近年來，數位公民利用開源軟體社群促使大眾參與公眾事務的模式逐漸廣為人知。G0V開源軟體社群藉由資訊科技，推動公民持續參與開源貢獻以強化公共事務，成為了翻轉公民參與形式的重要推手。尤其以「G0V開源軟體社群」以在國際間開源軟體社群中廣為人知。

本研究使用質化研究方法，以G0V開源軟體社群成員為對象，探究成員持續參與動機。本研究針對五名當前仍持續參與G0V社群的成員作為主要研究對象，利用個案研究，探究該G0V開源軟體社群短期、中期、長期參與者如何透過持續投入社群活動解決開源軟體社群參與者流動性高的問題。另外，也會探討個人的生存需求、聯結需求與成長需求如何藉由社群參與者的持續投入產生交互作用，了解G0V對參與者個人動機所帶來的正向影響，探討其參與行為在社交、專案、個人等面向之影響與改變。

本研究發現，G0V社群參與者的持續參與動機，受生存、聯結與成長需求強烈影響。首先，社交與專案能力能增強參與動機，但個人生活型態對持續投入也可能產生阻礙。另外，數位公民在選擇是否持續參與，與他人的聯結感將會反應在社交互動上。當獲得成情感與社交支持時，會產生價值觀積極改變與作為。再者，當專案產出具有價值與影響力又能達成利他行為時，參與意願會因此提升。故強化社群成員間交流互動，除得鞏固個人參與動機，亦能產生自我實現的感受。

In recent years, digital citizens using the model of open-source software communities to encourage the public to participate in public affairs have gradually become widely known. The G0V open-source software community uses information technology to promote the continuous participation of citizens. It doesn’t only strengthen citizen engagement in public affairs but also becomes an important role in overturning citizen participation. "G0V Open Source Software Community" is rapidly known in the international open-source software community.

This research uses qualitative research methods to explore members' motivation in continuous participation in the GOV open-source software community. Mainly focuses on five members that are still being participated in the G0V community as the main research objects. Case studies are used to explore how short-term, mid-term, and long-term participants can solve with high open-source software community members turnover rate problem via ERG theory (Existence Needs, Relatedness Needs, and Growth Needs Theory, ERG Theory). To keep digital citizenship participating in open-source software community activities. In addition, existence needs, relatedness needs, growth needs in ERG theory will come up interaction, even take the positive impact on the social, project, personal sides.

According to the study results, the motivation of participants in the G0V community to continue to participate is strongly influenced by the need for ERG. First of all, social and project skills can enhance motivation to participate. However, personal life-model also would be a barrier to continuous engagement. Apart from this, when digital citizens consider whether to continue to participate, the bond between others will be reflected on social interaction. When citizens get emotional and social to support, it will produce positive changes in values and actions. On the other hand, when the project output more social value, influence, and can achieve altruistic behavior, the willingness to participate will also increase. So, promoting communication and interaction between open-source community members can consolidate personal motivation for participation, generates a sense of self-achievement.

中文文獻
1. 鄭婷宇,&林子倫.(2018).鍵盤參與:從[零時政府]檢視黑客社群協作式的公民參與.傳播與社會學刊,(46),15-51.
英文文獻
1. Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational behavior and human performance, 4(2), 142-175.
2. Alderfer,C.P. (1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth: Human needs in organizational settings.
3. Aristeidou, M., Scanlon, E., & Sharples, M. (2017). Profiles of engagement in online communities of citizen science participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 246-256.
4. Arnolds,C.A., & Boshoff, C. (2002). Compensation, esteem valence and job performance: an empirical assessment of Alderfer's ERG theory. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(4), 697-719.
5. Babbie, E. R. (2016). The basics of social research. Cengage learning.
6. Babbie, E. R. (2020). The practice of social research. Cengage learning.
7. Baytiyeh, H., & Pfaffman, J. (2010). Open source software: A community of altruists. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1345-1354.
8. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The clearing house, 83(2), 39-43.
9. Bennett, L., & Fessenden, J. (2006). Citizenship through online communication. Social Education, 70(3), 144.
10. Berson,I.R., & Berson, M. J. (2003). Digital literacy for effective citizenship.(Advancing Technology). Social Education, 67(3), 164-168.
11. Bouzguenda, I., Alalouch, C., & Fava, N. (2019). Towards smart sustainable cities: A review of the role digital citizen participation could play in advancing social sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101627.
12. Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input.
