簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 娜絲卡
Naisamkhand Buyandalai
論文名稱: 考慮降低新品退貨的閉環式供應鏈之研究
A Study of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models With Options to Reduce New Product Returns
指導教授: 陳正綱
Cheng-Kang Chen
口試委員: 洪大為
Ta-Wei Hung
呂志豪
Shih-Hao Lu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 資訊管理系
Department of Information Management
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 78
中文關鍵詞: 閉環式供應鏈新品退貨Stackelberg game降低退貨線上平台
外文關鍵詞: Closed-Loop Supply Chain, New product return, Stackelberg game, Reduce return, Online platform
相關次數: 點閱:372下載:12
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 網絡零售業的快速發展徹底改變了市場,帶來了效率和便利性的提升。然而,也導
    致產品退貨的激增,由於消費者可能對購買的商品不滿意或遇到缺陷。本論文旨在理解新 產品退貨對由單一製造商和單一線上平台構成的分權式模型下供應鏈績效的影響。本論文 開發了四種不同的分權式模型,其中融入了各種努力來減少新產品退貨,而研究這些努力 如何影響供應鏈的整體績效。我們採用 Stackelberg game 來計算各模型閉式解,從而確 定平衡解。得到的平衡解隨後經過數值和對比分析,考慮價格、新產品退貨量、佣金和利 潤等因素。此外,我們生成可視化圖表以幫助理解結果。通過對所有四個模型的全面分析 和比較,我們觀察到,製造商和線上平台共同努力減少新產品退貨的模型可實現最佳的整 體供應鏈績效。
    本研究的結果有助於理解網絡零售環境中新產品退貨與供應鏈績效之間的關係。提 出的去中心化模型和 Stackelberg game 的應用為供應鏈管理中的決策和戰略制定提供了 有價值的見解。


    The rapid development of online retailing has revolutionized the market, bringing increased in efficiency and convenience. However, it has also led to a surge in product returns as consumers may not be satisfied with the purchased items or encounter defects. This thesis focuses on understanding the impact of new product returns on the performance of supply chains in the context of decentralized models comprising a single manufacturer and a single online platform. To address this issue, four different decentralized models are developed, incorporating various efforts to mitigate new product returns. The objective is to examine how these efforts influence the overall performance of the supply chains. The Stackelberg game framework is employed to compute closed form solutions for the models, enabling the determination of equilibrium solutions. The obtained equilibrium solutions are then subjected to numerical and symbolic analysis, considering factors such as price, new product return, commission, and profit. Additionally, visualizations are generated to aid in comprehending the results. Through comprehensive analysis and comparison of all four models, it is observed that the model where the manufacturer and the online platform jointly work to reduce new product returns yields the best overall supply chain performance.
    The findings of this research contribute to the understanding of the dynamics between new product returns and supply chain performance in the online retailing context. The proposed decentralized models and the application of the Stackelberg game provide valuable insights for decision making and strategy formulation in the supply chain management.

    摘要.............................................................................. I Abstract ..................................................................II Acknowledgement ................................................. III Table of Contents ............................................................ IV List of Figures ............................................................ VI List of Tables ....................................................VII Chapter 1. Introduction ........................................ 1 1.1. Research Background ............................................. 1 1.2. Research Motivation & Objective ........................... 3 Chapter 2. Literature Review ............................................ 5 2.1. New product returns....................................................... 5 2.2. Closed-Loop Supply Chain......................................... 7 2.3. Effort to reduce new product returns ................................... 8 Chapter 3. Notation and Assumptions ............................................. 11 3.1. Notation.................................................................. 11 3.2. Model assumptions ....................................... 12 Chapter 4. Models Formulation and Equilibrium Solutions................... 14 4.1. Model B: Basic Model ............................................. 14 4.2. Model E: Basic Model with Sales Service Improvement Effort.................. 19 4.3. Model M: Basic Model with New Product Quality Improvement Effort.......... 25 4.3. Model EM: Basic Model with Both New Product Quality Improvement Effort and Sales Service Improvement Effort ............................................. 31 Chapter 5. Comparative Analysis of the Proposed Models ............. 40 Chapter 6. Conclusion and Further Research ........................... 60 Reference ................................................................ 64

    [1] Akçay, Yalçın, Tamer Boyacı and Dan Zhang (2013). "Selling with money back guarantees: The impact on prices, quantities, and retail profitability." Production and Operations Management 22(4): 777-791.
