簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: Wareewan Tangsupthawee
Wareewan Tangsupthawee
論文名稱: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Evolutionary Knowledge Network in Technology Transfer Studies
A Comprehensive Analysis of the Evolutionary Knowledge Network in Technology Transfer Studies
指導教授: 何秀青
Mei HC Ho
口試委員: 劉顯仲
John S. Liu
王孔政
Kung-Jeng Wang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 科技管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Technology Management
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 80
外文關鍵詞: author contribution
相關次數: 點閱:162下載:16
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報


The success of technology transfer (TT) allows the research institution to earn commercialized benefits, reputations, and intellectual property rights. TT studies thus have been developed for decades. As TT is related to research institutions, laboratories, universities, industry, and government, scholars from different backgrounds conduct research from different perspectives and with different methodologies. Therefore, this study focuses on the evolution of TT and explores the existing sub-topics from which we will learn the relevant theories and critical issues for facilitating TT. Additionally, this study also explores the scholar’s network in order to have various perspectives on what characteristics could help the scholar have contributions to the research.
To explore the knowledge flow of TT, this study collects a total of 1,520 papers from the Web of Science (WOS) database. It covers the year 1986 to 2023 collected for analysis.
The citation data focuses on SSCI which is a social sciences citation index from scientific and technical journals around the world. We apply main path analysis (MPA), a citationbased method, to study the knowledge diffusion path and the developmental trajectory.
Moreover, edge-betweenness clustering is used for further analysis in order to identify the existing sub-topics in the field. On the other hand, the statistical method, regression analysis, is applied to examine the influence of a scholar’s contribution.
This study has three main findings. One is about the 3-stage development of the knowledge path in the TT field. The research focuses on the path from investigating TT partnerships, emphasizing the determinants and mechanisms of TT, and then till the recent issue in strengthening factors influencing TT success and impact. The whole path shows that TT studies started from macro policy concerns to wider system growth. The other finding shows that some emerging themes are discovered, such as clean development mechanism (CDM) on TT. These emerging themes lead us to know more about the future development of TT. The last finding shows the characteristics that have an impact on the contribution of the researcher such as collaboration and a particular research field.

TABLE OF CONTENT ABSTRACT ............................................................ i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT...................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENT......................................................iii LIST OF FIGURES...................................................... v LIST OF TABLES....................................................... vi 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................... 1 1.1. Technology Transfer Background ................................. 1 1.2. The Emergence of Technology Transfer ........................... 1 1.3. Differences in Technological Advancements across Nations........ 2 1.4. Research Questions and Structure ............................... 4 2. LITERATURE REVIEW................................................. 6 2.1. Technology Transfer Policy...................................... 6 2.1.1. The Bayh-Dole Act............................................. 6 2.1.2. International Policy ‘‘emulation’’ of the Bayh-Dole Act....... 7 2.2. The Studies of Technology Transfer in Different Aspects......... 8 2.3. Knowledge Accumulation ......................................... 11 2.4. The Impacts on Knowledge Development............................ 12 2.4.1. Cooperation .................................................. 13 2.4.2. Knowledge Base ............................................... 15 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ............................................. 17 3.1. Data Collection ................................................ 17 3.2. Main Path Analysis.............................................. 17 3.3. Clustering Analysis............................................. 20 3.4. Regression Analysis............................................. 22 4. MAIN THEMES IN TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER................................ 24 4.1. Descriptive Statistics.......................................... 24 4.1.1. Distribution of Countries..................................... 25 4.1.2. Source of Publication......................................... 26 4.2. Main Themes in Technology Transfer.............................. 27 4.3. Some Emerging Themes in Technology Transfer Studies ............ 36 4.4. The Determinants of Scholar’s Contribution...................... 40 4.4.1. Variable Description.......................................... 40 4.4.2. Empirical Findings ........................................... 44 4.4.3. Corporative Characteristics .................................. 46 4.4.4. Research Field Characteristics................................ 46 4.4.5. Knowledge Source Characteristics.............................. 47 5. CONCLUSION ....................................................... 48 5.1. Conclusion ..................................................... 48 5.2. Technology Transfer Knowledge Trajectory........................ 48 5.3. The Impact on Researcher’s Contribution ........................ 49 5.4 Managerial Implication........................................... 49 5.5 Limitation and Future Research................................... 50 REFERENCES .......................................................... 51 APPENDICES........................................................... 67

REFERENCES
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2009). Research collaboration and
productivity: Is there correlation? Higher education, 57, 155-171.
