簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 高富強
Phu-Cuong Cao
論文名稱: A Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Approach for Optimizing Construction Time-Cost Tradeoff
A Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Approach for Optimizing Construction Time-Cost Tradeoff
指導教授: 鄭明淵
Min-Yuan Cheng
口試委員: 陳鴻銘
Hung-Ming Chen
潘南飛
Nang-Fei Pan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工程學院 - 營建工程系
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 103
外文關鍵詞: Time-cost tradeoff, Artificial Int
相關次數: 點閱:214下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

  • Problems in construction industry are complex, full of uncertainty, and vary based on site environment. In the management of a construction project, the project duration can often be compressed by accelerating some of its activities at an additional expense. This is the so-called time-cost tradeoff (TCT) problem, which has been studied extensively in the project management literature.
    TCT decisions, however, are complex and require planners to select appropriate resources for each project task, including crew size, equipment, methods, and technology. As combinatorial optimization problems, finding optimal decisions is difficult and time consuming considering the number of possible permutations involved. The present study applies a new optimization approach, named K-means clustering with Chaos Genetic Algorithms (KCGA) proposed by Cheng and Huang (2009), to solve the TCT problem, that is to minimize the total project cost as an objective function and account for project-specific constraints on time and costs.
    To improve existing methods, particularly to demonstrate how the genetic algorithms (GA) optimizer can be improved by incorporating a hybridization strategy, KCGA employs the chaos procedure to maintain the population diversity of GA and K-means clustering technique to speed up the optimization search in GA. Besides, the TCT-KCGA model is capable of treating all existing types of activity time-cost functions, such as linear, nonlinear, discrete, discontinuous, and a hybrid of the above; and being insensitive to the scales of time and cost.
    Through two experimental studies, it can be revealed that the hybrid KCGA approach is able to reduce the computational amount and improve estimation accuracy when compared to other algorithms separately. On the whole, the KCGA model is shown effective and efficient in conducting advanced time-cost analysis. Future applications of the proposed TCT model are suggested in the conclusion.

    ABSTRACT I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS III TABLE OF CONTENTS IV ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS VI LIST OF FIGURES VIII LIST OF TABLES X CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. RESEARCH MOTIVATION 1 1.2. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES 5 1.3. SCOPE DEFINITION 5 1.4. METHODOLOGY 6 1.4.1. Introduction 9 1.4.2. Literature Review 9 1.4.3. Model construction 10 1.4.4. Case study 11 1.4.5. Conclusions and Recommendations 11 1.5. STUDY OUTLINE 12 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 13 2.1. TIME-COST (TCT) TRADEOFF HISTORY AND PREVIOUS APPROACHES 13 2.2. GENETIC ALGORITHMS (GA) 20 2.3. CHAOS APPROACH 26 2.3.1. General Introduction 26 2.3.2. Integrate Chaos approach with GA 31 2.4. K-MEANS CLUSTERING TECHNIQUE 33 2.4.1. General Introduction 33 2.4.2. Advantages and Disadvantages 37 2.4.3. Integrate K-means clustering with GA 39 2.5. K-MEANS CLUSTERING AND CHAOS GENETIC ALGORITHMS (KCGA) 40 CHAPTER 3. MODEL CONSTRUCTION 41 3.1. MODEL ARCHITECTURE 41 3.2. MODEL ADAPTATION PROCESS 43 3.3. MODEL REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS 51 3.4. SUMMARY 52 CHAPTER 4. CASE STUDY 53 4.1. PREPARATION FOR MODEL VALIDATION 53 4.2. CASE 1 - DORMITORY RENOVATION PROJECT (JOHN DOE PROJECT) 55 4.2.1. Experiment background 55 4.2.2. Experiment results 57 4.2.3. TCT analysis 62 4.3. CASE 2 - FAST FOOD OUTLET PROJECT 63 4.3.1. Experiment background 63 4.3.2. Experiment results 66 4.3.3. TCT analysis 77 CHAPTER 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 78 5.1. CONCLUSIONS 78 5.2. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS 80 APPENDIX 82 BIBLIOGRAPHY 89

