臺灣規劃2025年達成離岸風電5.7GW容量目標，預期創造新臺幣1兆元商機及提供兩萬個工作機會，成為全球營建市場上矚目的焦點。此一開發商機令人嚮往，惟其建造所需資本龐大，回收期長，再加上必須面臨許多未知的挑戰與風險，本土廠商對於是否參與產業供應鏈投資無所依據
，難以抉擇。
另因離岸風電水下基礎造價昂貴，體積重量巨大，在歐洲製造完成後，海運來臺的成本跟風險非常高，考量目前臺灣工業技術及材料品質均屬成熟，具有發展本土化生產的優勢。業界如何慎選最適合作夥伴共同投入市場競爭，為一值得探討的課題。
本研究創新針對臺灣水下基礎產業，發展投資評估決策模式（Investment Evaluation Model, IEM），應用FPR求取風險因子權重，再搭配數值評分方式計算總體投資風險值，提供廠商在無例可循的困境中，可以依據客觀指標，做出是否參與投資的輔助決策。並導入供應鏈分包商夥伴關係合作概念，首創建構整合SWARA-FTOPSIS夥伴關係評選模式，協助水下基礎製造商結合臺灣特性，遴選具備運輸及施工安裝條件最佳夥伴關係，一起合作參與國際競爭，獲取最大利益。
最後以台電公司離岸風電第二期新建工程為案例進行驗證，結果確認本決策評估模式適切可行，不僅簡化以往複雜、繁冗之計算流程，並可以快速提供更為準確、客觀的建議給決策者參考。

With a plan to achieve the target of 5.7GW offshore wind power capacity in 2025, Taiwan anticipates building a NT$1 trillion industry and creating 20,000 jobs. It makes Taiwan the center of attention in the global marketplace of building and construction. The offshore wind power industry in Taiwan has enormous potential attractive to many international wind farm investors. Nevertheless, due to huge capital requirement and prolonged time for investment return, among other challenges and risks, local Taiwanese companies have no basis for judgement and find it difficult to make the decision whether to invest in the industrial supply chain.
In addition, offshore wind power underwater infrastructure is costly and the size and weight are enormous. As it is manufactured in Europe, both the cost and risk of shipping to Taiwan can be very high. As industrial technology capability and material quality in Taiwan continue to mature, it possesses the advantage to develop localized production. How the industry in Taiwan selects the most suitable partners to compete in the market is therefore a topic worthy of discussion.
Aiming at Taiwan’s underwater foundations industries, this research is the first to develop the Investment Evaluation Model (IEM), apply FPR to obtain the risk factor weights, and calculates the overall investment risk value with a numerical scoring method. In a dilemma where no precedent exists for reference, the study provides auxiliary and supportive tools to help the manufacturers to make a decision, based on objective indicators, whether to undertake the investment. In addition, the paper introduces the concept of partnership and cooperation between subcontractors in the supply chain and establishes the integration of the SWARA-FTOPSIS partner selection model. It helps the underwater foundations manufacturers take the Taiwanese characteristics into account in their selection of the best partners who meet the requirements of transportation, construction and installation. Ultimately they can work together to compete in the international arena and maximize benefits.
Finally, using the Taiwan Power Company (Taipower) offshore wind power project (2nd phase) as a case, the results confirm that this decision-making evaluation model is appropriate and feasible, not only simplifies the complicated and tedious calculation process in the past, but also can quickly provide more accurate and objective suggestions for decision-makers' reference.

[1] The Global Wind Energy Council.(2019). Taiwan Finally has What the Whole World Desires. http://www.asindexing.org/site/software.shtml
[2] IEA.(2019). Offshore Wind Outlook. https://www.iea.org/reports/offshore-wind-outlook-2019
[3] Executive Yuan Important Policy. (2019).Efforts to Promote Offshore Wind Power to Build Taiwan into Asia’s Offshore Wind Power Technology Industry Clusters. https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/9eebb9b8-490b-4357-963fa48a981852a7.
[4]孫文臨（2021年5月21日）。離岸風電區塊開發規則終公布。環境資訊中心。https://e-info.org.tw/node/231013
[5]李建興(2018年1月29日)。台灣海峽的綠金寶藏。遠見出版社，2018-02。 https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/42527
[6] Liu, Q., Sun, Y., Wu, M. (2021). Decision-making methodologies in offshore wind power investments: A review. J. Clean. Prod, 295, 126459.