Ahluwalia, S., Mahto, R. V., & Guerrero, M. (2020). Blockchain technology and startup
financing: A transaction cost economics perspective. Technological Forecasting
and Social Change, 151, 119854.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119854
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal
study. Administrative science quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
Aksnes, D. W., Sivertsen, G., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Wendt, K. K. (2017). Measuring the
productivity of national R&D systems: Challenges in cross-national comparisons of
R&D input and publication output indicators. Science and public policy, 44(2), 246-
258.
Allen, T. J., Utterback, J. M., Sirbu, M. A., Ashford, N. A., & Hollomon, J. H. (1978).
Government influence on the process of innovation in Europe and Japan. Research
policy, 7(2), 124-149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(78)90002-1
Anklam, P. (2003). KM and the social network. Inside Knowledge, 6(8), 24-28.
Arrow, K. J. (1969). Classificatory notes on the production and transmission of
technological knowledge. The American Economic Review, 59(2), 29-35.
Aslam, M. A. (2001). Technology transfer under the CDM Materializing the myth in the
Japanese context? Climate Policy, 1(4), 451-464.
AUTM Licensing Survey: Survey Summary. (1996).
Bagchi, A., & Mukherjee, A. (2014). Technology licensing in a differentiated oligopoly.
International Review of Economics & Finance, 29, 455-465.
Batagelj, V. (2003). Efficient algorithms for citation network analysis. arXiv preprint
cs/0309023.
Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004).
Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial
Organization, 22(8), 1237-1263.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.08.001
Bengoa, A., Maseda, A., Iturralde, T., & Aparicio, G. (2021). A bibliometric review of the
technology transfer literature. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(5), 1514-
1550.
Bolatan, G. I. S., Giadedi, A., & Daim, T. (2022). Innovation leadership through
technology transfer: Case of Turkish industry. Technology in Society, 68, 101909.
Bordons, M., Morillo, F., & Gómez, I. (2004). Analysis of cross-disciplinary research
through bibliometric tools. In Handbook of quantitative science and technology
research (pp. 437-456). Springer.
Bozeman, B. (1994). Evaluating government technology transfer: early impacts of the
“cooperative technology paradigm”. Policy Studies Journal, 22(2), 322-337.
Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and
theory. Research policy, 29(4-5), 627-655.
Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for
scientific and technical human capital. Research policy, 33(4), 599-616.
Bozeman, B., & Fellows, M. (1988). Technology transfer at the US national laboratories:
A framework for evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 11(1), 65-75.
Bremer, H. W. (1998). University technology transfer: evolution and revolution.
Brooks, H. (1966). National Science Policy and Technology Transfer: Proceedings of a
Conference on Technology Transfer and Innovation. Washington DC, National
Science Foundation Publication No. NSF, 67-65.
Bush, V. (1994). Science, the endless frontier. In Science, the Endless Frontier. Princeton
University Press.
Calero-Medina, C., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2008). Combining mapping and citation network
analysis for a better understanding of the scientific development: The case of the
absorptive capacity field. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 272-279.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.09.005
Calero, C., Buter, R., Cabello Valdés, C., & Noyons, E. (2006). How to identify research
groups using publication analysis: an example in the field of nanotechnology.
Scientometrics, 66(2), 365-376.
Calero Medina, C., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2012). Seed journal citation network maps: A
method based on network theory. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science and Technology, 63(6), 1226-1234.
Carlsson, B., & Fridh, A.-C. (2002). Technology transfer in United States universities.
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(1), 199-232.
Caves, R. E., & Caves, R. E. (1996). Multinational enterprise and economic analysis.
Cambridge university press.
Chakrabarti, S. (2018). Securitization of the Arctic: A Need for a Regional Security
Architecture. In (pp. 99-116). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6954-1.ch005
Chang, M.-C., Hu, J.-L., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2009). Decision making on strategic
environmental technology licensing: fixed-fee versus royalty licensing methods.
