聯合國減災辦公室（United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction，UNDRR）發起「推動韌性都市運動（Making Cities Resilient Campaign）」政策，係透過整合式減災、降低災損、響應和疏散計畫，以強化都市抗災能力並維護城市環境。本研究利用空間型構理論（Space Syntax），以拓樸幾何距離（geometric distance）分析，瞭解疏散避難路徑之特徵，於分析圖中顯示，便捷道路（accessible roads）的效率性（efficiency）為31.61%，可以清楚在研究區域中，針對第一象限內的高風險脆弱性區域（多人口+高屋齡+低避難收容比例），提供增加可及性道路的建議方案，增加疏散避難路徑的效能，使防災疏散避難更便捷、範圍更廣，將有助於政府部門改善防災政策，且本研究亦證明這樣一個便捷性路網，與現行都市防災計畫的緊急防災道路有78.15%的重疊性，是可以提供未來人工智能判斷之參考依據。本研究並提出建議增設2條防災道路，提供高風險區域可以減少219.58公尺路徑，提升31.61%之效能，並分析次要道路有建築物超過2倍路寬之11條道路，可以進行耐震評估及耐震補強，可以確保9.64公尺之平均道路寬度，預防301.82公尺之道路長度被阻塞，預防比例是82.66%。本研究以Space Syntax的便捷性及可及性分析指標，提供了另一個空間分析工具，得以重新檢視都市防災道路系統之適宜性，於未來進行檢視疏散避難地圖或是管理都市更新政策時，也提供另一個觀點，從整體空間結構的特徵，來模擬與探究非工程性減災措施的可行性，Space Syntax也對都市防災研究領域，建立一項重要的應用模型。

Cities evolve and change with economic development and population growth, and urban planning laws in Taiwan have regulations that should be comprehensively reviewed every six years. Most current government policies aim to add new disaster prevention shelters or rescue stations. An economical way to improve the disaster prevention capabilities of urban planning is through examining or reviewing spatial structures and disaster prevention plans from the perspective of citizens or residents. The UN Office of Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) launched the Making Cities Resilient Campaign policy to enhance disaster-resistant and sustainable urban environments through integrated disaster mitigation, reduction, response, and evacuation plans. This study used Space Syntax to ascertain evacuation route features using geometric distance analysis. There was 31.61% efficiency in relation to accessible roads on a comprehensive map. This paper could clearly indicates that since the areas in the first quadrant were relatively close to accessible roads, and there was an area that was not connected to the existing evacuation routes. This study also proposes to add 2 disaster-prevention roads to provide high-risk areas, which can reduce the path of 219.58 meters and improve the efficiency by 31.61%. It also analyzes 11 roads with high buildings more than twice the road width on the secondary roads, which can be earthquake-resistant Evaluation and seismic reinforcement can ensure an average road width of 9.64 meters and prevent road lengths of 301.82 meters from being blocked, with a prevention ratio of 82.66% by DEA, Data Envelopment Analysis. Such suggestions are helpful for government departments to prepare for disaster management. Our findings reveal that Space Syntax is an important application for examining evacuation maps and urban spatial characteristics.

