研究生: |
郭禮維 RICHARD KUO |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
根據區間Type-2模糊集合以作群體決策及根據區間直覺模糊值以作多屬性決策之新方法 New Methods for Autocratic Decision Making Using Group Recommendations Based on Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets and Multiattribute Decision Making Based on Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values |
指導教授: |
陳錫明
Shyi-Ming Chen |
口試委員: |
李惠明
Huey-Ming Lee 呂永和 Yung-Ho Leu 程守雄 Shou-Hsiung Cheng |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
電資學院 - 資訊工程系 Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 124 |
中文關鍵詞: | 專制式決策 、多屬性決策 、多屬性群體決策 、EKM演算法 、區間Type-2模糊集合 、OWA運算子 、直覺模糊集合 、區間直覺模糊集合 、區間直覺模糊值 、非線性規劃法 、雙曲線函數 |
外文關鍵詞: | Autocratic Decision Making, Multiattribute Decision Making, Multiattribute Group Decision Making, EKM algorithms, Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets, OWA Operator, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values, Non-Linear Programming Methodology, Hyperbolic Functions |
相關次數: | 點閱:329 下載:1 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在本論文中,我們根據區間Type-2模糊集合提出一個新的群體決策方法且
根據區間直覺模糊值提出一個新的多屬性決策方法。本論文中所提之第一個新方法是根據區間Type-2模糊集合、增強型Karnik-Mendel演算法、及有序加權平均運算子以作群體決策,其中決策者們所提供的評估矩陣及屬性權重向量都是以語義詞來描述的區間Type-2模糊集合來表示。我們所提之新方法能自動的修正各個決策者的權重,直到群體共識度大於或等於預定之門檻值,其可以克服目前已存的群體決策方法之缺點,並且提供我們一個很有用的方法以在區間Type-2模糊集的環境中作群體決策。本論文中所提之第二個新方法是根據區間直覺模糊值及根據雙曲線正切函數的非線性規劃方法以作多屬性決策。決策者提供的決策矩陣及屬性權重都是以區間直覺模糊值來表示。我們所提的新方法先建立決策矩陣的轉換決策矩陣,然後使用雙曲線正切函數構成的非線性規劃模型來得到各屬性的最佳權重,然後採用區間直覺模糊加權平均運算子以計算各方案間的加權評估區間直覺模糊值,最後再對所得之加權評估區間直覺模糊值進行比較以獲得方案間之偏好排序。本論文中所提之第二個新方法可以克服目前已存在之多屬性決策方法的缺點。
In this thesis, we propose a new method for multiattribute group decision making based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and propose a new method for multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values. The proposed first method deals with autocratic decision making using group recommendations based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets, enhanced Karnik-Mendel algorithms and the ordered weighted aggregation operator, where both the evaluating matrices and the weighting vectors of the attributes given by the decision makers are evaluated by linguistic terms represented by interval type-2 fuzzy sets. It automatically modifies the weights of the decision makers until the group consensus degree is larger than or equal to a predefined consensus threshold value. It can overcome the shortcomings of the existing methods and can provide us with a very useful way for autocratic decision making using group recommendations in interval type-2 fuzzy environments. The proposed second method deals with multiattibute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and the non-linear programming methodology with the hyperbolic tangent function, where both the decision matrix and the weights of the attributes are represented by interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values. First, it constructs the transformed decision matrix of the decision matrix. Then, it constructs a non-linear programming model with the hyperbolic tangent function to get the optimal weights of the attributes. Then, it uses the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging operator to calculate the weighted evaluating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values of the alternatives. Finally, it compares the obtained weighted evaluating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values to obtain the preference order of the alternatives. It can overcome the drawbacks of the existing multiattibute decision making method.
[1] K. T. Atanassov and G. Gargov, “Interval-valued Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 343-349, 1989.
[2] G. F. Becker and C. E. V. Orstand, Hyperbolic Functions, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 1924.
[3] M. Cai, Q. Li, and G. Lang, “Shadowed sets of dynamic fuzzy sets,” Granular Computing, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 85-94, 2017.
[4] K. Chatterjee and S. Kar, “Unified Granular-number based AHP-VIKOR multi-criteria decision making framework,” Granular Computing, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 199-221, 2017.
[5] C. T. Chen, “Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2000.
[6] S. M. Chen and C. H. Chiou, “Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, PSO techniques, and evidential reasoning methodology,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1905-1916, 2015.
[7] S. M. Chen and W. H. Han, “A new multiattribute decision making method based on multiplication operations of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and linear programming methodology,” Information Sciences, vol. 429, pp. 421-432, 2018.
[8] S. M. Chen and J. A. Hong, “Fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy sets and the TOPSIS method,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1665-1673, 2014.
[9] S. M. Chen and Z. C. Huang, “Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and linear programming methodology,” Information Sciences, vol. 381, no. 1, pp. 341-351, 2017.
[10] S. M. Chen and L. W. Kuo, “Autocratic decision making using group recommendations based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets, enhanced Karnik–Mendel algorithms, and the ordered weighted aggregation operator,” Information Sciences, vol. 412-413, pp. 174-193, 2017.
[11] S. M. Chen and L. W. Kuo, “Multiattribute decision making based on non-linear programming methodology with hyperbolic function and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values,” Information Sciences, vol. 453, pp. 379-388, 2018.
