簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 高明秀
Minh-Tu Cao
論文名稱: Artificial Intelligence-Based Inference Support Models for Construction Engineering and Management
Artificial Intelligence-Based Inference Support Models for Construction Engineering and Management
指導教授: 鄭明淵
Min-Yuan Cheng
口試委員: 黃榮堯
Rong-yau (Ethan) Huang
王維志
Wei-Chih Wang
楊亦東
I-Tung Yang
柯千禾
Chien-Ho Ko
陳維東
Wei Tong Chen
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 工程學院 - 營建工程系
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering
論文出版年: 2015
畢業學年度: 103
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 132
外文關鍵詞: construction engineering and management, inference support system, fuzzy logic.
相關次數: 點閱:377下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報


Problems in the field of construction management are sophisticated, highly uncertain, and context-dependent. Therefore, using artificial intelligence (AI) to tackle these problems is a promising direction for research. The present research integrates Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS), Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN), Artificial Bee Colony (ABC), and Fuzzy Logic (FL) to develop three novel inference models. The first model, the Evolutionary Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (EMARS), incorporates MARS and ABC. The EMARS resolves regression problems using input values for the underlying function mapping response and the various factors of influence that are provided by civil engineers. The second model, the Self-adaptive Structure Radial Basis Function Inference Model (SSRIM), fuses MARS, RBFNN, and ABC. The SSRIM is an efficient model for addressing inference tasks that have many un-assessed potential factors of influence. After the MARS removes the redundant (neutral) factors from the set of input variables, the ABC-optimized RBFNN uses the remaining input variables to execute the supervised learning task. Finally, the Intelligent Fuzzy Radial Basis Function Neural Network Inference Model (IFRIM), hybridizes RBFNN, FL, and ABC. In the IFRIM, FL handles vague input information, RBFNN handles the fuzzy input-output mapping relationships, and the ABC search engine employs optimization to identify the most suitable tuning parameters for RBFNN and FL based on minimal error estimation. Experimental results obtained from the applications of these newly established AI models demonstrate that these models may significantly enhance the ability of decision makers to resolve problems in the field of construction engineering and management.

TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS vi LIST OF FIGURES x LIST OF TABLES xi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research Motivation 1 1.2 Research Objectives 5 1.3 Research Scope 6 1.3.1 Boundary Identification 6 1.3.2 Research Assumption and Hypotheses 7 1.4 Research Organization 7 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 12 2.1 Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) 12 2.2 Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN) 14 2.3 Fuzzy Logic (FL) 16 2.4 Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) 19 CHAPTER 3. MODEL CONSTRUCTION 22 3.1 Evolutionary Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (EMARS) 22 3.2 Self-adaptive Structure Radial Basis Function Inference Model (SSRIM) 25 3.3 Intelligent Fuzzy Radial Basis Function Neural Network (IFRIM) 27 3.4 Models’ Limitations 32 3.5 Potential Application Areas 32 CHAPTER 4. CASE STUDY AND MODEL VALITDATON 33 4.1 Evaluation Performance Methods 33 4.2 Case 1 - Strength of Rubberized Concrete 34 4.2.1 Problem statement 34 4.2.2 Data collection and process 37 4.2.3 System validation 39 4.3 Case 2 - Shear Strength in Reinforced-Concrete Deep Beams 43 4.3.1 Problem statement 43 4.3.2 Data collection and process 45 4.3.3 System validation 49 4.4 Case 3 - Building Energy Performance 56 4.4.1 Problem statement 56 4.4.2 Data collection and process 58 4.4.3 System validation 61 4.5 Case 4 - Uplift Capacity of Suction Caissons 70 4.5.1 Problem statement 70 4.5.2 Data collection and process 72 4.5.3 System validation 73 4.6 Case 5 - Equilibrium Scour Depth at Bridge Piers 82 4.6.1 Problem statement 82 4.6.2 Data collection and process 84 4.6.3 System validation 86 4.7 Case 6 - Taiwan Construction Cost Index 91 4.7.1 Problem statement 91 4.7.2 Data collection and process 93 4.7.3 System validation 95 CHAPTER 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 105 5.1 Conclusions 105 5.2 Research Contributions 108 5.3 Future Research Direction and Recommendations 109 REFERENCES 110

REFERENCES
1. Sears, K., G. Sears, and R. Clough, Construction Project Management: A Practical Guide to Field Construction Management (5th Edition). John Wiley and Son, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2008.
2. Yu, W.-d. and Y.-c. Liu, Hybridization of CBR and numeric soft computing techniques for mining of scarce construction databases. Automation in Construction, 2006. 15(1): p. 33-46.