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 8(03), 609-
624.
Chang, R.-Y., Hwang, H., & Peng, C.-H. (2013). Technology licensing, R&D and welfare.
Economics Letters, 118(2), 396-399.
Chang, R.-Y., Hwang, H., & Peng, C.-H. (2016). Discriminatory vs. uniform tariffs with
international technology licensing. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting &
Economics, 23(3), 268-277.
Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2005). Assessing the relative
performance of UK university technology transfer offices: parametric and nonparametric evidence. Research policy, 34(3), 369-384.
Clinton, W. J., & Gore, A. (1993). Technology for America's growth: A new direction to
build economic strength. Journal of industry studies, 1(1), 88-91.
Comacchio, A., Bonesso, S., & Pizzi, C. (2012). Boundary spanning between industry and
university: the role of Technology Transfer Centres. The Journal of Technology
Transfer, 37(6), 943-966.
Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge
versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5), 477-501.
Cooke, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional development in the knowledge-based
economy: The construction of advantage. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31,
5-15.
Corsi, A., de Souza, F. F., Pagani, R. N., & Kovaleski, J. L. (2021). Technology transfer
oriented to sustainable development: proposal of a theoretical model based on
barriers and opportunities. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5081-5112.
Corsi, A., Pagani, R. N., & Kovaleski, J. L. (2020). Technology transfer for sustainable
development: Social impacts depicted and some other answers to a few questions.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118522.
Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2008). Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at
the individual level. Scientometrics, 77(2), 267-288.
Cunningham, J. A., Lehmann, E. E., Menter, M., & Seitz, N. (2019). The impact of
university focused technology transfer policies on regional innovation and
entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(5), 1451-1475.
Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & Young, C. (2017). A review of qualitative case methods
trends and themes used in technology transfer research. The Journal of Technology
Transfer, 42(4), 923-956.
Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of
Management, 26(1), 31-61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-
2063(99)00037-9
Davel, R., Toit, A., & Mearns, M. (2017). Understanding Knowledge Networks Through
Social Network Analysis. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 13, 1-
17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJKM.2017040101
De Coninck, H., Haake, F., & Van Der Linden, N. (2007). Technology transfer in the clean
development mechanism. Climate Policy, 7(5), 444-456.
Denison, E. F. (1974). Accounting for United States economic growth, 1929-1969.
Dosi, G. (1988). The nature of the innovative process. Technical change and economic
theory.
Doz, Y. L., & Hamel, G. (1998). Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through
partnering. Harvard Business Press.
Drucker, P. F. (1985). The discipline of innovation. Harvard business review, 63(3), 67-72.
Dunning, J. H. (1981). International Production and the Multinational Enterprise.
Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2013). Impact of funding on scientific output and
collaboration: A survey of literature. Journal of Information & Knowledge
Management, 12(04), 1350037.
Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2016). How to boost scientific production? A statistical
analysis of research funding and other influencing factors. Scientometrics, 106(3),
1093-1116.
Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152.
Etemad, H., & Lee, Y. (2003). The knowledge network of international entrepreneurship:
Theory and evidence. Small Business Economics, 20(1), 5-23.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the
entrepreneurial university. Research policy, 32(1), 109-121.
Federal Technology Transfer Act and Related Legislation.
https://www.epa.gov/ftta/federal-technology-transfer-act-and-related-legislation
Feldman, M. P., Gates, M., & Ratnatunga, M. (2022). Research to Renewal: Advancing
University Tech Transfer.
Fosfuri, A. (2006). The licensing dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of
technology licensing. Strategic Management Journal, 27(12), 1141-1158.
Foster, G. M. (1962). Traditional cultures: and the impact of technological change.
Traditional cultures: and the impact of technological change.
Frohman, A. L. (1985). Putting technology into strategic planning. California Management
Review, 27(2), 48-59.
Gantman, E. R. (2012). Economic, linguistic, and political factors in the scientific
productivity of countries. Scientometrics, 93(3), 967-985.
Gaspar, M. A., Sarmento Silva, R., Farina, M. C., & de Siqueira, J. P. L. (2014). Interorganizational relationships: promoters and restrictive factors in the formation of
cooperation network. Revista Eletrônica de Estratégia & Negócios, 7(1).
