根據行政院主計統計，台灣農業勞動人口的年齡逐年攀升，同時2020年初爆發的新冠疫情對全球農產品市場產生了巨大衝擊。在這樣的情勢下，各國的糧食自給率變得尤為重要，為了因應這些挑戰，台灣行政院農委會積極推動各項農業轉型之計畫，在這之中智慧農業科技廠商扮演了不可或缺的角色。
本研究以個案研究的方法，並採取多重個案的方式，以靈巧能力的觀點，探索智慧農業科技廠商如何利用其科技框架所識別之物質性，並且透過組織的靈巧能力，幫助農業領域達到可供性實現，進一步使科技賦能，促進農業的可持續發展。
本研究以智慧農業科技廠商為研究對象，個案包括：鍠麟機械、農識國際、智食良果。透過分析三間個案公司，探討組織如何利用核心能力，及開發關係資源，在農業領域達到可供性實現，將其技術與能力落實應用。本研究提出一套「智慧農業的可供性實現之歷程」之架構，透過此理論架構，能夠為智慧農業領域提供有價值的洞察和建議，進一步推動智慧農業領域的升級與發展。

According to the statistics from the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics of the Executive Yuan, the average age of Taiwan's agricultural workforce has been increasing year by year. The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 has had a significant impact on the global agricultural market. In this situation, the rate of food self-sufficiency has become particularly important for countries worldwide. To cope with these challenges, the Council of Agriculture under Taiwan's Executive Yuan has been actively promoting various agricultural transformation plans, in which smart agriculture technology companies play an indispensable role.
This study adopts a case study approach and utilizes multiple cases to investigate how smart agriculture technology companies identify materiality within their technological frames. Additionally, how organizations use their Ambidexterity capabilities to actualize affordances, thereby facilitating the digital transformation of agriculture and promoting the sector's sustainable development.
Huang Lin Machinery, Smartagr Integration Service, Kiao Farming are the main research subjects. The study analyzes how they exploitation their core ability and exploration the relational network resources , this research proposes a framework of " The process of affordance actualization in smart agriculture", By utilizing this theoretical framework, valuable insights and recommendations can be provided for the field of smart agriculture, further promoting its advancement and development.

中文部分
陳向明，2002，社會科學質的研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
英文部分
Barua, A., Konana, P., Whinston, A. B., & Yin, F. (2004). An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 585–620
Challa, M., & Tilahun, U. (2014). Determinants and impacts of modern agricultural technology adoption in west Wollega: the case of Gulliso district. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 4(20), 63-77.
Davidson, E. (2006). A technological frames perspective on information technology and organizational change. The journal of applied behavioral science, 42(1), 23-39.
Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The management of organization, 1(1), 167-188.
Faik, I., Barrett, M., & Oborn, E. (2020). How information technology matters in societal change: An affordance-based institutional logics perspective. MIS quarterly, 44(3). 1359–1390.
Fiedler, K. D., Grover, V., & Teng, J. T. C. (1995). An empirical study of information technology enabled business process redesign and corporate competitive strategy. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(1), 17-30.
Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology press.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
Hartson, R. (2003). Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behaviour & information technology, 22(5), 315-338.
Hedrick, T. E., Bickman, L., & Rog, D. J. (1993). Applied research design: A practical guide. Sage Publications.
Huang, C. T., Fu, T. Y. R., & Chang, S. S. (2009). Crops and food security-experiences and perspectives from Taiwan. Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition, 18(4), 520-526.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
Maria, K., Maria, B., & Andrea, K. (2021). Exploring actors, their constellations, and roles in digital agricultural innovations. Agricultural Systems, 186, 102952.
Markus, M. L., & Silver, M. S. (2008). A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole's concepts of structural features and spirit. Journal of the Association for Information systems, 9(10), 609-632
Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS quarterly, 28(2), 283-322.
Nagy, P., & Neff, G. (2015). Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media+ Society, 1(2), 1–9.
Neuman, W. Lawrence (2017). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson Education Inc., 7th ed.
Nevo, S., & Wade, M. R. (2010). The formation and value of IT-enabled resources: antecedents and consequences of synergistic relationships. MIS quarterly, 34(1) , 163-183.
Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic books.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994). Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 12(2), 174-207.
Stoffregen, T. A. (2003). Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system. Ecological psychology, 15(2), 115-134.
Strong, D. M., Volkoff, O., Johnson, S. A., Pelletier, L. R., Tulu, B., Bar-On, I., & Garber, L. (2014). A theory of organization-EHR affordance actualization. Journal of the association for information systems, 15(2), 53–85
Suakanto, S., Engel, V. J., Hutagalung, M., & Angela, D. (2016, October). Sensor networks data acquisition and task management for decision support of smart farming. In 2016 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI),1-5
Thomas, G. (2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative inquiry, 17(6), 511-521.
Vaast, E., Safadi, H., Lapointe, L., & Negoita, B. (2017). Social Media Affordances for Connective Action. MIS quarterly, 41(4), 1179-1206.
Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. M. (2013). Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. MIS quarterly, 37(3), 819–834.
Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429-442.
Wang, J., Shao, W., & Kim, J. (2020). Analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on the correlations between crude oil and agricultural futures. Chaos, solitons, and fractals, 136, 109896.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications.

網路部分
上下游News&Market，(2023)，農識國際技轉，https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/177555/
行政院農業委員會農業試驗所，(2023)，智農是什麼，https://www.intelligentagri.com.tw/xmdoc/cont?xsmsid=0J164373919378174143
社會創新平台，(2023)，智食良果農來福之介紹，https://si.taiwan.gov.tw/Home/Org?Fid=3145
高雄區農業改良場，(2023)，慶奇科技應用實例
https://www.tdais.gov.tw/upload/tdais/files/web_structure/12741/11-果樹生產智慧化與應用實例.pdf
農業科技決策資訊平台，(2023)，什麼是氣候智慧型農業，https://agritech-foresight.atri.org.tw/article/contents/4229
農識國際，官方網站，https://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/indicator/Indicator.aspx
臺大農推會，(2019)，農業推廣手冊第74期，http://ntucae.ntu.edu.tw/?page_id=1949
數位時代，(2022)，微軟、遠傳、鍠麟三方攜手 智慧農業走向AI數據化https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/68206/microsoft_202204