簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王鵬智
Peng-chih Wang
論文名稱: 居室火災避難容許時間基準之驗證研究
A FULL SCALE EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE ASSESSMENT FACTORS OF ROOM AVAILABLE SAFETY EGRESS TIME
指導教授: 林慶元
Ching-yuan Lin
口試委員: 丁育群
Yu-chun Ding
何明錦
Ming-chin Ho
沈子勝
Tzu-sheng Shen
鄭政利
Cheng-li Cheng
陳俊勳
Chiun-Hsun Chen
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 設計學院 - 建築系
Department of Architecture
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 90
中文關鍵詞: 全尺寸實驗、避難容許時間、性能式設計
外文關鍵詞: full scale experiment; ASET; performance-based d
相關次數: 點閱:351下載:29
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 性能式(performance-based)防火避難設計法,皆以人員實際避難時間REST(Required Safety Egress Time)必須小於避難容許時間ASET(Available Safety Egress Time),作為評估避難成功與否之判斷基準;避難容許時間最主要的參考,則常依據煙層下降至離該房間地面一定高度之時間,而決定煙層之一般判定基準,主要取決於煙層溫度對進行避難人員的影響,往往忽略可視度、煙毒性及輻射熱等其他因子相對之危害度。
    本研究之目的擬透過全尺寸實驗,驗證二層煙流模式所預測的煙層下降時間與實際實驗所量測煙層下降時間之關係,以及煙層下降時間與可視度、煙毒性、輻射熱等其他相關影響因子達到影響避難極限值時間之比較,以分析計算合理之煙層下降高度。經實驗結果發現:1.經實驗結果發現,小尺寸空間之火災現象確屬二層(two layers)區域模式火場;2.經實驗值與預測值比較,一般煙層下降時間趨勢以N=20%最為貼近預測值,建議採用N-percent方式評估時,N值取20%;3.居室火災實驗煙層下降至離地板1.8m的時間與計算式預估之時間大致相同; 4. 居室火災實驗煙層下降至離地板高度1.8m的時間,與同一實驗煙層所產生的煙粒子濃度、CO量、輻射熱值與溫度值到達臨界值的時間貼近,因此,一般居室以煙層下降至離地板1.8m高度作為居室內人員避難容許時間,尚屬合理。


    Available safety egress time (ASET) is one of the basic assessment criteria in performance-based fire safety design, which will directly determine the success of building fire protection design from the results of evaluation. In general, the ASET in performance-based egress design complies with the critical time for the smoke layer height descending to a certain distance above the floor. Through full scale experiments of compartment fire in this study, we demonstrated that (1) the relationships between the predicted descending time of smoke layer by “Two Zone Model” and the practical descending time of smoke layer by experimental measurements; and (2) the comparisons between the descending time of smoke layer and the threshold values of other correlative influential factors, which serve to analyze and calculate the reasonable descending smoke layer height in egress design. From the experimental results, we also concluded as follows: (1) By comparing the experimental data with the estimated values, the trend of descending time of smoke layer is close to estimated value when N is equal to 20%. In other words, as the evaluation is determined by “N-Percent Method”, adopting 20% as the N value is suggested. (2) In the compartment fire experiments, the experimental and estimated values of the descending time of smoke layer to 1.8 meter above the floor are approximately the same. (3) Similarly, the corresponding time is close to the one reaching threshold values of smoke particle density, carbon monoxide concentration, heat flux, and temperature produced by the smoke layer within the same experiments. Hence, it is rational to take the time of smoke layer descending to 1.8 meter above the floor as the available safety egress time in compartment fire.