Gasson, S. (2005). Resolving wicked problems: collaborative information systems design
in boundary-spanning groups.
Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological
networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(12), 7821-7826.
https://doi.org/doi:10.1073/pnas.122653799
Goduscheit, R. C., & Knudsen, M. P. (2015). How barriers to collaboration prevent
progress in demand for knowledge: a dyadic study of small and medium‐sized
firms, research and technology organizations and universities. Creativity and
Innovation Management, 24(1), 29-54.
Grant, R. M., & Baden‐Fuller, C. (2004). A knowledge accessing theory of strategic
alliances. Journal of management studies, 41(1), 61-84.
Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., & Piccaluga, A. (2021). University technology transfer, regional
specialization and local dynamics: lessons from Italy. The Journal of Technology
Transfer, 46, 855-865.
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2017). The impact of Triple Helix agents on entrepreneurial
innovations' performance: An inside look at enterprises located in an emerging
economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 294-309.
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2019). Effectiveness of technology transfer policies and
legislation in fostering entrepreneurial innovations across continents: an overview.
The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(5), 1347-1366.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09736-x
Hahn, F., & Matthews, R. (1969). The theory of economic growth: a survey.'InAmerican
Economic Association and Royal Economic Society, Surveys of EconomicTheory.
In: London: Macmillan.
Halili, Z. (2020). Identifying and ranking appropriate strategies for effective technology
transfer in the automotive industry: Evidence from Iran. Technology in Society, 62,
101264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101264
Hall, G. R., & Johnson, R. E. (1970). Transfers of United States aerospace technology to
Japan. In The technology factor in international trade (pp. 305-363). NBER.
Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output
per worker than others? The quarterly journal of economics, 114(1), 83-116.
Haneberg, D. H., & Aaboen, L. (2020). Incubation of technology-based student ventures:
The importance of networking and team recruitment. Technology in Society, 63,
101402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101402
Haščič, I., & Johnstone, N. (2011). CDM and international technology transfer: empirical
evidence on wind power. Climate Policy, 11(6), 1303-1314.
Heinze, T., Shapira, P., Rogers, J. D., & Senker, J. M. (2009). Organizational and
institutional influences on creativity in scientific research. Research policy, 38(4),
610-623.
Helms, R., & Buijsrogge, K. (2005). Knowledge Network Analysis: a technique to analyze
knowledge. management bottlenecks in organizations.
https://doi.org/10.1109/DEXA.2005.127
Helms, R., & Buijsrogge, K. (2006). Application of knowledge network analysis to identify
knowledge sharing bottlenecks at an engineering firm.
Hillebrand, B., & Biemans, W. G. (2003). The relationship between internal and external
cooperation: literature review and propositions. Journal of Business Research,
56(9), 735-743.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572.
Hong, X., Govindan, K., Xu, L., & Du, P. (2017). Quantity and collection decisions in a
closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing. European Journal of
Operational Research, 256(3), 820-829.
Huang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2017). Information sharing in a closed-loop supply chain with
technology licensing. International Journal of Production Economics, 191, 113-
127.
Huang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2019). Pricing and production decisions in a closed-loop supply
chain considering strategic consumers and technology licensing. International
Journal of Production Research, 57(9), 2847-2866.
Hülsbeck, M., Lehmann, E. E., & Starnecker, A. (2013). Performance of technology
transfer offices in Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 199-215.
Hummon, N. P., & Doreian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The
development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11(1), 39-63.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(89)90017-8
Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., Wright, M., & Piva, E. (2014). Technology transfer offices as
boundary spanners in the pre-spin-off process: The case of a hybrid model. Small
Business Economics, 43(2), 289-307.
Ibidunni, A. S., Kolawole, A. I., Olokundun, M. A., & Ogbari, M. E. (2020). Knowledge
transfer and innovation performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs): An
informal economy analysis. Heliyon, 6(8), e04740.
Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patents, citations, and innovations: A window on
the knowledge economy. MIT press.
Kabiraj, T. (2005). Technology transfer in a Stackelberg structure: Licensing contracts and
welfare. The Manchester School, 73(1), 1-28.
