由於生產程序的變遷及傳統產業的工廠遷往工資較低的地方，留下許多結構體還未達耐用年限的老舊廠房。由於早期的廠房或廠辦產權所有人太多，很難全部拆除重建。且從珍惜地球資源的角度來看，這些老舊廠房的結構體還堪用，應盡可能透過整建翻新的方法來重整，讓現代化的生產模式與流程在翻新的老舊廠房可以被實現。本研究擬定一套系統化的方法來協助參與老舊工廠翻修整建的高階管理者能有效的進行決策制定。研究進行過程中，首先應用模糊德爾菲法（FDM），透過立意抽樣法問卷調查找出工業生產流程及建築方面專家所共同認可對老舊廠房整建決策較具影響的因子。其次，再進一步用模糊集合理論（Fuzzy set theory）及層級分析法（AHP），同樣採立意抽樣法問卷調查，並依據專家的意見來估算個別因子的權重及優先順序。問卷調查分析結果顯示專家共同認可的影響因子有12項。其中，依據專家意見計算出個別因子的權重後顯示：最重要的前三項因子依次為：1）建築材料, 2）空氣汙染, 3）能源和環境效率。利用本研究所獲得的結果，應該可以協助老舊廠房翻修整建的決策者比較有效的來評選及推動工作。此外我們把這個系統再進一步演化，也可以應用到其他類型的建築翻修整建評估。文中舉工業建築翻修整建的案例比較，也顯示系統可協助決策者選出比較具有潛力或優勢的方案。同時，對生產事業的從業人員也能夠提供一套具有環境保護意義的學習模式，對國際大廠供應鏈的環保要求也比較有深刻的認知。

Many industrial buildings became derelict due to the changes of production processes as well as the migration of conventional industries that move to lower costs states. It is difficult to tear down and rebuild these derelict industrial buildings because the complexity of the real estate property rights in Taiwan. Most of these industrial buildings are still in their effective service life. For sustainable development purposes as well as reducing consumption of resources, it is crucial to renovate the old buildings to fit the current production processes. A systematic approach is proposed in this research to assist top management in making effective decisions under the multi-criteria of a renovation plan. A Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) was first applied in conjunction with an intentional sampling technique to identify common criteria that may affect old industrial building renovation. Twelve criteria were identified by the responses of practitioners from both production and building related areas. An Analytical hierarchical process (AHP) is then utilized to quantify the weighs for each criterion in a renovation scheme. Results show that three most crucial factors in sequential order are building material, air pollution and energy efficiency. The proposed system should be very helpful in assisting renovation decisions. Similar approach may evolve to assist different types of building renovation projects.

英文部分
1.Achim, M. I., Stan, A. V., & Dragolea, L. L. (2018). Study on the importance of sustainable development strategy for a community. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 19(1), 152-162.
2.Akadiri, P. O., Olomolaiye, P. O., & Chinyio, E. A. (2013). Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects. Automation in Construction, 30, 113-125.
3.Altomonte, S., Schiavon, S., Kent, M. G., & Brager, G. (2017). Indoor environmental quality and occupant satisfaction in green-certified buildings. Building Research & Information, 1-20.
4.Arnold, T. J., Fang, E. E., & Palmatier, R. W. (2011). The effects of customer acquisition and retention orientations on a firm’s radical and incremental innovation performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 234-251.
5.Böhm, G., & Pfister, H. R. (2005). Consequences, morality, and time in environmental risk evaluation. Journal of Risk Research, 8(6), 461-479.
6.Brondi, S., Sarrica, M., Cibin, R., Neresini, F., & Contarello, A. (2012). The Chiampo River 30 years later: long‐term effects of environmental regulations on social representations. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22(4), 283-299.
7.Caillaud, S., Kalampalikis, N., & Flick, U. (2012). The social representations of the Bali climate conference in the French and German media. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22(4), 363-378.
8.Climate Change Performance Index. （2020/4/26）. The Climate Change Performance Index is an independent monitoring tool of countries’ climate protection performance. Retrieved from https://www.climate-change-performance-index.org/
9.Chiang, T. Y. (2019). Real Estate Developer's Product Positioning: AHP-Utility-Based Model. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 23(5), 317-327.
10.Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Ameyaw, E. E., Owusu, E. K., Pärn, E., & Edwards, D. J. (2019). Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. International journal of construction management, 19(5), 436-452.
11.Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.
12.Gudienė, N., Banaitis, A., Podvezko, V., & Banaitienė, N. (2014). Identification and evaluation of the critical success factors for construction projects in Lithuania: AHP approach. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(3), 350-359.
