簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 金毓傑
Yu-chieh Chin
論文名稱: 商場走道空間使用者滿意度分析
Retail Sales aisle space of user satisfaction
指導教授: 林慶元
Ching-Yuan Lin
口試委員: 彭雲宏
Yeng-Horng Perng
湯潔新
Chieh-Hsin Tang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 設計學院 - 建築系
Department of Architecture
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 53
中文關鍵詞: 走道寬度設計官能評價滿意度零售業便利商店
外文關鍵詞: Aisle width design, sensory evaluation, store operations strategies, retail sales, convenience stores
相關次數: 點閱:247下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

零售業成為整個內需市場活絡及金字塔的最底端的礎石。是最基礎也是最
重要的角色。
一個成功的商場設計,不僅只是良好的人流物流車流規劃。從利用流暢的
車流將貨物運送到儲放處,以流暢的運送路徑將其置放到指定貨架,最後良好
的動線規劃將顧客從入口吸引到指定位置購物並結帳完成。
本研究試圖以便利感(convenience)與擁擠感(crowded)交互主導購物情境
與購物滿意度的重要條件。研究方法首先以田野調查,將大型購物賣場走道空
間做數值個案分析。另外以無障礙空間中法規作為限制因素。綜合數據以照片
模擬問卷情境。藉由照片模擬走道情境。
以消費者觀感設計問卷問項;另一方面詢問業方貨架擺放是否會造成熱銷
感,作為另一個變數。其間以統計手法分析消費者對於不同的貨架擺放最佳寬
度範圍,以及業方配置意涵,作為設計參考準則的建立。問卷內容以二維象限
法歸結。以走道寬度X 軸,視覺與心理感受為Y 軸。
本資料希望給與建築從業設計師反饋參考值。將參與式設計的一部分導入
使用者及規劃使用者場域。好的設計參考資料應當依照環境及時代文化背景不
同而修正,數值分析必將成為賦與自我修正機制的資料庫集成的方法。
以現況調查及法規限制作為三種走道寬度模擬值,再由統計手法分析問卷
資訊後,本研究設計問卷分析後有以下成果:
1.消費者及業方在問卷分析呈現的趨勢下,最小走道寬度趨勢1.5m 成
立。
2.業者與消費者對走道寬度皆有共識,但是無法清楚的表達出走道寬度
物理量與心理量的差異。


Retail active is the foundation of entire domestic market and the bottom of the
pyramid.
A successful mall design, not only require the complete passenger flow and
freight traffic but also deliver goods to store office smoothly. It also smooths the
path to the placement of the delivery to the designated shelf. A good route should
guide the customer from the entrance to the specified location shopping and
checkout.
This study attempts to facilitate a sense of convenience and the crowded
feeling (crowded) interactive context driven shopping and shopping an important
condition for satisfaction. The research methodology will be implemented by
analyzing shopping store aisle space in a numerical way. Besides, think of barrierfree
space in the regulations as a limiting factor.
Questionnaire will be represented in a way of space simulation integrated
with photos.
Comprehensive analysis of the survey was to side with the users of integrated
perception of the industry trends, through the analysis of statistical methods, form
design of this study confirmed that the width of the aisle and to facilitate smooth
- iii -
passage of the canonical correlation numbers significantly. This means that the
user expectations in the aisle width to facilitate passage of the aisle in the industry
in designing the questionnaire and reached wide consensus. This chart will define
“aisle width” as X direction and “visual experience” as Y direction.
It is expected that this information feedback to the reference value of building
practitioners designers. And the users of the user and planning to join the field of
design part. Numerical analysis will become a trend, a prediction and will follow
the environmental and cultural backgrounds are different times, endowed with
self-correction mechanism for database integration.
Now, the control width of the three analog values, and then use statistical
methods to analyze the survey data, analyzing the survey results are as follows:
1. Consumer and business trends survey, the minimum aisle width of 1.5
meters established trend.
2. Aisle width of the industry and consumers consensus. However, the width
of the aisle can not be clearly expressed, the contents of physical and
psychological differences.