Kabiraj, T., & Marjit, S. (2003). Protecting consumers through protection: The role of
tariff-induced technology transfer. European Economic Review, 47(1), 113-124.
Kadlec, V., & Blažek, J. (2015). University-business collaboration as perceived by leading
academics: Comparing and contrasting the two most innovative Czech regions.
Erdkunde, 327-339.
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2015). The wisdom of teams: Creating the highperformance organization. Harvard Business Review Press.
Kilger, C., & Bartenbach, K. (2002). New Rules for German Professors. Science,
298(5596), 1173-1175. https://doi.org/doi:10.1126/science.1075269
Kim, J.-S., & Kim, B.-K. (2022). Examining different technology transfer capabilities and
their counterpart works from two different positions. Technology in Society, 68,
101856.
Kirchherr, J., & Matthews, N. (2018). Technology transfer in the hydropower industry: An
analysis of Chinese dam developers’ undertakings in Europe and Latin America.
Energy policy, 113, 546-558.
Kirchherr, J., & Urban, F. (2018). Technology transfer and cooperation for low carbon
energy technology: Analysing 30 years of scholarship and proposing a research
agenda. Energy policy, 119, 600-609.
Kobarg, S., Stumpf-Wollersheim, J., & Welpe, I. M. (2019). More is not always better:
Effects of collaboration breadth and depth on radical and incremental innovation
performance at the project level. Research policy, 48(1), 1-10.
Koehnen, T. (2019). Innovative Management of Community Territories and InterOrganizational Communication for Regional Development. In (pp. 319-335).
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5849-1.ch016
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the
replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.
Koskina, A., Farah, P. D., & Ibrahim, I. A. (2020). Trade in clean energy technologies:
sliding from protection to protectionism through obligations for technology transfer
in climate change law, or Vice Versa? The Journal of World Energy Law &
Business, 13(2), 114-128.
Kwiek, M. (2015). The internationalization of research in Europe: A quantitative study of
11 national systems from a micro-level perspective. Journal of studies in
international education, 19(4), 341-359.
Landry, R., Amara, N., Cloutier, J.-S., & Halilem, N. (2013). Technology transfer
organizations: Services and business models. Technovation, 33(12), 431-449.
Lederman, L. L. (1994). A comparative analysis of civilian technology strategies among
some nations: France, the Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, the United
Kingdom, and the United States. Policy Studies Journal, 22(2), 279-295.
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific
productivity. Social studies of science, 35(5), 673-702.
Lee, Y., & Gaertner, R. (1994). Technology transfer from university to industry: a large‐
scale experiment with technology development and commercialization. Policy
Studies Journal, 22(2), 384-399.
Lee, Y. S. (1996). ‘Technology transfer’and the research university: a search for the
boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research policy, 25(6), 843-863.
Lee, Y. S. (1998). University‐industry collaboration on technology transfer: views from the
ivory tower. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 69-84.
Lewis, J. D. (1995). Connected Corporation: How Leading Companies Manage CustomerSupplier All. Simon and Schuster.
Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The triple helix, quadruple helix,…, and an N-tuple of helices:
explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the
Knowledge Economy, 3, 25-35.
Li, C., & Song, J. (2009). Technology licensing in a vertically differentiated duopoly.
Japan and the World Economy, 21(2), 183-190.
Li, L., & Yan, F. (2015). Effects of International Education Degree and Organizational
Effectiveness Perception on Academic Research Productivity in China. RIHE the
Changing Academic Profession Report No. 22. Japan: Hiroshima University. RIHE
International, 69.
Lichtenthaler, U., & Ernst, H. (2009). RETRACTION NOTICE: Technology licensing
strategies: the interaction of process and content characteristics. Strategic
Organization, 7(2), 183-221.
Liebowitz, J. (2005). Linking social network analysis with the analytic hierarchy process
for knowledge mapping in organizations. Journal of knowledge management.
Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity
of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and
Corporate Change, 16(4), 641-655.
