研究生: |
LE THI TUYET LE - THI TUYET |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Information in a Recruitment Brochure on Job Seeker`s Intention to Organizations Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Information in a Recruitment Brochure on Job Seeker`s Intention to Organizations |
指導教授: |
葉穎蓉
Ying-Jung Yeh |
口試委員: |
Day-Yang Liu
Day-Yang Liu Jen-Wei Cheng Jen-Wei Cheng |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理系 Department of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2017 |
畢業學年度: | 105 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 82 |
中文關鍵詞: | Corporate social responsibility 、applicant intention 、human resource 、recruitment strategy 、organizational attractiveness 、perceived CSR 、recruitment brochures |
外文關鍵詞: | Corporate social responsibility, applicant intention, human resource, recruitment strategy, organizational attractiveness, perceived CSR, recruitment brochures |
相關次數: | 點閱:337 下載:1 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) becomes a source of competitive advantages of enterprises in attracting high quality human resources as well as job applicants. Understanding a relationship between CSR and applicant intention is vital for companies in releasing effective recruitment strategies. This empirical study explores influences of level of CSR information provided in a job advertisement on job seekers` intention to organizations through multiple aspects. Three levels of without CSR information, implicit CSR information, and explicit CSR information were designed in three experiments to collect data from participants via questionnaire survey. The collected sample of 225 data were then analyzed to test the proposed hypotheses. The analytical results supported the hypotheses that (1) perceived CSR is higher when CSR information posted in the recruitment brochure; (2) perceptions of organizational attractiveness is higher when CSR information posted in the recruitment brochure; (3) a relationship between a level of CSR information and intention of applying for job is mediated by perceptions of organizational attractiveness; (4) a relationship between a level of CSR information and intention of applying for job is mediated by perceived CSR; and (5) perceived CSR is positively related to perceptions of organizational attractiveness and intention of applying for job. Findings of this study suggest that CSR information should be provided in recruitment brochure as much as possible. In practice implementation, findings of this study provide company managers with comprehensive references in choosing an effective human resource strategy policy.
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) becomes a source of competitive advantages of enterprises in attracting high quality human resources as well as job applicants. Understanding a relationship between CSR and applicant intention is vital for companies in releasing effective recruitment strategies. This empirical study explores influences of level of CSR information provided in a job advertisement on job seekers` intention to organizations through multiple aspects. Three levels of without CSR information, implicit CSR information, and explicit CSR information were designed in three experiments to collect data from participants via questionnaire survey. The collected sample of 225 data were then analyzed to test the proposed hypotheses. The analytical results supported the hypotheses that (1) perceived CSR is higher when CSR information posted in the recruitment brochure; (2) perceptions of organizational attractiveness is higher when CSR information posted in the recruitment brochure; (3) a relationship between a level of CSR information and intention of applying for job is mediated by perceptions of organizational attractiveness; (4) a relationship between a level of CSR information and intention of applying for job is mediated by perceived CSR; and (5) perceived CSR is positively related to perceptions of organizational attractiveness and intention of applying for job. Findings of this study suggest that CSR information should be provided in recruitment brochure as much as possible. In practice implementation, findings of this study provide company managers with comprehensive references in choosing an effective human resource strategy policy.
REFERENCES
Aguinis, H., Zedeck, S., 2011. Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US.
Aiman-Smith, L., Bauer, T.N., Cable, D.M., 2001. Are You Attracted? Do You Intend to Pursue? A Recruiting Policy-Capturing Study. Journal of Business and Psychology 16, 219-237.
Albinger, H.S., Freeman, S.J., 2000. Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations. Journal of Business Ethics 28, 243-253.
Andreea, I.I., Yılmazdogan, O.C., Secilmis, C., Cicek, D., 2015. 2nd GLOBAL CONFERENCE on BUSINESS, ECONOMICS, MANAGEMENT and TOURISMThe Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Perception on Tourism Students’ Intention to Work in Sector. Procedia Economics and Finance 23, 1340-1346.
Backhaus, K.B., Stone, B.A., Heiner, K., 2002. Exploringthe Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness. Business & Society 41, 292-318.
Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A., 1986. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 1173-1182.
Behrend, T.S., Baker, B.A., Thompson, L.F., 2009. Effects of Pro-Environmental Recruiting Messages: The Role of Organizational Reputation. Journal of Business and Psychology 24, 341-350.
Birim, B., 2016. Evaluation of Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media as Key Source of Strategic Communication. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 235, 70-75.
Carroll, A.B., Shabana, K.M., 2010. The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews 12, 85-105.
CEC, 2001. Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibilities. COM (2001) 366 final.
Dahlsrud, A., 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15, 1-13.
Duarte, A.P., 2011. Corporate Social Responsibility from an Employees’ Perspective: Contributes for Understanding Job Attitudes, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa. University Institute of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
Duarte, A.P., Gomes, D.R., Das-Neves, J.G., 2014a. Tell me your socially responsible practices, I will tell you how attractive for recruitment you are! The impact of perceived CSR on organizational attractiveness. Tékhne 12, Supplement 1, 22-29.
Duarte, A.P., Gomes, D.R., Neves, J.G.d., 2014b. Finding the Jigsaw Piece for our Jigsaw Puzzle with Corporate Social Responsibility: The impact of CSR on Prospective Applicants’ Responses. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management 12, 240-258.
Ersoy, I., Aksehirli, Z., 2015. The Effects of Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility on Employer Attractiveness. Research Journal of Business Management 2, 507-518.
Esmaeelinezhad, O., Singaravelloo, K., Boerhannoeddin, A., 2015. Linkage between Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Engagement: Mediation Effect of Organizational Identification. International Journal of Human Resource Studies 5.
Flammer, C., 2015. Does Corporate Social Responsibility Lead to Superior Financial Performance? A Regression Discontinuity Approach. Manage. Sci. 61, 2549-2568.
Fombrun, C., Shanley, M., 1990. What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy. The Academy of Management Journal 33, 233-258.
Greening, D.W., Turban, D.B., 2000. Corporate Social Performance As a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce. Business & Society 39, 254-280.
Gully, S.M., Phillips, J.M., Castellano, W.G., Han, K., Kim, A., 2013. A Mediated Moderation Model of Recruiting Socially and Environmentally Responsible Job Applicants. Personnel Psychology 66, 935-973.
Highhouse, S., Lievens, F., Sinar, E.F., 2003. Measuring Attraction to Organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement 63, 986-1001.
Hsu, K.-T., 2012. The Advertising Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Reputation and Brand Equity: Evidence from the Life Insurance Industry in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics 109, 189-201.
Jones, D.A., Willness, C.R., Madey, S., 2014. Why Are Job Seekers Attracted by Corporate Social Performance? Experimental and Field Tests of Three Signal-Based Mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal 57, 383-404.
Kim, H.-R., Lee, M., Lee, H.-T., Kim, N.-M., 2010. Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee–Company Identification. Journal of Business Ethics 95, 557-569.
Kim, S.-Y., Park, H., 2011. Corporate Social Responsibility as an Organizational Attractiveness for Prospective Public Relations Practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics 103, 639-653.
Luo, X., Bhattacharya, C.B., 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value. Journal of Marketing, 70, 1-18.
Martínez-Ferrero, J., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., García-Sánchez, I.-M., 2016. Corporate social responsibility as an entrenchment strategy, with a focus on the implications of family ownership. Journal of Cleaner Production 135, 760-770.
Paul, K., Meyskens, M., Robbins, S., 2011. Components of a global mindset: corporate social responsibility and cross-cultural sensitivity. Journal of International Business & Cultural Studies 5.
Rynes, S., 1989. Recruitment, job choice, and post-hire consequences : a call for new research directions. Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University, New York, USA.
Schneider, B., 1987. THE PEOPLE MAKE THE PLACE. Personnel Psychology 40, 437-453.
Turban, D.B., Greening, D.W., 1997. Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees. The Academy of Management Journal 40, 658-672.
Zhang, L., Gowan, M.A., 2012. Corporate Social Responsibility, Applicants’ Individual Traits, and Organizational Attraction: A Person–Organization Fit Perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology 27, 345-362.