簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 馬皓宸
Hao-Chen Ma
論文名稱: 根據非線性規劃模型、吉尼係數及區間直覺模糊值之新的得分函數以作多屬性決策之新方法
Multiattribute Decision Making Using Nonlinear Programming Model, the Gini Coefficient, and Novel Score Function of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values
指導教授: 陳錫明
Shyi-Ming Chen
口試委員: 呂永和
Yung-Ho Leu
程守雄
Shou-Hsiung Cheng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 電資學院 - 資訊工程系
Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 82
中文關鍵詞: 區間直覺模糊集合區間直覺模糊值得分函數多屬性決策吉尼係數非線性規劃
外文關鍵詞: Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values, Score Function, Multiattribute Decision Making, Gini Coefficient, Nonlinear Programming
相關次數: 點閱:354下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本論文旨在根據我們所提之非線性規劃法、吉尼係數、及我們所提之區間直覺模糊值之新的得分函數提出一個新的多屬性決策方法。首先,我們提出一個區間直覺模糊值之新的得分函數,以克服目前已存在的區間直覺模糊值之得分函數的缺點。然後,我們根據所提之區間直覺模糊值之新的得分函數及決策者所提供之決策矩陣建構一個得分矩陣。然後,我們根據建構之得分矩陣、吉尼係數、及決策者所提供之各屬性的區間直覺模糊權重建構一個非線性規劃模型。在求解完此非線性規劃模型後,我們得到每一個屬性的最佳化權重。然後,我們根據建構之得分矩陣及每一個屬性的最佳權重計算了每一個方案的加權得分。最後,我們根據每一個方案之加權得分對這些方案進行排序。如果一個方案有較高之加權得分,則此方案具有更佳之偏好排序。我們所提之多屬性決策方法在區間直覺模糊環境下可以克服目前已存在之多屬性決策方法的缺點。


    In this thesis, we propose a novel multiattribute decision making method on the basis of the proposed nonlinear programming model, the Gini coefficient, and the proposed score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values. Firstly, we propose a new score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values to overcome the drawbacks of the existing score functions of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values. Then, we build a score matrix using the proposed score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and the decision matrix provided by the decision maker. Then, we construct a nonlinear programming model using the constructed score matrix, the Gini coefficient, and the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy weights of the attributes provided by the decision maker. After solving the constructed nonlinear programming model, we get the optimal weight of each attribute. Then, we calculate the weighted score of each alternative based on the constructed score matrix and the obtained optimal weights of the attributes. Finally, we rank the alternatives based on the obtained weighted scores of the alternatives. The larger the weighted score of an alternative, the better the preference order of the alternative. The proposed multiattribute decision making method can overcome the drawbacks of the existing multiattribute decision making methods in interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments.

    Abstract in Chinese Abatract in English Acknowledgements Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Motivation 1.2 Organization of This Thesis Chapter 2 Preliminaries 2.1 Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values 2.2 Largest Range of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values 2.3 Ranking Method of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values 2.4 Score Functions of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values 2.5 Summary Chapter 3 The Proposed Novel Score Function of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values 3.1 The Proposed Novel Score Function 3.2 A Comparison of Score Functions 3.3 A Comparison of the Existing Score Functions 3.4 Summary Chapter 4 Analyze the Drawbacks of Chen and Tsai’s Multiattribute Decision Making Method 4.1 A Review of Chen and Tsai’s Multiattribute Decision Making Method 4.2 Shortcomings of Chen and Tsai’s Multiattribute Decision Making Method 4.3 Summary Chapter 5 A New Multiattribute Decision Making Method Based on the Proposed Nonlinear Programming Model, the Gini Coefficient, and the Proposed Score Function of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values 5.1 A New Multiattribute Decision Making Method 5.2 Application Examples 5.3 Summary Chapter 6 Conclusions 6.1 Contributions of This Thesis 6.2 Future Research References

    [1] M. Akram, A. Sattar, and A. B. Saeid, “Competition graphs with complex intuitionistic fuzzy information,” Granular Computing, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 25-47, 2022.
    [2] K. Atanassov and G. Gargov, “Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 343-349, 1989.
    [3] K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87-96, 1986.
    [4] Z. Y. Bai, “An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method based on an improved score function,” The Scientific World Journal, Article ID 879089, 6 pages, 2013 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/879089).
    [5] E. Bas, U. Yolcu, and E. Egrioglu, “Intuitionistic fuzzy time series functions approach for time series forecasting,” Granular Computing, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 619-629, 2021.
    [6] S. M. Chen and C. H. Chiou, “Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, PSO techniques, and evidential reasoning methodology,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1905-1916, 2015.
    [7] S. M. Chen and Y. C. Chu, “Multiattribute decision making based on U-quadratic distribution of intervals and the transformed matrix in interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments,” Information Sciences, vol. 537, pp. 30-45, 2020.
    [8] S. M. Chen and H. L. Deng, “Multiattribute decision making based on nonlinear programming methodology and novel score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values,” Information Sciences, vol. 607, pp. 1348-1371, 2022.
    [9] S. M. Chen and K. Y. Fan, “Multiattribute decision making based on probability density functions and the variances and standard deviations of largest ranges of evaluating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values,” Information Sciences, vol. 490, pp. 329-343, 2019.
    [10] S. M. Chen and W. H. Han, “A new multiattribute decision making method based on multiplication operations of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and linear programming methodology,” Information Sciences, vol. 429, pp. 421-432, 2018.
    [11] S. M. Chen and W. H. Han, “An improved multiattribute decision making method using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values,” Information Sciences, vol. 467, pp. 489-505, 2018.
    [12] S. M. Chen and Z. C. Huang, “Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and linear programming methodology,” Information Sciences, vol. 381, pp. 341-351, 2017.
    [13] S. M. Chen and Z. C. Huang, “Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and particle swarm optimization techniques,” Information Sciences, vol. 397, pp. 206-218, 2017.
    [14] S. M. Chen and W. T. Liao, “Multiple attribute decision making using Beta distribution of intervals, expected values of intervals, and new score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values,” Information Sciences, vol. 579, pp. 863-887, 2021.
    [15] S. M. Chen and H. C. Ma, “Multiattribute decision making based on nonlinear programming model, the Gini coefficient, and novel score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values,” Accepted and to appear in Information Sciences, 2023.
    [16] S. M. Chen and B. D. H. Phuong, “Fuzzy time series forecasting based on optimal partitions of intervals and optimal weighting vectors,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 118, pp. 204-216, 2017.
    [17] S. M. Chen and C. A. Tsai, “Multiattribute decision making using novel score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and the means and the variances of score matrices,” Information Sciences, vol. 577, pp. 748-768, 2021.
    [18] S. M. Chen and K. Y. Tsai, “Multiattribute decision making based on new score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and normalized score matrices,” Information Sciences, vol. 575, pp. 714-731, 2021.
    [19] S. M. Chen and W. H. Tsai, “Multiple attribute decision making based on novel interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy geometric averaging operators,” Information Sciences, vol. 367, pp. 1045-1065, 2016.
    [20] S. M. Chen and C. H. Wang, “Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking fuzzy numbers using α-cuts, belief features and signal/noise ratios,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 5576-5581, 2009.
    [21] S. M. Chen and S. H. Yu, “Multiattribute decision making based on novel score function and the power operator of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values,” Information Sciences, vol. 606, pp. 763-785, 2022.
    [22] T. Y. Chen, “A comparative analysis of score functions for multiple criteria decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy settings,” Information Sciences, vol. 181, no. 17, pp. 3652-3676, 2011.
    [23] S. H. Cheng, “Autocratic multiattribute group decision making for hotel location selection based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 427, pp. 77-87, 2018.
    [24] J. Dong, S. Wan, and S. M. Chen, “Fuzzy best-worst method based on triangular fuzzy numbers for multi-criteria decision-making,” Information Sciences, vol. 547, pp. 1080-1104, 2021.
    [25] P. Dutta and B. Saikia, “Arithmetic operations on normal semi elliptic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their application in decision-making,” Granular Computing, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 163-179, 2021.
    [26] P. Dutta, “Multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty via the operations of generalized intuitionistic fuzzy numbers,” Granular Computing, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 321-337, 2021.
    [27] E. Egrioglu, R. Fildes, and E. Bas, “Recurrent fuzzy time series functions approaches for forecasting,” Granular Computing, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 163-170, 2022.
    [28] C. Gini, “Variabilita e mutabilita: Contributo allo studio delle distribuzioni e delle relazioni statistiche,” Tipografia di Paolo Cuppin, Bologna, 1912.
    [29] R. Gupta and S. Kumar, “Intuitionistic fuzzy scale-invariant entropy with correlation coefficients-based VIKOR approach for multi-criteria decision-making,” Granular Computing, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 77-93, 2022.
    [30] R. Hua, B. Li, and Y. Li, “Intuitionistic fuzzy PRI-AND and PRI-OR aggregation operators based on the priority degrees and their applications in multi-attribute decision making,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 155472-155490, 2021.
    [31] Y. T. İc and M. Yurdakul, “Development of a new trapezoidal fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS hybrid approach for manufacturing firm performance measurement,” Granular Computing, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 915-929, 2021.
    [32] R. Joshi, “Multi-criteria decision-making based on bi-parametric exponential fuzzy information measures and weighted correlation coefficients,” Granular Computing, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49-62, 2022.
    [33] R. Kadian and S. Kumar, “A novel intuitionistic Renyi’s-Tsallis discriminant information measure and its applications in decision-making,” Granular Computing, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 901-913, 2021.
    [34] M. Kaushal and Q. M. D. Lohani, “Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm using an adaptive intuitionistic fuzzification technique,” Granular Computing, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 183-195, 2022.
    [35] K. Kimura, “A micro-macro linkage in the measurement of inequality: Another look at the Gini coefficient,” Quality and Quantity, vol. 28, no. 1, pp.83-97, 1994.
    [36] K. Kumar and S. M. Chen, “Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values, score function of connection numbers, and the set pair analysis theory,” Information Sciences, vol. 551, pp. 100-112, 2021.
    [37] K. Kumar and S. M. Chen, “Multiattribute decision making based on the improved intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein weighted averaging operator of intuitionistic fuzzy values,” Information Sciences, vol. 568, pp. 369-383, 2021.
    [38] D. F. Li, “TOPSIS-based nonlinear-programming methodology for multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 299-311, 2010.
    [39] Z. Liang, “Models for multiple attribute decision making with fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy Hamy mean operators and their application,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 115634-115645, 2020.
    [40] Muneeza, S. Abdullah, M. Qiyas, and M. A. Khan, “Multi-criteria decision making based on intuitionistic cubic fuzzy numbers,” Granular Computing, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 217-227, 2022.
    [41] M. Pant and S. Kumar, “Particle swarm optimization and intuitionistic fuzzy set based novel method for fuzzy time series forecasting,” Granular Computing, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 285-303, 2022.
    [42] K. Rahman, S. Ayub, and S. Abdullah, “Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators based on confidence levels for group decision making,” Granular Computing, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 867-886, 2021.
    [43] M. R. Seikh and U. Mandal, “Intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision-making,” Granular Computing, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 473-488, 2021.
    [44] S. Sen, K. Patra, and S. K. Mondal, “A new approach to similarity measure for generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and its application to fuzzy risk analysis,” Granular Computing, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 705-718, 2021.
    [45] E. Sheshinski, “Relation between a social welfare function and the Gini index of income inequality,” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 98-100, 1972.
    [46] C. Y. Wang and S. M. Chen, “An improved multiattribute decision making method based on new score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and linear programming methodology,” Information Sciences, vol. 411, pp. 176-184, 2017.
    [47] Z. Wang, F. Xiao, and W. Ding, “Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Jenson-Shannon divergence and its application in multi-attribute decision making,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 52, no. 14, pp. 16168-16184, 2022.
    [48] Z. S. Xu, “Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making,” Control and Decision, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 215-219, 2007.
    [49] L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338-353, 1965.
    [50] Z. Zhao and Y. Zhang, “Multiple attribute decision making method in the frame of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” in: Proceedings of the 2011 Eighth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, Shanghai, China, pp. 192-196, 2011.
    [51] X.Y. Zou, S.M. Chen, and K.Y. Fan, “Multiple attribute decision making using improved intuitionistic fuzzy weighted geometric operators of intuitionistic fuzzy values,” Information Sciences, vol. 535, pp. 242-253, 2020.

    QR CODE