中文摘要..................................................................................................... i 英文摘要..................................................................................................... ii 目錄.............................................................................................................v 圖目錄.........................................................................................................viii 表目錄.........................................................................................................ix 第一章 緒論..............................................................................................1 1.1 緣起............................................................................................1 1.2 研究目的.....................................................................................3 1.3 研究方法.....................................................................................4 1.3 研究範圍與對象.........................................................................5 1.4 研究範圍與限制.........................................................................5 1.5 研究流程.....................................................................................6 第二章文獻回顧與探討 ..........................................................................8 2.1 源起.............................................................................................8 2.2 零售店相關研究..........................................................................8 2.3 有關商場空間使用者滿意度的研究...........................................10 2.4 有關商場空間氛圍以及相關擁擠度研究`..................................13 第三章研究方法..................................................................................... 15 3.1 源起.............................................................................................15 vi 3.2 使用者問卷設計..........................................................................17 3.3 商業空間經營者問卷設計..........................................................18 3.4 官能評價手法的應用..................................................................23 3.5 分析工具......................................................................................24 第四章結果與討論 ..................................................................................25 4.1 走道寬度現況調查-以台灣地區北中南及東部量販店為例... 25 4.2 問卷樣本描述............................................................................. 31 4.3 購物時對走道寬度滿意度......................................................... 32 4.3.1 使用者走道寬度滿意度多變量變異數分析......................32 4.3.2 業方走道寬度滿意度多變量變異數分析..........................38 4.4 業方與使用者理想走道寬度分析.............................................. 44 4.4.1 前言....................................................................................44 4.4.2 使用者與業方理想走道寬度交叉分析..............................45 4.4.3 小結....................................................................................49 第五章結論與建議 ..................................................................................50 5.1 結論............................................................................................ 50 5.2 建議............................................................................................ 53 參考文獻..................................................................................................... 54 附錄 vii A 本研究相關研究主軸、樣本數、研究方法設計、研究內涵、檢定項 目、及研究成果比較表.................................................................50 B 本研究使用之開放式雲端軟體範例...............................................51

1. 中華徵信所,台灣地區產業年報-配銷流通業,1995
2. 聯合報,台灣服務業,神秘客,消費者被服務經驗,10月4日B02版,2005
3. Karen A. Machleit,“Perceived Retail Crowding and Shopping Satisfaction :
What Modifies This Relationship? ”,JOURNAL OF CONSUMER
PSYCHOLOGY,Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc,2000.
4. Cheng Li, “Analyses on the Users Impressions of Railway Stationsand Their
Effects on the Shopping Behavior”,Nagoya University,2004
5. 馮先勉,店面投資必勝法,住展雜誌第297期,5月9日,2006
6. 郭奕均,「連鎖便利商店店經理管理才能評鑑指標之研究」,國立中山大
學人力資源管理研究所碩論,2002
7. 台灣省零售市場建築規格,http:// www.taa.org.tw/front/legislation/word檔/M
台灣省零售市場建築規格.doc,2010
8. 莊琇媚,「服務品質與顧客滿意度關係之研究-以姿也髮型連鎖店為
例」,國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩論,2006
9. 許雄傑,「運動用品零售店之氛圍因素對服務品質、顧客滿意與行為意
圖間影響之探討」行銷評論冬季號,第3 卷,第4 期,頁473-496,2006
10. Rust R. T. and Oliver R. L, “Service Quality: Insights and Managerial
Implications from the Frontier, In Service Quality: New Directions in
Theory and Practice”, N.Y. Sage Publications, Inc, 1-19,1994.
11. Dabholkar, P. A., Shepherd, C. D., & Thorpe, D. I., “A Comprehensive Framework
for Service Quality: An Investigation of Critical Conceptual and Measurement
Issues Through a Longitudinal Study. ”Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 139-173,2000.
12. Fornell, C, “A national satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience.”
Journal of Marketing, 1992:56, 6-21,1992.
13.Eguene W. Anderson, Claes Fornell,and Roland T. Rust, “Customer
satisfaction, productivity, and profitability: Differences between goods and
services ”,Journal of Marketing Science,1997/vol,16,2,1997.
14. Firnstahl, T.W., “My Employees Are My Service Guarantees”,Harvard
Business Review, 24, 4-8,1989.
15. Hurley, R. F. and H. Estelami, “Alternative indexes for monitoring customer
perceptions of service quality: A comparative evaluation in a retail
context”,Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(3),p.209-221,1998.
16. Bolton, R. N. and J. H. Drew, “A multistage model of customer assessment
of service quality and value”, Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), pp.375-384,
1991.
17. Kotler..Phillip., “Atmospherics as a marketing tool. ”, Journal of Retailing, 49(4),
48-64,1973.
18. Berman, B., and Evans, J., R., “Retail Management: A Strategic Approach”,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. ,6th Edition,1995.
19. Turley, L.W. and Ronald E. Milliman, “Atmospheric Effects on Shopping
Behavior: A Review of the Experimental Evidence”, Journal of Business
Research, 49(August), 193-211,2000.
20. 陳淑鈴,「零售商店擁擠知覺與購物滿意關係之探討」」,國立中央大學企業
管理研究所碩論,2001。
21. 林思潔,「針對零售擁擠對消費者情緒、調適行為與滿意度之研究」,國立中
山大學企業管理學系研究所碩論,1995。
22. 感性工學(KANSEI Engineering),維基百科wikipedia,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansei_Engineering,2010。
23. 楊壬孝,「積分法則之一比較」國立臺灣師範大學學報第三十一期,1986。
24. 徐昊杲、邱佳樁,技職教育研究教戰手冊-SPSS進階篇,師大書苑,2003。

QR CODE