一、中文部分
丁育群、李威儀及潘國雄，都市窳陋地區環境災害評估方法之研擬（一）-社區空間致災風險評估之研究，內政部建築研究所（2005）。
王永杰，風險認知帶動社區適應性轉變的災害管理策略，國立東華大學自然資源及環境學系博士論文（2021）。
何明錦、李威儀，從都市防災系統檢討實質空間之防災功能-（一）防救災交通動線系統及防救災據點，內政部建築研究所（1998）。
何明錦、李威儀，台北市實質環境防災機能之研究，內政部建築研究所（1999）。
何明錦、李威儀，都市計畫防災規劃手冊彙編，內政部建築研究所（2000）。
何明錦、李威儀及楊龍士，台中市都市防災空間系統規劃，內政部建築研究所（2002）。
何明錦、黃定國，都市計畫防災規劃作業之研究，內政部建築研究所（1997）。
李永展，「韌性城市的觀念與論點」，余紀忠文教基金會（2015），http://www.yucc.org.tw/news/domestic/20150302-1。
李威儀、錢學陶及李咸亨，台北市都市計畫防災系統之規劃，台北市政府都市發展局（1997）。
李威儀，台北市市中心區防救災據點與路徑之檢討與空間規劃，台北市政府都市發展局（2001）。
李威儀，城鄉重建規劃與管理，商周出版（2020）。
呂獎慧，都市震災救災路線選擇模式之構建，國立臺灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文（2000）。
吳杰穎、鄭春發及鄭國泰，考量減災觀點之都市計畫通盤檢討防災規劃：以淡海新市鎮特定區為例，環境與世界，第14期，70-92（2006）。
吳杰穎，大規模災害下避難疏散居民之避難需求行為與安置照護決策支援之研究－以颱風土石流災害為例（II），國科會研究計畫（2007）。
吳杰穎，災害防救與復建統計資料專刊，內政部消防署（2007）。
吳杰穎，災害預警之風險溝通與居民認知：以高雄市六龜區土石流潛勢區為例，2011臺灣災害管理研討會，台灣：台北（2011）。
吳杰穎，環境脆弱地區災害預警之風險溝通與使用者認知之研究--以土石流災害預警與地區居民為對象(I)，國科會研究計畫（2011）。
吳杰穎、何天河、蔡綽芳及黃繼霆，現行各縣市區域計畫中防災規劃之課題，建築舆規劃學報，第18卷第2期，93-112（2017）。
林筱玫，工業物聯網預兆診斷技術應用於智慧建築，國立臺灣科技大學建築研究所博士論文（2022）。
侯鵬曦，防震災存活路網設計模型，國立交通大學交通運輸研究所博士論文（2006）。
室崎益輝，大規模災害時之避難行動與避難計畫，台北，內政部消防署（演講稿）（1997）。
孫式文，網際網路因應危機的傳播功能：理論與實務的辯證，新聞學研究，71：133-156（2002）。
陳亮全，社區防災的推動，北投文化雜誌（2001）。
陳俊傑，都市空間規劃在都市防災中功能定位與如何落實之探討，國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文（2008）。
陳奕竹，災害管理之對話式決策支援，國立臺灣大學土木研究所博士論文（2022）。
張維安、胡嘉志及陳仲偉，網際網路與地震救難，資訊社會研究，2：245-250（2002）。
張學聖、陳姿伶，地震帶土地使用規劃策略跨國比較研究，建築與規劃學報，第17卷第2/3期，137-152（2016）。
郭俊欽、莊翰華及康良宇，土石流災區之防災教育初探，環境與世界，15，99-128（2007）。
郭俊欽、莊翰華及康良宇，社區防災學習影響因素之研究，臺中教育大學學報：人文藝術類，25(1)，99-123（2011）。
許添本、呂獎慧，地震救災最小風險路徑產生模式之建立與應用，都市地區地震防災交通系統之研究，八十九學年度期末研究成果研討會論文集（2000）。
葉光毅、李泳龍，新世紀交通資訊提供之新課題，都市地區地震防災交通研討會，91學年度期中研究成果研討會，171-199（2002）。
董娟鳴，非都市地區高齡者鄰里活動類型、活動空間與鄰里環境供給滿意度之研究：以新北三峽與桃園新屋區為例，地理研究，72，139-162（2020）。
蔡綽芳、蔡淑瑩、陳政雄、李淑貞、陳靜怡及靳燕玲，高齡友善空間與輔具應用，新北市：國立空中大學（2018）。
蕭江碧、李威儀、錢學陶及吳榕檳，都市老舊社區防災研究-子計畫一：都市防災力不足地區防災整備與法制化推動之研究，內政部建築研究所（2004）。
羅億田，地震救災道路及街廓建物損害風險評估，國立臺灣科技大學建築研究所博士論文（2021）。
二、外文部分
Adebiyi, K.A., Charles‐Owaba, O.E and Waheed, M.A., Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 16(2), 178-187 (2007).
Alexander, D., Dunedin Academic Press, 150, 180-183 (2002).
Batty, M. Cities and Complexity; MIT Press: Cambridge, UK, (2005).
