簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 陳嘉儷
Melisa - Rosiana Tanadi
論文名稱： 梯田式音樂廳獨唱演出之聲學評價
Acoustic Assessment of Solo Singing Performances in Vineyard Halls
指導教授： 江維華
Wei-Hwa Chiang
口試委員: 林敬舜
Ching-Shun Lin　
林葳
Wei Lin
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 設計學院 - 建築系
Department of Architecture
論文出版年： 2016
畢業學年度： 104
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 105
中文關鍵詞： 獨唱 、梯田式廳堂 、主觀評價測試
外文關鍵詞： solo singing, vineyard halls, assessment test
相關次數： 點閱：202  下載：4 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 梯田式廳堂內的表演者與觀眾間之密切連結使此類型廳堂持續盛行，然而舞台周邊觀眾席的能量分布依舊為設計時的主要考量，亦需特別顧及聆聽人聲演出時面臨之聽覺與視覺雙重問題。
    本研究為驗證獨唱演出在已開發廳堂模型中聲學效果的主觀評價，並錄製若干具校正資訊的無響人聲演唱樂段。主觀評價由聲樂主修之專業者與代表一般大眾的大學生完成，測試用片段使用商用聲學模擬軟體製作，經特定耳機播放。
    從主觀測試之數據統計分析可得知，使用人聲聲源的高音比(TRvoice)與聲音強度(Gvoice)為梯田式廳堂獨唱演出時最重要的兩項客觀聲學參量，各控制群組的線性回歸顯示Gvoice之可接受下限值介於–3 dB至–2 dB之間，主觀評價結果亦顯示在舞台前方8.5至10米處觀眾席增加分區牆對提升聲學品質之成效。

    The trend of vineyard halls continues to prevail due to the intimate performer-audience relationships. However, the energy distribution problem at the audience seats surrounding the stage remains a major concern, in particular when listening to the vocal sound where both acoustic and visual deprivation exists.
    This study was intended to verify the effect of design on the subjective perception of solo singing in previously proposed hall models. Anechoic vocal segments with calibration information were recorded. Odeon 9.2 acoustic software was employed for producing the test recordings played via specific headphones. The recordings grouped by pairs were eval-uated by listeners consisted of voice major experts and students representing the general pub-lic.
    From the statistical test analysis involving all or subgroup of data, treble ratio (TRvoice) and strength from a voice source (Gvoice) were the most important acoustical measures for evaluating the acoustical quality of solo singing in vineyard halls. Linear regressions for all control groups indicated minimum acceptable Gvoice in the range of –3 dB to –2 dB. The results suggested the effectiveness of the added walls due to the subdivision of audience seats 8.5 to 10 m in front of the stage.

    Abstract I Chinese Abstract II Acknowledgement III Contents IV List of Figures VII List of Tables XI Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1. Research Motivation and Purpose 1 1.2. Research Content and Method 2 1.3. Research Process 3 Chapter 2 Literature Review 4 2.1. The Architecture and Acoustics of Vineyard Halls 4 2.1.1. Vineyard Concert Hall Background 4 2.1.2. Designing a Vineyard Hall 6 2.2. Character of Singing Voice 11 2.3. Vineyard Concert Hall Prototyping 13 2.3.1. Overall Shape 13 2.3.2. The Four Design Schemes 13 2.4. Related Content 16 2.4.1. Acoustics Measures 16 2.4.2. The Effect of Reflection and Early Reflection Design 17 Chapter 3 Recording and Playback of Sound Sample 21 3.1. Anechoic Recording of Singing Voice 21 3.1.1. Content of Recording 21 3.1.2. Recording Location 24 3.1.3. Recording Procedure 25 3.1.4. Simple statistic of the Recording 27 3.1.5. Trimmed Music Segments for the Pair Comparison Test 32 3.2. Auralization Using Odeon 9.2 34 3.3. Volume Calibration for Playback 36 3.3.1. Reproduce the Sound Signal 38 3.3.2. Speaker Sound Signal Recording through Dummy Head Process 38 3.3.3. Headphone Sound Signal Recording through Dummy Head Process 39 3.3.4. Equalized the Speaker Sound Signal Recording file with Headphone Sound Signal Recording file. 40 3.3.5. Final Result and Method of the Calibration Test 41 Chapter 4 Subjective Evaluation Test and Result 42 4.1. Receiver and Sound Source 42 4.1.1. Receiver 42 4.1.2. Sound Source 45 4.2. Subjective Evaluation Procedure 49 4.2.1. Arrangement of Test Stimuli 50 4.2.2. Test Process 52 4.2.3. Questionnaires 53 4.2.4. The Listeners 54 4.2.5. Test Location 55 4.3. Analysis and Discussion of Subjective Assessment Result 56 4.3.1. Data processing 56 4.3.2. Data Analysis 59 Chapter 5 Conclusions 70 References 71 Appendix 73 A.1 Musical Notes and lyrics 73 A.2 Pairwise Comparison Sample and Rational Zero Sample 78 A.3 Questionnaire Samples 80 A.4 Result Data 83

    [1] Barron, M. 2009. Auditorium Acoustics and Architectural Design. London: E&FN SPON.
    [2] L. Beranek. 2004. Concert hall and opera houses: music, acoustics and architecture. 2nd Edition. New York: Springer-Verlag.
    [3] Long, M. 2006. Architectural Acoustic. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Inc.
    [4] Kuttruff, H. 2009. Room Acoustic. 5th Edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Spon Press.
    [5] Blundell Jones, Peter. 1978. Hans Scharoun a Monograph. London: Gordon Fraser.
    [6] T. Hidaka, L.L. Beranek, N. Nshihara. 2008. A comparison between shoebox and non-shoebox halls based on objective measurements in actual halls. 327-332, Paris: The Proceedings of Acoustics.
    [7] 2003. Walt Disney Concert Hall. Journal of Nagata Acoustics.
    [8] M. Barron, L-J. Lee. 1988. Energy Relations in Concert Auditorium. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84 (2), 618-628.
    [9] Marshall A. H. and Meyer J. 1985. The directivity and auditory impressions of singers. 130–140, Acustica 58.
    [10] Dunn H. K. and Farnsworth D. W. 1939. Exploration of pressure field around the human head during speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 10, 184–199. 10.1121/1.1915975.
    [11] D. Cabrera, P.J. Davis, A. Connolly. 2011. Long-term horizontal vocal directivity of opera singers: effects of singing projection and acoustic environment, J. Voice, 25(6), e291-e303.
    [12] Shoenberg, D. 1965. Low Temperature Physics LT9: The de Haas-Van Alphen Effect. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
    [13] Y. Toyota, K. Oguchi, K. Motoo. 2007. Acoustical design of new concert hall in Mariinsky Theatre, St. Petersburg. 327-332. Madrid: The Proceedings of 19th ICA.
    [14] L. Cremer. 1989. Early lateral reflections in some modern concert Halls. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 1213-1225.
    [15] Y. Toyota, K. Oguchi, K. Motoo. 2010. Acoustical design of new Danish Radio Concert Hall. Melbourne, Australia: ISRA.
    [16] Wei-Hwa Chiang, Wei Lin, Hui-Ping Wu, Bing-Jie Chiu. 2012. Multi-dimensional Analyses of Large Vineyard Halls. INTER NOISE 2012, New York. August 19th -22 th.
    [17] Torgerson, W. S. 1958. Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley.
    [18] Mosteller, F. Remarks. 1951. A test of significance for paired comparisons when equal cor-relations are assumed. Psychometrika, 16, 207–218.

    QR CODE