簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: Thi Thao Nguyen Mac
Thi Thao Nguyen Mac
論文名稱: Investigating the Relationship among Work Ethic, Student Engagement, and Academic Performance for High School Students in Vietnam
Investigating the Relationship among Work Ethic, Student Engagement, and Academic Performance for High School Students in Vietnam
指導教授: 黃美慈
Mei-Tzu Huang
口試委員: Chung-wen Chen
Chung-wen Chen
Kristine Velasquez Tuliao
Kristine Velasquez Tuliao
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 57
中文關鍵詞: work ethicMultidimensional Work Ethic Profile (MWEP)Multidimensional Work Ethic Profile–Short Form (MWEP-SF)academic performanceGrade Point Average (GPA)Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB)student behavioral engagement
外文關鍵詞: work ethic, Multidimensional Work Ethic Profile (MWEP), Multidimensional Work Ethic Profile–Short Form (MWEP-SF), academic performance, Grade Point Average (GPA), Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB), student behavioral engagement
相關次數: 點閱:286下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Work ethic has received increased research attention in recent years because of its importance in a wide variety of settings. It is an important determinant that motivates an individual and ensures one’s professionalism in both the classroom and workplace. Work ethic was explored in this study as a predictor of student academic performance and behavioral engagement. Academic performance was expanded to include student organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) in addition to high school grade point average (GPA). A sample of 229 high school students from Vietnam completed surveys on work ethic, behavioral engagement, OCB and GPA. Results indicated that specific dimensions of work ethic were related to the two dimensions of student OCB (i.e., OCB-I and OCB-O), student behavioral engagement, and GPA among Vietnamese high school students. These findings provide support for the importance of non-cognitive predictors such as work ethic in the academic context, particularly when considering expanding the performance domain to include non-cognitive elements. Furthermore, results provide additional empirical evidence for the nature of work ethic as a multidimensional construct. Implications of the study’s results, limitations, and directions for future research are discussed.


    Work ethic has received increased research attention in recent years because of its importance in a wide variety of settings. It is an important determinant that motivates an individual and ensures one’s professionalism in both the classroom and workplace. Work ethic was explored in this study as a predictor of student academic performance and behavioral engagement. Academic performance was expanded to include student organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) in addition to high school grade point average (GPA). A sample of 229 high school students from Vietnam completed surveys on work ethic, behavioral engagement, OCB and GPA. Results indicated that specific dimensions of work ethic were related to the two dimensions of student OCB (i.e., OCB-I and OCB-O), student behavioral engagement, and GPA among Vietnamese high school students. These findings provide support for the importance of non-cognitive predictors such as work ethic in the academic context, particularly when considering expanding the performance domain to include non-cognitive elements. Furthermore, results provide additional empirical evidence for the nature of work ethic as a multidimensional construct. Implications of the study’s results, limitations, and directions for future research are discussed.

    Literature Review 4 Work Ethic 4 Academic Performance in an Expanded Domain 7 Student Behavioral Engagement 12 Control Variable 14 Method 16 Research Subjects and Procedure 16 Measures 16 Work ethic (MWEP-SF). 16 GPA. 17 Organizational citizenship behavior. 17 Behavioral engagement. 18 Results 19 Descriptive Statistics 19 Confirmatory Factor Analysis 22 Construct Validity 29 Common Method Variance 31 Hypothesis Testing 33 Discussion and Conclusion 36 Discussion 36 Implications for Practice and Research 38 Limitations and Recommendations 39 References 41 Appendix A 52

    Alas, R., & Edwards, V. (2011). Work-related attitudes in Asia and Europe: Institutional approach. Engineering Economics, 22(1), 24–31.
    Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 274–289.
    Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016). A critical review and best‐practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 229–283.
    Bing, M. N., LeBreton, J. M., Davison, H. K., Migetz, D. Z., & James, L. R. (2007). Integrating implicit and explicit social cognitions for enhanced personality assessment: A general framework for choosing measurement and statistical methods. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 136–179.
    Blakely, G. L., Srivastava, A., & Moorman, R. H. (2005). The effects of nationality work role centrality, and work locus of control on role definitions of OCB. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(1), 103–117.
    Blau, G., & Ryan, J. (1997). On measuring work ethic: A neglected work commitment facet. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51(3), 435–448.
    Breu, M., Dobbs, R., Remes, J., Skilling, D., & Kim, J. (2012). Sustaining Vietnam’s growth: The productivity challenge. New York, NY: McKinsey & Company.
    Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86.
    Chang, S.-J., Van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 178–184.
    Cooper, K. S. (2014). Eliciting engagement in the high school classroom: A mixed-methods examination of teaching practices. American Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 363–402.
    Diefendorff, J. M., Brown, D. J., Kamin, A. M., & Lord, R. G. (2002). Examining the roles of job involvement and work centrality in predicting organizational citizenship behaviors and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1), 93–108.
    Duckworth, A. L. (2009). (Over and) beyond high-stakes testing. American Psychologist, 64(4), 279–280.
    Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Voelkl, K. E. (1995). Disruptive and inattentive-withdrawn behavior and achievement among fourth graders. The Elementary School Journal, 95(5), 421–434.
    Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221–234.
    Finn, J. D., & Voelkl, K. E. (1993). School characteristics related to student engagement. The Journal of Negro Education, 62(3), 249–268.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
    Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
    Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. H. (2005). School Engagement. In K. A. More & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 305–321). New York, NY: Springer Science.
    Garson, D. (2010). Statnotes: Topics in multivariate analysis: Factor analysis. Retrieved from http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/statnote.htm.
    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Hamilton, G. (1985). Why no capitalism in China? Negative questions in historical comparative research. In A. E. Buss (Ed.), Max Weber in Asian studies (pp. 65–89). Leiden, The Netherlands: E.J. Brill.
    Hanson, M. A., & Borman, W. C. (2006). Citizenship performance: An integrative review and motivational analysis. In W. Bennett, C. E. Lance, & D. J. Woehr (Eds.), Performance measurement: Current perspectives and future challenges (pp. 141–173). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Hanushek, E. A., & Kim, D. (1995). Schooling, labor force quality, and economic growth (No. 5399). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Hirschfeld, R. R., & Feild, H. S. (2000). Work centrality and work alienation: Distinct aspects of a general commitment to work. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 21(7), 789–800.
    Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9(2), 131–146.
    Kaufman, J. C., & Agars, M. D. (2009). Being creative with the predictors and criteria for success. American Psychologist, 64(4), 280–281.
    Kim, S. H. (2019). Max Weber. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/weber/#EthConRes
    Koys, D. J. (2001). The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: A unit-level, longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 54(1), 101–114.
    Kumar, R. (2019). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Limited.
    Kuncel, N. R., Credé, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 63–82.
    Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131–142.
    LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: a critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 52–65.
    MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. (1991). Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons’ performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(1), 123–150.
    Martin, J., & Torres, A. (2016). What is student engagement and why is it important? National Association of Independent Schools.
    McNeely, B. L., & Meglino, B. M. (1992). Good Soldiers or Good Duty? the Role of Work Values and Contextual Antecedents in Prosocial Organizational Behavior. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1992(1), 232–236.
    Meriac, J. P. (2012). Work ethic and academic performance: Predicting citizenship and counterproductive behavior. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(4), 549–553.
    Meriac, J. P. (2015). Examining relationships among work ethic, academic motivation and performance. Educational Psychology, 35(5), 523–540.
    Meriac, J. P., & Gorman, C. A. (2017). Work ethic and work outcomes in an expanded criterion domain. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(3), 273–282.
    Meriac, J. P., Thomas, A. L. E., & Milunski, M. (2015). Work ethic as a predictor of task persistence and intensity. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 249–254.
    Meriac, J. P., Woehr, D. J., & Banister, C. (2010). Generational differences in work ethic: An examination of measurement equivalence across three cohorts. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 315–324.
    Meriac, J. P., Woehr, D. J., Gorman, C. A., & Thomas, A. L. E. (2013). Development and validation of a short form for the multidimensional work ethic profile. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(3), 155–164.
    Merrens, M. R., & Garrett, J. B. (1975). The Protestant Ethic Scale as a predictor of repetitive work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(1), 125–127.
    Miller, M. J., Woehr, D. J., & Hudspeth, N. (2002). The meaning and measurement of work ethic: Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(3), 451–489.
    Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845–855.
    Morphew, C. C., & Hartley, M. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 456–471.
    Morrow, P. C. (1993). The theory and measurement of work commitment. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.
    Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. (1st ed.). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.
    Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85–97.
    Organ, D. W., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 157–164.
    Ostrander, S. A. (2004). Democracy, civic participation, and the university: A comparative study of civic engagement on five campuses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(1), 74–93.
    Ozatalay, K. C., & Chanzanagh, H. E. (2013). Examining the Validity of MWEP Scale in Turkish Culture. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 220–225.