Batty, Michael, The emergence and evolution of urban AI, AI & SOCIETY, volume 38, pages1045-1048 (2023).
Beckman, M., Resilience society, vulnerable people: A study of disasterresponse and recovery from floods in central Vietnam, Doctoral thesis SwedishUniversity of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala (2006).
Bernow, R. and Ståhle, A. Värdering av Stadskvaliteter: PM Sammanfattning av Metod och Resultat. Available online: https: //www.spacescape.se/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/stadskvaliteter.pdf
Bernow, Stephen, Biewald, Bruceand Raskin, Paul, From Social Costing to Sustainable Development: Beyond the Economic Paradigm, Social Costs of Energy, pp. 373-404 (1994).
Bernow, Stephen, Dougherty, W., Duckworth, M., Kartha, S., Lazams, M.andRuth, M., America’s Global Warming Solutions. Boston, Massachusetts: Tellus Institute and Stockholm Environment Institute (1999).
Birkland, Thomas A., Learning and policy improvement after disaster: The case of aviation security, American Behavioral Scientist, 48(3), pp. 341-364(2004).
Birkland, Thomas A., Lessons of disaster: Policy change after catastrophic events, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press (2006).
Bostenaru Dan, M. and Armas, I., Earthquake impact on settlements: the role of urban and structural morphology, Natual Hazards Earth System Sciences, vol.15, pp. 2283–2297 (2015).
Cando-Ja’come, M.and Martinez-Grana, A.; Valdes, V. Prevention of disasters related to extreme natural ground deformation events by applying spatial modeling in urban areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 753 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030753.
Castillo, Milton Montejano, URBAN PATTERNS AND DISASTER RISK: The informal city on the hills, Proceedings of the Ninth International Space Syntax Symposium Edited by Y O Kim, H T Park and K W Seo, Seoul: Sejong University, pp.114: 1-114: 13 (2013).
Chang, H.W.and Lee, W.I., Decoding network patterns for urban disaster prevention by comparing Neihu district of Taipei and Sumida district of Tokyo. In Proceedings of the MATEC Web Conference No. 169, Hualien, Taiwan, 27-31 October (2017).
Chang, H.S. and Liao, C.H., Planning emergency shelter locations basedon evacuation behavior, Natural Hazards, 76:1551-1571 (2015).
Chen, Anthony, Yang, Hai, Lo, Hong K. and Tang, Wilson H., Capacity reliability of a road network: an assessment methodology and numerical results, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp. 225-252 (2002).
Claramunt, C.and Jiang, B.A., Qualitative Model for the Simulation of Traffic Behaviours in a Multi-Lane Environment. J. Geogr. Sci., 11, 29-42 (2001).
Dou, K.and Zhan, Q., Accessibility Analysis of Urban Emergency Shelters: Comparing Gravity Model and Space Syntax. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering, Nanjing, China, 24–26 June (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/RSETE.2011.5965642.
Enström, R.and Netzell, O., Can space syntax help us in understanding the intraurban office rent pattern? Accessibility and rents in downtown Stockholm. J. Real Estate Financ. Econ., 36, 289-305(2008).
Folke, C., Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analysis. Glob. Environ. Chang., 16, 253-267 (2006).
Geertman, S.C.M.and Van Eck, J.R.R., GIS and models of accessibility potential: An application in planning. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 9, 67-80 (1995).
Geertman, Stan, Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development, springer publishers (2013).
Godschalk, David R., Disaster mitigation and hazard management, Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government, pp.131-160 (1991).
Günther, Daniel, Kerr, Nathan and Müller, Paul, A simulation model for evaluating the impact of communication services in a functional-block-based network protocol graph, SpringSim (CNS)(2012).
Helbing, Dirk, Farkas, Illés and Vicsek, Tamás, Simulating dynamical features of escape panic, Nature, volume 407, pp.487-490 (2000).
Hillier, B., Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK (1996).
Hillier, B., Burdett, R., Peponis, J.& Penn, A., Creating Life: Or, Does Architecture Determine Anything? Architecture et Comportement/Architecture and Behaviour, 3(3) 233 - 250. pp.237(1987).