3. Dainty, A., M. Cheng, and D. Moore, Competency-Based Model for Predicting Construction Project Managers’ Performance. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2005. 21(1): p. 2-9.
4. Cheng, M.-Y., H.-C. Tsai, and E. Sudjono, Evolutionary fuzzy hybrid neural network for dynamic project success assessment in construction industry. Automation in Construction, 2012. 21(0): p. 46-51.
5. Son, H., C. Kim, and C. Kim, Hybrid principal component analysis and support vector machine model for predicting the cost performance of commercial building projects using pre-project planning variables. Automation in Construction, 2012. 27(0): p. 60-66.
6. Mubarak, S., Construction Project Scheduling and Control. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2010.
7. Anumba, C.J., C.O. Egbu, and P.M. Carrillo, Knowledge Management in Construction. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2005.
8. Cheng, M.-Y., et al., Evolutionary Fuzzy Neural Inference System for Decision Making in Geotechnical Engineering. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2008. 22(4): p. 272-280.
9. Roy, Evolutionary Fuzzy Decision Model For Construction Management Using Weighted Support Vector Machine. PhD Dissertation, Taiwan Tech, 2010.
10. Vercellis, C., Business Intelligence Data Mining and Optimization for Decision Making. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2009.
11. Kamruzzaman, J., R.K. Begg, and R.A. Sarker, Artificial Neural Networks in Finance and Manufacturing. Idea Group Publishing, 2006.
12. Russell, S.J. and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence A Modern Approach, 2nd Edition. Prentice Hall, Person Education, Inc, 2003.
13. Cheng, M.-Y., H.-C. Tsai, and C.-L. Liu, Artificial intelligence approaches to achieve strategic control over project cash flows. Automation in Construction 18 (2009) 386–393, 2009.
14. Cheng, M.-Y. and M.-T. Cao, Hybrid intelligent inference model for enhancing prediction accuracy of scour depth around bridge piers. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2014: p. 1-12.
15. Cheng, M.-Y., M.-T. Cao, and D.-H. Tran, A hybrid fuzzy inference model based on RBFNN and artificial bee colony for predicting the uplift capacity of suction caissons. Automation in Construction, 2014. 41(0): p. 60-69.
16. Cheng, M.-Y. and M.-T. Cao, Evolutionary multivariate adaptive regression splines for estimating shear strength in reinforced-concrete deep beams. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2014. 28(0): p. 86-96.
17. Cheng, M.-Y. and M.-T. Cao, Accurately predicting building energy performance using evolutionary multivariate adaptive regression splines. Applied Soft Computing, 2014. 22(0): p. 178-188.
18. An, S.-H., et al., Application of Support Vector Machines in Assessing Conceptual Cost Estimates. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2007. 21(4): p. 259-264.
19. Cheng, M.-Y., et al., A novel time-depended evolutionary fuzzy SVM inference model for estimating construction project at completion. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2011. 25(4): p. 744–752.
20. Leu, S.-S. and H.-C. Lo, Neural-network-based regression model of ground surface settlement induced by deep excavation. Automation in Construction, 2004. 13(3): p. 279-289.
21. Zeng, J., M. An, and N.J. Smith, Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment. International Journal of Project Management, 2007. 25(6): p. 589-600.
22. Chou, J.-S., et al., Visualized EVM system for assessing project performance. Automation in Construction, 2010. 19(5): p. 596-607.
23. Cheng, M.-Y. and N.-D. Hoang, Risk Score Inference for Bridge Maintenance Project Using Evolutionary Fuzzy Least Squares Support Vector Machine. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000275, 2013.
24. Pan, N.-F., et al., Pavement performance prediction through fuzzy regression. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011. 38(8): p. 10010-10017.
25. Kawamura, K. and A. Miyamoto, Condition state evaluation of existing reinforced concrete bridges using neuro-fuzzy hybrid system. Comput. Struct., 2003. 81(18-19): p. 1931-1940.
26. Cheng, M.-Y. and L.-C. Lien, A hybrid AI-based particle bee algorithm for facility layout optimization. Engineering with Computers, 2011: p. 1-13.
27. Ko, C.-H. and M.-Y. Cheng, Hybrid use of AI techniques in developing construction management tools. Automation in Construction, 2003. 12(3): p. 271-281.
28. Friedman, J.H., Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines. The Annals of Statistics, 1991. 19(1): p. 1-67.
29. Lu, C.-J., T.-S. Lee, and C.-M. Lian, Sales forecasting for computer wholesalers: A comparison of multivariate adaptive regression splines and artificial neural networks. Decision Support Systems, 2012. 54(1): p. 584-596.