[7] Büyüközkan, G., Karabulut, Y. (2017).Energy project performance evaluation with sustainability perspective. Energy, 119, 549–560.。
[8]財團法人中技社（2021）全面建構台灣離岸風電產業競爭力。專題研究，第2121-04期，第27~46頁。
[9]陳淑敏（2018年7月20日）。我國當前推動離岸風力發電問題之研析。立法院議題研析。https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6590&pid=171457
[10]工業技術研究院（2014）。示範獎勵。風力發電單一服務窗口。https://www.twtpo.org.tw/offshore_show.aspx?id=18
[11] Daisy Chuang（2020）。第三階段規則即將出爐，回顧從零開始的台灣離岸風電。TechNews。https://technews.tw/2020/03/30/taiwan-offshore-wind/
[12]能源局（2021年8月19日）。經濟部啟動離岸風電區塊開發選商機制。新聞與公告。https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/populace/news/News.aspx?kind=1&menu_id=40&news_id=96475
[13]楊哲一（2020）。離岸風電之產業整合。能源知識庫。https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/populace/news/News.aspx?kind=1&menu_id=40&news_id=96475https://km.twenergy.org.tw/Knowledge/knowledge_more?id=7162
[14]廖學瑞、丁金彪、林俶寬（2014）。離岸風場電場開發之海事工程施工船機與安裝技術初探。中華技術，第103期，第96~109頁。
[15] Yu, Hsien, Lin., Po, Ying, Lu., Chia, Wei, Lin. (2019).Numerical simulation of
maximum wave loads and run-up heights on offshore wind turbine foundations
influenced by the instability of bichromatic wave groups. Marine Structuresme,
67,10264
[16]鄭偉成、林曉琪（2019年7月）。離岸風力機的雙腳─水下基礎技術簡述。能源簡析。ttps://eip.iner.gov.tw/msn.aspx?datatype=YW5hbHlzaXM=&id=MTc4
[17] Ki, Yong, Oh., Woochul, Nam., Moo, Sung, Ryu., Ji, Young, Kim., Bogdan, I,
Epureanu. (2018) A review of foundations of offshore wind energy convertors:
Current status and future perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews,88,16-36.
[18]黃金城、樊庭宇、朱棟樑（2019）。海上巨型風扇的支撐者—水下結構。科學發展，560期，20-27頁。
[19]經濟部（2018）。前瞻基礎建設計畫－綠能建設。高雄海洋科技產業創新專區（核定版），第17~19頁。
[20]金屬中心（2019年12月17日）。單樁式水下基礎產業發展動向。財團法人資訊工業策進會產業情報研究所。
https://mic.iii.org.tw/AISP/ReportS.aspx?id=CDOC20191213002
[21]陳文姿（2019年1月26日）。20年離岸風場穩定營運的秘訣-沃旭道出水下三道工程關卡。環境資訊中心。ttps://e-info.org.tw/node/216231
[22] Cannatelli, B. L., Smith, B. Ba. (2012).Creation and Ba Expansion in Social
Entrepreneurship Partnerships. Academy of Management, 1, 1-1.
[23] Cao, M., Zhang, Q. (2011).Supply chain collaboration: impact on collaborative
advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29,
163–180.
[24]黃繼德（2011）。中衛體系之夥伴關係對經營績效之影響〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立高雄第一科技大學企業管理研究所。
[25] Wong, P. S. P., Cheung S. O.（2004）.Trust in construction partnering: views
fromparties of the partnering dance.International Journal of Project
Management,22(6),437-446.
[26] Maloni, M., W. C., Benton. (2000). Power influences in the supply chain. Journal
of Business Logistics, 21(1), 49-73
[27] Larson, E. (1995). Project Partnering: Results of Study of 280 Construction
Projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 11(2), 30-35.
[28] Rackham, Neil., Friedman, Lawrence., Ruff, Richard. (1995).Getting Partnering
Right: How Market Leaders Are Creating Long-term Competitive Advantage.
McGraw-Hill. New York.