13.Herrmann, C., Schmidt, C., Kurle, D., Blume, S., & Thiede, S. (2014). Sustainability in manufacturing and factories of the future. International Journal of precision engineering and manufacturing-green technology, 1(4), 283-292.
14.Ho, W., & Ma, X. (2018). The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(2), 399-414.
15.Hosseini, S. T., Lale Arefi, S., Bitarafan, M., Abazarlou, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2016). Evaluation types of exterior walls to reconstruct Iran earthquake areas (Ahar Heris Varzeqan) by using AHP and fuzzy methods. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 20(3), 328-340.
16.Hsueh, S. L. (2012). A fuzzy utility-based multi-criteria model for evaluating households’ energy conservation performance: a Taiwanese case study. Energies, 5(8), 2818-2834.
17.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. （2020/4/26）. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change － Global Warming of 1.5 °C. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/spm-a/spm1_figure-final-2/
18.Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., & Mieno, H. (1993). The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55(3), 241-253.
19.Juan, Y. K., Perng, Y. H., Castro-Lacouture, D., & Lu, K. S. (2009). Housing refurbishment contractors selection based on a hybrid fuzzy-QFD approach. Automation in Construction, 18(2), 139-144.
20.Kahlor, L., & Rosenthal, S. (2009). If we seek, do we learn? Predicting knowledge of global warming. Science Communication, 30(3), 380-414.
21.Kaya, İ., & Kahraman, C. (2014). A comparison of fuzzy multicriteria decision making methods for intelligent building assessment. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(1), 59-69.
22.Kim, S. H., Cohen, M. A., & Netessine, S. (2007). Performance contracting in after-sales service supply chains. Management Science, 53(12), 1843-1858.
23.Kuo, Y. F., & Chen, P. C. (2008). Constructing performance appraisal indicators for mobility of the service industries using Fuzzy Delphi Method. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(4), 1930-1939.
24.Lam, P. T. I., Chan, E. H. W., Poon, C. S., Chau, C. K., & Chun, K. P. (2010). Factors affecting the implementation of green specifications in construction. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(3), 654-661.
25.Li, T. H., Ng, S. T., & Skitmore, M. (2013). Evaluating stakeholder satisfaction during public participation in major infrastructure and construction projects: A fuzzy approach. Automation in construction, 29, 123-135.
26.Mamdani, E. H., & Assilian, S. (1975). An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International journal of man-machine studies, 7(1), 1-13.
27.Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications–Two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert systems with Applications, 42(8), 4126-4148.
28.Medineckiene, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Björk, F., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria decision-making system for sustainable building assessment/certification. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 15(1), 11-18.
29.Morgan, S. J., Pullon, S. R., Macdonald, L. M., McKinlay, E. M., & Gray, B. V. (2017). Case study observational research: A framework for conducting case study research where observation data are the focus. Qualitative health research, 27(7), 1060-1068.
30.Murata, K., Matsumoto, J., Tezuka, A., Matsuba, Y., & Yokoyama, H. (2005). Super-fine ink-jet printing: toward the minimal manufacturing system. Microsystem technologies, 12(1-2), 2.
31.Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (1992). Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
32.Rehman, O. U., & Ryan, M. J. (2018). A framework for design for sustainable future-proofing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 715-726.
33.Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26.
34.Santin, O. G., Itard, L., & Visscher, H. (2009). The effect of occupancy and building characteristics on energy use for space and water heating in Dutch residential stock. Energy and buildings, 41(11), 1223-1232.
35.Sarrica, M., Brondi, S., & Cottone, P. (2014). Italian views on sustainable energy: Trends in the representations of energy, energy system, and user, 2009–2011. Nature and Culture, 9(2), 122-145.
36.Satterthwaite, D. (2008). Climate Change and Urbanization: effects and implications urban governance, United Nations Secretariat.
37.Sauer, O. (2014). Information Technology for the Factory of the Future–State of the Art and Need for Action. Procedia CIRP, 25, 293-296.
38.Simanaviciene, R., Liaudanskiene, R., & Ustinovichius, L. (2014). Assessing reliability of design, construction, and safety related decisions. Automation in Construction, 39, 47-58.
39.Van-Leekwijck, W., & Kerre, E. E. (1999). Defuzzification: criteria and classification. Fuzzy sets and systems, 108(2), 159-178.
40.Von Mises, R. (2014). Mathematical theory of probability and statistics. Academic Press.
41.Whitmarsh, L. (2009). What's in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of "climate change" and "global warming". Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 401-420.
42.World Bank and United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN ISDR) (2008).
43.Yazdani-Chamzini, A. (2014). An integrated fuzzy multi criteria group decision making model for handling equipment selection. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(5), 660-673.