13. Bretthauer, D. (2001). Open source software: A history.
14. Briscoe, G. (2014). Digital innovation: The hackathon phenomenon.
15. Bryman, A., & Burgess, B. (Eds.). (2002). Analyzing qualitative data. Routledge
16. Cantador, I., Cortés-Cediel, M. E., & Fernández, M. (2020). Exploiting Open Data to analyze discussion and controversy in online citizen participation. Information Processing & Management, 57(5), 102301.
17. Caulton, J. R. (2012). The development and use of the theory of ERG: A literature review. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 5(1), 2-8.
18. Chang, H. H., & Chuang, S. S. (2011). Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator. Information & management, 48(1), 9-18.
19. Chen, Y. Y., Park, J., & Park, A. (2012). Existence, relatedness, or growth? Examining turnover intention of public child welfare caseworkers from a human needs approach. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(10), 2088-2093.
20. Choi, J. C., & Song, C. (2020). Factors explaining why some citizens engage in E-participation, while others do not. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101524.
21. Choi, M. (2016). A concept analysis of digital citizenship for democratic citizenship education in the internet age. Theory & research in social education, 44(4), 565-607.
22. Choi, M., Cristol, D., & Gimbert, B. (2018). Teachers as digital citizens: The influence of individual backgrounds, internet use and psychological characteristics on teachers’ levels of digital citizenship. Computers & Education, 121, 143-161.
23. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Sage Publications, Inc.
24. Coleman, J. S. (1987). Norms as social capital. Economic imperialism: The economic approach applied outside the field of economics, 133-155.
25. Coleman, S. (2006). Digital voices and analogue citizenship Bridging the gap between young people and the democratic process. Public policy research, 13(4), 257-261.
26. Cooper, D. R., Schindler, P. S., & Sun, J. (2006). Business research methods (Vol. 9, pp. 1-744). New York: Mcgraw-hill.
27. Costa Fonte, C., Fritz, S., Olteanu-Raimond, A. M., Antoniou, V., Foody, G., Mooney,P., & See, L. (2017). Mapping and the citizen sensor (p. 398). Ubiquity Press.
28. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
29. DeLuca, K. M., Lawson, S., & Sun, Y. (2012). Occupy Wall Street on the public screens of social media: The many framings of the birth of a protest movement. Communication, Culture & Critique, 5(4), 483-509.
30. Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative research. A user-friendly guide for social scientists
31. Diep, N. A., Cocquyt, C., Zhu, C., & Vanwing, T. (2016). Predicting adult learners’ online participation: Effects of altruism, performance expectancy, and social capital. Computers & Education, 101, 84-101.
32. Dornyei, Z., & Ottó, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation.
33. Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2021). Teaching and researching motivation.
34. Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018). Beyond technology: Identifying local government challenges for using digital platforms for citizen engagement. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 17-20.
35. Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of economic perspectives, 14(3), 159-181.
36. Fitzgerald, B. (2006). The transformation of open source software. MIS quarterly, 587-598.
37. Flores, C. C., & Rezende, D. A. (2018). Twitter information for contributing to the strategic digital city: Towards citizens as co-managers. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1082-1096.
38. Furby, L. (1978). Possession in humans: An exploratory study of its meaning and motivation. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 6(1), 49-65.
39. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. mill valley.
40. Glassman, M., Bartholomew, M., & Hur, E. H. (2013). The importance of the second loop in educational technology: An action science study of introducing blogging in a course curriculum. Action research, 11(4), 337-353.
41. Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension (Vol. 609). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
42. Herrera, L. (2012). Youth and citizenship in the digital age: A view from Egypt. Harvard Educational Review, 82(3), 333-352.
43. Hicks, D., van Hover, S., Washington, E. Y., & Lee, J. K. (2011). Internet literacies for active citizenship and democratic life. Contemporary social studies: An essential reader, 467-491.
44. Hippel, E. V., & Krogh, G. V. (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization science, 14(2), 209-223.
45. Hsu, C. I. (2008). I in JC C. Aeeeptauce of blog usage: The ro1es 0f tech. nology acceptance, social intluenee and knowledge sharing motiva—tion. Infornlation&. Management, 45(1), 65-74.
46. Isman, A., & Canan Gungoren, O. (2014). Digital citizenship. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(1), 73-77.
47. Janssen, M., & Charalabidis, Y. A. Zuiderwijk (2012).‘Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government’. Information systems management, 29(4), 258-268.
48. Jennett, C., & Cox, A. L. (2018). Digital citizen science and the motivations of volunteers. The Wiley Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, 2, 831-841.
49. Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014, May). The promises and perils of mining github. In Proceedings of the 11th working conference on mining software repositories (pp. 92-101).