    [2] Alamdar, S, M Rabbani and J Heydari (2019). "Optimal decision problem in a three- level closed-loop supply chain with risk-averse players under demand uncertainty." Uncertain Supply Chain Management 7(2): 351-368.
    [3] Alamdar, Safoura Famil, Masoud Rabbani and Jafar Heydari (2018). "Pricing, collection, and effort decisions with coordination contracts in a fuzzy, three-level closed-loop supply chain." Expert Systems with Applications 104: 261-276.
    [4] Bhattacharya, R., & Kaur, A. (2015). Allocation of external returns of different quality grades to multiple stages of a closed loop supply chain. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, 692-702.
    [5] Borenich, Andrea, Yanick Dickbauer, Marc Reimann and Gilvan C. Souza (2020). "Should a manufacturer sell refurbished returns on the secondary market to incentivize retailers to reduce consumer returns?" European Journal of Operational Research 282(2): 569-579.
    [6] Chen P , Zhao R, Y an Y , Li X. Promotional pricing and online business model choice in the presence of retail competition. Omega 2020;94:102085.
    [7] Chen, Cheng-Kang, M. Akmalul Ulya and Uki Astika Mancasari (2020). "A Study of Product Quality and Marketing Efforts in Closed-Loop Supply Chains With Remanufacturing." IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 50(12): 4870-4881.
    [8] Chen, Jingxian, Liang Liang and Feng Yang (2015). "Cooperative quality investment in outsourcing." International Journal of Production Economics 162: 174-191.
    [9] Choi, Tsan-Ming, Duan Li and Houmin Yan (2004). "Optimal returns policy for supply chain with e-marketplace." International Journal of Production Economics 88(2): 205-227.
    [10] Debo, L., B. Toktay, L. Van Wassenhove. 2005. Market segmentation and technology
    selection for remanufacturable products. Management Sci. 51 1193–1205.
    [11] Ferguson, M., B. Toktay. 2006. The effect of competition on recovery strategies.
    Production Oper. Management 15(3).
    [12] Ferguson, Mark E, Moritz Fleischmann and Gilvan C Souza (2011). "A profit-maximizing
    approach to disposition decisions for product returns." Decision Sciences 42(3): 773-798.
    [13] Ferguson, Mark, V. Daniel R. Guide and Gilvan C. Souza (2006). "Supply Chain Coordination for False Failure Returns." Manufacturing & Service Operations
    Management 8(4): 376-393.
    [14] Ferrer, G., M. Ketzenberg. 2004. Value of information in remanufacturing complex
    products. IIE Trans. 36 265–277.
    [15] Gao, Juhong, Hongshuai Han, Liting Hou and Haiyan Wang (2016). "Pricing and effort
    decisions in a closed-loop supply chain under different channel power structures." Journal
    of Cleaner Production 112: 2043-2057.
    [16] Gaur, J., Amini, M., & Rao, A. K. (2017). Closed-loop supply chain configuration for new
    and reconditioned products: An integrated optimization model. Omega, 66, 212-223.
    [17] Genc, Talat S. and Pietro De Giovanni (2017). "Trade-in and save: A two-period closed- loop supply chain game with price and technology dependent returns." International
    Journal of Production Economics 183: 514-527.
    [18] Gong, Y., Chen, M., Wang, Z., & Zhan, J. (2021). With or without deposit-refund system for a network platform-led electronic closed-loop supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125356.
    [19] Guide, V. D. R., Jr. 2000. Production planning and control for remanufacturing. J. Oper. Management 18 467–483.
    [20] Gurnani, Haresh and Murat Erkoc (2008). "Supply contracts in manufacturer-retailer interactions with manufacturer quality and retailer effort induced demand." Naval Research Logistics (NRL) 55(3): 200-217.
    [21] Ha AY, Tong S, Wang Y. Channel structures of online retail platforms. Manuf 
Serv Oper Manag 2022;24(3):1547–61.
