簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳妮均
Ni-chun Chen
論文名稱: 廠商創新策略與外部知識來源之關係探討:台灣創新廠商之實證分析
The Relationship of Innovative Strategies and External Linkages : The Empirical Study of Innovative Firms in Taiwan
指導教授: 何秀青
Mei HC Ho
口試委員: 劉顯仲
none
盧煜煬
none
陳宥杉
none
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 科技管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Technology Management
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 70
中文關鍵詞: 創新策略創新活動外部知識來源台灣創新調查
外文關鍵詞: innovation strategy, innovative activity, external linkage, Taiwan Technological Innovation Survey
相關次數: 點閱:192下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

經濟合作發展組織(OECD)1999年的研究提出,企業發展創新活動的最新趨勢是與市場上其他角色之間的關係愈來愈緊密,研發的合作或結盟現象愈來愈普遍,因此創新合作的議題在國際間逐漸受重視。本研究的主要目的在於探討台灣創新廠商在創新過程中的合作動機與行為。我們主要利用國科會企劃處2010年「台灣地區第三次產業創新活動調查研究」的資料,研究方法採用Multivariate Probit Model,探討在創新過程中,台灣的廠商除了自身研發能力的貢獻之外,當採取不同的創新策略,不同智財保護策略及投資不同的創新活動時,是否影響廠商去選擇與不同的外部知識來源進行正式的合作,或非正式的知識交流,並針對製造業及服務業進行比較分析。本研究之研究結論有以下四點:

1.對於廠商選擇外部知識來源之合作或交流而言,廠商本身之創新策略比產業差異之影響來的程度高。

2.製造業及服務業對於外部知識來源之選擇存在差異,製造業多集中傾向與供應商及政府研究機構合作創新 ,服務業廠商傾向同時使用多個知識來源。

3.智財策略扮演廠商創新發展一重要角色,且對於廠商對於知識來源之選擇造成影響。

4.正式知識來源之間存在互補關係,而正式及非正式來淵之間多為替代關係。


In 1999, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development pointed out that the most recent development of firms’ innovation activity is the tendency to interact with other market actors. Business cooperation such as alliance between firms became more common. Firms increasingly rely upon external actors during their innovation process. We analyze the reasons why firms consider it crucial to develop formal (i.e. through a collaboration agreement) and informal (i.e. external actors acts as sources of information) external linkages in the innovation process, by looking at the role played by firms’ innovative strategies, intellectual property right protection strategies, and the investment of innovation activities. We use multivariate probit model to demonstrate the factors affect a firm’s choices to interact externally during innovation process by analyzing the data from Taiwan Technological Innovation Survey 3 (TIS 3) which is jointly collected by National Science Council and Ministry of Economic Affairs.

第壹章 緒論1 第一節 研究背景1 第二節 研究目的2 第貳章 文獻探討3 第一節 創新起源與定義3 第二節 創新類型4 第三節 智財策略與創新6 第四節 外部知識來源7 第五節 外部知識來源與創新之關聯性8 第六節 小結13 第參章 資料與方法14 第一節 資料來源15 第二節 樣本說明17 第三節 模型設定20 第四節 變數說明21 第肆章 結果與分析29 第五節 TIS 3 整體分析29 第六節 製造業分析37 第七節 服務業分析44 第八節 綜合分析51 第伍章 結論與建議62 第一節 研究結論62 第二節 研究貢獻64 第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向64 參考文獻66 中文部分66 英文部分66

中文部分

吳思華(1998),「知識流通對產業創新的影響」,第七屆產業管理研討會論文集,政治大學科學管理研究所,7,2-42

劉常勇,創新管理,http://cm.nsysu.edu.tw/~cyliu/

英文部分

Afuah, A. (1998), Innovation management: strategies, implementation and profits, NY: Oxford University Press.

Aschhoff, B. and Schmidt, T. (2008), Empirical Evidence on the Success of R&D Cooperation—Happy Together? Review of Industrial Organization, 33, 41–62.

Baldwin, J., Hanel, P., Sabourin, D., (2002) Determinants of innovative activity in Canadian manufacturing firms. In: Kleinknecht, A., Mohnen, P., (eds) Innovation and firm performance. Palgrave, London.

Becker, W. and Dietz, J. (2004), R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33, 209–223.

Beise, M. and Stahl, H. (1999), Public research and industrial innovations in Germany. Research Policy 28,397– 422.

Belderbos, R., Carree, M. and Lokshin, B. (2004a), Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy 33,1477–1492.

Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Lokshin, B. and Veugelers, R. (2004b), Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22,1237–1263.

Betz, F. (1998), Strategic technology management, McGraw Hill.

Branstetter, L. and Sakakibara, M. (1988), Japanese research consortia: a microeconometric analysis of industrial policy. Journal of Industrial Economics, 66, 207–233.

Cabagnols, A. and Le Bas, C. (2002), Differences in the determinants of product and process innovations: the French case. In: Kleinknecht, A., Mohnen, P. (eds) Innovation and firm performance. Palgrave, London.

Cappellari, L. and Jenkins, S. P. (2003) Multivariate probit regressions using simulated maximum likelihood. The STATA Journal 3,278–294.

Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2002) Spillovers and R&D cooperation: some empirical evidence. The American Economic Review 92(4),1169–1184.

Chacke, G. K. (1998), Technology Management - Application to Corporate Markets and Military Missions, New York: Praeger.

Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1989) Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Journal of Economics 99,569–596.

Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R.R. and Walsh, J. P. (2002) Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Manage Science 48(1),1–23.

Crosby, M. (2000), Patents, innovation and growth. Economic Record 76, 255 – 262.

Damanpour, F. (1991), Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal 34,355-590.

Deolalikar, A. and Lars-Hendrik, R. (1989), Patenting by manufacturing firms in India: its production and impact. Journal of Industrial Economics 37, 303 – 314.

Drucker, P. F. (1985), Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Harper Row, New York.

Freitas, I., Clausen,T., Fontana, R. and Verspagen, B. (2011), Formal and informal external linkages and firms’ innovative strategies. A cross-country comparison, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 21(1), 91-119.

Gloria Sa ́nchez-Gonza ́lez, Nuria Gonza ́lez-A ́lvarez and Mariano Nieto (2009), Sticky information and heterogeneous needs as determining factors of R&D cooperation with customers, Research Policy, 38, 1590–1603

Gould, D. and Gruben, W. (1997), The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth. In: Dev Gupta, Satya, Choudhry, Nanda K. (Eds.), Dynamics of Globalization and Development. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Helpman, E. (1993), Innovation imitation and intellectual property rights. Econometrica 61(6), 1247–1280.

Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R. and Winter S. G. (1995), On the sources and significance of inter industry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24, 185–205.

Lach, S. (1995), Patents and productivity growth at the industry level: a first look. Economics Letters 49, 101 – 108.

Levin, R. C. and Reiss, P.C. (1988), Cost-reducing and demand-creating R&D with spillovers. Rand Journal of Economics 19(4),538–556.

Malerba, F. (1992), Learning by firms and incremental technical change. Journal of Economics 102,845–859

Mariti, P. and Smiley, R.H.(1983), Co-operative agreements and the organization of industry, The Journal of industrial economics 437-451.

Marsili, O. (2001), The anatomy and evolution of industries: technological change and industrial dynamics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Marsili, O. and Verspagen, B. (2002), Technology and the dynamics of industrial structures: an empirical mapping of Dutch manufacturing, Industrial and Corporate Change 11(4),791-815

Maskus, K. E. and McDaniel, C. (1999), Impacts of the Japanese patent system on productivity growth. Japan and the World Economy 11, 557 – 574.

Monjon, S. and Waelbroeck, P. (2003), Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21,1255–1270.

Noteboom, B. (1999), Innovation and inter-firm linkages: new implications for policy. Research Policy 28,793–805

Park, W.G. and Ginarte, J. C. (1997), Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy 15, 51 – 61.

Pavitt, K. (1984), Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 13(6),343–373

Reinchstein, T. and Salter, A. (2006), Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change 15(4),653–682

Salter, A. J. and Martin, B. R. (2001), The economic benefits of publicly funded research: a critical review. Research Policy 30,509–539

Schmookler, J. (1966), Invention and Economic Growth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

Shrolec, M. and Verspagen, B. (2008), The voyage of the Beagle in innovation systems land. Explorations on sectors, innovation, heterogeneity and selection. No 20080220, Working papers on innovation studies from Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.

Swann, G. M. P. (2002), Innovative businesses and the science and technology base: an analysis using CIS3. Data Report for Department of Trade and Industry, Manchester Business School University of Manchester.

Tether, B. (2002), Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis. Research Policy 31,947–967.

Teece, D. J. (1992), Competition, cooperation, and innovation: organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 18 (1), 1–25.

Thompson, M.A. and Rushing, F. (1996), An empirical analysis of the impact of patent protection on economic growth. Journal of Economic Development 21, 61 – 79.

Thompson, M.A. and Rushing, F. (1999), An empirical analysis of the impact of patent protection on economic growth: an extension. Journal of Economic Development 24, 67 – 76.

Tushman, M. and Nadler, D. (1986), Organizing for innovation, California management review, 28(3), 74-92.

von Hippel, E. (1988), The sources of innovation. Oxford University Press, New York.

Whitley, R. (2000), The institutional structuring of innovation strategies: business systems, firm types and patterns of technical change in different market economies. Organization Study 21,855–886.

無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2018/07/29 (校內網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE