簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳承諾
Novreza Utama Putra
論文名稱: 應用品質機能展開(QFD)和失效模式與影響分析(FMEA)於 ISO/IEC 17025中的外包商評選
Applying quality function deployment (QFD) and failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to subcontractor selection in ISO/IEC 17025 standard
指導教授: 王福琨
Fu-Kwun Wang
口試委員: 羅士哲
Shih-Che Lo
Darcy
Darcy
Andi Cakravastia Arisaputra Raja
Andi Cakravastia Arisaputra Raja
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業管理系
Department of Industrial Management
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 58
中文關鍵詞: ISO/IEC 17025Quality function deployment (QFD)Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA)Readiness of equipment and manpower (RoEM)Risk priority number (RPN)
外文關鍵詞: ISO/IEC 17025, Quality function deployment (QFD), Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), Readiness of equipment and manpower (RoEM), Risk priority number (RPN)
相關次數: 點閱:361下載:15
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在ISO/IEC17025的第4.5條中,概述了確保分包商有能力能夠完成任何可能影響結果質量的測試,所需滿足的要求。評估分包商的能力通常是通過評估參與生產活動的設備和人力的準備來進行的。通過考慮實驗室的設備和人力的準備,來對實驗室進行評估。然而,其他顯著影響實驗室性能的因素是分析實驗室中每一個生產過程中可能發生失效的風險,從接收樣品的過程到報告給客戶的測試結果。在本研究中,我們採用ISO/IEC17025標準中的品質機能展開(QFD)和失效模式與影響分析(FMEA)方法。我們提出的方法提供了設備和人力的準備評
    分(RoEM)和實驗室在選擇包商過程的風險優先數(RPN)。


    In clause 4.5 of ISO/IEC 17025, it outlines the requirements that will be met to ensure the competence of the subcontractor to complete any required test(s) that may impact the quality of results. To evaluate subcontractor competence is usually conducted by assessing the readiness of equipment and manpower involved in production activities. The process of assessing the laboratory by considering the readiness of equipment and manpower of laboratory has been done. However, other factors that significantly affect laboratory performance are to analyze the risk of failure that may occur in every production process in the laboratory, from the process of receiving samples to reports test results sent to the customer. In this study, we apply the quality function deployment (QFD) and failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) methods for subcontractor selection in ISO/IEC 17025 standard. Our proposed method provides the score of a readiness of equipment and manpower (RoEM) and the risk priority number (RPN) of laboratory for selecting laboratory subcontractor process.

    Acknowledgements i Abstract iii Table of content iv List of figures vi List of tables vii List of appendix viii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Research background and motivation 1 1.2 Research objectives 2 1.3 Research scopes 3 1.4 Research contributions 3 1.5 Organization of thesis 3 Chapter 2: Literature review 5 2.1 ISO/IEC 17025 5 2.1.1 General requirements 5 2.1.2 Subcontracting of tests 6 2.1.3 Accreditation body 6 2.2 Quality function deployment (QFD) 7 2.3 Component of technology 9 2.4 Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) 9 2.5 Integration of QFD and FMEA 12 2.6 Research position 13 Chapter 3: Methodology 15 3.1 Research flow 15 3.1.1 Laboratory subcontractor candidates 16 3.1.2 Quality function deployment (QFD) stage 18 3.1.3 Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) stage 20 3.1.4 Assessment stage 21 3.2 Reliability of the questionnaire 22 Chapter 4: Analysis Results and Discussions 23 4.1 Analysis results 23 4.1.1 House of quality 23 4.1.2 Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) tables 24 4.1.3 Assessment results 25 4.1.4 Questionnaire reliability results 26 4.2 Discussions 26 Chapter 5: Conclusion and future research 28 References 29 Appendix 31

    Almannai, B., Greenough, R., Kay, J., 2008. A decision support tool based on QFD and FMEA for the selection of manufacturing automation technologies. Robotic and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 24, 501–507.
    Bergquist, K., Abeysekera, J., 1996. Quality function deployment (QFD) — A means for developing usable products. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 18, 269–275.
    Braglia, M., Fantoni, G., Frosolini, M., 2007. The house of reliability. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 24, 420–440.
    Chen, S.-H., 2016. Determining the service demands of an aging population by integrating QFD and FMEA method. Quality and Quantity 50, 283–298.
    Firdaus, H., Widianti, T., 2015. Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) sebagai tindakan pencegahan pada kegagalan pengujian. 10th Annual Meeting on Testing and Quality. ISSN 1907-7459, 131-147.
    Govers, C.P.M., 1996. What and how about quality function deployment (QFD). International Journal of Production Economics 46, 575–585.
    Hassan, A., Siadat, A., Dantan, J.-Y., Martin, P., 2010. Conceptual process planning – an improvement approach using QFD, FMEA, and ABC methods. Robotic and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 26, 392–401.
    Islam, S., 2013. Perancangan model pengukuran tingkat kesiapan technoware dan humanware laboratorium dalam memenuhi persyaratan SNI ISO/IEC 17025. Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung.
    ISO/IEC 17025, 2005. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva.
    Li, S., Zeng, W., 2016. Risk analysis for the supplier selection problem using failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA). Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 27, 1309–1321.
    Li M.-H.C., Yeh C.-H.B., Abbas A.-R., Kuo H.-W., 2015. The application of FMEA and QFD to the Improvement of packaging processes for transistors. Journal of Quality 22, 441–460.
    Lin, W.T., Chen, S.C., Jang, H.F., Wu, H.H., 2006. Performance evaluation of introducing QS-9000 to the Taiwanese semiconductor industry. International Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology 27, 1011–1020.
    National standardization agency of Indonesia, 2017. Laboratorium lembaga & inspeksi.
    Rajesh, G., Malliga, P., 2013. Supplier selection based on AHP QFD methodology. Procedia Engineering 64, 1283–1292.
    UNESCAP, 1989. Technology atlas project: A frame work for technology based development. Bangalore. India.
    Wang, F.-K., Yeh, C.-T., Chu, T.-P., 2016. Using the design for Six Sigma approach with TRIZ for new product development. Computer and Industrial Engineering 98, 522–530.

    QR CODE