簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳沅竹
Yuan-chu Chen
論文名稱: 股票與債券間之動態資產配置-BEYR之應用
Dynamic asset allocation between stocks and bonds using the Bond-Equity Yield Ratio
指導教授: 黃彥聖
Yan-Sheng Huang
口試委員: 劉代洋
Dai-Yang Liu
張琬喩
Wan-Yu Chang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 68
中文關鍵詞: 動態配置灰預測擇時指標
外文關鍵詞: Bond-Equity Yield Ratio
相關次數: 點閱:292下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

股票與債券之間的關係非常密切,對資產配置亦相當重要。因此,本研究擬將股票與債券結合,運用股債收益比(Bond-Equity Yield Ratio; BEYR)做為動態配置股票及債券短期調整的指標。研究期間擷取自1994年1月至2005年3月,共135筆月資料。有別於過去研究多半使用樣本內預測,本文將樣本區分為樣本內與樣本外資料,先以ARMA(1,1)及GM(1,1)對樣本內資料進行估計,利用滾動式預測方法,求出下一期預測值,建構BEYR之樣本外預測模型。
利用兩預測模型,結合天真策略,本文採用10種交易策略研判股票與債券之動態調整時點,即對股票及債券之一種擇時策略。實證結果顯示,在10種交易策略中,以短期平均(實際值前12期平均)及固定值為1做為門檻值形成的交易策略,無論在ARMA(1,1)、GM(1,1)或是天真策略的預測模型下,皆能為投資人帶來比買進持有策略更高的報酬。
此外,為觀察結合股票與債券資訊的股債收益比,相較於純粹僅使用股價資訊之股價指數盈餘收益率之優劣,本研究亦採用後者,並使用相同的研究方法重新計算各交易策略下動態配置之損益,研究結果發現,以股價指數盈餘收益率做為動態配置股票與債券投資時點指標並不能為投資人帶來較高的報酬,反而會有虧損。
經由實證分析,本文發現BEYR在台灣資本市場中的確是股票與債券動態配置上的良好擇時指標,透過BEYR及各種交易策略之結合,可提供給投資人判斷買賣股票及債券之適當時機。


The relationship between stocks and bonds is close and important for asset allocation. In order to allocate capital between equities and bonds dynamically on a short-term basis, this research tries to use the information of stocks and bonds and put forward Bond-Equity Yield Ratio (BEYR) as a criterion.

Most previous studies only use in-sample data to observe return predictability. In this paper, we employ an alternative approach by separating data into in-sample and out-of-sample data. We use monthly data from January in 1994 to March in 2005 and adopt ARMA Model and Grey Theory to model and forecast the BEYR. To judge the investment timing of stocks and bonds, we utilize ten trading rules which is formed by two forecasting model and naïve strategy. The evidence shows that whatever in ARMA(1,1),GM(1,1) or naïve strategy, the strategies using short-term average and fixed value 1 as a threshold value of BEYR will make higher profit than buy-and-hold strategy.

For comparing the differences between BEYR combining the information of stocks and bonds and equity yield only including the information of stock price, we also use the equity yield as input variable to investigate the profit of dynamic asset allocation under the same ten trading rules. The evidence finds that using equity yield as a criterion to judge the investment timing between stocks and bonds can not obtain higher profit for investors. However, investors will loss in these cases.

In summary, we find that BEYR is a good indicator in Taiwan capital market. If we want to capture the market timing between stocks and bonds, BEYR can help investors to judge the investment timing in each period of time.

