近年來由拓樸理論(Topology)所衍伸出空間語法(Space Syntax)越來越廣泛的運用在都市紋理與空間結構分析，但此分析方法仍受到以下兩點侷限。首先，對於過渡空間的使用分析，仍模糊、抽象的存在整體空間中；第二，此種空間網絡分析方法較無法以清楚直觀方式，呈現空間網絡中所蘊含之特性，尤其是抽象深層空間結構與社會組織或傳統文化的關係，更難以全面性的呈現。

有鑑於拓樸學在建築學領域應用的重要性，本研究企圖藉由組織網絡分析方法(Organization risk analyzer)使空間網絡之間的關係能更明確的被描述。組織網絡分析方法(簡稱ORA)，原本開發使用於人際組織網絡之分析研究，利用人際網絡分析之名詞解釋空間網絡關係，可以有助於人們以更直觀的方式理解空間網絡之特徵。

本研究以八八風災後的受災最嚴重的小林村為研究對象，小林村全村遭受土石流淹沒，全村居住人口為545人，只有79位倖存者逃過一劫，其中多數為長年在外縣市工作者。歷經山崩土石流摧殘，山林土地千瘡百孔，倖存者被迫搬離到其它地方重建家園。倖存者期望能重建記憶中的家園以安撫內心受創的心靈，最終卻因意見分歧而分居三地，使得小林村的文化傳承與生活方式正面臨巨大轉變與考驗。

因此本研究透過問卷訪談調查，從村民的空間記憶及生活經驗，記錄下他們所經歷過的各個聚落空間(社會)及住屋空間(個人)的生活型態，再透過ORA的分析，理解原小林聚落及重建社區之空間型態的特徵與變遷，清楚明確的呈現聚落空間所蘊含意義，成功的說明解釋為何小林村民對於生活環境良好的新建社區仍無法適應。

In recent years, space syntax , a method derived from topology theory, has been applied to analyze the spatial configuration of built environment with some success. However, two challenges remain in its application. This first challenge is related to the translation of spatial configuration into an abstracted network model. The second challenge lies in the outputs of this spatial network analytical method in which the characteristics of the spatial network are not articulated in a straightforward manner. It is especially so when meanings in multiple spatial scales need to be draw from them.

With full understanding of the significance of the application of Topology theory in architectural research, the study attempted to improve the clarity of spatial network analysis by using ORA (Organization risk analyzer) instead. ORA was originally developed for the network analysis of human organization. Its terms for network analysis were designed to describe human relationship, and thus, more intuitive to human understanding.

The recently destructed XiaoLin village was used as the study case. This village was hit by a serious landslide and buried under it. Out of 545 total residential population, only 79 survive this tragedy, most of them working in the city at the time of landslide. The survivors were forced to rebuild their homes somewhere else. All they want is to rebuild a community as in their memory; however they were separated into three settlements by different opinions. The continuation of their culture and way of living is facing an unforeseeable future.

Through face-to-face interviews with the survivors and questionnaires, the spatial organizations of XiaoLin village , both in community and residence level, were reconstructed from their memories. Using ORA, the characteristics as well as the evolution of the spatial organization of the XioLin village, old and relocated ones, were identified in various spatial scales. It was then used successfully to explain the dissatisfactory responds from some of the survivors regarding their new residences, although these structures were built in good quality.

期刊
A1.林峰田、李琦華，「台灣聚落的空間結構與社會脈絡研究」，中華民國建築學會「建築學報」，第65期，第45-62頁，(2008.9)
A2.林峰田、李琦華，「台灣聚落的空間型構法則分析」，中華民國建築學會「建築學報」，第60期，第27-45頁，(2007.3)
A3.簡文敏，「文化資產與變遷：小林平埔族傳統神靈信仰研究」，文化資產保存學刊，第五期，第24-35頁，(2010)
A4.潘英海，「聚落, 歷史, 與意義頭社村的聚落發展與族群關係」，中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，第77期，第89-123頁,(1994)
A5.Simon,H.A., “The Structure of Ill-structured Problems,” Artificial Intelligence, Vol.4, pp.181-201(1973)

書籍
B1.Hillier,B.,Julienne Hanson -The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge,Cambridge University Press.(1984)
B2.Julienne Hanson,-Decoding Homes and Houses. Cambridge,University College London (1999)
B3.胡守仁(譯)連結，原作者：Mark Buchanan，原書名：Nexus，天下文化，台北(2003)。

研討會論文
C1.Kerstin,S.,Alan,P,.“Towards an Architectural Theory of Space and Organisations : Cognitive,Affective and Conative Relations in Workplaces”2nd Workshop on Architecture and Social Architecture,EIASM,Brussels,(2010.5)
C2.Carley, Kathleen & DeReno, Matt.“ORA: Organization Risk Analyzer, ORA User's Guide.” Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research, Technical Report,(2006).
C3.M.E.J. Newman.“Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks.”Phys. Rev. E69,066133(2004)

學位論文

D1.李琦華，「台灣聚落的拓樸空間文化研究」，臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所，博士論文，(2009)。
D2.陳俊宏，「台灣傳統住居空間組構型態研究─以外埔農宅與大溪、淡水街屋為例」，逢甲大學，碩士論文，(2002)。
D3.黃春滿，「大溪、大甲、鹿港三城鎮之街道空間結構與產業分布歷史變遷」，逢甲大學，碩士論文，(2008)。
D4.曾健瑋，「以空間型構法則探討台南市街道路網結構變遷之研究」，成功大學，碩士論文，(2010)。
D5.張紘聞，以型態分析理論解讀日本傳統數寄屋與現代民宅之空間組構特徵，逢甲大學，碩士論文(2005)。
D6.王文錤，博物館空間組構邏輯探討—以國立自然科學博物館與國立科學工藝博物館為例，逢甲大學，碩士論文(2004)。
D7.吳梨華，「從文獻資料解讀清代台灣平埔族的社會文化」，台南師範學院台灣文化研究所，碩士論文，(2003)。
D8.Wasserman, Stanley and Katherine Faust. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
D9.Carley, Kathleen 2002. Summary of Key Network Measures for Characterizing Organizational Architectures. Unpublished Document: CMU 2002