簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 闕怡馨
Yi-Hsin Chueh
論文名稱: 建築結構損傷偵測
Structural Damage Detection for Building Structures
指導教授: 陳希舜
Shi-Shuenn Chen
口試委員: 鄭蘩
Van Jeng
陳瑞華
none
施俊揚
Jun-Yang Shi
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工程學院 - 營建工程系
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 131
中文關鍵詞: 結構損傷偵測法頻率域反應函數損傷指標
外文關鍵詞: structural damage detection, frequency-response function, damage indicator
相關次數: 點閱:169下載:7
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本文探討結構物在簡諧地震波作用下,以頻率域反應函數發展適用於建築-土壤互制系統之結構損傷偵測法,提出未正規化損傷指標與正規化損傷指標,以判斷損傷之樓層位置。研究結果顯示正規化損傷指標判斷損傷樓層準確度優於未正規化損傷指標,又以正規化損傷指標中的正規化殘留層間變位角及正規化殘留曲率為最佳,其針對未含雜訊系統樓層損傷之判斷準確度可達100%。本研究亦發現未含雜訊系統下,結構週期、土壤剪力波速及結構樓層數對正規化殘留層間變位角及正規化殘留曲率判斷損傷樓層準確度皆無影響。
本文另探討建築物受環境雜訊之影響,以驗證損傷指標之可行性。研究結果顯示以正規化殘留曲率指標判斷損傷樓層準確度最高且最穩定,結構損傷在底層時,損傷指標受雜訊影響小,而結構損傷在中高樓層時,損傷指標判斷損傷樓層準確度受雜訊影響則較大,因此,本文建議進行建築結構損傷偵測時,可使用正規化殘留曲率指標,且提高分析頻率可提升損傷指標判斷損傷樓層準確度。


This study develops a new method to detect structural damage for building-soil systems subjected to harmonic waves by using frequency-response functions. Non-normalized and normalized damage indicators are proposed to predict the damaged floor level in a building structure. The analyzed results show that the normalized indicators are much better than the non-normalized indicators to predict accurately the damaged floor level. The normalized residual story drift ratio (NSDR) and the normalized residual curvature (NRC) are the best indicators with a predictive accuracy rate 100% for the structure response without noise. It is also found that the changes of fundamental periods, shear-wave velocities, and building stories have no influences on the predictive accuracies of the two indicators, NSDR and NRC, for the structural response without noise.
In addition, this study also applies the proposed damage indicators to the building structure system interfered by environmental noise. The analyzed results show that NRC is the most accurate and stable indicator to predict the damaged floor level. As the base floor is damaged, the predictive accuracies of proposed indicators are affected by noise insignificantly. In contrast, as the middle or high floor is damaged, the predictive accuracies are considerably influenced by the noise. Therefore, this study suggests that the indicator NRC be used to detect damage location for building structures. Moreover, increasing the analysis frequency may improve the predictive accuracies of the indicators.

論文摘要I ABSTRACTII 誌謝III 目錄IV 表目錄VII 圖目錄IX 第一章 緒論1 1.1 研究動機與目的1 1.2 研究內容與方法2 第二章 文獻回顧4 2.1 結構健康監測4 2.2 結構損傷偵測方法5 第三章 研究方法9 3.1 頻率域反應函數9 3.2 損傷指標建立14 3.2.1 未正規化損傷指標14 3.2.2 正規化損傷指標16 3.3 高斯雜訊之模擬17 3.4 勁度折減比18 3.5 準確度18 3.6 貢獻因子18 第四章 未含雜訊數值模擬驗證19 4.1 分析模式19 4.2 未正規化損傷指標之結構損傷判斷20 4.2.1 未正規化殘留反應20 4.2.2 未正規化殘留層間變位角21 4.2.3 未正規化殘留曲率22 4.2.4 未正規化損傷指標比較22 4.3 正規化損傷指標之結構損傷判斷24 4.3.1 正規化殘留反應24 4.3.2 正規化殘留層間變位角25 4.3.3 正規化殘留曲率26 4.3.4 正規化損傷指標比較27 4.4 損傷指標判斷之探討28 4.4.1 未正規化與正規化損傷指標判斷之差異28 4.4.2 未正規化損傷指標判斷改善之探討30 4.4.3 正規化損傷指標判斷改善之探討33 4.5 其他系統參數對結構損傷判斷影響35 4.5.1 結構週期36 4.5.2 土壤剪力波速37 4.5.3 十二層樓結構38 第五章 含雜訊數值模擬驗證39 5.1 分析模式39 5.2 正規化損傷指標之結構損傷判斷39 5.2.1 模擬次數39 5.2.2 正規化殘留反應40 5.2.3 正規化殘留層間變位角41 5.2.4 正規化殘留曲率42 5.2.5 正規化損傷指標比較43 5.4 其他系統參數對結構損傷判斷影響46 5.4.1 結構週期46 5.4.2 土壤剪力波速48 5.4.3 十二層樓結構50 第六章 結論與建議52 6.1 結論52 6.2 建議54 參考文獻55

1.Frangopol, D.M. and Messervey, T.B., “Life-cycle cost and performance prediction: role of structural health monitoring” , International Workshop on Frontier Technologies for Infrastructures Engineering (IWFTIE), Taiwan, Oct. 23-25, pp. 323-342(2008)
2.Frangopol, D.M., “Life-cycle performance, management, and optimization of structural systems under uncertainty: Accomplishments and Challenges” , Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 7(6), pp. 389-413 (2010)
3.Ewins, D.J., “Modal testing : theory practice and application” , John Wiley & Sons,London(1984)
4.Barrish, R.A., Kirk, A.G. and Akin, A.E., “Instrumented monitoring of the Commodore Barry” ,SPIE,Vol.2, pp 35-137(2000)
5.潘敏俊,「故障診斷系統與結構狀態監測」,「橋樑與工程研習會(三):橋樑監測預警與診斷技術」,國立中央大學土木工程系橋樑工程研究中心,第Ⅱ-1-11頁,民國89年
