簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: Irene anggraini
Irene anggraini
論文名稱: Investigation of the Near-fault Earthquake Effect for a River Bridge
Investigation of the Near-fault Earthquake Effect for a River Bridge
指導教授: 邱建國
Chien-Kuo Chiu
口試委員: 廖國偉
Kuo-Wei Liao
陳瑞華
Cherng, Rwey-Hua
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工程學院 - 營建工程系
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 152
中文關鍵詞: fragility curveNon linear time history analysis
外文關鍵詞: fragility curve, Non linear time history analysis
相關次數: 點閱:168下載:8
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

Earthquake ground motion takes important part in representing the strength of the earthquake. Near-fault ground motion has significant effect on the response of the structure. Hence, the purpose of this research is to investigate the safety status of a bridge based on probability of exceedance subjected to both near-fault ground motion and far-field ground motion excitations. In order to present the accuracy of the result, fragility curve will be used as probability approaches. A highway bridge located in Changhua County was selected in this study. Non-linear time history is performed to obtain the structure performance under different PGA values. The fragility curve is constructed from calculating of displacement ductility from the response of time history analysis. The results show that fitting ground motions based on a design response spectrum may be an unsuitable approach. However, structural performances under normalized PGA values give a significant difference between near and far-field ground motions.


Earthquake ground motion takes important part in representing the strength of the earthquake. Near-fault ground motion has significant effect on the response of the structure. Hence, the purpose of this research is to investigate the safety status of a bridge based on probability of exceedance subjected to both near-fault ground motion and far-field ground motion excitations. In order to present the accuracy of the result, fragility curve will be used as probability approaches. A highway bridge located in Changhua County was selected in this study. Non-linear time history is performed to obtain the structure performance under different PGA values. The fragility curve is constructed from calculating of displacement ductility from the response of time history analysis. The results show that fitting ground motions based on a design response spectrum may be an unsuitable approach. However, structural performances under normalized PGA values give a significant difference between near and far-field ground motions.

ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................. iv LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................... xii NOTATIONS .............................................................................................................. xvi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Motivation research ......................................................................................... 2 1.3 Objective and scope ........................................................................................ 3 1.4 Outline ............................................................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ....................................................................... 5 2.1 Properties of concrete ........................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Cover concrete ............................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Core concrete ................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Properties of steel ................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Failure mode ......................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Standard codes...................................................................................................... 9 2.4.1 AASHTO Guide Specification for Seismic Bridge Design........................... 9 2.4.2 Taiwan Code for Soil Spring ....................................................................... 10 2.4.3 Taiwan Code for Response Spectrum ......................................................... 11 2.5 Ground Motion ................................................................................................... 12 2.5.1 Near fault ground motion ............................................................................ 13 2.5.2 Far-field ground motion............................................................................... 16 2.6 Input Energy ....................................................................................................... 16 CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................... 19 vi 3.1 Bridge General Information ............................................................................... 19 3.2 Methodology ...................................................................................................... 21 3.3 Modelling of structural Section .......................................................................... 23 3.4 Soil Modelling .................................................................................................... 24 3.4 Non-linear Property ............................................................................................ 26 3.5 Time history analysis ......................................................................................... 29 3.6 Fragility Curve ................................................................................................... 34 CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS RESULT .......................................................................... 38 4.1 Fragility curve .................................................................................................... 38 4.2 Input Energy ....................................................................................................... 46 CHAPTER 5. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ................................................. 56 5.1 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 56 5.2 Suggestion .......................................................................................................... 58 APPENDIX A. BRIDGE DRAWING ......................................................................... 59 APPENDIX B. SAFETY FACTOR ............................................................................ 64 APPENDIX C. RESPONSE SPECTRUM AND GROUND MOTION ................... 108 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................... 132

Alipour, A., Shafei, B., and Shinozuka, M. (2013). "Reliability-Based Calibration of Load and Resistance Factors for Design of RC Bridges under Multiple Extreme Events: Scour and Earthquake." Journal of Bridge Engineering, 18(5), 362-371.
Anil, K.C., Chintanapakdee, C., “Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions.” Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn. 2001; 30:1769-1789 (DOI: 10.1002/eqe.92).
Brown, A., Saiidi. M., S. (2008), “Investigation of Near-fault Vs. Far field ground motion effects on a substandard bridge bent.” Report University of Nevada, Reno.
Chang, K.-C., et al. (2009). "Seismic Assessment and Retrofit Manual for Highway
Bridges."NCREE-09-028.
Chen, G., Lu, W., Wang, L., Wu, Qi., “Study on Far-field Ground motion Characteristics”. Applied mechanics and Materials. ISSN: 1662-7482, Vols 438-439, pp 1471-1473.
Delima, A. B. (2011). Seismic Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Bridge with Corroded Steel Reinforcement using Pushover Analysis. Master, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.
Highway, A. A. o. S., Officials, T., Highway, A. A. o. S., and Materials, T. O. H. S. o. (2012). 2012 AASHTO Provisional Standards, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
Liao, W.I., Loh, C.H., Wan, S., Jean, W.Y., Chai, J.F., “Dynamic responses of bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions.” J. Chinese Inst. Eng 23(4), pp.455-464, 2000.
Loh, C.H., Liao, W.I., Chai, J.F., (2002). “Effect of near-fault earthquake on bridges: lessons learned from Chi-Chi earthquake.” Earthquake engineering and engineering vibration, Vol.1 No.1.
Loh, C.H., Wu, T.C., Huang, N.E., (2001). “Application of the Emperical Mode Decomposition_Hilbert Spectrum Method to Identify Near-fault Ground-Motion Characteristics and Structural responses.” Bulettin of the Seismological Society of America, 91,5, pp. 1339-1357, October 2001.
Malhotra, P.K., 1999, “Response of buildings to near-field pulse-like ground motions.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.28, pp. 1309-1326.
Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R. (1988). "Theoretical Stress‐Strain Model for Confined Concrete." Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(8), 1804-1826.
NIST GCR (2011). “Selecting and Scaling Earthquake Ground Motions for Performing Response-History Analyses.” NIST GCR 11-917-15.
Shinozuka, M., Feng, M.Q., Kim, H., Uzawa, T., and Ueda, T., “Statistical Analysis of Fragility curves.” Technical Report MCEER, 2001.
Sung, Y.-C., K.-Y. Liu, C.-K. Su and I.-C. T. a. K.-C. Chang (2005). “ A study on Pushover Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Columns.” Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol.21.
Travakoli, H.R., Gilani, H., Abdollahzadeh, G.R., (2012). “Comparative evaluation of seismic parameters for near-fault and far-fault earthquakes.” The fifthteenth World Conference Erathquake Engineering.
133
Uang, C.M., Bertero, V.V., “Evaluation of seismic energy in structures.” Earthquake engineering and structural dynamic, vol. 19, 77-90 (1990).

QR CODE