    中文摘要 ……………………………………………………………I 英文摘要 ……………………………………………………………II 誌 謝 ……………………………………………………………III 目 錄 ……………………………………………………………IV 符號索引 ……………………………………………………………VI 圖表索引 ……………………………………………………………VIII 第一章 緒論 1-1 研究背景 ………………………………………………………1 1-2 研究目的 ………………………………………………………2 1-3 研究目標與範圍 ……………………………………………3 1-4 研究方法架構流程 ……………………………………………4 第二章 避難設計與評估理論及文獻回顧 2-1 避難理論與避難設計評估 ………………………………………6 2-1-1 避難設計理論 ……………………………………………6 2-1-2 性能式避難設計評估架構 ……………………………8 2-2 避難容許時間之內容 ……………………………………………9 2-2-1 避難容許時間(ASET)之定義 ……………………………9 2-2-2避難容許時間之重要性 …………………………………10 2-3避難容許時間與火場環境容受度(tenability)之關係 ………12 2-3-1 人體火場環境容受度(tenability)與避難容許時間之關係 2-3-2 心理因子—高溫與火災生成物對避難者的心理影響 …16 2-4 煙層沉降公式與避難容許時間之關係 ………………………17 2-4-1 煙層高度預測(二層煙流模式) ………………………17 2-4-2 溫度推估煙沉降高度N-percent模式 …………………18 2-4-3 撒水系統導入性能式煙控設計的推導 …………………19 2-5國外實驗案例介紹— 容受度基準值與危險度分析實驗…………20 第三章 避難容許時間國際規範規定比較 3-1日本規定 ……………………………………………………………24 3-2美國規定 ……………………………………………………………28 3-3英國規定(BS 7974:2001) ………………………………………30 3-4澳洲規定 ……………………………………………………………32 3-5紐西蘭規定 ………………………………………………………33 3-6 瑞典規定(Fire safety risk analysis) ………………………34 3-7小結 ……………………………………………………………36 第四章 實驗設計探討 4-1 實驗場所及火源介紹 ……………………………………………38 4-1-1 實驗地點 …………………………………………………38 4-1-2 撒水設備 …………………………………………………38 4-2 實驗項目規劃 …………………………………………………43 4-3 實驗設備 ………………………………………………………47 4-4 實驗數據之收集與轉換 ………………………………………49 第五章 實驗結果分析 5-1 實驗結果 ………………………………………………………52 5-1-1 CASEI實驗結果(614cm*356cm) ………………………52 5-1-1.1 CASEI-a.居室火災實驗 ………………………53 5-1-1.2 CASEI-b.居室火災有撒水實驗 …………………55 5-1-2 CASE II.居室(700cm * 1200cm)火災實驗 ………56 5-1-2.1 CASEII-a.居室火災實驗 ………………………58 5-1-2.2 CASEII-b.居室火災有撒水實驗 …………………60 5-1-3 實驗結果分析比較 ………………………………………62 5-2 實驗分析—煙層高度實測值與預測值之比較分析 ……………63 5-2-1 利用N-percentage方法所量測之煙層高度與計算值之比較 5-2-2 煙層高度與溫度變化之關係 ……………………………64 5-2-3煙層高度計算值與實驗值之比較 ………………………66 5-2-4煙層高度與煙氣各種性質之比較 ………………………67 5-2-4.1煙層高度與煙的遮蔽率(可視度)之比較 ………67 5-2-4.2煙層高度與煙毒性(CO)值之比較 …………………68 5-2-4.3煙層高度與輻射熱之比較 ………………………70 5-3 小結 ……………………………………………………………72 第六章 結論與建議 6-1 研究結論 ………………………………………………………73 6-2 建議事項 ………………………………………………………74 參考文獻 …………………………………………………………………75 附 錄 一 預備實驗ISO9705/90根木堆實驗 ……………………………80 作者簡介 …………………………………………………………………87 授權書 …………………………………………………………………90

    中文文獻
    C-1 營建雜誌社,2006,「建築技術規則設計施工編」。
    C-2 內政部消防署,2006,「各類場所消防安全設備設置標準」。
    C-3 顏世錫等,1987,「建築消防概論」,內政部營建署建築研究所籌備小組。
    C-4 沈子勝,1996,「火災中人類避難相關理論分析研究」,警學叢刊,26卷6期。
    C-5 丁育群、王鵬智,2000,「各國建築物性能防火法規推動現況及展望」,內政部建築研究所2000 年建築物性能防火法規研討會論文集。
    C-6 鍾基強,2003,「水系統火災控制之研究(I)—水系統效應對性能式煙控設計之模式研究與實驗驗證」,內政部建築研究所。
    C-7 熊光華,1984,「建築物火載量與建築物防火安全設計之研究」,中央警官學校警政研究所碩士論文,P159-183。
    C-8 鄧文心、江崇誠,1999,「建築物避難避難模式之研究-以台北世貿中心展覽大樓為例」,內政部建築研究所專題研究計劃成果報告。
    C-9 鍾基強、簡賢文,2001,「建築火災避難安全及煙控式性能式設計法之研究」,內政部建築研究所。