第一章 緒論 …………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究動機 ……………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的 ……………………………………………………………2 第三節 研究架構 ……………………………………………………………4 第二章 動態資產配置策略之相關文獻探討 ………………………5 第一節投資組合理論及動態資產配置………………………………………5 第二節股債收益比(BEYR) …………………………………………………14 第三章 研究方法與流程 ……………………………………………19 第一節 樣本選取……………………………………………………………20 第二節 時間序列模型的建立………………………………………………21 第三節 ARMA模型…………………………………………………………25 第四節 灰預測模型…………………………………………………………27 第五節 灰預測數據處理……………………………………………………29 第六節 GM(1,1)建模與檢驗 ………………………………………………32 第七節 績效評估指標………………………………………………………36 第八節 交易策略 …………………………………………………………38 第四章 實證結果分析 ………………………………………………40 第一節 單根檢定與模型績效評估…………………………………………40 第二節 交易策略獲利分析…………………………………………………46 第五章 結論與建議 …………………………………………………59 第一節 結論…………………………………………………………………59 第二節 建議…………………………………………………………………60 參考文獻 中文部分…………………………………………………………………………61 英文部分…………………………………………………………………………61 圖 目 錄 圖1-1 研究架構圖 ………………………………………………………………4 圖3-1 研究方法流程 ……………………………………………………………9 圖3-2 GM(1,1)(灰預測模型)的運作流程……………………………………36 圖4-1a BEYR之原始序列圖……………………………………………………41 圖4-1b equity yield之原始序列圖………………………………………………42 圖4-2a BEYR經一階差分後之時間序列圖……………………………………44 圖4-2b equity yield經一階差分後之時間序列圖………………………………45 表 目 錄 表4-1 各變數之敘述性統計 ……………………………………………………41 表4-2 BEYR 與 equity yield之ADF、PP單根檢定………………………… 43 表4-3 delta_B 與 delta_E之ADF、PP單根檢定 ……………………………43 表4-4 ARMA模型階次檢定 ……………………………………………………45 表4-5 預測模型之績效評估 ……………………………………………………46 表4-6a BEYR利用ARMA(1,1)預測並透過10種交易策略之報酬比較 ……48 表4-6b BEYR利用GM(1,1)預測並透過10種交易策略之報酬比較…………48 表4-7a equity yield利用ARMA(1,1)預測並透過8種交易策略之報酬比較…51 表4-7b equity yield利用GM(1,1)預測並透過8種交易策略之報酬比較 ……51 表4-8a BEYR利用ARMA(1,1)預測並透過10種交易策略之報酬比較(加入證券交易所得稅及手續費) ……………………………………………………………54 表4-8b BEYR利用GM(1,1)預測並透過10種交易策略之報酬比較(加入證券交易所得稅及手續費) ………………………………………………………………54 表4-9a equity yield利用ARMA(1,1)預測並透過8種交易策略之報酬比較(加入證券交易所得稅及手續費) ………………………………………………………55 表4-9b equity yield利用GM(1,1)預測並透過8種交易策略之報酬比較(加入證券交易所得稅及手續費) ……………………………………………………………55 表4-10a 以BEYR 及equity yield做動態資產配置相對於買進持有債券之報酬比較(未考慮稅負)……………………………………………………………………57 表4-10b 以BEYR 及equity yield做動態資產配置相對於買進持有股票之報酬比較(未考慮稅負)……………………………………………………………………57

一、 中文部分
1. 游欣慧(1999),「多種情境模式資產配置之研究」,國立台灣大學財務金融學研究所碩士論文。
2. 張桂莉(2000),「資產配置之最適策略」,國立政治大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。
3. 蔡秉寰(2001),「資產配置之動態規劃」,國立政治大學金融研究所國立政治大學金融研究所碩士論文。
4. 張婉蘭(2002),「因應台灣景氣循環的最適資產配置投資組合之研究」,國立高雄第一科技大學金融營運系碩士論文。
5. 劉文祺、洪瑩珊、詹麗錦(2001),「ARIMA模式應用於金融商品股價趨勢預測之實用性研究」,產業金融第112期,頁1-32。
6. 鄧聚龍、郭洪、溫坤禮、張廷政、張偉哲(1999),「灰預測模型方法與應用」,台北:高立圖書。
7. 康億毅(1996),「台灣證券市場的灰色建模」,國立台灣科技大學電機工程研究所碩士論文。
8. 唐宜楷(1998),「台灣加權股價指數預測— 灰色預測之運用」,國立台灣大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
9. 劉定焜、施能仁(1998),「台灣股價指數之避險操作— 灰色滾動模式預測」,灰色系統學刊,第1卷第2期,頁14-26。
10. 鍾惠民、吳壽山、周賓凰、莊懷文(2002),「財金計量」,台北:雙葉書廊。

二、 英文部分
1. Ammer, J., and J.Y. Campbell, 1993, What moves the stock and bond markets? A variance decomposition for long-term asset returns, Journal of Finance 48, 3-37.
2. Andersen, T.G., T. Bollerslev, F.X. Diebold, and C. Vega, 2003, Micro effects of macro announcements: real-time price discovery in foreign exchange, American Economic Review 93, 38-62.
3. Ang, A., and G. Bekaert, 2004, stock return predictability: Is it there?, Manuscript, Columbia University.
4. Asness, C.S., 2003, Fight the Fed model, Journal of Portfolio Management 30, 11-24.
5. Barr, P.G., 1998, Stress testing gains favor, Pensions & Investment , Jan.
6. Barsky, R.B., 1989, Why don’t the prices of stocks and bonds move together?, American Economic Review 79, 1132-1145.
7. Beltratti, A.E., and R.J. Shiller, 1992, Stock prices and bond yield, Journal of Monetary Economics 20, 25-46.
8. Bitters, W.E., 1997, The New Science of Asset Allocation, Glenlake Publishing Co.,Ltd.
9. Boudry, W., and P. Gray, 2003, Assessing the economic significance of return predictability: A research note, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 30, 1305-1326.
10. Boyd, J.H., R. Jagannathan, and J. Hu,2001, The stock market’s reaction to unemployment news: Why bad news is usually good for stocks, NBER Working Paper No. 8092.
11. Brooks, C., and G. Persand, 2001, The trading profitability of forecasts of the gilt-equity yield ratio, Internation Journal of Forcasting 17, 11-29.
12. Brinson, G.P., L.R. Hood and G.L. Beebower, 1986, Determinants of Portfolio Performance, Financial Analyst Journal, July/August, 39-44.
13. Brinson, G.P.,L.R. Hood and G.L. Beebower, 1991, Determinants of Portfolio Performance II: An Update, Financial Analyst Journal, May/June, 40-48.
14. Campbell, J.Y., 1987, Stock returns and the term structure, Journal of Financial Economics 18, 373-399.
15. Chang, K. H. and C. S. Wu, 1998 , A Gray Time Series Model on Forecasting the Chinese New Year Effect in the Taiwan Stock Market, Journal of Grey System 1, 55-63.
16. Chopra ,V.K. and W.T. Ziemba, 1993, The effect of errors in Means ,Variances and Covariances on Optimal portfolio Choice, The Journal of Portfolio Management, winter.
17. Cochrane, J.H., 1999, New facts in finance, Economic Perspectives Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 23, 36-58.
18. Connolly, R., C. Stivers, and L. Sun, 2004 Stock market uncertainty and stock-bond return relationship, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 39, Forthcoming.
19. David, A., and P. Veronesi, 2004, Inflation and earninfs uncertainty and volatility forecasts, Manuscript, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago.
20. Erichhorn,D., F.Gupta and E.Stubs ,1998, Using Constrains to Improve the
Robustness of Asset Allocation, Journal of Portfolio Management,Spring, 41-48
21. Fleming, J., C. Kirby, and B. Ostdiek, 1998, Information and volatility linkages in the stock, bond and money markets, Journal of Financial Economics 49, 111-137.
22. Fong,H.G.and F.J. Fabozzi, 1988, Asset Allocation Optimization Models, In Arnott, Robert D., Frnak J, Fabozzi,eds., Asset allocation: A Handbook of Portfolio Policies, Strategies & Tactics, Chicago.
23. Gordon, M.J., 1962, The investment, financing and valuation of a corporation.
24. Guidolin, M., and A. Timmermann, 2003, Strategic asset allocation under multivariate regime switching, Manuscript.
25. Hammer,D.A.,1991, Dynamic Asset Allocation, :Strategies for the Stock, Bond, and Money Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
26. Harris, R.D.F., and R. Sanchez-Valle, 2000, The information content of lagged equity and bond yields, Economics Letters 68, 179-184.
27. Koskosidis, Y.A. and A.M.Duarte, 1997, A Scenario-Based Approach to Active Asset Allocation, The Journal of Portfolio Management, Winter.
28. Kothari, S.P., and J. Shanken, 1997, Book-to-market,dividendyield, and expected market returns: A time series analysis, Journal of Financial Economics 44, 169-203.
29. Lamont, O., 1998, Earnings and expected returns, Journal of Finance 53, 1563-1587.
30. Lander, J., A. Orphandides, and M. Douvogiannis, 1997, Earnings forecasts and the predictability of stock returns: Evidence from trading the S&P, Journal of Portfolio Management 23, 24-35.
31. Lettau, M., and S. Ludvigson, 2001, Consumption, aggregate wealth, and expected stock returns, Journal of Finance 56, 815-849.
32. Levin, E.J., and R.E. Wright, 1998, The information content of the gilt-equity yield ratio, The Manchester School Supplement 25, 89-101.
33. Li, L., 2002, Macroeconomic factors and the correlation of stock and bond returns, Manuscript, Department of Economics, Yale University.
34. McQueen, G., and V.V. Roley, 1993, Stock prices, news and business conditions, Review of Financial Studies 6, 683-707.
35. Mills, T.C., 1991, Equity prices, dividends and gilt yields in the UK: cointegration, error correction and ‘confidence’, Scottish Journal of Portfolio Economy 38, 242-255.
36. Pesaran, M.H., and A. Timmermann, 1995, Predictability of stocks returns: Robustness and economic sighificance, Journal of Finance 50, 1201-1228.
37. Giot, P., and P. Mikael, 2004, Dynamic asset allocation between stocks and bonds using the Bond-Equity Yield Ratio, Manuscript, University of Namur.
38. Pontiff, J., and L.D. Schall, 1998, Book-to-market ratios as predictors of market returns, Journal of Financial Economics 49, 141-160.
39. Ribeiro, R., and P. Veronesi, 2002, The excess comovement of international stock markets in bad times: A rational expectations equilibrium model, Manuscript, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago.
40. Rigobon, R., and B. Sack, 2003, Spillovers across U.S. financial markets, NBER Working Paper No. 9640.
41. Rigobon, R., and B. Sack, 2004, The impact of monetary policy on asset prices, Journal of Monetary Economics 51, Forthcoming.
42. Robertson, D., and S. Wright, 2004, Tobin’s q and the stock market, Economic Journal.
43. Scruggs, J.T., and P. Glabadanidis, 2003, Risk premia and the dynamic covariance between stock and bond returns, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38, 295-316.
44. Shen, P., 2003, Market timing strategies that worked, Journal of Portfolio Management 29, 77-102.
45. Smithers, A., and S. Wright, 2000, Valuing Wall Street.
46. Sy, W., 1990, Market Timing: Is It a Folly?, Journal of Portfolio Management, Summer, 11-16.
47. Williams, J.O., 1997, Maximizing the Probability of Achieving Investment Goals, Journal of Portfolio Management, Fall.
48. Xia, Y., 2001, Learning about predictability: The effects of parameter uncertainty on dynamic asset allocation, Journal of Finance 56, 205-246.

無法下載圖示
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE