簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張維修
WEI-HSIU Chang
論文名稱: SDN控制策略於動態頻寬管理機制之研究
Study of SDN-based Control Mechanisms for Dynamic Bandwidth Management
指導教授: 陳俊良
Jiann-Liang Chen
口試委員: 黎碧煌
Bih-Hwang Lee
陳英一
Ing-Yi Chen
林宗男
Tsungnan Lin
謝錫堃
Ce-Kuen Shieh
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 電資學院 - 電機工程系
Department of Electrical Engineering
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 64
中文關鍵詞: OpenWrtOpenFlow動態頻寬管理軟體定義網路
外文關鍵詞: OpenWrt, OpenFlow, Dynamic Bandwidth
相關次數: 點閱:229下載:4
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著網際網路的快速發展,如何有效分配與管理無線網路頻寬,以達到較高服務品質,是當前急需解決之課題。現今的網路架構中,需要在大量的網路設備上,手動設定頻寬固有規則;設定上的複雜度、需要設定的網路設備數量、以及網路管理員專業知識不足,很容易出現因人為錯誤而導致服務中斷,或是僅能提供粗糙服務品質的保證。且市售之網路設備,其軟硬體架構多為封閉式,研究人員無法修改底層架構,僅能於上層做應用服務的設計與開發。

    因此,本研究利用嵌入式系統與開放式OpenWrt平台,加上OpenFlow之網路架構,建構一開放式無線網路環境,並於此環境驗證本研究所提出之動態頻寬管理策略機制。首先,本研究於各網路節點上,對頻寬使用率、以及各節點下使用者之應用程式種類數量,進行監控與分析;接著,依據上述的評估,對各節點配予得分分數;最後,經由比例計算,變更網路頻寬之分配情形。根據研究結果顯示,本研究所提出的SDN-DBM動態頻寬分配機制,與未使用本機制之嵌入式設備互相比較下,能有效提升網路頻寬使用率12.4%。


    With rapid development of the internet, it’s an imperious task to arrange and manage wireless bandwidth effectively. In today’s network architecture, it is needed to set bandwidth control rules manually on lots of network equipment. Human error can be easily caused by the complicated setting method, the large amount of equipment, and the lack of professional knowledge of network manager. Moreover, closed systems of most network devices allows researchers to merely develop applications on the top layer rather than modify the architecture on the bottom layer.

    This work provides a mechanism of dynamic bandwidth management and verify it on an open wireless environment by using OpenWrt platform with OpenFlow network architecture. First, this work monitors and analyses bandwidth situation of each network node. The number and types of currently executing applications of users on each network node are also monitored. Second, according to the evaluation as mentioned above, this work assigns a number as index weight to each device. Finally, according to the weight ratio, this work reallocate bandwidth distribution. Based on the results obtained, this work improves bandwidth utilization by 12.4%.

    摘要 III Abstract IV 致謝 V 目錄 VI 圖目錄 VIII 表目錄 IX 第一章 緒論 1 1.1研究動機 1 1.2研究貢獻 2 1.3研究架構 2 第二章 知識背景 3 2.1 OPENWRT 3 2.2 OPENFLOW 3 2.2.1 OpenFlow交換器 6 2.2.2安全通道(Secure Channel) 6 2.2.3 控制器(Controller) 7 2.2.4 OpenRoads 9 2.3 無線區域網路(802.11) 10 2.4 動態頻寬管理(DYNAMIC BANDWIDTH MANAGEMENT) 12 第三章 SDN-DBM系統架構 14 3.1系統概述 14 3.2系統操作與架構 16 3.3 SDN動態頻寬管理系統設計 17 3.3.1 SDN動態頻寬管理模組 18 3.3.2 SDN-DBM運作流程 20 第四章 系統設計與效能分析 30 4.1 情境環境 30 4.2系統設計 31 4.2.1 OpenFlow 1.3安裝與設計 31 4.2.2 安裝Ryu Controller及設計 39 4.2.3安裝支援OpenFlow 1.3.0 Wireshark 39 4.3 效能分析 41 第五章 結論與未來研究方向 49 5.1 結論 49 5.2 未來研究方向 49 參考文獻 51