Hillier, B.and Hanson, J. The Social Logic of Space; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK (1984).
Hillier, B.and Hanson, J. The Social Logic of Space; Cambrigde University Press: Cambrigde, UK (1989).
Hillier, B.and Lida, S., Network effects and psychological effects: A theory of urban movement. In Spatial Information Theory; Cohn, A., Mark, D., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, pp. 473-490 (2005).
Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T.and Xu, J., Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environ. Plan.B Plan.Des., 20, 29-66 (1993).
Hillier, B. and Stonor, T., Space Syntax-Strategic Urban Design, City Planning Institute of Japan, Special Issue：Future of Urban Space and Humanity, 284-288 (2010)
Holling,C.S., Resilience and stability of ecological systems, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4: 1-23 (1973).
Hossain, Nasreen, ‘Street’ as Accessible Open Space Network in Earthquake Recovery Planning in Unplanned Urban Areas, Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (AJHSS) Volume 2, Issue-4, November, ISSN: 2320-9720,pp. 103-115 (2014).
Jetel,V., 8th International Scientific Conference Building Defects, MATEC Web of Conferences, 93, 03009 (2017).
Jiang, B. and Omer, I., Transactions in GIS, 11(6), 943-960 (2007).
Jiang, B.; Omer, I. Spatial Topology and Its Structural Analysis Based on the Concept of Simplicial Complex. Trans. GIS, 11, 943-960 (2007).
Kar, B.and Hodgson, M.E.A GIS-based model to determine site suitability of emergency evacuation shelters. Trans. GIS, 12, 227-248 (2008).
Kilci, F., Kara, B.Y. and Bozkaya, B., European Journal of Operational Research, 243(1), 323-332 (2015).
Lee, Ji-Soo, Hong, Won-Hwaand Jeong, Gwi-Og, Analysis of Space Syntax Characteristics in Roads around Temporary Relief Area: Case Study of Sewol Disaster, International Conference on Biological, Environment and Food Engineering (BEFE-2014) August 4-5, Bali (Indonesia), pp.38-41 (2014).
Lee, J.S. and Hong, W.H., Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 21(6), 1968-200 (2015).
Lee, Ji-Sooand Hong, Won Hwa, Arrangement Characteristics of Temporary Relief Facilities: A Case Study of the Sewol Ferry Disaster Using Space Syntax Modeling, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp.1686-1699 (2015).
Lee, Y.and Yeh, K. The Street Network Closure Survey in Times of Chi-Chi Earthquake—Nantou City Case Study, Part 3 in Traffic Management System in Time of Earthquake Disaster Based on The Experience of Chi-Chi and Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake. In Proceedings of the IATSS Conference, Tokyo, Japan, 2 November; pp. 3-1–3-31 (2018).
Leu, C.H.The Construction of Route Selection Model for Urban Earthquake Disaster Relief.Master’s Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan (2003).
Liao, C. H. and Chang, H. S., Exploration assessment of the service distance based on Geographical Information Systems and Space Syntax analysis on the urban public facility, ICECS 2009 Proceedings, pp. 289-292 (2009).
Liao, C.H. and Chang, H.S., 3rd International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology, Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10, 1092-1097 (2011).
Lima, J.J. Socio-spatial segregation and urban form: Belem at the end of the 1990s. Geoforum, 32, 493–507 (2001).
Lin, F.T., 23rd International Fire Chiefs’ Association of Asia General Conference, Taipei, Taiwan (2004).
Lin, F.T.,The Development of Disaster Management Information Systems in Taiwan. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Fire Chiefs’ Association of Asia General Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, 17-19 November (2004).
Liu, J., Wu, D., Hidetosi, F. &Gao, W., Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 5, 97-108 (2015)
Makrí, M.-C.and Folkesson, C., Accessibility Measures for Analyses of Land Use and Travelling with Geographical Information Systems. In Proceedings of the 2nd KFB-Research Conference, Lund, Sweden, 7–8 June; pp. 1-17 (1999).
Marcus, L., Spatial Capital: A Proposal for an Extension of Space Syntax Into a More General Urban Morphology. J. Space Syntax, 1, 30-40 (2010).
Michiyas, O., Kuniaki, U.and Takamasa, S., Analysis of Traffic Situation in Disaster Area after the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake by Using Aerial Photos. Jpn. J. JSCE, 18, 5(1999).
Mohareb, N.I., Emergency evacuation model: Accessibility as a starting point. Proc. Inst. Civ.Eng.Urban Des.Plan, 164, 215-224 (2011).
Olshansky, Robert, Urban Planning after Disasters, Taylor & Francis Group (2016).
Osti, Rabindra, Forms of community participation and agencies’role for the implementation of water‐induced disaster management: protecting and enhancing the poor, Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp.6-12 (2004).
Penn, Alan, Intelligent Analysis of Urban Space Patterns: graphical interfaces to precedent databases for urban design from Proceedings of the AUTOCARTO 11 Conference, Minneapolis (1993).
Penn, Alan, 'Day surgery units: an evaluation of spatial planning'from Day Surgery Building Note, NHS Estates, Leeds (1993).
Penn, Alan, Space Syntax Based Agent Simulation (2001). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32884789_Space_Syntax_Based_Agent_Simulation
Penn, Alan, Space Syntax and Spatial Cognition-Or, Why the Axial Line?In Proceedings of the 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA, 7-11 May; pp. 11.1-11.16 (2001).
Penchev, Georgi, Using Space Syntax For Estimation Of Potential Disaster Indirect Economic Losses, Comparative Economic Research, Volume 19, Number 5, pp.125-142(2016).
Pezzica, Camilla, Cutini, Valerioand Bleil de Souza, Clarice, Rapid configurational analysis using OSM data: towards the use of Space Syntax to orient post-disaster decision makingProceeding 12th Int. Sp. Syntax Symp, Beijing JiaoTong University, Beijing, pp.147.1-147.18 (2019).
Schwab, James, Topping, Kenneth C., Eadie, Charles C., Deyle, Robert E. and Smith, Richard A., Planning for Post-DisasterRecovery and Reconstruction, PAS Report 483/484. Chicago:American Planning Association (1998).
Schwab, A.K., Eschelbach, K. and Brower, D.J., Hazard Mitigation and Preparedness: Building Resilient Communities, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons (2006).
Scoppa, M., Towards a Theory of Distributed Attraction: The Effects of Street Network Configuration Upon the Distribution of Retain in the City of Buenos Aires. Ph.D. Thesis, The School of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology: Atlanta, GA, USA (2012).
Seamon, D.,The Life of Place; Nordisk Arkitektur Fosking Publish: Oslo, Norway (1994).
Smit, B. and Wandel, J., Adaptation, Adaptive Capacity and Vulnerability, Global Environmental Change, 16, 282-292 (2006).
Srinuraka,Nattasit,Mishimab,Nobuo,Fuchikamic,Takayuki,andDuangthima,Wittaya, Analysis of urban morphology and accessibility character to provide evacuation route in historic area, Urban Planning and Architecture Design for Sustainable Development, UPADSD 14- 16 October 2015, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences vol.216,pp. 460-469( 2016 ).
Srinurak, N.,Mishima, N.and Kakon, A.N., Urban morphology and accessibility classification as supportive data for disaster mitigation in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Lowl.Technol.Int., 18, 219-230(2016).
Ståhle, Agneta, Mer Park andTätare Stad: Teoretiska och Empiriska Undersökningar av Stadsplaneringens Mått på Friytetillgång. Master’s Thesis, Arkitekturskolan, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm, Sweden (2005).
Ståhle, Agneta, Marcus, L. andKarlström, A., Place Syntax - Accessibility with axial lines, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, submitted (2006).
Steadman, P., Developments in space syntax. Environ. Lanning B Plan. Des., 31, 483-486(2004).
Sheu, J.B.and Pen, C., Transportmetrica A, Transport Science, 11(3), 210-242 (2015).
Ting, Y. C., Lee, W. Y. andPan, K. H., "The Establishment of Risk Assessment Method for Environment Disaster in Urban Deteriorated Areas—(1) Research on Assessment of Disaster High Risks in Community Spaces, Architecture and Building Research Institute of Ministry of the Interior, Taiwan (2005).