    [22] He B, Gupta V, Mirchandani P. Online selling through O2O platform or on your own? Strategic implications for local Brick-and-Mortar stores. Omega 2021;103:102424.
    [23] Heese, H., K. Cattani, G. Ferrer, W. Gilland, A. Roth. 2005. Competitive advantage
    through take-back of used products. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 164 143–157.
    [24] Huang, Ximin, Sin-Man Choi, Wai-Ki Ching, Tak-Kuen Siu and Min Huang (2011). "On supply chain coordination for false failure returns: A quantity discount contract approach."
    International Journal of Production Economics 133(2): 634-644.
    [25] Ma, Peng, Haiyan Wang and Jennifer Shang (2013). "Supply chain channel strategies with
    quality and marketing effort-dependent demand." International Journal of Production
    Economics 144(2): 572-581.
    [26] Padmanabhan, V., Png, I.P.L., 1995. Returns policies: make money by making good. Sloan
    Manag. Rev. 65–72. Fall.
    [27] Sane-Zerang, Emad, Jafar Razmi and Ata Allah Taleizadeh (2020). "Coordination in a closed-loop supply chain under asymmetric and symmetric information with sales effort- dependent demand." Journal of Business Economics 90(2): 303-334.
    [28] Savaskan, R. C., Bhattacharya, S., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2004). Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management science, 50(2), 239-252.
    [29] Shulman, J.D., Coughlan, A.T., Savaskan, R.C., 2010. Optimal reverse channel structure
    for customer product returns. Mark. Sci. 29 (6), 1071–1085.
    [30] Souza, G., M. Ketzenberg, V. D. R. Guide, Jr. 2002. Capacitated remanufacturing with
    service level constraints. Production Oper. Management 11 231–248.
    [31] Taleizadeh, Ata A, Mohammad S Moshtagh and Ilkyeong Moon (2017). "Optimal decisions of price, quality, effort level and return policy in a three-level closed-loop supply chain based on different game theory approaches." European Journal of Industrial
    Engineering 11(4): 486-525.
    [32] Taleizadeh, Ata Allah, Mohammad Sadegh Moshtagh and Ilkyeong Moon (2018). "Pricing,
    product quality, and collection optimization in a decentralized closed-loop supply chain with different channel structures: Game theoretical approach." Journal of Cleaner Production 189: 406-431.
    [33] Taylor, Terry A. (2002). "Supply Chain Coordination Under Channel Rebates with Sales Effort Effects." Management Science 48(8): 992-1007.
    [34] Tian L, Vakharia AJ, Tan Y, Xu Y. Marketplace, reseller, or hybrid: Strategic analysis of an emerging e-commerce model. Prod Oper Manag 2018;27(8):1595–610.
    [35] Van der Laan, E., M. Salomon, R. Dekker, L. Van Wassenhove. 1999. Inventory control in hybrid systems with remanufacturing. Management Sci. 45 733–747.
    [36] Wang, L., Chen, J., & Song, H. (2021). Marketplace or reseller? Platform strategy in the presence of customer returns.Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 153, 102452.
    [37] Xiao, Tiaojun, Kuiran Shi and Danqin Yang (2010). "Coordination of a supply chain with consumer return under demand uncertainty." International Journal of Production Economics 124(1): 171-180.
    [38] Xie, Gang, Shouyang Wang and K. K. Lai (2011). "Quality improvement in competing supply chains." International Journal of Production Economics 134(1): 262-270.
    [39] Yan Y, Zhao R, Liu Z. Strategic introduction of the marketplace channel under 
spillovers from online to offline sales. Eur J Oper Res 2018;267(1):65–77.
    [40] Yoo, S. H., Kim, D., & Park, M. S. (2015). Pricing and return policy under various supply contracts in a closed-loop supply chain.International Journal of Production Research, 53(1), 106-126.
    [41] Zennyo Y. Strategic contracting and hybrid use of agency and wholesale contracts in e- commerce platforms. Eur J Oper Res 2020;281(1):231–9.
    [42] Zhang, Z., Xu, H., Chen, K., Zhao, Y., & Liu, Z. (2023). Channel mode selection for an e- platform supply chain in the presence of a secondary marketplace. European Journal of Operational Research, 305(3), 1215-1235.

    QR CODE