    Parkhurst, John T, Fleisher, M. S., Skinner, C. H., Woehr, D. J., & Hawthorn-Embree, M. L. (2011). Assignment choice, effort, and assignment completion: Does work ethic predict those who choose higher-effort assignments? Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 575–579.
    Parkhurst, John Thomas. (2013). Academic work ethic: Predicating student assignment choice and evaluating the academic work ethic-student measure (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA). Retrieved from https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2469/
    Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual-and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122–141.
    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142.
    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563.
    Rau, W., & Durand, A. (2000). The academic ethic and college grades: Does hard work help students to" make the grade"? Sociology of Education, 19–38.
    Renninger, K. A., & Bachrach, J. E. (2015). Studying triggers for interest and engagement using observational methods. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 58–69.
    Rogelberg, S. G., & Luong, A. (1998). Nonresponse to mailed surveys: A review and guide. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(2), 60–65.
    Russell, S. S., Spitzmüller, C., Lin, L. F., Stanton, J. M., Smith, P. C., & Ironson, G. H. (2004). Shorter can also be better: The abridged job in general scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(5), 878–893.
    Ryan, J. J. (2002). Work values and organizational citizenship behaviors: Values that work for employees and organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(1), 123–132.
    Sackett, P. R., Borneman, M. J., & Connelly, B. S. (2008). High stakes testing in higher education and employment: Appraising the evidence for validity and fairness. American Psychologist, 63(4), 215–227.
    Sackett, P. R., Borneman, M. J., & Connelly, B. S. (2009). Responses to issues raised about validity, bias, and fairness in high-stakes testing. American Psychologist, 64(4), 285–287.
    Schjoedt, L., & Sangboon, K. (2015). Control Variables: Problematic Issues and Best Practices. In K. D. Strang (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Research Design in Business and Management (pp. 239–261). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillian.
    Schmitt, N., Oswald, F. L., Friede, A., Imus, A., & Merritt, S. (2008). Perceived fit with an academic environment: Attitudinal and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(3), 317–335.
    Schmitt, N., Oswald, F. L., Kim, B. H., Imus, A., Merritt, S., Friede, A., & Shivpuri, S. (2007). The use of background and ability profiles to predict college student outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 165–179.
    Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
    Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (1997). Influences of adaptation to communist rule on value priorities in Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 18(2), 385–410.
    Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. New York, NY: Springer.
    Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525.
    Smith, C., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653–663.
    Spitzmuller, M., Van Dyne, L., & Ilies, R. (2008). Organizational citizenship behavior: A review and extension of its nomological network. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior, 1, 106–123.
    Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self‐report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194.
    Talachi, R. K., Gorji, M. B., & Boerhannoeddin, A. Bin. (2014). An investigation of the role of job satisfaction in employees’ organizational citizenship behavior. Collegium Antropologicum, 38(2), 429–436.
    Taylor, E. P. (2016). Academic Work Ethic in Middle School Students: Extending Scale Research and Investigating Construct Validity (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA). Retrieved from https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5626&context=utk_graddiss
    Ullman, J. B. (1996). Structural Equation Modeling (in Using Multivariate Statistics, BG Tabachnick and LS Fidell Eds) (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins.
    Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. W., & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765–802.
    Weathington, B. L., Cunningham, C. J. L., & Pittenger, D. J. (2010). Research methods for the behavioral and social sciences. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
    Weber, M. (1958). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York, NY: Scribners.
    Weikamp, J. G., & Göritz, A. S. (2016). Organizational citizenship behaviour and job satisfaction: The impact of occupational future time perspective. Human Relations, 69(11), 2091–2115.
    Wentworth, D. K., & Chell, R. M. (1997). American college students and the Protestant work ethic. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(3), 284–296.
    Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617.
    Williams, S., & Sandler, R. L. (1995). Work values and attitudes: Protestant and Confucian ethics as predictors of satisfaction and commitment. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 3(1), 1–13.
    Woehr, D. J., Arciniega, L. M., & Lim, D. H. (2007). Examining work ethic across populations: A comparison of the multidimensional work ethic profile across three diverse cultures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(1), 154–168.
    Yazzie-Mintz, E., & McCormick, K. (2012). Finding the humanity in the data: Understanding, measuring, and strengthening student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 743–761). New York, NY: Springer.
    Zettler, I. (2011). Self-control and academic performance: Two field studies on university citizenship behavior and counterproductive academic behavior. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 119–123.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2023/08/25 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 2025/08/25 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2025/08/25 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE