簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉月麗
Ana Yelina Arif
論文名稱: Multi-Objective Pile Foundation Design using Metaheuristic-Integrated PLAXIS 2D API
Multi-Objective Pile Foundation Design using Metaheuristic-Integrated PLAXIS 2D API
指導教授: 鄭明淵
Min-Yuan Cheng
口試委員: 呂守陞
Sou-Sen Leu
曾惠斌
Hui-Ping Tserng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工程學院 - 營建工程系
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 85
外文關鍵詞: pile design
相關次數: 點閱:151下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

  • Pile foundation design are known for their inherent uncertainties and complex calculations. The designing process involves non-convex and non-continuous objective functions, resulting in irregular solution patterns. An important consideration in this domain is to achieve the minimum cost with sufficient safety factor at the same time. Therefore, multi-objective optimization is employed to replace repetitive trial and error designs and address the optimization problem simultaneously. This study developed a new metaheuristic algorithm with the name of Multi-Objective Optical Microscope Algorithm (MOOMA) to search for optimal pile designs safety factors and costs. In order to help with the calculations, a widely used commercial geotechnical software PLAXIS 2D is utilized using the Application Programming Interface (API) for pile foundation safety factors assessment. Through a real-life case study involving pile design under multiple loads, the MOOMA algorithm is used to identify optimal pile designs with balanced safety factors and costs. The study also applies indifference curves to determine the optimal design from the Pareto front and compares it with the Taiwanese Geotechnical Standard for more effective design evaluations. The findings highlight the MOOMA algorithm as a valuable tool for designers seeking to strike a balance between safety factors and costs in pile design.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............ ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................... iii TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................. iv ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS ......................... vi Abbreviations ........ vi Symbols ................ vi Open and Closed Intervals .......................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................... viii LIST OF TABLES ....................... ix 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1 1.1 Research Background............................................ 1 1.2 Research Objectives .............................................. 2 1.3 Research Scope and Assumptions ......................... 3 1.4 Research Organization .......................................... 3 1.5 Research Outline ................................................... 6 2. LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................... 7 2.1 Multiple Objective Optimization .......................... 7 2.1.1 Problem definition ............................................ 7 2.1.2 Dominance Concept and Pareto front .............. 8 2.1.3 Fast non-dominated sorting method ............... 10 2.1.4 Elitist archiving and crowding distance ......... 10 2.2 Basic Optical Microscope Algorithm (OMA)..... 13 2.2.1 The inspiration of OMA ................................. 13 2.2.2 The flowchart of OMA ................................... 16 2.3 Previous Studies of Metaheuristic Application in Geotechnical Engineering ........... 21 2.3.1 Pile and Foundation Design ........................... 21 2.3.2 Slope Stability ................................................ 21 2.3.3 Integration with PLAXIS 2D ......................... 22 2.4 Optimum Planning Model ................................... 22 2.4.1 Planning Preference Functions ....................... 22 2.4.2 Indifference Curve .......................................... 23 2.4.3 Efficiency Evaluation ..................................... 26 3. MODEL CONSTRUCTION ................................... 28 3.1 MOOMA Model Architecture and Description ............... 28 3.1.1 Naked Eyes Phase (Initialization) .................. 29 3.1.2 Objective Lens Phase ..................................... 29 3.1.3 Eyepiece Phase ............................................... 30 3.1.4 Population Selection ....................................... 30 3.2 Constructing the Application Model ................... 33 3.2.1 Details for modeling in PLAXIS 2D .............. 33 3.2.2 Constructing the MOOMA-Integrated PLAXIS 2D API .................. 37 3.3 Model Limitations ............................................... 39 4. MODEL VALIDATIONS AND CASE STUDIES .......................... 40 4.1 Performance Evaluation Methods ....................... 40 4.1.1 Performance Measure ..................................... 40 4.1.2 MOOMA Comparison .................................... 42 4.2 MOOMA pile case study application .................. 49 4.2.1 Optimization Result ........................................ 49 4.2.2 Indifference Curve .......................................... 52 4.2.2.1 Planning Preference ................................. 52 4.2.2.2 Optimum Risk Preference ....................... 54 4.2.2.3 Efficiency Evaluation .............................. 56 5. System Demonstration ............................................. 63 5.1 PLAXIS 2D API system for Calculating Safety Factor ........................ 63 5.2 Cost Calculation .................................................. 67 5.3 MOOMA Integration .......................................... 68 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................... 70 6.1 Conclusion ................................. 70 6.2 Future Research Recommendations .................... 71 REFERENCES ................................... 72

    陳清山(2011)。考量多目標及規劃偏好之中小學校舍最適規劃模式。﹝博士論文。國立臺灣科技大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/e49ve9。
    Ali, M., Siarry, P., & Pant, M. (2012). An efficient Differential Evolution based algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 217(2), 404-416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.09.025
    Audet, C., Cartier, D., Le Digabel, S., & Salomon, L. (2020). Performance indicators in multiobjective optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.016
    Chan, C. M., Zhang, L., & Ng, J. T. (2009). Optimization of pile groups using hybrid genetic algorithms. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135(4), 497-505.
