摘要

消防產業在我國一向是最薄弱的產業，平時人人吝於投資，避之猶恐不及。火災發生後又交相指責成為千夫所指,消防隊只能在事發之後亡羊補牢進行搶救，雲梯車及救火直昇機徒然浪費公帑，平時浪費人力保養，緊急時有可能派不上用場。真正未來要擔負起全國消防安全防護重責的是按裝在各場所的消防安全設備。養兵千日用於一時,建立完整的消防知識與架構是日前消防業的使命。
消防工程業為整體建設的一環，與經濟景氣關係密切，目前消防工程業中評核工程的管理績效大多缺乏客觀依據，考評者大多依工程個案獲利給予考核績效，未能公正地反應出工程的管理績效。若企業沒有建立合理的績效評估制度，將造成工地員工士氣不振等影響，但不論再公正的績效評估制度定會有對於制度結果表示不滿，而 透過各種數據分析，並輔以學界的管理理論客觀評估員工績效，可減少員工與公司管理階層間的摩擦，在員工認同績效評估方式的同時亦能提升組織整體績效及員工向心力。 本研究嘗試從影響消防工程績效的主要因素探討消防工程管理績效評估。本研究自某消防公司中挑選符合本研究評比變數資料完整的工程案共得20案作為研究對象，以 2008至 2011 年之統計資料作為研究觀察樣本。
本研究採用資料包絡分析法（data envelopment analysis, DEA）進行 研究評估，應用此方法建立決策單位，以投入、產出資料進行評估分析。運用 CCR(Charnes，Cooper and Rhodes)與 BCC(Banker，Charnes and Cooper)模式求得各消防工程管理相對效率。
本研究結果經過數據分析，可檢討在工地人員調配上，及工地決算成本，與施工工期互相搭配，創造更佳管理績效﹔並且可由此數據做為工地績效獎金的依據。
關鍵詞：績效評估、資料包絡分析法、消防工程

Abstract

The fire safety industry has always been the weakest industry in our country. Everyone ordinarily is stingy about investing in it and avoids doing so at all costs. After a fire happens, both sides blame one another, putting everyone at fault. The fire brigade can only act belatedly to rescue the site. The dispatch of ladder trucks and water-dumping helicopters in vain wastes public funds. Ordinarily, they are a waste of manpower to maintain, but in an emergency they may not come in handy. That which truly must shoulder the heavy responsibility of fire safety and prevention for the whole country in the future is the fire safety equipment installed at each site. We maintain the fire department only to use it at a single moment. Of late, providing complete knowledge and establishing a complete structure on fire protection is the mission of the fire safety industry.
The whole structure of the fire engineering industry and the state of the economy share a close relationship with one another. Recently, the fire engineering industry has criticized the performance management of the nuclear engineering industry as mostly lacking objective evidence. Most investigators give an assessment of performance according to the profitability of each engineering case and are not yet able to react fairly to the performance management of engineering. Had the firm not established a reasonable system to evaluate performance management, then that would cause a lack of morale for workers of the construction site and other such influences. Nonetheless, regardless of whether a fair performance assessment system is set up will have unsatisfactory results for the system, through each kind of data analysis and supplementing management theories on objectively evaluating employee performance from the scholarly world, we can reduce conflict between employees and the management levels of the company. At the same time that employees approve of the manner of assessment, we can also promote the overall performance of the group and cohesion between employees. This research attempts to discuss performance management assessments for fire engineering from the main factors influencing fire engineering performance. This research project selected a total of 20 cases complete in information that were suitable for this research project’s variable data to serve as research targets. Statistics from 2008 to 2011 serve as the sample for our research observations.
This research utilizes data envelopment analysis (DEA) to conduct research evaluations. We apply this method to set up a decision-making unit in order to invest and produce data by conducting an evaluation analysis. Employing the methods of CCR (Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes) and BCC (Banker, Charnes, and Cooper), we try to obtain relative efficiency for the management of fire engineering.
The results of this research project underwent data analysis, examined allocation of site workers, and calculated the final costs for the construction site to match each other with the time allocated for a construction site, creating excellent performance management. In addition, this data can serve as the basis for premium site performance.

Keywords: performance evaluation, data envelopment analysis (DEA),fire protection engineering

參考文獻

一、中文部份
1. 孫遜著，「資料包絡分析法-理論與應用」，揚智文化出版，民國93年2月。
2. 黃旭男著，「決策分析-方法與應用」第五章資料包絡分析法，華泰文化出版，民國96年1月。
3. 李長貴（2000），人力資源管理 組織的生產力與競爭 ，台北： 華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
4. 黃英忠（1997），人力資源管理，台北：三民書局。
5. 蕭新祿，「運用資料包絡分析法於集合住宅大樓新建工程管理績效 評估」，逢甲大學土木工程學系碩士論文，民國97年6月。
6. 倪秀梅，「策略供應商輔導與改善績效之研究」，元智大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文，民國102年7月。
7. 黎萬山，「影響北台灣大樓住戶對消防工程器材品牌權益關係之研究」，國立東華大學企業管理學系在職專班碩士論文，民國95年6月。
8. 邱文杰，「施工專案績效指標與機制之建立」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文，民國91年6月。
9. 賴易聰，「消防工程產業競爭策略-以s公司為例」，逢甲大學經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文，民國100年6月。
10. 林逸明，「應用DEA方法評估台灣半導體產業經營績效之研究」，義守大學工業管理學系碩士論文，民國101年7月。
11. 黃芸珊，「使用資料包絡分析法探討臺灣地區加油站之經營效率」， 國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文，民國91年6月。
12. 余銘忠、李淑真，「運用資料包絡分析法進行庇護工場經營績效之衡量」，國立高雄應用科技大學企業管理系，民國99年3月。
13. 高強、黃旭南、末吉俊幸，「管理績效評估 資料包絡分析法」華泰文化事業公司，民國92年7月。

二、英文部份
1. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W.(1984) “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, 1078-1092
2. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The management of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Socuety Series A, General, 120, 253-290.
3. Cooper, W. W.,Park, K. S. and Yu, G (1999) , “IDEA and AR-IDEA: Models for Dealing with Imprecise Data in DEA,” Management Science, Vol.45, No. 4.
4. Charnes, A.and Cooper, W. and Rhodes, E.(1978), “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Marking Unit,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.2, No.6, pp.429-444.