    英文文獻
    E-1 E.G. Butcher and A.C. Parnell,1979,”Smoke control in fire safety design”,E.& F. N.Spon ,London.
    E-2 J.R., Hall,Jr.,2004,”How Many People Are Exposed to Sublethal Fire Smoke?”Fire Technology, Vol.40,PP.109-124.
    E-3 Chow,W.K.,1995,”A comparison of the use of fire zone and field models for simulating atrium smoke filling processes,”Fire Safety Journal, Vol.25,No.4,pp.337-353.
    E-4 Klote,J.H.,1997,”Prediction of smoke movement in atria: partII —application to smoke management,”ASHRAE Transactions: Symposia, pp.545-553.
    E-5 Milke,J.A.,2000,”Evaluating the early development of smoke hazard from fires in large space,”ASHRAE Transactions:Symposia, pp.627-636.
    E-6 Kissell F.N. and Litton C.D.,1992,”How smoke hinders escape from coal mine fires,”Mining Engineering, Technical Papers.
    E-7 D.Canter & R.Mattews,1976, ”The behaviour of people in fire Situations:Possibilities for research”, CP 11/76 BRE, UK.
    E-8 Marchant E.W.,Sep 1976,”Some aspects of human behaviour and escape route design”, 5th International Fire Protection Seminar, Karlsruhe.
    E-9 International Standards Organisation,1999,”Part 8: Life safety – Occupant behaviour,location and condition, ISO/TR 13387-8”.
    E-10 BSI Technical Committee FSH/24,2001, BS 7974: ”Application of Fire Safety Engineering Principles to the Design of Buildings-Part1.Guide to the Application of Fire Safety Engineering Principles”.
    E-11 James A.Milke, Diana E.Hugue, Bryan L. Hoskins, and James P.Carroll,2006/spring,”Tenability Analyses in Performance-Based Design”, Fire Protection Engineering, SFPE.
    E-12 Wieczorek and Dembsey,2001,Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 2, 88-111.
    E-13 Powell,P.,1997,”Learning Fire and Life Safety Fundamentals,”Fire and Life Safety Educator,2nd edition,IFSTA,Oklahoma State University
    E-14 Hartzell G.E, 1991,”Combustion Products and Their Effects on Life Safety,”Fire Protection Handbook,17th edition, NFPA, Massachusetts.
    E-15 Babrauskas, V., 1979,”Full-scale Burning of Upholstered Chairs,” Technical Note 1103, National Bureau of Standards.
    E-16 Custer,R.L.P.,and Bright,R.G.,1974,”Fire Detection: State of the Art,National Bureau of Standards Technical Note 839,” Gaitherburg,MD.
    E-17 Hartzell G.E, 1985,”Modeling of toxicological effects of fire gases: II. Mathematical modeling of intoxication of rats by carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide,”J Fire Sci;3:115-128.
    E-18 Claudy,W.D.,1957,”Respiratory Hazard of the Fire Services,” NFPA, Boston, MA.
    E-19 Fahy, R.F.,and Proulx, G.1995,”Collective Common Sense: A Study of Human Behavior During the World Trade Center Evacuation.”NFPA Journal, March/April,pp.59-67.
    E-20 Bryan J.L.,1977,”Smoke as a determinant of human behaviour in fire situations (project people),”U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC. Report NBS-GCR-77-94.
    E-21 Cooper, L.Y., Harkleroad, H.,1982,”An Experimental Study of Upper Hot Layer Stratification in Full-scale Multi-room Fire Scenarios,”Journal of Heat Transfer, Vol.104, pp.742-749.
    E-22 David Purser, 2001,“Human Tenability,”Fire & Risk Sciences Division, Building Research Establishment, UK.
    E-23 Hadjisophocleous George V., Benichou Noureddine and Tamim Amal S.,1998, “Literature Review of Performance-based Fire Codes and Design Enviornment,”J. of Fire Prot. Engr., 9(1), pp12-40.
    E-24 Jones, W.W. and Peacock, R.D., 1989,”Technical Reference Guide for FAST Version 18,”NIST, TN 1262.
    E-25 Peacock, R.D.,Jones,W.W.,Bukowski,R.W., and Forney, C.L., 1991,”Technical Reference Guide for the HAZARD I Fire Hazard Assessment Method, Version 1.1,”Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., Handbook 146.
    E-26 ABCB,Nov/2001,”Fire Safety Engineering Guidelines,”Commonwealth and the States and Territories of Australia.
    E-27 Buchanan A.H.,Apr/2001,”Fire Engineering Design Guide,”Centre for Advanced Engineering University of Canterbury, NZ.
    E-28 Cooper, L.Y., Stroup, D.W. ,1985, "ASET–a computer program for calculating available safe egress time," Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 9 No.1, pp.29-45.
    E-29 The Building Regulation ,1991,”Approved Document B,” section B1, HMSO Publication, Londo.
    E-30 TAKEYOSHI TANAKA,1993-1994,”Concept and Framework of a Performance Based Fire Safety Design System for Buildings,”Journal of Applied Fire Science, Vol.3 (4)335-338.
    E-31 Gordon E., 1998,”Engineering Analysis of Hazards to Life Safety in Fires:The Fire Effluent Toxicity Component,”Human Behaviour in Fire- Proceedings of the International symposium, pp.621-629.
    E-32 Society of Fire Protection Engineers Bethesda, Maryland,2000,”SFPE Engineering Guide to Performance-Based Fire Protection,”Published by the National Fire Protection Association.
    E-33 Shields, T.J.; Proulx, G.,2000,”The Science of human behaviour: past research endeavours, current developments and fashioning a research agenda,”Proceedings of the Sixth Internation Symposium on Fire Safety Science, IAFSS, PP. 95-114.
    E-34 Ron Cot’e(editor) 2000,”Life Safety Code Handbook,”NFPA.p.51.
    E-35 EC Measurements and Testing Report,”Fire Safety of Upholstered Furniture- the final report on the CBUF research program,”
    E-36 David Purser,2001,”Human Tenability,”Fire & Risk Sciences Division, Building Research Establishment, UK.