[12] S. M. Chen and L. W. Lee, “Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 2790-2798, 2010.
[13] S. M. Chen and L.W. Lee, “Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision making based on the ranking values and the arithmetic operations of inerval type-2 fuzzy sets,” Expert Ststems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 824-833, 2010.
[14] S. M. Chen, L. W. Lee, H. C. Liu, and S. W. Yang, “Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 15, pp. 10343-10351, 2012.
[15] S. M. Chen and W. H. Tsai, “Multiple attribute decision making based on novel interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy geometric averaging operators,” Information Sciences, vol. 367-368, no. 1, pp. 1045-1065, 2016.
[16] S. M. Chen, M. W. Yang, L. W. Lee, and S. W. Yang, Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy sets,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 5295-5308, 2012.
[17] S. M. Chen, M. S. Yeh, and P. Y. Hsiao, “A comparison of similarity measures of fuzzy values,” Fuzzy sets and Systems, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 78-895
[18] T. Y. Chen, “A comparative analysis of score functions for multiple criteria decision making intuitionistic fuzzy settings,” Information Sciences, vol. 181, pp. 3652-3676, 2001.
[19] T. Y. Chen, “An ELECTRE-based outranking method for multiple criteria group decision making using interval type-2 fuzzy sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 263, pp. 1-21, 2014.
[20] Z. Chen, X. Yang, and Y. Zhu, “Approach to multiple attribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and its application,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 489-497, 2015.
[21] S. H. Cheng, “Autocratic multiattribute group decision making for hotel location selection based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 427, pp. 77-87, 2018.
[22] S. H. Cheng, S. M. Chen, and Z. C. Hunag, “Autocratic decision making using group recommendations based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 361-362, pp. 135-161, 2016.
[23] S. Das, S. Kar, and T. Pal, “Robust decision making using intuitionistic fuzzy numbers,” Graular Computing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41-54, 2017.
[24] D. Dubois and H. Prade, Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications, New York: Academic Press, 1980.
[25] Y. Jiang, Z. Xu, and Y. Shu, “Interval-valued intuitionistic multiplicative aggregation in group decision making,” Granular Computing, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 387-407, 2017.
[26] N. N. Karnik and J. M. Mendel, “Centroid of a type-2 fuzzy set,” Information Sciences, vol. 132, no. 1-4, pp, 195-220, 2001.
[27] D. F. Li, “TOPSIS-based on nonlinear-programming methodology for multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 299-311, 2010.
[28] Q. Liang and J. M. Mendel, “Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems: Theory and design,” IEEE Transacions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 535-550, 2000.
[29] L. Livi and A. Sadeghian, “Granular computing, computational intelligence, and the analysis of non-geometric input spaces,” Granular Computing, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13-20, 2016.
[30] J. Mendel, “Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems: An overview,” IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 20-29, 2007.
[31] J. M. Mendel, R. I. John, and F. Liu, “Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 808-821, 2016.
[32] S. Meng, N. Liu, and Y. He, “GIFIHIA operator and its application to the selection of cold chain logistic enterprises,” Granular Computing, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 187-197, 2017.
[33] M. A. Sanchez, J. R. Castro, O. Castillo, and O. Mendoza, “Fuzzy higher type information granules from an uncertainty measurement,” Granular Computing, vol. 2, no.2, pp. 95-103, 2017.
[34] C. Y. Wang and S. M. Chen, “Multiple attribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, linear programming methodology, and the extended TOPSIS method,” Information Sciences, vol. 397-398, pp. 155-167, 2017.
[35] C. Y. Wang and S. M. Chen, “An improved multiattribute decision making method based on new score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and linear programming methodology,” Information Sciences, vol. 411, no. 1, pp. 176-184, 2017.
[36] W. Wang, X. Liu, and Y. Qin, “Multi-attribute group decision making models under interval type-2 fuzzy environment,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 30, pp. 121-128, 2012.
[37] Z. Wang, K. W. Li, and W. Wang, “An approach to multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessments and incomplete weights,” Information Sciences, vol. 179, no. 17, pp. 3026-3040, 2009.
[38] D. Wu and J. M. Mendel, “Enhanced Karnik-Mendel algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 17, no.4, pp. 923-934, 2009.
[39] Z. Xu and X. Gou, “An overview of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregations and applications,” Granular Computing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13-39, 2017.
[40] Z. Xu and H. Wang, “Managing multi-granularity linguistic information in qualitative group decision making: An overview,” Granular Computing, vol. 1, no 1, pp. 21-35, 2016.
[41] R. R. Yager, “On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making,” IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 183-190, 1988.
[42] R. R. Yager, “Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 49-73, 1996.
[43] L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338-353, 1965.
[44] L. A. Zadeh, The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning–I,” Information Sciences, vol. 8 no. 3, pp. 199-249, 1975.
[45] X. Ze-Shui, “Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making,” Control and Decision, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 215-219, 2007 (in Chinese).
[46] Z. Zhitao and Z. Yingjun, “Multiple attribute decision making method in the frame of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” in Proceedings of the 2011 8th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, Shanghai, China, pp. 192-196, 2011.
[47] X. Zhou, “Membership grade mining of mutually inverse fuzzy implication propositions,” Granular Computing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 55-62, 2017.