30. García Nieto, P.J., et al., Using multivariate adaptive regression splines and multilayer perceptron networks to evaluate paper manufactured using Eucalyptus globulus. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2012. 219(2): p. 755-763.
31. Vidoli, F., Evaluating the water sector in Italy through a two stage method using the conditional robust nonparametric frontier and multivariate adaptive regression splines. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011. 212(3): p. 583-595.
32. Chang, L.-Y., Analysis of bilateral air passenger flows: A non-parametric multivariate adaptive regression spline approach. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2014. 34(0): p. 123-130.
33. Zhou, Y. and H. Leung, Predicting object-oriented software maintainability using multivariate adaptive regression splines. Journal of Systems and Software, 2007. 80(8): p. 1349-1361.
34. Chou, S.-M., et al., Mining the breast cancer pattern using artificial neural networks and multivariate adaptive regression splines. Expert Systems with Applications, 2004. 27(1): p. 133-142.
35. Lee, T.-S. and I.F. Chen, A two-stage hybrid credit scoring model using artificial neural networks and multivariate adaptive regression splines. Expert Systems with Applications, 2005. 28(4): p. 743-752.
36. Broomhead, D.S. and D. Lowe, Multivariable Functional Interpolation and Adaptive Networks. Complex Systems 2, 1988: p. 321-355.
37. Jain, T., S.N. Singh, and S.C. Srivastava, Fast static available transfer capability determination using radial basis function neural network. Applied Soft Computing, 2011. 11(2): p. 2756-2764.
38. Yang, Y.-K., et al., A novel self-constructing Radial Basis Function Neural-Fuzzy System. Applied Soft Computing, 2013. 13(5): p. 2390-2404.
39. Sudheer, K. and S. Jain, Radial Basis Function Neural Network for Modeling Rating Curves. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2003. 8(3): p. 161-164.
40. Mateo, F., et al., Multilayer perceptron neural networks and radial-basis function networks as tools to forecast accumulation of deoxynivalenol in barley seeds contaminated with Fusarium culmorum. Food Control, 2011. 22(1): p. 88-95.
41. Singh, A., et al., Comparison of Artificial Neural Network Models for Sediment Yield Prediction at Single Gauging Station of Watershed in Eastern India. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2013. 18(1): p. 115-120.
42. Hasani, M. and F. Emami, Evaluation of feed-forward back propagation and radial basis function neural networks in simultaneous kinetic spectrophotometric determination of nitroaniline isomers. Talanta, 2008. 75(1): p. 116-126.
43. Cheng, M.-Y., et al., A novel time-depended evolutionary fuzzy SVM inference model for estimating construction project at completion. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2012. 25(4): p. 744-752.
44. Jang, J.-S.R., C.-T.Sun, and E. Mizutani, Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing: a computational approach to learning and machine intelligence Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1997.
45. Khemchandani, R., Jayadeva, and S. Chandra, Regularized least squares fuzzy support vector regression for financial time series forecasting. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009. 36(1): p. 132-138.
46. Ko, C.-H., M.-Y. Cheng, and T.-K. Wu, Evaluating sub-contractors performance using EFNIM. Autom.Constr., 2007. 16(4): p. 525-530.
47. Cheng, M.-Y., H.-C. Tsai, and E. Sudjono, Evaluating subcontractor performance using evolutionary fuzzy hybrid neural network. International Journal of Project Management, 2011. 29(3): p. 349-356.
48. Li, J.-Q., Q.-K. Pan, and K.-Z. Gao, Pareto-based discrete artificial bee colony algorithm for multi-objective flexible job shop scheduling problems. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2011. 55(9-12): p. 1159-1169.
49. Li, H., K. Liu, and X. Li, A Comparative Study of Artificial Bee Colony, Bees Algorithms and Differential Evolution on Numerical Benchmark Problems, in Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Systems, Z. Cai, et al., Editors. 2010, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 198-207.
50. Karaboga, D. and B. Akay, A comparative study of Artificial Bee Colony algorithm. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2009. 214(1): p. 108-132.
51. Hong, W.-C., Electric load forecasting by seasonal recurrent SVR (support vector regression) with chaotic artificial bee colony algorithm. Energy, 2011. 36(9): p. 5568-5578.
52. Samui, P., Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline (Mars) for Prediction of Elastic Modulus of Jointed Rock Mass. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2012: p. 1-5.
53. Sekulic, S. and B.R. Kowalski, MARS: A tutorial. Journal of Chemometrics, 1992. 6(4): p. 199-216.
54. Sánchez-Lasheras, F., et al., A hybrid device for the solution of sampling bias problems in the forecasting of firms’ bankruptcy. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012. 39(8): p. 7512-7523.
55. Bateni, S.M., S.M. Borghei, and D.S. Jeng, Neural network and neuro-fuzzy assessments for scour depth around bridge piers. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2007. 20(3): p. 401-414.
56. Han, H., Q. Chen, and J. Qiao, Research on an online self-organizing radial basis function neural network. Neural Computing and Applications, 2010. 19(5): p. 667-676.
57. Bojadziev, G. and M. Bojadziev, Advances in Fuzzy Systems Applications and Theory, 2nd Edition. Advances in Fuzzy Systems - Applications and Theory - Vol. 23, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, 2007.
58. Ross, T.J., Fuzzy Logic With Engineering Application. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2004.
59. Kandel, A., Fuzzy Mathematic Techniques with Applications. Adison Wesley, 1986.
60. Eyke, H., Fuzzy sets in machine learning and data mining. Appl. Soft. Comput., 2011. 11(2): p. 1493-1505.
61. Oliveira, J.V.d. and W. Pedrycz, Advances in Fuzzy Clustering and Its Applications. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2007.
62. Hanss, M., Applied Fuzzy Arithmetic - An Introduction with Engineering Applications. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2005.
63. Alavala, C.R., Fuzzy Logic and Neural Networks - Basic Concepts and Applications. New Age International Publishers, 2008.
64. Mamdani, E.H. and S. Assilian, An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int.J.Man-Mach.Stud., 7(1), 1-13, 1975.
65. Takagi, T. and M. Sugeno, Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernetics ;15:116–32, 1985.
66. Pasino, K.M. and S. Yurkovich, Fuzzy Control. Adison Wesley, 1998.
67. Sivanandam, S.N., S. Sumathi, and S.N. Deepa, Introduction to Fuzzy Logic using MatLab. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.
68. Li, K., H. Su, and J. Chu, Forecasting building energy consumption using neural networks and hybrid neuro-fuzzy system: A comparative study. Energy and Buildings, 2011. 43(10): p. 2893-2899.
69. Guo, J. and H.G. Shen, Modeling solar-driven ejector refrigeration system offering air conditioning for office buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2009. 41(2): p. 175-181.
70. Elhag, T. and Y. Wang, Risk Assessment for Bridge Maintenance Projects: Neural Networks versus Regression Techniques. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2007. 21(6): p. 402-409.
71. Zounemat-Kermani, M., et al., Estimation of current-induced scour depth around pile groups using neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Applied Soft Computing, 2009. 9(2): p. 746-755.
72. Bishop, C.M., Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics). 2006: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
73. Gesoğlu, M., et al., Modeling the mechanical properties of rubberized concretes by neural network and genetic programming. Materials and Structures, 2010. 43(1-2): p. 31-45.
74. Son, K.S., I. Hajirasouliha, and K. Pilakoutas, Strength and deformability of waste tyre rubber-filled reinforced concrete columns. Construction and Building Materials, 2011. 25(1): p. 218-226.
75. Zheng, L., X. Sharon Huo, and Y. Yuan, Experimental investigation on dynamic properties of rubberized concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2008. 22(5): p. 939-947.
76. Topçu, İ.B. and M. Sarıdemir, Prediction of rubberized concrete properties using artificial neural network and fuzzy logic. Construction and Building Materials, 2008. 22(4): p. 532-540.
77. Khaloo, A.R., M. Dehestani, and P. Rahmatabadi, Mechanical properties of concrete containing a high volume of tire–rubber particles. Waste Management, 2008. 28(12): p. 2472-2482.
78. Topçu, l.B. and N. Avcular, Analysis of rubberized concrete as a composite material. Cement and Concrete Research, 1997. 27(8): p. 1135-1139.
79. Khatib, Z. and F. Bayomy, Rubberized Portland Cement Concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 1999. 11(3): p. 206-213.
80. Güneyisi, E., M. Gesoğlu, and T. Özturan, Properties of rubberized concretes containing silica fume. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004. 34(12): p. 2309-2317.
81. Bentur, A. and M.D. Cohen, Effect of Condensed Silica Fume on the Microstructure of the Interfacial Zone in Portland Cement Mortars. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1987. 70(10): p. 738-743.
82. Yeh, I.C., Modeling of strength of high-performance concrete using artificial neural networks. Cement and Concrete Research, 1998. 28(12): p. 1797-1808.
83. Eldin, N.N. and A.B. Senouci, Measurement and prediction of the strength of rubberized concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 1994. 16(4): p. 287-298.
84. Abdollahzadeh, A., R. Masoudnia, and S. Aghababaei, Predict strength of rubberized concrete using atrificial neural network. W. Trans. on Comp., 2011. 10(2): p. 31-40.
85. Samarasinghe, S., Neural Networks for Applied Sciences and Engineering: From Fundamentals to Complex Pattern Recognition. 2006: Auerbach Publications.
86. Kiranyaz, S., et al., Evolutionary artificial neural networks by multi-dimensional particle swarm optimization. Neural Networks, 2009. 22(10): p. 1448-1462.
87. Davidson, J.W., D.A. Savic, and G.A. Walters, Symbolic and numerical regression: experiments and applications. Information Sciences, 2003. 150(1–2): p. 95-117.
88. Mansour, M.Y., et al., Predicting the shear strength of reinforced concrete beams using artificial neural networks. Engineering Structures, 2004. 26(6): p. 781-799.
89. Amani, J. and R. Moeini, Prediction of shear strength of reinforced concrete beams using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and artificial neural network. Scientia Iranica, 2012. 19(2): p. 242-248.
90. ACI-318, A.C.I.C., 318-08: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. 2008: American Concrete Institute.
91. CSA, C.S.A., Design of concrete structures: Structures (design) - a national standard of Canada. CAN-A23.3-94. 1994, Toronto.
92. CIRIA-Guide2, C.I.R.a.I.A., CIRIA Guide 2: The Design of Deep Beams in Reinforced Concrete. 1977, CIRIA: Ove Arup and Partners. p. 131.
93. Pal, M. and S. Deswal, Support vector regression based shear strength modelling of deep beams. Computers & Structures, 2011. 89(13–14): p. 1430-1439.
94. Tan, K.H., L.W. Weng, and S. Teng, A Strut-And-Tie Model for Deep Beams Subjected To Combined Top-And-Bottom Loading. Structural Engineer Journal, 1997. 75(13): p. 215-225.
95. Teng, S., F.K. Kong, and S.P. Poh Shear Strength Of Reinforced And Prestressed Concrete Deep Beams. Part 1: Current Design Methods And A Proposed Equation. Proceedings of the ICE - Structures and Buildings, 1998. 128, 112-123.
96. Appa, R.G. and R. Sundaresan, Evaluation of size effect on shear strength of reinforced concrete deep beams using refined strut-and-tie model. Sadhana, 2012. 37(1): p. 89-105.
97. Tsai, H.-C., Weighted operation structures to program strengths of concrete-typed specimens using genetic algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011. 38(1): p. 161-168.
98. Goh, A.T.C., Prediction of Ultimate Shear Strength of Deep Beams Using Neural Networks. ACI Structural Journal, 1995. 92(1): p. 28-32.
99. Sanad, A. and M. Saka, Prediction of Ultimate Shear Strength of Reinforced-Concrete Deep Beams Using Neural Networks. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2001. 127(7): p. 818-828.
100. ACI-318, A.C.I.C., Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318M-95) and Commentary, ACI 318RM-95. 1995: American Concrete Institute.
101. Siao, W.B., Strut-and-Tie Model for Shear Behavior in Deep Beams and Pile Caps Failing in Diagonal Splitting. ACI Structural Journal, 1993. 90(4): p. 356-363.
102. Mau, S.T. and T.S.T.C. Hsu, Formula for the Shear Strength of Deep Beams. ACI Structural Journal, 1989. 86(5): p. 516-523.
103. Yang, K.-H., A.F. Ashour, and J.-K. Song, Shear Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Beams Using Neural Network. international journal of Concrete Structures and Materirals, 2007. 1: p. 63-73.
104. Ashour, A.F., L.F. Alvarez, and V.V. Toropov, Empirical modelling of shear strength of RC deep beams by genetic programming. Computers & Structures, 2003. 81(5): p. 331-338.
105. ACI-318, A.C.I.C., 318-05/318R-05: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. 2004, American Concrete Institute p. 432.
106. Kong, F.K., P.J. Robins, and D.F. Cole, Web Reinforcement Effects on Deep Beams. ACI Journal Proceedings, 1970. 67(12): p. 1010-1018.
107. Smith, K.N. and A.S. Vantsiotis, Shear Strength of Deep Beams. ACI Journal Proceedings, 1982. 79(3): p. 201-213.
108. Tan, K.-H., et al., High-Strength Concrete Deep Beams with Effective Span and Shear Span Variations. ACI Structural Journal, 1995. 92(4): p. 395-405.
109. Hsu, C.W., C.C. Chang, and C.J. Lin, A practical guide to support vector classification. 2003.
110. ACI-318, A.C.I.C., 318-11: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. 2011: American Concrete Institute. 509.
111. CEB-FIP, C.E.d.B., CEB-FIP Model Code 1990: Design Code Comite Euro-International Du Buton. 1993: Thomas Telford.
112. Tang, C. and K. Tan, Interactive Mechanical Model for Shear Strength of Deep Beams. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004. 130(10): p. 1534-1544.
113. Li, Z. and G. Huang, Re-evaluation of building cooling load prediction models for use in humid subtropical area. Energy and Buildings, 2013. 62(0): p. 442-449.
114. Council, E.P.a., Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings, in Official Journal of the European Union. 2010. p. 23.
115. Pessenlehner, W. and A. Mahdavi, Building Morphology, Transparence, and Energy Performance, in Eighth International IBPSA Conference. 2003: Eindhoven, Netherlands. p. 1025-1032.
116. Wan, K.K.W., et al., Future trends of building heating and cooling loads and energy consumption in different climates. Building and Environment, 2011. 46(1): p. 223-234.
117. Schiavon, S., et al., Influence of raised floor on zone design cooling load in commercial buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2010. 42(8): p. 1182-1191.
118. Parasonis, J., et al., Architectural Solutions to Increase the Energy Efficiency of Buildings. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2012. 18(1): p. 71-80.
119. Yu, Z., et al., A decision tree method for building energy demand modeling. Energy and Buildings, 2010. 42(10): p. 1637-1646.
120. Tsanas, A. and A. Xifara, Accurate quantitative estimation of energy performance of residential buildings using statistical machine learning tools. Energy and Buildings, 2012. 49(0): p. 560-567.
121. Ben-Nakhi, A.E. and M.A. Mahmoud, Cooling load prediction for buildings using general regression neural networks. Energy Conversion and Management, 2004. 45(13–14): p. 2127-2141.
122. Ekici, B.B. and U.T. Aksoy, Prediction of building energy consumption by using artificial neural networks. Advances in Engineering Software, 2009. 40(5): p. 356-362.
123. Olofsson, T., S. Andersson, and R. Östin, A method for predicting the annual building heating demand based on limited performance data. Energy and Buildings, 1998. 28(1): p. 101-108.
124. Hou, Z., et al., Cooling-load prediction by the combination of rough set theory and an artificial neural-network based on data-fusion technique. Applied Energy, 2006. 83(9): p. 1033-1046.
125. Dong, B., C. Cao, and S.E. Lee, Applying support vector machines to predict building energy consumption in tropical region. Energy and Buildings, 2005. 37(5): p. 545-553.
126. Li, Q., et al., Applying support vector machine to predict hourly cooling load in the building. Applied Energy, 2009. 86(10): p. 2249-2256.
127. Li, X., et al. A Novel Hybrid Approach of KPCA and SVM for Building Cooling Load Prediction. in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2010. WKDD '10. Third International Conference on. 2010.
128. Lv, J., et al. Applying principal component analysis and weighted support vector machine in building cooling load forecasting. in Computer and Communication Technologies in Agriculture Engineering (CCTAE), 2010 International Conference On. 2010.
129. Li, Q., et al., Predicting hourly cooling load in the building: A comparison of support vector machine and different artificial neural networks. Energy Conversion and Management, 2009. 50(1): p. 90-96.
130. Yang, Z.-Q., X.-H. Xiao, and H.-p. Gao. An Improved DM Algorithm Based on Rough Set Theory. in Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2007. WiCom 2007. International Conference on. 2007.
131. Matlab-2012a, MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release 2012a. The MathWorks, Inc.: Natick, Massachusetts, United States.
132. Orenstein, T., Z. Kohavi, and I. Pomeranz, An optimal algorithm for cycle breaking in directed graphs. Journal of Electronic Testing, 1995. 7(1-2): p. 71-81.
133. Bostancioğlu, E., Effect of building shape on a residential building's construction, energy and life cycle costs. Architectural Science Review, 2010. 53(4): p. 441-467.
134. Parasonis, J., A. Keizikas, and D. Kalibatiene, The relationship between the shape of a building and its energy performance. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 2012. 8(4): p. 246-256.
135. Kusiak, A., M. Li, and Z. Zhang, A data-driven approach for steam load prediction in buildings. Applied Energy, 2010. 87(3): p. 925-933.
136. Garcia Nieto, P.J., et al., Study of cyanotoxins presence from experimental cyanobacteria concentrations using a new data mining methodology based on multivariate adaptive regression splines in Trasona reservoir (Northern Spain). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011. 195(0): p. 414-421.