    日文文獻

    J-1 日本建築中心,1995,「新•建築防災計畫指針─建築物防火•避難計畫解說書」,平成7年。
    J-2 日本建築,1989,「建築物綜合防火設計法第3 卷避難安全設計法」,平成元年。
    J-3田中孝義,2002,「改訂版建築火災安全工學入門」P.232,財團法人日本建築中心。
    J-4 大宮喜文、高山英之、荻原一郎、田中哮義、若松孝旺,1987,「避難安全規定關研究─ 1 各國避難調查比較」,日本火災學會研究發表會概要集。
    J-5 田中哮義,1993,「建築物火災安全工學入門」,日本建築中心,平成5年。
    J-6 建設省建築研究所,1997,「火災安全設計分科會」,建設省總合技術開發,防•耐火能評價技術開發報告書,平成9年。
    J-7日本建設省告示令第1441號, 2000/5/31,「與樓層避難安全檢證法相關的核算制定要件」。
    J-8 日本建設省住宅局建築指導課,2000,「改正建築基準法(2年目施行)之解說」。
    J-9 萩原一郎、林廣明,2000.11,「避難安全檢證法」,建築技術,日本建築防災協會。
    J-10 荻原一郎,2001,「避難安全檢證法概要」,火災,Vol. 51 No.1。
    J-11 長谷見雄二等,2002.07,「建築物火災安全設計指針」,日本建築學會。

    QR CODE