50. Kittur, A., Suh, B., Pendleton, B. A., & Chi, E. H. (2007, April). He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 453-462).
51. Klaßmann, S., Dahmen, N., & Seifert, U. A Digital Habitat for interdisciplinary music research and teaching.
52. Kleinsmann, M., Deken, F., Dong, A., & Lauche, K. (2012). Development of design collaboration skills. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(7), 485-506.
53. Kropf, M., & Knack, S. (2003). Viewers like you: Community norms and contributions to public broadcasting. Political Research Quarterly, 56(2), 187-197.
54. Kuo, Y. K. (2013). Organizational commitment in an intense competition environment. Industrial Management & Data Systems.
55. Lakhani, K. R., & von Hippel, E. (2003). How open source software works: ‘‘Free” user-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 32, 923–943.
56. Lakhani, K., & Fayard, A. L. N., Pkorywa, SH (2013). OpenIDEO, 612(066), 1-29.
57. Lawler III, E. E., Ledford Jr, G. E., & Chang, L. (1993). Who uses skill-based pay, and why. Compensation & Benefits Review, 25(2), 22-26.
58. Lawler III, E. E., Mohrman, S., & Ledford Jr, G. E. (1992). The fortune 1000 and total quality. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 15(5), 6.
59. Lee, S., & Park, D. H. (2019). Community attachment formation and its influence on sustainable participation in a digitalized community: Focusing on content and social capital of an online community. Sustainability, 11(10), 2935.
60. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, Kindness and Cruelty on Social Network Sites: How American Teens Navigate the New World of" Digital Citizenship". Pew Internet & American Life Project.
61. Lin, K. Y., & Lu, H. P. (2011). Intention to continue using Facebook fan pages from the perspective of social capital theory. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(10), 565-570.
62. Longford, G. (2005). Pedagogies of digital citizenship and the politics of code. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 9(1), 68-96.
63. Ma, W. WK, & Chan, A.(2014). Knowledge sharing and social media: altruism, perceived online attachment motivation, and perceived online relationship commitment. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 51-58.
64. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50(4), 370.
65. Maxwell, J. A. (2008). Designing a qualitative study. The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods, 2, 214-253.
66. Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). Sage publications.
67. McClean, K., Greer, D., & Jurek-Loughry, A. (2020). Social Network Analysis of Open Source Software: A Review and Categorisation. Information and Software Technology, 106442.
68. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human resource management review, 1(1), 61-89.
69. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd.
70. Moeller, S., Joseph, A., Lau, J., & Carbo, T. (2011). Towards Media and Information Literacy Indicators. Background Document of the Expert Meeting.
71. Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship. The internet, society, and participation, 1.
72. Moussawi, S., & Koufaris, M. (2015). Working on low-paid micro-task crowdsourcing platforms: An existence, relatedness and growth view.
73. Murray, N. (2012). Writing essays in English language and linguistics: Principles, tips and strategies for undergraduates. Cambridge University Press.
74. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011, June). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th annual international digital government research conference: digital government innovation in challenging times (pp. 282-291).
75. Naranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., Cruz-Jesus, F., Martins, J., Gonçalves, R., Branco, F., & Xavier, N. (2019). Examining social capital and individual motivators to explain the adoption of online citizen participation. Future Generation Computer Systems, 92, 302-311.
76. Newman, M. E. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM review, 45(2), 167-256.
77. Oh, W., & Jeon, S. (2007). Membership herding and network stability in the open source community: The Ising perspective. Management science, 53(7), 1086-1101.
78. Ohler, J. (2011). Digital citizenship means character education for the digital age. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(sup1), 25-27.
79. Orchard, S. (2018). Growing citizen science for conservation to support diverse project objectives and the motivations of volunteers. Pacific Conservation Biology, 25(4), 342-344.
80. Osterloh, M., & Rota, S. (2016). Trust and community in open source software production. In Trust and Community on the Internet (pp. 279-301). De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
81. Palacin, V., Ferrario, M. A., Hsieh, G., Knutas, A., Wolff, A., & Porras, J. (2021). Human values and digital citizen science interactions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 149, 102605.
82. Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation (No. 4). Sage.
83. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.
84. Pfeffer, J. (1998). Six dangerous myths about pay. Harvard business review, 76(3), 109-120.
85. Preece, J. (2016). Citizen science: New research challenges for human–computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(8), 585-612.
86. Preece, J., & Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability.
87. Rabey, G. P. (2001). Motivation is response. Industrial and commercial training.
88. Raoof, J. K., Zaman, H. B., Ahmad, A., & Al-Qaraghuli, A. (2013). Using social network systems as a tool for political change. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 8(21), 1143-1148.