137. García Nieto, P.J., et al., A new improved study of cyanotoxins presence from experimental cyanobacteria concentrations in the Trasona reservoir (Northern Spain) using the MARS technique. Science of The Total Environment, 2012. 430(0): p. 88-92.
138. Alonso Fernández, J.R., et al., Forecasting the cyanotoxins presence in fresh waters: A new model based on genetic algorithms combined with the MARS technique. Ecological Engineering, 2013. 53(0): p. 68-78.
139. Modeler, I., IBM SPSS Clementine 12.0 [Computer software] and Algorithm Guide. 2010: IBM, Chicago, USA.
140. Senpere, D. and G.A. Auvergne, Suction Anchor Piles - A Proven Alternative to Driving or Drilling, in Offshore Technology Conference. 1982, Houston, Texas: Houston, Texas. p. 12.
141. Clarence J. Ehlers, Alan G Young, and J.-h. Chen, Technology Assessment of Deepwater Anchors, in Offshore Technology Conference. 2004, Offshore Technology Conference: Houston, Texas. p. 17.
142. Chen, W. and M. Randolph, Uplift Capacity of Suction Caissons under Sustained and Cyclic Loading in Soft Clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007. 133(11): p. 1352-1363.
143. Chakrabarti, S., Handbook of Offshore Engineering (2-volume set). 2005: Elsevier Science.
144. Andersen, K.A., et al., Suction Caissons for Deepwater Applications. Intern. Symp. on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics (ISFOG), Perth 2005.
145. Alavi, A.H., et al., Genetic-based modeling of uplift capacity of suction caissons. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011. 38(10): p. 12608-12618.
146. Gandomi, A., A. Alavi, and G. Yun, Formulation of uplift capacity of suction caissons using multi expression programming. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2011. 15(2): p. 363-373.
147. E. C. Clukey, H. Banon, and F. H. Kulhawy, Reliability Assessment of Deepwater Suction Caissons, in Offshore Technology Conference. 2000, Offshore Technology Conference: Houston, Texas. p. 9.
148. Randolph, M. and M.R.S. Gourvenec, Offshore Geotechnical Engineering. 2011: Taylor & Francis.
149. Hogervorst, J.R. Field Trials with Large Diameter Suction Piles. in Offshore Technology Conference. 1980. Hauston, Texas, USA: Offshore Technology Conference.
150. T. I. Tjelta, Geotechnical Experience from the Installation of the Europipe Jacket with Bucket Foundations, in Offshore Technology Conference. 1995, Offshore Technology Conference: Houston, Texas. p. 12.
151. Rao, S.N., R. Ravi, and B.S. Prasad, Pullout behavior of suction anchors in soft marine clays. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 1997. 15(2): p. 95-114.
152. Deng, W. and J.P. Carter, A Theoretical Study of the Vertical Uplift Capacity of Suction Caissons. The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, 2002. 12(2): p. 9.
153. Zdravkovic, L., D.M. Potts, and R.J. Jardine A parametric study of the pull-out capacity of bucket foundations in soft clay. Géotechnique, 2001. 51, 55-67.
154. Sukumaran, B., et al., Efficient finite element techniques for limit analysis of suction caissons under lateral loads. Computers and Geotechnics, 1999. 24(2): p. 89-107.
155. Pai, G.A.V., Prediction of uplift capacity of suction caissons using a neuro-genetic network. Engineering with Computers, 2005. 21(2): p. 129-139.
156. Rahman, M.S., et al., A neural network model for the uplift capacity of suction caissons. Computers and Geotechnics, 2001. 28(4): p. 269-287.
157. Deng, W. and J.P. Carter, Vertical Pullout Behavior of Suction Caissons. 1999, Center for Geotechnical Research, The University of Sydney.
158. Samui, P., S. Das, and D. Kim, Uplift capacity of suction caisson in clay using multivariate adaptive regression spline. Ocean Engineering, 2011. 38(17–18): p. 2123-2127.
159. Melville, B. and A. Sutherland, Design Method for Local Scour at Bridge Piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1988. 114(10): p. 1210-1226.
160. Chiew, Y., Scour Protection at Bridge Piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1992. 118(9): p. 1260-1269.
161. Kattell, J. and M. Eriksson, Bridge scour evaluation: screening, analysis, & countermeasures. 1998, USDA Forest Service, San Dimas Technology and Development Center: Department of Agriculture, US.
162. Shirole, A.M. and R.C. Holt, Planning for a Comprehensive Bridge Safety Assurance Program, in Transportation Research Record. 1991, Transportation Research Board: Denver, Colorado, USA. p. 39-50.
163. Laursen, E.M. and A. Toch, Scour Around Bridge Piers and Abutments. 1956: Iowa Highway Research Board.
164. Shen, H.W., V.R. Schneider, and S. Karaki, Local scour around bridge piers. ASCI, Jounal of the Hydraulics Division, 1969. 95: p. 1919-1940.
165. Breusers, H.N.C., G. Nicollet, and H.W. Shen, Local Scour Around Cylindrical Piers. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1977. 15(3): p. 211-252.
166. Richardson, E.V., et al., Evaluating scour at bridges. 2nd ed. Hydraulic engineering circular ; no. 18. 1993: Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation, McLean, VA. 234.
167. Van Wilson, K., M.D.o. Transportation, and G. Survey, Scour at selected bridge sites in Mississippi. 1995: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey.
168. Melville, B. and Y. Chiew, Time Scale for Local Scour at Bridge Piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1999. 125(1): p. 59-65.
169. Mueller, D.S. and C.R. Wagner, Field Observations and Evaluations of Streambed Scour at Bridges. 2005, U.S. Department of Transportation. p. 134.
170. Froehlich, D., C., Analysis of onsite measurements of scour at piers, in Hydraulic Engineering: Proceedings of the 1988 National Conference on Hydraulic Engineering. 1988, Publ by ASCE: Colorado Springs, CO, USA. p. 6.
171. Najafzadeh, M., G.-A. Barani, and H.M. Azamathulla, GMDH to predict scour depth around a pier in cohesive soils. Applied Ocean Research, 2013. 40(0): p. 35-41.
172. Lagasse, P.F., et al., Effects of debris on bridge pier scour, in National Cooperative Highway Research Program. 2010, Transportation Research Board. p. 115.
173. Pal, M., N.K. Singh, and N.K. Tiwari, M5 model tree for pier scour prediction using field dataset. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2012. 16(6): p. 1079-1084.
174. Pal, M., N.K. Singh, and N.K. Tiwari, Support vector regression based modeling of pier scour using field data. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2011. 24(5): p. 911-916.
175. Hwang, S., Time Series Models for Forecasting Construction Costs Using Time Series Indexes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2011. 137(9): p. 656-662.
176. Cheng, M.-Y., N.-D. Hoang, and Y.-W. Wu, Hybrid intelligence approach based on LS-SVM and Differential Evolution for construction cost index estimation: A Taiwan case study. Automation in Construction, 2013. 35(0): p. 306-313.
177. Ervin, E., How to protect profit as material prices rise. Puget Sound Business Journal, 2007.
178. Shahandashti, S. and B. Ashuri, Forecasting Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index Using Multivariate Time Series Models. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2013. 139(9): p. 1237-1243.
179. Xu, J. and S. Moon, Stochastic Forecast of Construction Cost Index Using a Cointegrated Vector Autoregression Model. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2013. 29(1): p. 10-18.
180. Ashuri, B. and J. Lu, Time Series Analysis of ENR Construction Cost Index. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2010. 136(11): p. 1227-1237.
181. Ashuri, B., S. Shahandashti, and J. Lu, Is the Information Available from Historical Time Series Data on Economic, Energy, and Construction Market Variables Useful to Explain Variations in ENR Construction Cost Index?, in Construction Research Congress 2012. p. 457-464.
182. Williams, T., Predicting Changes in Construction Cost Indexes Using Neural Networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1994. 120(2): p. 306-320.
183. Zhang, Y.Y., Forecasting the trend of construction cost indices for Taiwan employing support vector machine, in Department and Graduate Institute of Constrction Engineering. 2007, Chao Yang University of Technology: Taiwan. p. 86.
184. Thomas Ng, S., et al., Prediction of tender price index directional changes. Construction Management and Economics, 2000. 18(7): p. 843-852.
185. Akintoye, A., P. Bowen, and C. Hardcastle, Macro-economic leading indicators of construction contract prices. Construction Management and Economics, 1998. 16(2): p. 159-175.
186. Box, G.E.P. and G.M. Jenkins, Time series analysis: forecasting and control. 1976: Holden-Day.
187. Hua, G.B. and T.H. Pin, Forecasting construction industry demand, price and productivity in Singapore: the Box–Jenkins approach. Construction Management and Economics, 2000. 18(5): p. 607-618.
188. Hwang, S., Dynamic Regression Models for Prediction of Construction Costs. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2009. 135(5): p. 360-367.

QR CODE