    Chen, X., Zheng, B., & Liu, H. (2011). Optical and digital microscopic imaging techniques and applications in pathology. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst), 34(1-2), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.3233/acp-2011-0006
    Chen, Z.-Y., & Shao, C.-M. (1988). Evaluation of minimum factor of safety in slope stability analysis. Canadian geotechnical journal, 25(4), 735-748.
    Cheng, M.-Y., & Chen, C.-S. (2011). Optimal planning model for school buildings considering the tradeoff of seismic resistance and cost effectiveness: a Taiwan case study. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 43, 863-879.
    Cheng, M.-Y., & Gosno, R. (2021). SOS 2.0: an evolutionary approach for SOS algorithm. Evolutionary Intelligence, 14, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-020-00476-8
    Cheng, M.-Y., & Sholeh, M. N. (2023). Optical Microscope Algorithm: A Novel Metaheuristic Inspired by Microscope Magnification for Solving Engineering Optimization Problems National Taiwan University of Science and Technology]. Taipei, Taiwan.
    Cheng, Y., Wong, H., Leo, C. J., & Lau, C. (2016). Stability of Geotechnical Structures: Theoretical and Numerical Analysis (Vol. 1). Bentham Science Publishers.
    Coello, C., Veldhuizen, D., & Lamont, G. (2007). Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36797-2
    Coello, C. A. C., & Lechuga, M. S. (2002, 12-17 May 2002). MOPSO: a proposal for multiple objective particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600),
    Deb, K., & Deb, K. (2014). Multi-objective Optimization. In E. K. Burke & G. Kendall (Eds.), Search Methodologies: Introductory Tutorials in Optimization and Decision Support Techniques (pp. 403-449). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6940-7_15
    Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 6(2), 182-197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
    Deng, Y., Zhang, K., Yao, Z., Zhao, H., & Li, L. (2023). Parametric analysis and multi-objective optimization of the coupling beam pile structure foundation. Ocean Engineering, 280, 114724. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114724
    Fonseca, C. M., & Fleming, P. J. (1993). Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: formulationdiscussion and generalization. Icga,
    Gandomi, A., Kashani, A., Mousavi, M., & Jalalvandi, M. (2017). Slope stability analysis using evolutionary optimization techniques. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 41(2), 251-264.
    Gunantara, N. (2018). A review of multi-objective optimization: Methods and its applications. Cogent Engineering, 5(1), 1502242. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1502242
    He, Z., & Yen, G. G. (2014). Comparison of many-objective evolutionary algorithms using performance metrics ensemble. Advances in Engineering Software, 76, 1-8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.05.006
    Hoang, N.-D., & Pham, A.-D. (2016). Hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on metaheuristic and machine learning for slope stability assessment: A multinational data analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 46, 60-68.
    Hong, W.-C., Dong, Y., Chen, L.-Y., & Wei, S.-Y. (2011). SVR with Hybrid Chaotic Genetic Algorithms for Tourism Demand Forecasting. Applied Soft Computing, 11, 1881-1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2010.06.003
    Huang, V. L., Suganthan, P. N., Qin, A. K., & Baskar, S. (2008). Multiobjective Differential Evolution with External Archive and Harmonic Distance-Based Diversity Measure. In.