6.張國鎮、林詠彬、陳振川、王倫,「光纖感測器於結構工程之應用」「橋樑與工程研習會(三):橋樑監測預警與診斷技術」,國立中央大學土木工程系橋樑工程研究中心,第Ⅴ-1-8頁,民國89年
7.Frangopol, D.M. and Messervey, T.B., “Life-cycle cost and performance prediction: Role of structural health monitoring”,Frontier technologies for infrastructures engineering: structures and infrastructures book series 4,pp.361 (2009)
8.Park, S., Stubbs, N. and Sikorsky, C., “ Linkage of nondestructive damage evaluation to structural system reliabilitySmart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways” ,Paper presented at the The International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham (1997)
9.Stubbs, N., Park, S., Sikorsky, C. and Choi, S., “ A global non-destructive damage assessment methodology for civil engineering structures” , International Journal of Systems Science, 31(11), pp.1361-1373 (2000).
10.Xia, P.Q. and Brownjohn, J.M.W., “ Residual stiffness assessment of structurally failed reinforced concrete structure by dynamic testing and finite element model updating” , Experimental Mechanics, 43(4), 372-378 (2003).
11.Yao, J.T.P. and Natke, H.G., “Damage detection and reliability evaluation of existing structures” , Structural Safety, 15(1-2), 3-16 (1994)
12.Rytter, A., “Vibration based inspection of civil engineering structures” , University of Aalborg, Denmark (1993)
13.Carden, E.P. and Fanning, P., “Vibration based condition monitoring: a review” , Structural Health Monitoring, 3(4), pp. 355–377 (2004)
14.Auweraer, H.V.D., “International research projects on structural damage detection” , Damage Assessment of Structures Key Engineering Materials, 204(2), pp. 97–112 (2001)
15.Shi, Z.Y., Law, S.S. and Zhang, L.M., “Structural damage detection from modal strain energy change” , Journal of Engineering Mechanics-ASCE, 126(12), pp. 1216–1223(2000)
16.Gawronski, W. and Sawicki, J.T., “Structural damage detection using modal norms”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 229(1), pp. 194–198 (2000)
17.Kawiecki, G., “Modal damping measurement for damage detection”, smart materials & structures, 10(3), pp. 466–471 (2001)
18.Abdo, M.A.B. and Hori, M., “A numerical study of structural damage detection using changes in the rotation of mode shapes” , Journal of Sound and Vibration, 251(2), pp. 227–239 (2002)
19.Shi, Z.Y., Law, S.S. and Zhang L.M., “Improved damage quantification from elemental modal strain energy change”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics-ASCE, 128(5), pp.521–529(2002)
20.Sampaio, R.P.C., Maia, N.M.M. and Silva, J.M.M., “The frequency domain assurance criterion as a tool for damage detection” , Damage Assessment of Structures, Proceedings Key Engineering Materials, 245(2), pp. 69–76 (2003)
21.Lee, Y.S. and Chung, M.J., “A study on crack detection using eigenfrequency test data” , Computers & Structures, 77(3), pp. 327–342(2000)
22.Kim, J.T., Ryu, Y.S., Cho, H.M. and Stubbs, N., “Damage identification in beam-type structures: frequency-based method vs. mode-shape based method” , Engineering Structures, 25(1), pp.57–67(2003)
23.Yang, H.Z., Li, H.J. and Wang, S.Q., “Damage localization of offshore platforms under ambient excitation” , China Ocean Engineering, 17(4), pp.495–504 (2003)
24.Khoo, L.M., Mantena, P.R. and Jadhav, P., “Structural damage assessment using vibration modal analysis” , Structural Health Monitoring, 3(2), pp.177–194(2004)
25.Aoki, Y. and Byon, O.I. “Damage detection of CFRP pipes and shells by using localized flexibility method” , Advanced Composite Materials, 10(2), pp.189–198 (2001)
26.Yan, A.M. and Golinval, J.C., “Structural damage localization by combining flexibility and stiffness methods”, Engineering Structures, 27(12),pp.1752–1761(2005)
27.Zang, C., Friswell, M.I. and Imregun, M., “Structural health monitoring and damage assessment using measured FRFs from multiple sensors, part I: The indicator of correlation criteria” , Damage Assessment of Structures, Proceedings Key Engineering Materials, 245(2), pp.131–139 (2003)
28.Yam, L.H., Li, Y.Y. and Wong, W.O., “Sensitivity studies of parameters for damage detection of plate-like structures using static and dynamic approaches” , Engineering Structures, 24(11), pp. 1465–1475 (2002)
29.Li, T.Y., Zhang, T., Liu, J.X. and Zhang, W.H., “Vibrational wave analysis of infinite damaged beams using structure-borne power flow”, Applied Acoustics, 65(1), pp.91–100 (2004)
30.Mahapatra, D.R. and Gopalakrishnan, S., “Spectral finite element analysis of coupled wave propagation in composite beams with multiple delaminations and strip inclusions” , International Journal of Solids and Structures, 41(5), pp.1173–1208 (2004)
31.Iwasaki, A.T., Shimamura, Y. and Kobayashi, H., “Unsupervised structural damage diagnosis based on change of response surface using statistical tool—(application to damage detection of composite structure)” , JSME International Journal Series A-Solid Mechanics and Material Engineering, 47(1), pp. 1–7 (2004)
32.Rajasekaran, S. and Varghese, S.P., “Damage detection in beams and plates using wavelet transforms” , Computers and Concrete, 2(6), pp. 481–498(2005)
33.Fugate, M.L., Sohn, H. and Farrar, C.R., “Vibration-based damage detection using statistical process control” ,Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 15.4,pp.707-721(2001)
34.Shi, Z.Y., Law, S.S. and Zhang, L.M., “Improved damage quantification from elemental modal strain energy change” , Journal of Engineering Mechanics-ASCE, 128(5), pp.521–529(2002)
35.Kim, J.T., Ryu, Y.S., Cho, H.M. and Stubbs, N., “Damage identification in beam-type structures: frequency-based method vs. mode-shape based method” , Engineering Structures, 25(1), pp.57–67(2003)
36.Barroso, L.R. and Rodriguez, R., “Application of the damage index method to phase II of the analytical SHM benchmark problem” , 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, Columbia University(2002)
37.郭家宇,「頻率反應函數於房屋結構健康監測的應用」,碩士論文,交通大學工程系所,新竹,民國99年8月
38.黃進國,「梁結構損傷偵測」,博士論文,中央大學土木工程系所, 桃園,民國98年6月
39.詹英舜,「小型柱之結構健康監測與診斷」,碩士論文,台北科技大學土木工程系所,台北,民國101年7月
40.莊靜怡,「應用HHT頻譜於結構物地震損傷之研究」,碩士論文,中央大學土木工程系所, 桃園,民國98年2月
41.許丁友,「土木基礎結構損壞偵測技術:含非線性環境影響之考慮」, 博士論文,臺灣大學土木工程系所,台北,民國99年
42.Lysmer, J., “Analytical Procedures in Soil Dynamics, ” Report No. EERC 78-29, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley(1978)
43.Gupta, S., Lin, T.W., Penzien, J. and Yen, C.S., “Hybrid Modelling of Soil Structure Interaction, ” Report No. EERC 80-9, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley(1980)
44.Mita A. and Luco, J.E., “ Impedance functions and input motions for embedded square foundations” , J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE 115(4) (1989) 491-503.
45.Hou, Z., Noori, M. and Amand, R.S., “Wavelet-based approach for structural damage detection” ,Journal of Engineering Mechanics 126.7,pp. 677-683(2000)
46.Hera, A. and Hou, Z., “Application of wavelet approach for ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark studies” , Journal of Engineering Mechanics 130.1, pp.96-104(2004)
47.Ovanesova, A.V. and Suarez, L.E., “Applications of wavelet transforms to damage detection in frame structures” , Engineering structures 26.1,pp.39-49(2004)
48.Kim, H. and Melhem, H., “Damage detection of structures by wavelet analysis” , Engineering Structures 26.3,pp. 347-362(2004)
49.Sampaio, R.P.C., Maia, N.M.M. and Silva, J.M.M., “Damage detection using the frequency-response-function curvature method” , Journal of Sound and Vibration 226 ,pp.1029–1042(1999)
50.Maia, N.M.M., Silva, J.M.M. and Almas, E.A.M., “Damage detection in structures: from mode shape to frequency response function methods” ,Mechanical System Signal Processing 17 (3) , pp.489–498 (2003)
51.Thyagarajan, S.K., Schulz, M.J., Pai, P.F. and Chung, J., “ Detecting structural damage using frequency response functions” , Journal of Sound and Vibration, 210(1), 162-170(1998)
52.Lee, U. and Shin, J., “A frequency response function-based structural damage identification method”, Computers & Structures 80.2 ,pp.117-132(2002)
53.徐銘志,「鋼骨結構物之易損性分析」,碩士論文,中央大學土木工程系所,桃園,民國95年10月

QR CODE