Liu, J. S., Ho, M. H.-C., & Lu, L. Y. Y. (2017). Recent Themes in Social Networking
Service Research. PLOS ONE, 12(1), e0170293.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170293
Liu, J. S., & Lu, L. Y. (2013). Collaboration to success in research. 2013 Proceedings of
PICMET'13: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services (PICMET),
Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., & Ho, M. H.-C. (2012). Total influence and mainstream measures for
scientific researchers. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 496-504.
Liu, J. S., & Lu, L. Y. Y. (2012). An integrated approach for main path analysis:
Development of the Hirsch index as an example
[https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21692]. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 528-542.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21692
Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., & Ho, M. H.-C. (2019). A few notes on main path analysis.
Scientometrics, 119(1), 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03034-x
Lopes, J., & Lussuamo, J. (2021). Barriers to University-Industry Cooperation in a
Developing Region. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(3), 1019-1035.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00646-0
Lorange, P., & Roos, J. (1993). Strategic alliances: Formation, implementation, and
evolution. Blackwell.
Low, K. Y. J., & Ho, E. Y.-C. (2016). A knowledge-based theory of the multinational
economic organization. Long Range Planning, 49(6), 641-647.
Lu, L. Y. Y., & Liu, J. S. (2016). A novel approach to identify the major research themes
and development trajectory: The case of patenting research. Technological
Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 71-82.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.018
Mansfield, E. (1968). The Economics of Technological Change.
Mansfield, E., Romeo, A., Schwartz, M., Teece, D., Wagner, S., & Brach, P. (1983). New
findings in technology transfer, productivity and economic policy. Research
Management, 26(2), 11-20.
Marjit, S. (1994). A competitive general equilibrium model of technology transfer,
innovation, and obsolescence. Journal of Economics, 59(2), 133-148.
Marx, K. (1874). Capital. Vol. 1.
McAdam, R., Miller, K., McAdam, M., & Teague, S. (2012). The development of
University Technology Transfer stakeholder relationships at a regional level:
Lessons for the future. Technovation, 32(1), 57-67.
Melro, A., & Oliveira, L. (2019). Knowledge Creation, Management, and Dissemination in
Impact Communities: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. In (pp.
809-823). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8182-6.ch041
Mensah, M. S. B., & Enu-Kwesi, F. (2018). Research collaboration for a knowledgebased
economy: towards a conceptual framework. Triple Helix, 5(1), 1-17.
Meo, S., & Usmani, A. (2014). Impact of R&D expenditures on research publications,
patents and high-tech exports among European countries. European Review for
Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 18(1), 1-9.
Meo, S. A., Al Masri, A. A., Usmani, A. M., Memon, A. N., & Zaidi, S. Z. (2013). Impact
of GDP, spending on R&D, number of universities and scientific journals on
research publications among Asian countries. PLOS ONE, 8(6), e66449.
Merrill, R. S. (1972). The role of technology in cultural evolution. Social Biology, 19(3),
240-247.
Moed, H. F. (2009). New developments in the use of citation analysis in research
evaluation. Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis, 57(1), 13-18.
Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., & Vining, G. G. (2021). Introduction to linear regression
analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The growth of
patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the
Bayh–Dole act of 1980. Research policy, 30(1), 99-119.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2001). Patenting and Licensing University Inventions:
Lessons from the History of the Research Corporation. Industrial and Corporate
Change, 10(2), 317-355. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.2.317
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2004). The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university–
industry technology transfer: a model for other OECD governments? The Journal
of Technology Transfer, 30(1), 115-127.
Mugwagwa, J., Banda, G., Ozor, N., Bolo, M., & Oriama, R. (2022). Optimising
governance capabilities for science, research and innovation in Africa. Technology
in Society, 68, 101804.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101804
Munari, F., Rasmussen, E., Toschi, L., & Villani, E. (2016). Determinants of the university
technology transfer policy-mix: A cross-national analysis of gap-funding
instruments. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 1377-1405.
Munari, F., Sobrero, M., & Toschi, L. (2017). Financing technology transfer: assessment of
university-oriented proof-of-concept programmes. Technology Analysis & Strategic
Management, 29(2), 233-246.
Muscio, A. (2010). What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? Evidence
from Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(2), 181-202.
Newman, M. E. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM review,
45(2), 167-256.