    Kumar, M., Nallagownden, P., & Elamvazuthi, I. (2016). Advanced Pareto Front Non-Dominated Sorting Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization for Optimal Placement and Sizing of Distributed Generation. Energies, 9, 982. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9120982
    Leung, Y. F., Klar, A., Soga, K., & Hoult, N. A. (2017). Superstructure–foundation interaction in multi-objective pile group optimization considering settlement response. Canadian geotechnical journal, 54(10), 1408-1420. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0498
    Liu, W., Moayedi, H., Nguyen, H., Lyu, Z., & Bui, D. T. (2021). Proposing two new metaheuristic algorithms of ALO-MLP and SHO-MLP in predicting bearing capacity of circular footing located on horizontal multilayer soil. Engineering with Computers, 37(2), 1537-1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00897-9
    Mankiw, N. G. (2014). Principles of economics. Cengage Learning.
    May, R. M. (2004). Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. In B. R. Hunt, T.-Y. Li, J. A. Kennedy, & H. E. Nusse (Eds.), The Theory of Chaotic Attractors (pp. 85-93). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21830-4_7
    Moayedi, H., Nguyen, H., & Rashid, A. S. A. (2021). Novel metaheuristic classification approach in developing mathematical model-based solutions predicting failure in shallow footing. Engineering with Computers, 37, 223-230.
    Öser, C., & Temür, R. (2018). Optimization of pile groups under vertical loads using metaheuristic algorithms. In Handbook of research on predictive modeling and optimization methods in science and engineering (pp. 276-298). IGI Global.
    Qi, C., & Tang, X. (2018). Slope stability prediction using integrated metaheuristic and machine learning approaches: A comparative study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 118, 112-122.
    Ravichandran, N., Wang, L., & Rahbari, P. (2022). Robust Optimization for Stability of I-Walls and Levee System Resting on Sandy Foundation. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 26(1), 57-68.
    Storn, R. M., & Price, K. (1997). Differential Evolution - A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces. Journal of Global Optimization, 11, 341–359.
    Tran, D.-H., Cheng, M.-Y., & Prayogo, D. (2016). A novel Multiple Objective Symbiotic Organisms Search (MOSOS) for time–cost–labor utilization tradeoff problem. Knowledge-Based Systems, 94, 132-145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.11.016
    Veldhuizen, D. A. V., & Lamont, G. B. (2000, 16-19 July 2000). On measuring multiobjective evolutionary algorithm performance. Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512),
    Verma, S., Pant, M., & Snasel, V. (2021). A Comprehensive Review on NSGA-II for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization Problems. IEEE Access, 9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070634
    Wang, Y.-N., Wu, L.-H., & Yuan, X.-F. (2010). Multi-objective self-adaptive differential evolution with elitist archive and crowding entropy-based diversity measure. Soft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications, 14(3), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-008-0394-9
    Wang, Y., Wu, L., & Yuan, X. (2010). Multi-objective self-adaptive differential evolution with elitist archive and crowding entropy-based diversity measure. Soft Comput., 14, 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-008-0394-9
    Wang, Z., Pei, Y., & Li, J. (2023). A Survey on Search Strategy of Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms. Applied Sciences, 13(7).
    Wood, K. L., & Antonsson, E. K. (1989). Computations with imprecise parameters in engineering design: background and theory.
    Wulandari, P. S., & Tjandra, D. (2015). Analysis of piled raft foundation on soft soil using PLAXIS 2D. Procedia Engineering, 125, 363-367.
    Zimmermann, H. J. (2001). Fuzzy Control. In H. J. Zimmermann (Ed.), Fuzzy Set Theory—and Its Applications (pp. 223-264). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0646-0_11
    Zitzler, E., & Thiele, L. (1999). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 3(4), 257-271. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.797969

    無法下載圖示
    全文公開日期 2025/08/23 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2025/08/23 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE