2021年行政院國家發展委員會推動台灣地方創生2.0計畫，相較於以中央政府為推動核心的1.0計畫，2.0計畫更擴大延攬返鄉青年、在地店家、地方機關包含：公所、農會、協會等作為合作夥伴，透過集體價值共創來推展地方創生，因此價值共創概念導入地方創生的個案是具備前瞻性的，本研究將使用Python程式語言，收集冬山地方創生官宣資料及消費者線上評論，從供給需求兩方的視角切入，探討價值共創導入地方創生之狀況。
主要分為兩大研究，研究一，透過收集新聞報導、部落客文章，從供給視角出發，歸納出當前冬山地方創生主推的關鍵地方元素及重點活動，再進行研究二，收集消費者線上評論，以需求視角，萃取消費者對於冬山地方創生價值共創成果的感知，最後藉由需求方的感知來檢視供給方的價值共創成效，給予冬山地方創生運營之策略建議。
研究一主要呈現「地名」、「合作夥伴與其推廣活動」、「冬山特色文化」，可以發現冬山地方創生確實以夥伴價值共創的成果作為主推重點，再看到研究二，其結果顯示消費者對於冬山老街、茶文化、老屋再造、知名景點、代表伴手禮、生態環境等有深刻感受，甚至達到願意推薦給其他遊客的層次。由研究二結果檢視研究一結果，本研究建議集結更多價值夥伴，舉辦更為豐富的冬山特色文化之藝文活動讓消費者參與，讓消費者能更深刻感受到其他冬山特色文化，同時共創夥伴應繼續保持熱心親切的良好服務態度，以及繼續維持場域環境狀態，並依狀況提升環境品質。
綜上所述，冬山鄉能從消費者視角調整共創方針，讓價值共創不斷帶動冬山地方創生向上發展。

In 2021, the National Development Committee of the Executive promoted the Taiwan Regional Revitalization 2.0 Plan. Compared with the 1.0 Plan with the central government as the core, the 2.0 Plan expanded to invite youth, local shops, and local agencies including: public offices, Farmers' associations, associations, etc., as partners, promote regional revitalization through collective value co-creation. Therefore, the case where the concept of value co-creation is introduced into regional revitalization would be forward-looking. Our research would use the Python to collect official propaganda materials and consumer online reviews of Dongshan regional revitalization, from the perspective of supply and demand, to discuss the situation of value co-creation leading to regional revitalization.
The research was mainly divided into two major researches. Research 1, through collecting news reports and blogger articles, from the perspective of supply, summarizes the key local elements and key activities currently promoted by Dongshan regional revitalization, and then conducts research 2, from the perspective of demand, collect consumer online comments, extracting consumers' perception of Dongshan regional revitalization and co-creation results, and finally examine the supply-side value co-creation effect through the perception of the demand side, give Dongshan regional revitalization and operation strategy suggestions.
Study 1 presents "place names", "partners and their promotion activities", and "Dongshan characteristic culture". It can be found that Dongshan Regional revitalization focus on the achievements of partners' value co-creation. Then see study 2, the results show that consumer have a deep understanding of Dongshan Old Street, tea culture, old house reconstruction, well-known attractions, representative gifts, ecological environment, etc., and even reach the level of being willing to recommend it to other tourists. Based on the results of Study 2 and the results of Study 1, we proposes to gather more value partners and hold more abundant Dongshan characteristic cultural arts and cultural activities for consumers to participate in, so that consumers can more deeply experience other Dongshan characteristic cultures. Creation partners should continue to maintain a warm and cordial good service attitude, continue to maintain the state of the field environment, and improve the environmental quality according to the situation.
To sum up, Dongshan could adjust the co-creation policy from the perspective of consumers, so that value co-creation can continuously drive Dongshan local creation to develop upward.

江秀姿. (2021). 從東川町立日語學校的營運看地方創生. 中華日本研究, (12), 116-137.
李柏洲, 徐廣玉, & 蘇屹. (2014). 中小企業合作創新行為形成機理研究——基于計畫行為理論的解釋架構. 科學學研究, 32(5), 777-786.
李麗娟. (2012). 旅遊體驗價值共創研究——以北京香山公園為例. 地理與地理信息科學, 28(3), 96-100.
施琳霞. (2020). 價值共創視閾下的鄉村旅遊產業振興路徑研究. 中國經貿導刊，第二十七期：99-101。
國家發展委員會. (2015). 地方創生2.0青年帶動在地創生力。工商時報夏季號,19(2), 4-19。
國家發展委員會. (2015). 行政院地方創生會報第23次工作會議紀錄。取自：https://www.twrr.ndc.gov.tw/index。搜尋日期：2022年2月20日。
張振松, 許聰鑫, & 莊閔越. (2015). 開啟多贏局面! 地方產業共創價值模式. 產業管理評論, 8(1), 9-23.
張振松, 許聰鑫, & 莊閔越. (2015). 開啟多贏局面! 地方產業共創價值模式. 產業管理評論, 8(1), 9-23.
黃志隆. (2021). 日本地方創生中的地域共生社會: 市民經濟與公民經濟的論辯. 人文及社會科學集刊, 33(2), 333-373.
蔡志堅. (2018). 地方創生之設計力實踐. 國土及公共治理季刊, 6(2), 68-77.
蔡富湞, & 林義斌. (2021). 觀光休閒產業與地方創生策略初探-以宜蘭頭城休閒農場為例. 休閒研究, 11(1), 44-62.
關輝國, & 楊平泊. (2021). 價值共創研究進展述評與展望——從 “二元交互” 到 “網路系統” 視角. 商業經濟研究.
Abarca-Alvarez, F. J., Ali, M., Abawajy, J., Ali, R., Abbruzzo, A., Ali, Y., ... & Arjoune, Y. (2021). Acknowledgment to Reviewers of Information in 2020.
Chuang, M. T., Chou, W. H., Chang, C. H., & Chou, W. L. (2021). Examining the key drivers for regional revitalization based upon social network analysis: A case study of Badouzi in Taiwan. Marine Policy, 133, 104754.
de Lima Barros, S. É., da Silva Dias, T. M., de Moura, M. S. B., Soares, N. R. M., Pierote, N. R. A., de Araújo, C. O. D., ... & do Nascimento Nogueira, N. (2020). Relationship between selenium status and biomarkers of oxidative stress in Crohn's disease. Nutrition, 74, 110762.
Eletxigerra, A., Barrutia, J. M., & Echebarria, C. (2021). Tourist expertise and pre-travel value co-creation: Task-related processes and beyond. Tourism Management Perspectives, 37, 100772.
Fotis, J. N., Buhalis, D., & Rossides, N. (2012). Social media use and impact during the holiday travel planning process (pp. 13-24). Springer-Verlag.
Fotis, J. N., Rossides, N., & Buhalis, D. (2010). Social media impact on leisure travel: The case of the Russian market and the challenges for the Cyprus tourism industry. In 3rd Annual EuroMed Conference of the EuroMed Academy of Business-Conference Readings Book Proceedings-Business Developments Across Countries And Cultures (pp. 1365-1367). EuroMed Press.
González-Mansilla, Ó., Berenguer-Contrí, G., & Serra-Cantallops, A. (2019). The impact of value co-creation on hotel brand equity and customer satisfaction. Tourism Management, 75, 51-65.
Han, C., Wu, X., Zou, N., Zhang, Y., Yuan, J., Gao, Y., ... & Qin, D. (2021). Cichorium pumilum Jacq Extract Inhibits LPS-Induced Inflammation via MAPK Signaling Pathway and Protects Rats from Hepatic Fibrosis Caused by Abnormalities in the Gut-Liver Axis. Frontiers in pharmacology, 12, 683613.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Wiertz, C., & Feldhaus, F. (2015). Does Twitter matter? The impact of microblogging word of mouth on consumers’ adoption of new movies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(3), 375-394.
Holbrook, M. B. (1999). Consumer value. A framework for analysis and research.
Kim, J. H., Ritchie, J. B., & McCormick, B. (2012). Development of a scale to measure memorable tourism experiences. Journal of Travel research, 51(1), 12-25.
Levitt, T. (1960). Marketing myopia. Harvard business review, 38(4), 24-47.
Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N., & Rigdon, E. (2001). Experiential value: conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment☆. Journal of retailing, 77(1), 39-56.
Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N., & Rigdon, E. (2001). Experiential value: conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment☆. Journal of retailing, 77(1), 39-56.
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
Ramirez, R. (1999). Value co‐production: intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic management journal, 20(1), 49-65.
See-To, E. W., & Ho, K. K. (2014). Value co-creation and purchase intention in social network sites: The role of electronic Word-of-Mouth and trust–A theoretical analysis. Computers in human behavior, 31, 182-189.
Sotiriadis, M. D., & Van Zyl, C. (2013). Electronic word-of-mouth and online reviews in tourism services: the use of twitter by tourists. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(1), 103-124.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). The four service marketing myths: remnants of a goods-based, manufacturing model. Journal of service research, 6(4), 324-335.
Ye, Q., Law, R., Gu, B., & Chen, W. (2011). The influence of user-generated content on traveler behavior: An empirical investigation on the effects of e-word-of-mouth to hotel online bookings. Computers in Human behavior, 27(2), 634-639.
Zeng, B., & Gerritsen, R. (2014). What do we know about social media in tourism? A review. Tourism management perspectives, 10, 27-36.