    [1] A. Dixit, F. Hao, S. Mukherjee, T. Lakshman and R. Kompella, “Towards an Elastic Distributed SDN Controller,“ Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networking, pp.1-6, 2013.
    [2] S. Sezer, S. Scott-Hayward, P. Chouhan, B. Fraser, D. Lake, J. Finnegan, N. Viljoen, M. Miller and N. Rao, “Are We Ready for SDN? Implementation Challenges for Software-defined Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 36-43, 2013.
    [3] E. Salvadori, R.D. Corin, A. Broglio and M. Gerola, “Generalizing Virtual Network Topologies in OpenFlow-based Networks, ” Proceedings of the Global Telecommunications Conference, pp. 1-6, 2011.
    [4] S. Shah, J. Faiz, M. Farooq, A. Shafi and S. Mehdi, “An Architectural Evaluation of SDN Controllers,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 3504-3508, 2013.
    [5] M. Fernandez, “Comparing OpenFlow Controller Paradigms Scalability: Reactive and Proactive,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, pp. 1009-1016, 2013.
    [6] M. Karl, J. Gruen and T. Herfet, “Multimedia Optimized Routing in OpenFlow Networks,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Networks, pp. 11-13, 2013.
    [7] S. Ortiz, “Software-Defined Networking:On the Verge of a Breakthrough?,” Computer, vol.46, no. 7, pp. 10-12, 2013.
    [8] W. Wendong, Y. Hu, X. Que and G. Xiangyang, “Autonomicity Design in OpenFlow Based Software Defined Networking,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Management of Emerging Networks and Services, pp. 818-823, 2012.
    [9] S.A. Shah, J. Faiz, M. Farooq, A. Shafi and S.A. Mehdi, “An Architectural Evaluation of SDN Controllers,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 3504-3508, 2013.
    [10] M.M.O. Othman and K. Okamura, “Enhancing Control Model to Ease off Centralized Control of Flow-based SDNs,” Proceedings of the IEEE Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference, 2013.
    [11] S. Dutt, D.Habibi and I.Ahmad, “A low cost Atheros System-on-Chip and OpenWrt based testbed for 802.11 WLAN research, ” Proceedings of IEEE Region 10 Conference on TENCON, pp.1-4, 2012.
    [12] M.Fernandez, “Comparing OpenFlow Controller Paradigms Scalability: Reactive and Proactive,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, pp. 1009-1016, 2013.
    [13] K. Yap, M. Kobayashi, R. Sherwood, N. Handigol, T. Huang, M. Chan and N. McKeown, “OpenRoads: Empowering Research in Mobile Networks,” Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM , pp.125-126, 2010.
    [14] L. Haizhuo, S. Lujingun, F. Yuntao and G. Suiming, “Apply embedded openflow MPLS technology on wireless Openflow — OpenRoads,” Proceedings of the Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks International Conference , pp.916-919, 2012.
    [15] M. Kim, J. Lee, B. Kim and W. Hong, “Implementation of an OpenFlow Network Virtualization for Multi-Controller Environment,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, pp. 589-592, 2012.
    [16] R. Sherwood, G. Gibb, K. Yap, G. Appenzeller, M. Casado, N. McKeown and G. Parulkar, “FlowVisor:A Network Virtualization Layer,” Technical Report Openflow, 2009.
    [17] T.Fratczak, M.Broadbent, P.Georgopoulos and N.Race, “HomeVisor: Adapting Home Network Environments,” Proceedings of the European Workshop on Software Defined Networks, pp. 32-37, 2013.
    [18] M. Petrova, L. Wu, P. Mahonen and J. Riihijarvi, “Interference Measurements on Performance Degradation between Colocated IEEE 802.11g/n and IEEE 802.15.4 Networks,” Proceedings of International Conference on Networking, pp.93,2007.
    [19] S.H. Shah, C. Kai and K. Nahrstedt, “Dynamic bandwidth management for single-hop ad hoc wireless networks, ” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, pp.195-203, 2003.
    [20] K.L. Cheah, T.H. Cheng and S.H. Oh, “Application of rate and buffer occupancy measurements in congestion detection and management: a simulation study, ” Proceedings of the IEEE Singapore International Conference on Networks, pp.334-338, 1993.
    [21] H.B. Guo and G.S. Kuo, “A dynamic and adaptive bandwidth management scheme for QoS support in wireless multimedia networks, ” Proceedings of the IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, pp.2081-2085, 2005.
    [22] K.L. Cheah, T.H. Cheng and S.H. Oh, “Improving the performance of a dynamic bandwidth management scheme, ”Proceedings of the IEE Eleventh UK Teletraffic Symposium, Performance Engineering in Telecommunications Networks, pp. 1-8, 1994.
    [23] G.H. Jung, H.Y. Chae and S.J. Kang, “Real-time bandwidth management middleware for multi-session isochronous streaming service in the IEEE1394-based home network, ” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol.55, no.2, pp.461-469, 2009.

    QR CODE