, Institution of Engineers Singapore, 2005.
23.APEC Engineer Register Assessment Statement, THAI Professional Engineer Board, 1999.
24.Annual Report for Financial Year 2005,Professional Engineer Board, Singapore, 2005.
25.Annual Report 2005/2006, Association of Consulting Engineers Australia, 2006.
26.Mutual Recognition of Qualified/Licensed Engineers by Jurisdictions of Canada and Hong Kong to Facilitate Mobility ,The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers, 2004.
27.A Bilateral Framework to Facilitate Mobility for Mutual Recognition of Registered/Licensed Engineers, Engineers Australia, 2003.
28.Procedures for Registering Graduate Engineers, Professional Engineer, Foreign Engineer & Body Corporates, Board of Engineers, Malaysia
29.Professional Development Program, The Engineering Practitioner’s Preferred Pathway to Chartered Status, Engineers Australia,2004.
30.Overseas Qualification Assessment KIT, The Engineering Practitioner’s Pathway to Chartered Status, Engineers Australia, 2004.
31.Global Reach, Supporting the Professional Mobility of Australian Engineers, Engineers Australia, 2006.
32.Republic Act No.544, An Act Regulate the Practice of Civil Engineering in the Philippines, Professional Regulation Committee, Philippines
33.APEC Engineer Assessment Statement, APEC Engineer Monitoring Committee Philippines, 2006.
34.Lembage Pembanguan Industri Pembinaan Malaysia Act 1994(Act 520), Construction Industry Development Board, Malaysia
35.APEC Engineer Register Assessment Statement, Malaysia, 2006.
36.Registration of Engineers Act1967(Revised 1987), Malaysia
37.Registration of Engineers Regulations 1990, Malaysia
38.APEC Engineer Assessment Statement, THAI Council of Engineers, 2003.
39.Foreign Business Act B.E.2542(1999), Thailand
40.Engineers Act B.E.2542(A.D.1999), Thailand
41.Civil Discipline Professional Assessment, The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers, 2006.
42.ASIA Pacific Economic Cooperation-APEC Engineer Procedure Manual, 2001.2
43.ALEC. J Hay & Peter Greenwood, International Mutual Recognition of Engineers, Engineers Australia, 2003.
44.The Dublin Accord, The Institution of Engineers of Ireland, 2002.5
45.ASEAN Mutual Recognition Arrangement on Engineering Services, 2005.
46.Republic Act No.8560,An Act Regulating the Practice of Geodetic Engineering in the Philippines.
47.Republic Act No.8559, An Act Regulating the Practice of Agricultural Engineering in the Philippines.
48.Republic Act No.7920,An Act Providing for More Responsive and Comprehensive Regulation for the Practice, Licensing, and Registration of Electrical Engineers and Electricians, Philippines 1995.
49.Promotion of International Mobility of Engineers-APEC Engineer Project, The 12th Conference on Public Works, Research and Development in Asia, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Japan, 2003 .
50.Engineers Mobility Forum Constration, 2003.
51.Annual Report 2005, National Engineering Registration Board Australia, 2005.
52.The APEC Engineer Manual–The Identification of Substantial Equivalence”, APEC Engineer Coordinating Committee, APEC Human Resource Working Group,Version 3, 2003.
53.Engineers Mobility Forum, Memorandum of Understanding to establish an EMF International Register of Professional Engineers ”, second reversion, 2000.
54.“Engineers Mobility Forum Agreement to Establish and Maintain an EMF International of Professional Engineers”, 2001.
55.“Guide to the FEANI REGISTER-Eur Ing”,3rd edition,The Federation of European National Engineering Associations, FEANI, 2000.

QR CODE