44.Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
45.Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353.
46.Zhang, X., Platten, A., & Shen, L. (2011). Green property development practice in China: costs and barriers. Building and Environment, 46(11), 2153-2160.

中文部分
1.MBA智庫百科 （2019）。檢索日期（2020/4/26）。取自MBA智庫百科，企業形象。網址：https://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E4%BC%81%E4%B8%9A%E5%BD%A2%E8%B1%A1。
2.MBA智庫百科 （2019）。檢索日期（2020/4/26）。取自MBA智庫百科，案例分析法。網址：https://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E6%A1%88%E4%BE%8B%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E6%B3%95。
3.全國法規資料庫網站 （2019）。檢索日期（2020/4/26）。取自全國法規資料庫網站，溫室氣體減量及管理法。網址：https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0020098。
4.行政院主計處 （2019）。檢索日期（2020/4/26）。取自行政院主計處，工業及服務業普查縣市別初步統計結果。網址：https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1。
5.行政院環境保護署 （2019）。檢索日期（2020/4/26）。取自溫室氣體減量及管理法立法與未來施政重點。網址：https://www.epa.gov.tw/。
6.吳伯翊 （2015）。政策工具與經濟對能源消費之影響。未出版之碩士論文。私立淡江大學會計學系，新北市。
7.李永展、董娟鳴、林士堅 （2017）。台灣區域容受力及生態足跡之研究。建築學報，(102)，37-52。
8.李君如、陳俞伶 （2010）。觀光工廠顧客滿意度模式的建構與實證研究。Journal of Data Analysis，5(1)，23-51。
9.沈旭明、姜廷宜、方豪 （2019）。探究商辦大樓颱風災害防範管理之關鍵指標。物業管理學報，10(1)，1-12。
10.侯文蕙譯，Donald Worster著 （1999）。自然的經濟體系 － 生態思想史（Natur’s Economy—A history of Ecological Ideas）。中國：商務印書館。
11.姜廷宜 （2019）。提升物業管理服務品質之創價模型。未出版之博士論文。國立臺灣科技大學建築研究所，臺北市。
12.能源知識庫 （2019）。檢索日期（2020/4/26）。取自國際能源總署（IEA）2018年能源效率市場報告解析。網址：https://km.twenergy.org.tw/DocumentFree/reference_more?id=208。
13.高力國際 （2019）。檢索日期（2020/4/26）。取自台灣工業地產的機遇與挑戰研究報告。網址：https://www.colliers.com/zh-tw/taiwan/insights/researchlibrary。
14.陳海曙 （2017）。綠色工業革命時代之綠建築技術。技師期刊，(76)，18-22。
15.黃克明、曾俊達、晁立中 （2013）。以模糊邏輯評比住宅投資案之研究。中國土木水利工程學刊，25(2)，171-181。
16.楊意菁、徐美苓 （2012）。環境風險的認知與溝通：以全球暖化議題的情境公眾為例。中華傳播學刊，(22)，169-209。
17.經濟部工業局 （2019）。檢索日期（2020/4/26）。取自經濟部工業局「綠色工廠推動計畫」。網址：https://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/ctlr?PRO=project.rwdProjectList&cate=101。
18.經濟部工業局台灣工業用地供給與服務資訊網 （2019）。檢索日期（2020/4/26）。取自經濟部工業局台灣工業用地供給與服務資訊網。網址：https://idbpark.moeaidb.gov.tw/#。
19.劉禹其 （2011）。氣候變遷脆弱度指標於都市空間規劃應用之研究。未出版之碩士論文。國立台北大學都市計畫研究所，臺北市。
20.Csrone 電子文教基金會、環境資訊中心/鄒敏惠 （2018）。檢索日期（2020/4/26）。取自《地球暖化1.5°C》 IPCC特別報告—決策者摘要。網址：https://csrone.com/news/5198。
21.環境資訊中心 （2019）。檢索日期（2020/4/26）。取自宣示2050年零碳排全球87大企業領頭邁向1.5℃目標。網址：https://e-info.org.tw/node/220337。
22.聯合新聞網 （2019）。檢索日期（2020/4/26）。取自聯合新聞網-工業用地興旺 新竹工業區2萬坪建物釋出。網址： https://house.udn.com/house/story/5889/3690126。
23.行政院國家科學委員會 （2017）。臺灣氣候變遷科學報告2017—衝擊與調適面向。（研究團隊：童慶斌、李培芬、林幸助、李明旭、盧虎生、蘇慧貞、張靜貞、詹士樑、許泰文、李河清等）。行政院國家科學委員會，臺北市。