[29] Rigby, D. K., Buchanan, W. T. (1994).Putting more strategy into strategic liances.Directors and Boards, 18(2), 14-19.
[30] Mohr, J., Spekman, P. (1994). Characteristics of Partnership Success：Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques.
Strategic management Journal, 15, 135-152.
[31] Hagedoorn, John . (1993).Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology
Partnering: Interorganizational Modes of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences.
Strategic Management Journal, 14, 371-385.
[32] Kinnula, M. (2004) An Outsourcing Partnership Model Proceedings of the.
Frontiers of e-Business Research 2004 conference, Tampere, Finland.
[33] Das. T. K., He. I. Y. (2006).Entrepreneurial firms in search of established
partners: review and recommendations. International Journal of Entrepreneurial
Behavior & Research, 12, 114-143.
[34] Ellram, L. M., Edis, O. R. V. (1996). A Case Study of Successful Partnering
Implementation. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials. Fall, 20-28.
[35] McIvor, R. (2000). A practical framework for understanding the outsourcing
process. Supply Chain Management, 5, 1, 22-36.
[36] Zhu, Z., Hsu, K., Lillie, J. (2001). Outsourcing – a strategic move: the
process and the ingredients for success. Management decision ,39, 5, 373-378.
[37] Domberger, S. (1998). The Contracting Organization – A Strategic guide to
Outsourcing. Oxford University Press
[38] Lacity, M. C., Hirschheim, R. (1996). Information Systems Outsourcing –
Myths, Metaphors and Realities. John Wiley & Sons.
[39] Ring, P. S., Van, de, Ven., A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative
interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review,19,1, 90-118.
[40] Warsta, J., Lappi, M., Seppänen, V. (2001) Screening of partner relationships
in software business: From commencement to continuous assessment. 17th
IMP-conference in Oslo, Norway.
[41] Laribee, J. F., Michaels,Barr, L. (1994). Dealing with Personnel Concerns in
Outsourcing. Journal of Systems Management.
[42] Ford, D., Gadde, L.E., Håkansson, H., Snehota, I. (2003). Managing
Business Relationships, Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[43] Tuten, T. L., Urban, D. J. (2001). An Expanded Model of Business-to-Business
Partnership Formation and Success. Industrial Marketing Management, 30,
149-164.
[44] Kern, T., Willcocks, L. (2000). Exploring information technology outsourcing
relationships: theory and practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9,
321-350.
[45] Spekman, R. E., Kamauff, J., Spear, J. (1999). Towards more effective
sourcing and supplier management. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply
Management, 5 , 103-116.
[46] Zhao, Z. Y., Hu, J., Zuo, J. (2009) Performance of wind power industry
development in China: A DiamondModel study. Renew. Energy , 34, 2883–2891.
[47] Masini, A., Menichetti, E. (2012) The impact of behavioral factors in the
renewable energy investment decision making process: Conceptual framework
and empirical findings. Energy Policy, 40, 28–38.
[48] Salo, O., Syri, S. (2014) What economic support is needed for Arctic offshore
wind power?. Energy Rev, 31, 343–352.
[49] Jin, X., Zhang, Z., Shi, X., Ju, W. (2014).A review on wind power industry and
corresponding insurance market in China: Current status and challenges. Energy
Rev, 38, 1069–1082.
[50] Prostean, G., Badea, A., Vasar, C., Octavian, P. (2014).Risk Variables in Wind
Power Supply Chain. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci, 124, 124–132.
[51] Balks, M., Breloh, P. (2014). Risk assessment for investments in offshore wind
turbines. J. Econ. Policy, 94, 26–33.
[52] 林彥碩（2015）。綠能產業風險管理與保險規劃－以離岸風力發電為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。淡江大學保險學系保險經營碩士專班。
[53] Gatzert, N., Kosub, T. (2016). Risks and risk management of renewable energy
projects: The case of onshore and offshore wind parks. Renew. Sustain. Energy
Rev, 60, 982–998.
[54] Rolik, Y. (2017).Risk Management in Implementing Wind Energy Project.
Procedia Eng,178, 278–288.
[55] Angelopoulos, D., Doukas, H., Psarras, J., Stamtsis, G. (2017) Risk-based
analysis and policy implications for renewable energy investments in Greece.
Energy Policy, 105, 512–523.
[56] Liping, X., Xinhua, L. (2019) The British offshore wind power industry chain
development of local experience. Build. Known Inf, 433, 24–27.
[57] Tu, Y. (2018) Benefit evaluation for ocean engineering based on grey Euclid
model of game compromise. Clust Comput, 22, 4625– 4630.
[58] Bayazit, O., Karpak, B., Yagci, A. (2006) A purchasing decision: Selecting a
supplier for a construction company. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng, 15, 217–231.
[59] Eriksson, P. E., Pesamaa, O. (2007).Modelling procurement effects on
cooperation. Constr Manag. Econ, 25, 893–901.
[60] Taiwan Power Co., Ltd. (2007). Study the related technologies of offshore wind
power generation planning, environmental assessment, construction, operation,
maintenance etc. Overseas Rep, 1, 38–67.
[61] Mat, N. A. C., Cheung, Y., Scheepers, H. (2009). Partner Selection: Criteria for
Successful Collaborative Network. ACIS, 43, 631–641.
[62] Ministry of Internal Affairs and Construction of the Republic of China. (2009)
Construction Industry Evaluation Approach.
https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0070144
[63] Watt, D., Kayis, B., Willey, K. (2010) The relative importance of tender
evaluation and contractor selection criteria. Int. J. Proj. Manag, 28, 51–60.
[64] Horta, I., Camanho, A., Lima, A. F. (2013). Design of Performance Assessment
System for Selection of Contractors in Construction Industry E-Marketplaces. J
Constr Eng Manag, 139, 910–917.
[65] Liang, R., Sheng, Z., Xu, F., Wu, C. (2016). Bidding Strategy to Support Decision-Making Based on Comprehensive Information in Construction Projects. Discret Dyn Nat Soc, 1–15.
[66] Taiwan Power Co., Ltd. (2017). Offshore Wind First Phase of the Project-Demonstration Wind Farm New Construction Tender Documents.Taiwan Power Co., Ltd.: Taipei, Taiwan.
[67] 曹婷婷（2018）。離岸風力發電海事工程之採購發包策略模式建立－以台灣為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系。
[68] Xinhua. L. (2018) Opportunities in Taiwan’s offshore marine wind power
projects and challenges. Constr. Known Inf, 429, 25–31.
[69] Weixian, L. (2018).The Impact of Weather Conditions in the Taiwan Sea on the
Establishment and Operation of Offshore wind Power. In Green Finance and
Offshore Wind Power Development Risks and Prospects. Institute of Green
Energy and Environment, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu
County, Taiwan.
[70] Liu, L., Ran, W. (2019). Research on supply chain partner selection method
based on BP neural network. Neural Comput Appl, 32.
[71] Wind Taiwan Offshore Wind Power Magazine. (2020) Taking One Step Further
in Offshore Wind Taiwan Needs to Build a Real Local Wind Farm.
https://www.windtaiwan.com/Article/ArticleDetail/1448
[72] Taiwan Power Company. (2019).The Second Phase of Offshore Wind Project
Feasibility Study.
//www.taipower.com.tw/upload/1428/2018082909542479857.pdf
[73] Harker, P. L. (1987) Alternative modes of questioning in the analytic hierarchy
process. Math Modeling, 9, 353–360.
[74] Belton, V., Gear, A. E. (1985)The Legitimacy of Rank Reversal–A Comment.
Omega ,13, 227–230.
[75] Millet, I., Harker, P. T. (1990) Globally effective questioning in the analytic
hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res,48, 88–97.
[76] Herrera,Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F., Luque, M. (2004) Some issues on
consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur. J. Oper. Res,154, 98–109.
[77] 宋睿綸（2008）。建築模板工程發包策略之探討〔未出版之碩士論文〕。逢甲大學土木工程學系。
[78] 劉姿蘭（2010）。國際聯合承攬專案之遴選夥伴模式建立-以工程顧問公司為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系。
[79] 龍竹茂（2011）。MCPM應用於營造業遴選分包商決策之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系。
[80] Shangde, K. (2011). Multi- criteria Prospective Model of General Contractor
Selection for Construction Projects. Ph.D. Thesis, National Taiwan University of
Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
[81] Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis
(SWARA). J. Bus. Econ. Manag, 11, 243–258.