Newman, M. E. J. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(23), 8577-8582.
https://doi.org/doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103
Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in
networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113
Nguyen, T. V., & Pham, L. T. (2011). Scientific output and its relationship to knowledge
economy: an analysis of ASEAN countries. Scientometrics, 89(1), 107-117.
O'Connell, J. J., & Zimmerman, J. W. (1979). Scanning the international environment.
California Management Review, 22(2), 15-23.
O'shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation,
technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research policy,
34(7), 994-1009.
O’Kane, C., Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & Walton, S. (2021). The brokering role of
technology transfer offices within entrepreneurial ecosystems: An investigation of
macro–meso–micro factors. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(6), 1814-1844.
OECD. (2003). Turning science into business : patenting and licensing at public research
organisations [Amtsdruckschrift, Government document, Graue Literatur, Noncommercial literature, Sammelwerk, Collection of articles of several authors].
Paris : OECD.
Oti-Sarpong, K., & Leiringer, R. (2021). International technology transfer through projects:
A social construction of technology perspective. International Journal of Project
Management, 39(8), 902-914.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.08.004
Palomeras, N. (2007). An analysis of pure‐revenue technology licensing. Journal of
Economics & Management Strategy, 16(4), 971-994.
Parker, G. M. (2003). Cross-functional teams: Working with allies, enemies, and other
strangers. John Wiley & Sons.
Pavitt, K. (1985). Technology Transfer among the Industrially Advanced Countries:
International Technology Transfer: Concepts, Measures and Comparisons p. 3-24.
In: New York: Praeger Scientific Press.
Pinto, M. M. A., Kovaleski, J. L., Yoshino, R. T., & Pagani, R. N. (2019). Knowledge and
technology transfer influencing the process of innovation in green supply chain
management: A multicriteria model based on the DEMATEL Method.
Sustainability, 11(12), 3485.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of business strategy.
Powers, J. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology
licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic
entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 291-311.
Qiu, S., Liu, X., & Gao, T. (2017). Do emerging countries prefer local knowledge or
distant knowledge? Spillover effect of university collaborations on local firms.
Research policy, 46(7), 1299-1311.
Rahm, D., Bozeman, B., & Crow, M. (1988). Domestic technology transfer and
competitiveness: An empirical assessment of roles of university and governmental
R&D laboratories. Public administration review, 969-978.
Rand, D. G., & Nowak, M. A. (2013). Human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
17(8), 413-425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003
Reingold, N. (1994). Science and Government in the United States since 1945. History of
Science, 32(4), 361-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/007327539403200401
Rivera, R., Sampedro, J. L., Dutrénit, G., Ekboir, J. M., & Vera Cruz, A. (2009). How
productive are academic researchers in agriculture-related sciences? The Mexican
case.
Rogers, E. M., & Williams, D. (1983). Diffusion of. Innovations (Glencoe, IL: The Free
Press, 1962).
Roper, S., & Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2015). Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and
innovation: Evidence from matched patents and innovation panel data. Research
policy, 44(7), 1327-1340.
Rosenberg, N. (1986). The impact of technological innovation: a historical view. The
positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth, 17-32.
Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in
industry. Research policy, 23(3), 323-348.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)90042-6
Salvador, R., Barros, M. V., do Prado, G. F., Pagani, R. N., Piekarski, C. M., & de
Francisco, A. C. (2021). Knowledge and technology transfer in sustainability
reports: fomenting stakeholder engagement for sustainable development. Corporate
Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 251-264.
Schumpeter, J. (1928). The Instability of Capitalism. The Economic Journal, 38(151), 361-
386. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224315
Şendoğdu, A. A., & Diken, A. (2013). A research on the problems encountered in the
collaboration between university and industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 99, 966-975.
Service, E. R. (1971). Cultural evolutionism: Theory in practice. In: Reinhart and Winston
New York.
Shang, Y., Lyu, G., & Mi, Z. (2022). Green Technology Transfer, Environmental
Regulation, and Regional Green Development Chasm: Based on the Empirical
Evidence from Yangtze River Delta. International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health, 19(21), 13925.
Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and
commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy
implications. Oxford review of economic policy, 23(4), 640-660.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational
practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an
exploratory study. Research policy, 32(1), 27-48.
Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns.
Management science, 51(5), 756-770.
Soares, A. M., Kovaleski, J. L., Gaia, S., & Chiroli, D. M. d. G. (2020). Building
sustainable development through technology transfer offices: An approach based on
levels of maturity. Sustainability, 12(5), 1795.
Soares, T. J., & Torkomian, A. L. (2021). TTO's staff and technology transfer: Examining
the effect of employees' individual capabilities. Technovation, 102, 102213.
Soares, T. J., Torkomian, A. L., & Nagano, M. S. (2020). University regulations, regional
development and technology transfer: The case of Brazil. Technological
Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120129.
Sood, A., & Tellis, G. J. (2005). Technological evolution and radical innovation. Journal
of marketing, 69(3), 152-168.
Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. (2018). Building knowledge stock and facilitating knowledge flow
through human resource management practices toward firm innovation. Human
Resource Management, 57. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21915
Swamidass, P. M., & Vulasa, V. (2009). Why university inventions rarely produce
income? Bottlenecks in university technology transfer. The Journal of Technology
Transfer, 34(4), 343-363.
Terpstra, V., & David, K. The Cultural Environment of International Business. 1985.
South-Western Pub.
Urban, F., Zhou, Y., Nordensvard, J., & Narain, A. (2015). Firm-level technology transfer
and technology cooperation for wind energy between Europe, China and India:
From North–South to South–North cooperation? Energy for Sustainable
Development, 28, 29-40.
Valenzuela-Zapata, A. G., Buell, P. D., de la Paz Solano-Pérez, M., & Hyunhee, P. (2013).
“Huichol” Stills: A Century of Anthropology–Technology Transfer and Innovation.
Crossroads, 8, 157-191.
Van Beers, C., & Zand, F. (2014). R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation
performance: an empirical analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management,
31(2), 292-312.
Verspagen, B. (2007). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks. A
study on the history of fuel cell research. Advances in Complex Systems, 10(01), 93-
115. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525907000945
Villani, E., Rasmussen, E., & Grimaldi, R. (2017). How intermediary organizations
facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 86-102.
Wahab, S. A., Rose, R. C., & Osman, S. I. W. (2012). Defining the concepts of technology
and technology transfer: A literature analysis. International business research, 5(1),
61-71.
Wassmer, U., & Dussauge, P. (2012). Network resource stocks and flows: how do alliance
portfolios affect the value of new alliance formations? Strategic Management
Journal, 33(7), 871-883.
Weckowska, D. M. (2015). Learning in university technology transfer offices:
Transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of
academic research. Technovation, 41, 62-74.
White, H. D., Wellman, B., & Nazer, N. (2004). Does citation reflect social structure?:
Longitudinal evidence from the “Globenet” interdisciplinary research group.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2),
111-126.
Willard, G. E., & Cooper, A. C. (1985). Survivors of industry shake‐outs: The case of the
US color television set industry. Strategic Management Journal, 6(4), 299-318.
WIPO. (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022.
Wu, L., & Xu, M. (2022). Research on cooperative innovation network structure and
evolution characteristics of electric vehicle industry. Sustainability, 14(10), 6048.
Xiao, Y., Lu, L. Y., Liu, J. S., & Zhou, Z. (2014). Knowledge diffusion path analysis of
data quality literature: A main path analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 594-605.
66
Yu, D., & Yan, H. (2021). Relationship between knowledge base and innovation-driven
growth: moderated by organizational character. Frontiers in Psychology, 12,
663317.
Zhang, H., Hong, X., & Zhou, M. (2022). Optimal technology licensing contract with
quality improvement innovation under Cournot competition. Journal of
Management Analytics, 1-18.
Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, M. (2022). Mixed competition and technology licensing in
a supply chain. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
Zhang, L., Li, H., Lin, C., & Wan, X. (2022). The Influence of Knowledge Base on the
Dual-Innovation Performance of Firms. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
Zhao, D., Chen, H., Hong, X., & Liu, J. (2014). Technology licensing contracts with
network effects. International Journal of Production Economics, 158, 136-144.
Zhao, L., & Reisman, A. (1992). Toward meta research on technology transfer. IEEE
Transactions on engineering management, 39(1), 13-21.

QR CODE