Transportation Research Board Washington, D.C., The Role of Transit in Emergency Evacuation, Committee on the Role of Public Transportation in Emergency Evacuation, Special Report 294, 43-73 (2008).
Tsukaguchi, H.andLi, Y., District and Local Distributor Network to Ensure Disaster-resilient Urban Planning, In Proceedings of the Shanghai International Symposium on Transportation Proceeding, 6–8 July (1999).
Turner, A.,From axial to road-centre lines: a new representation for space syntax and a new model of route choice for transport network analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(3) pp. 539-555(2007).
Unal,M. and Uslu,C., GIS-BASED ACCESSIBILITY ANALYSIS OF URBAN EMERGENCY SHELTERS: THE CASE OF ADANA CITY, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-2/W1, 2016 3rd International GeoAdvances Workshop, 16-17 October, Istanbul, Turkey, pp.95-102 (2016).
UNISDR, Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction (2015).
Walker, B. and Salt, D., Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World, Island Press, Washington, D.C. (2006).
Ye, M., Wang, J., Liu, Y. and Xu, S., Study on Refuge Accessibility of Park in Inner-City of Shanghai Based on GIS Technique. Geogr. Geo-Inf. Sci., 24, 96-103(2008).
Zhang, X., Ren, A., Chen, L. and Zheng, X., Measurement and spatial difference analysis on the accessibility of road networks in major cities of China. Sustainability, 11, 4209 (2019).
Zhou,B., 13th Global Congress on Manufacturing and Management, MATEC Web Conference 100, 02062 (2017).
太田裕、鏡味洋史，地震時避難場所の配置計画の検討(2)－避難人口・収容能力の変動と地震危険度の考慮－，地震第2輯，34，2，pp.161-174（1981）。
石田亨、中西英之、高田司郎，デジタルシティにおける危機管理シミュレーション，システム／制御／情報，Vol.13，No.13，pp.1-8（2002）。
光原弘幸，ICT活用型防災教育システムの現状と展望，教育システム情報学会誌，35巻，2号，pp.66-80（2018）。
李載吉，自走力追従モデルによる群集歩行速度の導出，筑波大学都市防災研究成果集(1)，pp.53-59（1992）。
李載吉，誘導群集の歩行動態ならびに広域群集避難勧告支援モデルの開発，筑波大学学位論文（1993）。
李載吉、梶秀樹，拡張最遅避難モデルに基づく避難誘導からみた避難計画の評価，日本都市計画学会，都市計画，No.177，pp.72-88（1992）。
佐藤慶一，想定首都直下地震後の仮住まい状況ミクロシミュレーションの拡張開発，日本建築学会計画系論文集，Vol.87，No.795，854-864（2022）。
金井淳子、梶秀樹，大震時の火災時による道路閉塞を考慮したリアルタイム避難誘導のための避難闘始時刻決定に関する研究，地域安全学会，地域安全学会論文集，Vol.4，pp.25-30（2002）。
原文雄，大震火災からの群集避難のダイナミックモデル，計測と制御動制御学会，Vol.19，No.7，pp.708-712（1980）。
梶秀樹，広域避難計画における地区別避難危険度の算定，都市計画別冊17号，日本都市計画学会，pp.88-92（1982）。
梶秀樹、塚越功，都市防災学地震対策の理論と実践，京都：学芸出版社（2007）。
梶秀樹、塚越功，城市防災學：日本地震對策的理論與實踐（修訂版），電子工業出版社（2016）。
梶秀樹、增山格，最遅避難モデルによる大地震火災時の広域避難計画の評価，都市計画20号，日本都市計画学会，pp.67-72（1985）。
塚口博司，一般街路の被害と閉塞，阪神・淡路大震災調査報告共通編-3都市安全システムの機能と体制，pp.173-186（1999）。
熊谷良雄，避難モデル論，都市計画89，日本都市計画学会，pp.40-50（1976）。
藤田隆史，大震火災時における住民避難の最適化一避難群集の流動シミュレーション一，計画自動制御学会論文集，12-4，pp.424-431（1976）。