89. Raven, B. H. (1964). Social influence and power. CALIFORNIA UNIV LOS ANGELES. 
90. Ren, Y., Harper, F. M., Drenner, S., Terveen, L., Kiesler, S., Riedl, J., & Kraut, R. E. (2012). Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. Mis Quarterly, 841-864.
91. Reynolds, G. (2011). Presentation Zen: Simple ideas on presentation design and delivery. New Riders.
92. Ribble, M. S., Bailey, G. D., & Ross, T. W. (2004). Digital citizenship: Addressing appropriate technology behavior. Learning & Leading with technology, 32(1), 6.
93. Roberts, J. A., Hann, I. H., & Slaughter, S. A. (2006). Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management science, 52(7), 984-999.
94. Rodgers, S., & Chen, Q. (2005). Internet community group participation: Psychosocial benefits for women with breast cancer. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), JCMC1047.
95. Saxby, S. (2015). The 2014 CLSR-LSPI Lisbon seminar on ‘the digital citizen’–Presented at the 9th International Conference on Legal, Security and Privacy Issues in IT Law (LSPI) 15–17 October 2014, Vieira De Almeida & Associados, Lisbon, Portugal. Computer Law & Security Review, 31(2), 163-180.
96. Schneider, A., Von Krogh, G., & Jäger, P. (2013). “What’s coming next?” Epistemic curiosity and lurking behavior in online communities. Computers in human behavior, 29(1), 293-303.
97. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
98. Sekhar, C., Patwardhan, M., & Singh, R. K. (2013). A literature review on motivation. Global business perspectives, 1(4), 471-487.
99. Simsek, E., & Simsek, A. (2013). New literacies for digital citizenship. Contemporary educational technology, 4(2), 126-137.
100. Srnka, K. J., & Koeszegi, S. T. (2007). From words to numbers: how to transform qualitative data into meaningful quantitative results. Schmalenbach Business Review, 59(1), 29-57.
101. Stake, R. (1995). The art of casestudy research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
102. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
103. Tatarchevskiy, T. (2011). The ‘popular’culture of internet activism. New Media & Society, 13(2), 297-313.
104. Tellis, W. (1997). Application of a case study methodology. The qualitative report, 3(3), 1-19.
105. Tellis, W. (1997). Introduction to case study. The qualitative report, 269.
106. Topi, H., & Tucker, A. (Eds.). (2014). Computing handbook: Information systems and information technology (Vol. 2). CRC Press.
107. Torvalds, L., & Diamond, D. (2001). Just for fun: The story of an accidental revolutionary. Harper Audio.
108. Torvalds,L., & Ghosh, R. A. (1998). What motivates free software developers?'Interview. First Monday, 3(3).
109. Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(4), 439-459.
110. VanFossen, P. J. (2006). The electronic republic? Evidence on the impact of the Internet on citizenship and civic engagement in the US. International Journal of Social Education, 21(1), 18-43.
111. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
112. Wang, R. (2020). Marginality and team building in collaborative crowdsourcing. Online Information Review.
113. Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS quarterly, 35-57.
114. Wilcove, G. L. (1978). The ERG model: Expansion and application to Navy personnel. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 13(3), 305-316.
115. Winn, M. R. (2012). Promote digital citizenship through school-based social networking. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(4), 10-13.
116. Xu, B., & Jones, D. R. (2010). Volunteers' participation in open source software development: a study from the social-relational perspective. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 41(3), 69-84.
117. Yang, C. L., Hwang, M., & Chen, Y. C. (2011). An empirical study of the existence, relatedness and growth (ERG) theory in consumers selection of mobile value-added services. African Journal of Business Management, 5(19), 7885-7898.
118. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods/Robert K. Yin, Applied social research methods series, 5.
119. Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
120. Zhao, Y., Llorente, A. M. P., & Gómez, M. C. S. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 104212.
網站資源
1. Marcinek, A. (2011). The path to digital citizenship. Retrieved from: http://www.edutopia.org/blog/the-path-to-digital-citizenship-andrew-marcinek
2. Ruge, T., 2015. Technology and people power: 5 ways to shape the sustainable development goals | global development professionals network | the guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2015/jan /15/sustainble-development-goals-technology-participation-africa. (Accessed on 08/01/2019).  
3. g0v台灣零時政府官方網站：https://g0v.tw/
4. Github開源官方網站：https://github.com/
5. Inside官方網站：https://www.inside.com.tw
6. 國家發展委員會官方網站：https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Default.aspx
7. 數位時代官方網站：https://www.bnext.com.tw/