    Alligood, K. T., Sauer, T. D., and Yorke, J. A. (1996). “Chaos: An Introduction to Dynamical Systems.” Springer, New York.
    Bountis, T. (1995). “Fundamental concepts of classical chaos. Part I.” Information Dynamics and Open Systems, Vol. 3, No. 23, 23-96.
    Cheng, M.Y., and Huang, K.Y. (2009). “K-means clustering and Chaos Genetic Algorithm for Nonlinear Optimization.” Information and Computational Technology, 26th ISARC 2009, 520-526.
    De Jong, K. A. (1975). “Analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems.” Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
    De, P., Dunne, E. J., Ghosh, J. B., and Welles, C. E. (1995). “The discrete time-cost trade-off problem revisited.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 81(2), 225–238.
    Deckro, R. F., Hebert, J. E., Verdini, W. A., Grimsrud, P. H., and Venkateshwar, S. (1995). “Nonlinear time/cost trade-off models in project management.” Comput. Ind. Eng., 28(2), 219–229.
    Elmaghraby, S. E. (1993). “Resource allocation via dynamic programming in activity networks.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 64, 199–215.
    Eshelmen, L.J., and Schaffer, J.D. (1991). “Preventing Premature Convergence in Genetic Algorithms by Preventing incest.” ICGA’ 91, Morgan Kaufmann, California, 115-122.
    Falk, J., and Horowitz, J. L. (1972). “Critical path problems with concave cost-time curves.” Manage. Sci., 19, 446–455.
    Feigenbaum, M.J. (1978). “Quantitative universality for a class of nonlinear transformations,” Journal of statistical physics, Vol. 19, 25-52.
    Feng, C. W., Liu, L. Y., and Burns, S. A. (1997). “Using genetic algorithms to solve construction time-cost trade-off problems.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 113, 184–189.
    Foldes, S., and Soumis, F. (1993). “PERT and crashing revisited: Mathematical generalizations.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 64, 286–294.
    Forgy, E. (1965). “Cluster analysis of multivariate data: Efficiency versus interpretability of classifications.” Biomertrics, Vol. 21, 768-780.
    Fulkerson, D. R. (1961). “A network flow computation for project cost curves.” Manage. Sci., 7, 167–178.
    Goldberg,D. E. (1989). “Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning.” Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Han, J., and Kamber, M. (2001). “Data mining: Concepts and techniques.” San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
    Harris, R. B. (1978). “Precedence and arrow networking techniques for construction.” Wiley, New York.
    Haupt, R. L., and Haupt, S. E. (1998). “Practical Genetic Algorithm.” Wiley-Interscience.
    Hegazy, T. (1999). “Optimization of construction time-cost trade-off analysis using genetic algorithms.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 266, 685–697.
    Hegazy, T., and Ayed, A. (1999). “Simplified spreadsheet solutions: Models for Critical Path Method and Time-Cost Tradeoff Analysis.” Cost Engineering; Vol. 41/No. 7, 26-33.
    Holland, J. H. (1975). “Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems.” Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Karshenas, S., and Haber, D. (1990). “Economic optimization of construction project scheduling.” Construction Management and Economics, 8(2): 135-146.
    Kim, J.H., Stringer, J. (1992). “Applied Chaos.” Wiley, New York.
    Leu, S. S., and Yang, C. H. (1999). “GA-based multicriteria optimal model for construction scheduling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1256, 420-427.
    Li, B., and Jiang, W. S. (1998). “Optimizing complex functions by chaos search.” Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, Vol. 29, 409-419.
    Li, H., and Love, P. E. D. (1997). “Using improved genetic algorithms to facilitate time-cost optimization.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1233, 233–237.
    Li, H., Cao, J. N., and Love, P. E. D. (1999). “Using machine learning and GA to solve time-cost trade-off problems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1255, 347–353.
    Liu, L., Burns, S., and Feng, C. (1995). “Construction time-cost tradeoff analysis using LP/IP.” ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(4): 446-454.
    Lorenze, E.N. (1963). “Deterministic nonperiodic flows.” J. Atmos. Sci, Vol. 20, 30-141.
    May, R. (1976). “Simple mathematical model with very complicated dynamics.” Nature, Vol. 261, 45–67.
    Mitsuo, G., Runwei, C. (1997). “Genetic Algorithms and Eengineering Design.” Wiley, New York.
    Moder, J. J., Phillips, C. R., and Davis, E. W. (1995). “Project management with CPM, PERT, and precedence diagramming.” 3rd Ed., Blitz, Middleton, Wis.
    Moussourakis, J., and Haksever, C. (2004). “Flexible model for time-cost trade-off problem.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1303, 307–314.
    O’Brien, J., and Plotnick, L. (2006). “CPM in Construction Management.” 6th edition, McGraw-Hill.
    Ohya, M. (1998). “Complexities and their applications to characterization of chaos.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 37, No. 1, 495-505.
    Phillips, S., and Dessouky, M. I. (1977). “Solving the project time-cost trade-off problem using the minimal cut concept.” Manage. Sci., 24, 393–400.
    Reda, R. M., and Carr, R. I. (1989). “Time-cost trade-offs among related activities.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 115(3), 475–486.
    Siemens, N. (1971). “A simple CPM time-cost tradeoff algorithm.” Management Science, 17(6): B-354-363.
    Skutella, M. (1998). “Approximation algorithms for the discrete time-cost trade-off problem.” Math. Op. Res., 23(4), 909–929.
    Syswerda, G. (1989). “Uniform Crossover in Genetic Algorithms.” ICGA’ 89, Morgan Kaufmann, California, 2-9.
    Yang, I. T. (2005a). “Chance-constrained time-cost tradeoff analysis considering funding variability.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(9), 1002–1012.
    Yang, I. T. (2005b). “Impact of budget uncertainty on project time-cost tradeoff.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 52(2), 167–174.
    Yang, I.T. (2007). “Using Elitist Particle Swarm Optimization to Facilitate Bi-criterion Time-Cost Trade-Off Analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(7), 498-505.
    Yu-Wei, W. (2009). “Object-Oriented Evolutionary Support Vector Machine Inference Model for Decision-Making in Construction Management.” Ph. D. Dissertation. National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.
    Zheng, D. X. M., Ng, S. T., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2004). “Applying a genetic algorithm-based multiobjective approach for time-cost optimization.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(2), 168–176.

    QR CODE