研究生: |
洪銘駿 Ming-Chun Hung |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
非承重天花板防火及遮煙性能研究 Experimental Study on Fire Resistance and Smoke Leakage Performance of non-loadbearing Ceiling |
指導教授: |
林慶元
Ching-Yuan Lin 莊英吉 Ying-Ji Chuang |
口試委員: |
林慶元
Ching-Yuan Lin 莊英吉 Ying-Ji Chuang 郭詩毅 SHI-YI GUO |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
設計學院 - 建築系 Department of Architecture |
論文出版年: | 2019 |
畢業學年度: | 107 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 120 |
中文關鍵詞: | 煙洩漏量 、防火時效 、天花板 |
外文關鍵詞: | smoke leakage, fire resistance, ceiling |
相關次數: | 點閱:245 下載:4 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究非承重天花板防火試驗參考CNS 12514-9進行本研究設計之A、B、C三種工法之一小時防火性能測試,A與B工法皆為暗架天花板,A工法與B工法差別在於不同主副架種類與有無吊筋,C工法為明架天花板。
參考CNS 15038規範進行各種類明架天花板三種尺寸60cm×60cm、30cm×60cm與30cm×30cm之遮煙性能試驗,以本研究設計之木箱120cm×120cm×120cm做為試驗艙體,並以檢測遮煙門煙洩漏量之儀器安裝於木箱進風口進行測量,並記錄各種天花板尺寸之煙洩漏量,箱體外側具兩處進風口可分別量測兩種壓力方向,以了解起火居室與非起火居室5-50Pa壓力下各種類天花板之煙洩漏量。試體種類包含本研究設計明架C工法、玻璃纖維天花板、GBF纖維強化石膏板、石膏天花板、礦纖天花板、矽酸鈣天花板、發泡板與廁所PVC板。
經防火試驗A與B工法皆在25分鐘後,GBF纖維強化石膏板因剝落產生測點溫度陡升,超出阻熱試驗標準,但符合CNS 12514-1規範之遮焰性,C工法因主副架為曝火面為導熱材質,故溫度變化最為急遽,為三種工法中防火性能最差者。由遮煙試驗結果可得當火場壓力25Pa方向由下往上時單片60cm×60cm C工法天花板煙洩漏量4.8853(m3/h)其遮煙效果最佳,方向由上往下時單片60cm×60cm C工法天花板煙洩漏量1.43(m3/h)其遮煙效果亦最佳。
Refer to CNS 12514-9 for an-hour fire resistance test of non-loadbearing ceiling designed by A, B, and C methods. Both A and B methods are concealed sus-pended ceiling. A method and B method is that there are different types of frames. C method is T-Bar suspended ceiling.
This study refers to the CNS 15038 specification for the smoke leakage test of various types of T-Bar suspended ceiling that single size are 60cm×60cm, 30cm×60cm and 30cm×30cm. The wooden box of this study is designed to be 120 cm × 120 cm × 120 cm as a cabin. In order to test the smoke leakage of T-Bar suspended ceiling. And install the instrument at the air inlet of the wooden box with the instrument for detecting the smoke leakage. Record the value of smoke leakage of various ceiling sizes. There are two inlets on the outside of the box to measure two pressure directions respectively, in order to understand the various types of ceilings under the pressure of 5-50Pa in the fire and non-fire rooms. The types of ceiling smoke leakage test included method C, fiberglass boards, firestop plasterboards, plasterboards, mineral fiber boards, calcium sili-cate boards, PVC foam boards, PVC boards.
After 25 minutes, temperature of method A and B’s measuring points had a sharp rise due to firestop plasterboards spalling. Method A and B couldn’t pass the heat resistance test. But according to CNS 12514-9 method A and B could pass the flame retardancy test. Due to exposing and heat-conducting frames, the temperature of method C’s measuring point is the most urgent, and the fire re-sistance is the worst among the three methods. Experimental results show that when the fire pressure is 25Pa from bottom to top, and the single piece of 60cm×60cm smoke leakage of C method is 4.8853 (m3/h). The smoke shielding effect is the best. When the 25Pa pressure is from top to bottom , and the single piece of 60cm×60cm smoke leakage of method C is 1.43 (m3/h). Also the C method’s shielding effect is the best.
[1]B.Clarke,Physiological Effects of “Smoke: Managing Escape”, ASHRAE Journal Vol.39 NO.3, 1997, P.47-56.
[2]蔡卓方、楊欣潔,「收容行動不變人員機構防火安全設計參考手冊之研編-老人長期照護、養護及護理之家機構」,內政部建築研究所協同研究報告,民國96年1月。
[3]CNS 15038,建築用門遮煙性試驗法,民國99年11月。
[4]CNS 11227-1,耐火性能試驗法‒第1部:門及捲門組件,民國105年11月。
[5]JIS A1516, Windows and Doorsets-Air permeability test, 1998。
[6]ISO 5925-1, Fire tests – Smoke-control door and shutter assemblies-Part 1: Ambi-ent-and medium-temperature leakage tests, 2012.
[7]ISO 5925-2, Fire tests – Smoke-control door and shutter assemblies-Part 2: Com-mentary on test method and the applicability of test conditions and the use of test data in a smoke containment strategy, 2012.
[8]UL 1784, Air Leakage Tests of Door Assemblies, 2001.
[9]BS 476-31, Methods for measuring smoke penetration through doorsets and shutter assemblies, 1983.
[10]DIN 18095-1, Smoke control doors; concepts and requirements, 1988.
[11]DIN 18095-2, Smoke control doors; type testing for durability and leakage, 1991.
[12]傅文懋,建築物居室天花板煙洩漏量之探討,碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學,民國104年1月。
[13]CNS 12514-9,建築物構造構件耐火試驗法-第9部:非承重天花板特定要求,民國103年11月。
[14]劉祥至,「防煙區劃之火災模式分析與實驗驗證之研究」,碩士論文,國立雲林科技大學,2001。
[15]蔡東宏,層間塞之煙洩漏量研究,博士論文,國立台灣科技大學,民國101年12月。
[16]欒中丕,煙洩漏量試驗儀器之研發與應用,博士論文,國立台灣科技大學,民國98年1月。
[17]田中哮義,改訂版建築火災安全工學入門,平成14年。
[18]N.B. Kaye and G.R. Hunt, “smoke filling time for a room due to a small fire-The effect of ceiling height to floor width aspect ratio”, Fire Safety Journal, Volume 42, Issue 5, 2007, pp. 329-339.
[19]CNS 12514-1,建築物構造構件耐火試驗法-第1部:一般要求事項,民國103年11月。
[20.]明架天花板施工,http://wwwg-jam.com.tw/index.php/web/products_i/15/9/,民國107年12月。
[21.]暗架天花板施工,http://www.linya.com.tw/dark-light-steel-frame-ceiling-1.html,民國107年12月。
[22]J. H. Klote, “Fire experiments of zoned smoke control at the plaza hotel in Wash-ington DC” [R]. NISTIR pp.90~4253, MD, NIST, 1990. “CIBSE Guide”, Fire engineering, 1995.
[23]李建均,建築物安全梯區劃防火遮煙性改善之研究,碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學,民國101年7月。
[24]內政部建築研究所,建築物防火避難安全性能驗證技術手冊(第二版),
民國105年6月。