每天天空中有數萬架飛機，連接著各地區的人民、經濟、貿易。面對現今航空軟硬體設施的快速發展及因應人們的需求，不可預期之經濟、社會環境及能源需求之變動與挑戰，政府、航空相關工業與從業人應致力持續改善及提升整體飛航環境，以現有的飛航安全績效為基礎持續精進。快速成長的航空運量，使得飛航安全成為重要的課題。為了提升飛航安全，並能獨立、客觀、公正的執行專業事故調查，我國行政院於 1998 年成立飛航安全委員會我國專責調查台灣境內飛安事故的飛航安全委員會，在2019 年擴大改制為運輸安全調查委員會，調查台灣境內陸、海、空等重大運輸事故，以建立更安全完善的運輸環境。而近幾年台灣飛安史上重大的飛安事故，不僅奪走數條人命，且帶來不可抹滅的傷害，透過分析先前事故原因，能夠幫助了解當前的飛航安全疏失，避免重複的事故再次發生。
本研究將從國家運輸安全調查委員會已結案(1999~2018 年)並公告的事故調查報告中，其中 78 件與民航機相關事故，利用 IATA、Safety Factors、HFACS 三種意外事故編碼模型進行統計分析。探討台灣民航機飛安事故的致災原因，統計不同事故類別的發生次數，探討致災因素與模式分析。

Facing the rapid development of aviation hardware and software facilities and the unpredictable changes in economic, social environment and energy demand in response to people's needs. The government, aviation-related industries should strive to continuously improve and enhance the overall aviation environment, continue to improve based on the existing flight safety performance. The rapid growth of air traffic makes flight safety an important issue.
To improve flight safety, and be able to independently, objectively, and fairly perform accident investigations. Taiwan Executive Yuan established the Flight Safety Committee in 1998 to specialize in investigating flight safety accidents in Taiwan, and restructuring in 2019 become Transportation Safety Board. It is a transportation safety investigation committee to investigate major transportation accidents in Taiwan, such as land, sea and air, in order to establish a safer and better transportation environment.
In recent years, the major flight accident in Taiwan has claimed several lives and brought indelible injuries. By analyzing the causes of previous accidents, it can help to understand the latest flight safety failures and avoid the accident happened again.
In this study, the National Transportation Safety Investigation Committee has closed the case (1999~2018) and announced the accident investigation report. Among them, 78 accidents related to civil aircraft were statistically analyzed using IATA, safety factors, and HFACS accident coding models. This research will analyze the accident cause, count coding number, and Pattern Analysis for different categories.

Anne R. Isaac. (2016). Air Traffic Control: Human Performance Factors. Ashgate.
Australian Transport Safety Bureau. (2011). ATSB Safety Investigation: Tools - Analysis
Supplement. Canberra: Australian Transport Safety Bureau.
Chi Chia-Fen, & Wu Meng-Lin. (1997). Fatal occupational injuries in Taiwan—
relationship between fatality rate and age. Safety Sci., 27, 頁 p. 1-17.
Chi Chia-Fen, Chang Tin-Chang, & Ting Hsin-I. (2005). Accident patterns and prevention
measures for fatal occupational falls in the construction industry. Applied
Ergonomics, Volume 36, Issue 4, 頁 Pages 391-400.
ClarkeSharon. (2015). International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences
(Second Edition).
DouglasA.Wiegmann, & ScottA.Shappell. (2003). A Human Error Approach to Aviation
Accident Analysis: The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System.
FAA . (2016). Human Behavior. Flight Safety Quarterly, Summer.
GoldingL.Wayne. (2002). Tubulence and Its Impact on Commercial Aviation. Journal of
Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research , Article 8.
Hawkins& Orlady, H.W. (Ed.).F.H.,. (1993). Human factors in flight. England: Avebury
Technical.
HeinrichWilliamHerbert. (1950). Industrial Accident Prevention (第 3rd 版). New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Hinze et al. (1998). Identifying root causes of construction injuries. 頁 p. 67-71.
International Air Transport Association. (2019). Safety Report 2018. Montreal, Canada:
International Air Transport Association.
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2005). Threat and Error Management (TEM).
77
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2012). Safety Management Manual.
International Civil Aviation Organization.
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2013, April ). Definitions and Usage Notes
Phase of Flight. International Civil Aviation Organization.
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2017). Aircraft Accident Reporting Resources
for Media.
Li, W. C. & Harris, D. (2005). HFACS analysis of ROC air force aviation
accidents:reliability analysis and cross-cultural comparison. . International Journal
of Applied Aviation Studies, 5(1), 頁 65-81.
Li, W. C. & Harris, D. (2006). International cooperation and challenges: Understanding
cross-cultural issues in the processes of accident investigation. . International
Society of Air Safety Investigators Conference: International Cooperation and
Challenge.
MaurinoDanCaptain. (2005). THREAT AND ERROR MANAGEMENT (TEM).
Vancouver, BC: ICAO.
Reason, J. (1990). Human Error. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shari Stamford Krause. (2003). Aircraft Safety Accident Investigations, Analyses &
Applications 2nd. McGraw-Hill.
U.S. Department of Defense. (2015). A Mishap Investigation and Data Analysis Tool.
Department of Defense Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. 擷取
自
https://www.public.navy.mil/NAVSAFECEN/Documents/5102/DOD_HFACS_v7.
0_Guide.pdf.
Wen-Chin Li, Don Harris. (2007 年 October 月). From Latent Failure to Active Failure:
The Investigation of Human Errors in Aviation Operation. Human Factors and
78
Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings 51(20), 頁 1425-1429.
Wiegmann, D. A. & Shappell, S. A. (2001). Human error analysis of commercial aviation
accidents: Application of the human factors analysis and classification system
(HFACS). Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 72, 1006-16.
Wiegmann, D. A. & Shappell, S. A. (2001b). Human error perspectives in aviation. The
International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11(4), 頁 341-357.
Wiegmann, D. A. & Shappell, S. A. (2001c). Human error analysis of commerical aviation
accidents: Application of the human factors analysis and classification system.
Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 72(11). 頁 1006-1016.
Wiegmann, D. A.; Shappell, S. A. (2001a). Applying the Human Factors Analysis and
Classification System to the Analysis of Commerical Aviation Accident Data.
Eleventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology.
WigginsMark W., & GlassRenee. (2013). Improving the Accessibility of. Ergonomics in
design.
(2019). 台灣飛安統計 1999-2008. 行政院飛航安全委員會.
民用航空局交通部. (2019). 國家民用航空安全計畫.
李文進, 陳正中, 丁豊芫. (2012). 飛航安全調查與預防:美軍運用 HFACS 與 HFIX 之
現況簡介. 空軍學術雙月刊, 頁 4-27.
飛航安全調查委員會. (2016). 飛航事故調查報告 中華民國 104 年 2 月 14 日, 復興
航空公司 GE235 班機, ATR72-212A 型機, 國籍標誌及登記號碼 B-22816, 於
台北松山機場東方 3 浬處失去控制墜毀於基隆河.
飛航安全調查委員會. (2019). 飛航事故調查報告 中華民國 106 年 11 月 22 日,
長榮航空股份有限公司 BR056 班機, 波音 B777-300ER 型機, 國籍標誌及登記
號碼 B-16718, 巡航階段於日本宮崎機場東北東 42 海浬公海上空遭遇強烈亂
流.
79
國家運輸安全調查委員會. (2019). 台灣飛安統計 2009-2018.
國家運輸安全調查委員會. (2019). 事故調查作業流程.
國家運輸安全調查委員會. (無日期). 已結案事故.