[82] Aghdaie, M. H., Zolfani, S. H., Zavadskas, E. K. (2013).Decision-making in
machine tool selection: An integrated approach with SWARA and COPRAS-G
methods. Eng. Econ, 24, 5–17.
[83] Alimardani, M., Zolfani, S. H., Aghdaie, M. H., Tamošaitienė, J. (2013) A novel
hybrid SWARA and VIKOR methodology for supplier selection in an agile
environment. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(3),
533–548.
[84] Perçin, S. (2019) An integrated fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy AD approach for
outsourcing provider selection. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag, 30 (2), 531–552.
[85] Ghenai, C., Albawab, M., Bettayeb, M. (2020) Sustainability indicators for
renewable energy systems using multi-criteria decision-making model and
extended SWARA/ARAS hybrid method. Renew. Energy, 146, 580–597.
[86] Maghsoodi, I. A., Mosavi, A., Rabczuk, T., Zavadskas, K. E. (2018) Renewable
energy technology selection problem using integrated -SWARA-MULTIMOORA
approach. Sustainability, 10 (12), 4481.
[87] Zolfani, S. H., Saparauskas, J. (2013) New application of SWARA method in
prioritizing sustainability assessment indicators of energy system .Eng. Econ., 24
(5), 408–414.
[88] Zolfani, S. H., Yazdani, M., Zavadskas, E. K.(2018). An extended stepwise
weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method for improving criteria
prioritization process. Soft Comput, 22, 7399–7405.
[89] Sushrut, H., Vinchurkar, B., Samtani, K. (2019). Performance evaluation of the
hydropower plants using various Multi-Criteria Decision-Making techniques. Int.
J. Eng. Adv. Technol, 8, 2131–2138.
[90] Hwang. C.L., Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and
Applications: A State of the Art Survey. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany.
[91] Wang, Y. J., Lee, H. S., Lin, K. (2003). Fuzzy TOPSIS for multi-criteria
decision-making. Int. Math, 3, 367–379.
[92] Chen, C. T. (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under
fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst, 114, 1–9.
[93] Ecer, F. (2006). Bulanık ortamlarda grup kararı vermeye yardımcı bir yöntem:
Fuzzy TOPSIS ve bir uygulama. Dokuz Eylul Univ. J. Fac. Bus, 7, 77–96.
[94] Hastak, M., Shaked, A. (2000). ICRAM-1: Model for International Construction
Risk Assessment. J. Manag. Eng, 16, 59–69.
[95] Stanek, M. B. (2004) Measuring alliance value and risk: A model approach to
prioritizing alliance projects. Manage Decis, 42(2), 182–204.
[96] Duisters, D.; Duysters, G. M.; Man, A. P. (2011) The partner selection process:
Steps effectiveness, governance. International Journal of Strategic Business
Alliances, 2, 7–25.
[97] Chen, C. T.; Lin, C.T.; Huang, S. F. A (2006) fuzzy approach for supplier
evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of
Production Economics, 102(2), 289–301.
[98] Fei, T.; Qiao, K.; Lin, Z. (2012) GA-BHTR: An improved genetic algorithm for
partner selection in virtual manufacturing. International journal of production
research, 50(8), 2079–2100.
[99] Cao, X.; Liu, G. W.; Fu, X. M. (2013) Analysis on group decision making of
industry-university-research partners choice based on preferences and dynamic
intuition. Operations research and management science, 22(4), 33–41.
[100] You, D. M.; Huang, X. Z. (2014) Partner selection and evaluation of radical
technological innovation. Systems engineering, 32(3), 99–103.
[101] Guoyuan, H.; Wei, C.; Zhijun, F. (2014) Selection of enterprise’s cooperative
innovation partners based on PSO fixed weight and ameliorated TOPSIS
method. Science research management, 35(3), 119–126.
[102] Shenglan, S. (2015) Multi-attribute decision making mode of dynamic alliance
partner selection based on fuzzy. Operations research and management
science, 24(4),36–40.
[103] Baizhou, L.; Shuo, G. (2019) Research on the mutualism partner selection of
enterprise collaborative original innovation. Journal of Harbin Engineering
University, 40(7), 1367–1374.