簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳泰嘉
Tai-Jia Wu
論文名稱: 數位賦能驅動力-洽吧的Insurtech創新之路
The Power of Digital Enablement – A Road to Insurtech Innovation : Bravo AI
指導教授: 周子銓
Tzu-Chuan Chou
口試委員: 黃世禎
Sun-Jen Huang
李國光
Gwo-Guang Lee
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 管理學院MBA
School of Management International (MBA)
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 80
中文關鍵詞: 保險科技商業模式資源基礎理論組織靈巧性制定理論創新與創業
外文關鍵詞: Insurtech, business model, resource-based view, ambidexterity, enactment, fintech
相關次數: 點閱:217下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 數位轉型(Digital Transformation)近日成為膾炙人口的一門顯學,科技應用逐漸轉化人們的生活形態與消費行為,過往的商業模式若不積極進行轉型則恐被後進者超越甚至是淘汰,也因為瞬息萬變的市場變化,使得數位轉型與傳統企業競爭力的提升有著緊密的關係,尤以金融產業服務結合數位科技應運而生的金融科技(FinTech)更受人矚目,透過網路、大數據、行動通訊、區塊鏈乃至於人工智慧與金融產品、服務的結合,除提升消費者滿意度、市佔率,更將達成「普惠金融」的最終目標。
    而金融科技又可劃分出另一主要應用領域–保險科技(InsurTech);趙式隆執行長看見台灣保險業者在保險核保、理賠流程上仍耗費大量人力且行政效率低落而亟需轉型,創辦專為傳統保險產業提供解決方案的新創金融科技公司「洽吧智能 Bravo AI Co., Ltd.」,透過人工智慧等科技導入優化保險行政作業流程,提供如核保理賠自動化方案、產物保險自動定損與建立風險模型等服務。總體來說,本研究希望藉由對金融保險科技的新創事業的個案研究,提供同樣具有金融保險科技創新思維的後進者一個參考模型,給予創業方向與建議。
    本研究透過哈佛式個案的方式進行研究撰寫與分析,透過深度訪談探討洽吧智能在保險科技產業下的商業模式、資源基礎、組織靈巧性,最後透過制定理論探討新創企業發展政策與外部市場環境認知下互相形塑的一個連續性過程。


    Digital transformation has recently become a well-known subject. The application of technology is gradually transforming people’s lifestyles and consumer behavior. If we remain the outdated business models, we may be surpassed or even be knocked out by the latecomers. Therefore, digital transformation is considered to be highly related with the competitiveness of traditional enterprises under this volatile environment. Especially Fintech, the application of digital technology in the financial industry, has attracted wide attention. With the combination of finance and digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and others, it will not only increase the consumer satisfaction, market share, but even reach the ultimate goal - " Inclusive Financing ".
    Furthermore,“Insurtech” is one another main domain in fintech. Shih-Lung Chao, the CEO of Bravo AI, realized that the consumption of immense manpower in underwriting and claims procedure led to low administrative efficiency in Taiwan insurance corporations. To help those companies improve this situation, he founded " Bravo AI Co., Ltd.", a Fintech company which aims at solving the pain point of traditional insurance industry through AI technology. Their automation solutions include automated underwriting and claims settlement process, automated loss assessment, and risk model establishment, which can enhance the process efficiency of insurance administrative operation.
    Generally speaking, this research hopes to provide a reference for people who also have innovative thinking in Fintech and gives them directions and suggestions for starting a business. This research used the Harvard case method to carry on the investigation. Through in-depth interviews, we explored the management theories behind the case such as business model, resource-based view and ambidexterity, then discuss the continuous process of mutual shaping between new venture strategies and the cognition of external environment through the enactment theories.

    摘要 I ABSTRACT II 誌謝 III 目錄 IV 表索引 VII 圖索引 VIII 壹、 個案本文 1 一、 序場:保險業的困境 1 (一) 保險業的信息不對稱 1 (二) 核保後的道德性風險 2 (三) 理賠申請的管理作業 3 二、 保險科技的進入 6 (一) 保險科技的歷程 6 (二) 市場潛在規模 8 三、 解放人力,洽吧智能的創立 13 (一) 創業初始 13 (二) 跨進金融保險圈 14 四、 火力全開,保險業的軍火商 16 (一) 科技賦能,馬克的誕生 16 (二) 實力打底,逐步成長 19 (三) 聚焦市場,深化合作 21 (四) 保險科技之於社會資本 22 五、 疫情的當下與未來 24 (一) 備齊軍火待時機到來 24 (二) 下一步,成為主導者 25 六、 附錄 26 貳、 個案討論 27 一、 個案總覽 27 二、 教學目標與適用課程 28 三、 學生課前討論問題 32 四、 個案人物背景 33 五、 個案分析 34 (一) 課程目標一: 金融保險科技商業模式 35 (二) 課程目標二: 資源基礎觀點 42 (三) 課程目標三: 組織雙元靈巧性 46 (四) 課程目標四: 制定理論 51 六、 課程結論 55 七、 教學建議 56 八、 板書規劃 62 參、 參考文獻 64 一、 英文參考文獻 64 二、 中文參考文獻 67 三、 參考網站 68

    一、英文參考文獻
    1.Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of management review, 27(1), 17-40.
    2.Akerlof, G. A. (1978). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism Uncertainty in economics (pp. 235-251): Elsevier.
    3.Arnott, R. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1988). The basic analytics of moral hazard: National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA.
    4.Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
    5.Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of management, 27(6), 625-641.
    6.Campbell, D. T. (1965). Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. Social Change in Developing Area.
    7.Cantamessa, M., Gatteschi, V., Perboli, G., & Rosano, M. (2018). Startups’ roads to failure. Sustainability, 10(7), 2346.
    8.Chiappori, P.-A., & Salanié, B. (2013). Asymmetric information in insurance markets: Predictions and tests. Handbook of insura nce, 397-422.
    9.Cohen, A., & Siegelman, P. (2010). Testing for adverse selection in insurance markets. Journal of Risk and insurance, 77(1), 39-84.
    10.Cortis, D., Debattista, J., Debono, J., & Farrell, M. (2019). InsurTech Disrupting finance (pp. 71-84): Palgrave Pivot, Cham.
    11.Cummins, J. D., & Tennyson, S. (1996). Moral hazard in insurance claiming: evidence from automobile insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 12(1), 29-50.
    12.Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The management of organization, 1(1), 167-188.
    13.Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of management review, 20(4), 986-1014.
    14.Husnjak, S., Peraković, D., Forenbacher, I., & Mumdziev, M. (2015). Telematics system in usage based motor insurance. Procedia Engineering, 100, 816-825.
    15.Jennings, P. D., & Greenwood, R. (2003). 6bConstructing the iron cage: Institutional theory and enactment'. Debating organization: point-counterpoint in organization studies, 195.
    16.Katila, R., & Chen, E. L. (2008). Effects of search timing on innovation: The value of not being in sync with rivals. Administrative science quarterly, 53(4), 593-625.
    17.KPMG (2019). Pulse of Fintech H2’20, 16.
    18.Löfgren, K.-G., Persson, T., & Weibull, J. W. (2002). Markets with asymmetric information: the contributions of George Akerlof, Michael Spence and Joseph Stiglitz. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 195-211.
    19.Lee, K. (1992). Moral hazard, insurance and public loss prevention. Journal of Risk and insurance, 275-283.
    20.March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71-87.
    21.Maskin, E. S. (2019). The Economics of Kenneth J. Arrow: A Selective Review. Annual Review of Economics, 11(1), 1-26. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030323
    22.Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective. Journal of business research, 58(6), 726-735.
    23.O'Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California management review, 53(4), 5-22.
    24.O'Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338.
    25.Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers: John Wiley & Sons.
    26.Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy, New York Free Press. PorterCompetitive Strategy1980.
    27.Stewart, D. W., & Zhao, Q. (2000). Internet marketing, business models, and public policy. Journal of public policy & marketing, 19(2), 287-296.
    28.The World Economic Forum (2015). The Future of Financial Services, 12.
    29.Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California management review, 38(4), 8-29.
    30.Varian, H. R. (2014). Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach: Ninth International Student Edition: WW Norton & Company.
    31.Waters, B. (2005). Software as a service: A look at the customer benefits. Journal of Digital Asset Management, 1(1), 32-39.
    32.Weick, K. E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing.
    33.Weick, K. E. (1988). Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations [1]. Journal of management studies, 25(4), 305-317.
    34.Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization science, 16(4), 409-421.
    35.Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180.
    二、中文參考文獻
    1.全國法規資料庫:保險業財務報告編製準則第12條。
    2.安侯建業KPMG (2020),安侯建業2020年臺灣保險業報告。
    3.財團法人台灣網路資訊中心 (2021),2020台灣網路報告。
    4.金融監督管理委員會 (2020),金融科技投資狀況統計表 v.2。
    5.金融監督管理委員會 (2020),金融科技投資統計近3年數據比較表。
    三、參考網站
    1.帕雷托最優。取自MBA智庫百科:https://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E5%B8%95%E7%B4%AF%E6%89%98%E6%9C%80%E4%BC%98
    2.逆選擇。取自維基百科:https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%80%86%E5%90%91%E9%80%89%E6%8B%A9
    3.道德風險。取自MBA智庫百科:https://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E9%81%93%E5%BE%B7%E9%A3%8E%E9%99%A9
    4.World Economic Forum。取自維基百科:https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%B8%96%E7%95%8C%E7%B6%93%E6%BF%9F%E8%AB%96%E5%A3%87
    5.What is Telematics?。取自Verizon Connect:https://www.verizonconnect.com/resources/article/what-is-telematics/
    6.202102保險市場重要指標。取自財團法人保險事業發展中心網頁:https://www.tii.org.tw/tii/research/research05/category03/000169.html
    7.Disruptive Innovation。取自Investopedia: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/disruptive-innovation.asp
    8.保險業的技術軍火商!洽吧智能打造產、壽險核保理賠解決方案。取自創業小聚:https://meet.bnext.com.tw/articles/view/44284
    9.How do insurance providers deliver value now?。取自World Economic Forum:https://reports.weforum.org/future-of-financial-services-2015/how-do-insurance-providers-deliver-value-now/?doing_wp_cron=1620492083.6746098995208740234375
    10.概念性驗證(Proof of Concept;POC)。取自DigiTimes:https://www.digitimes.com.tw/tech/dt/n/shwnws.asp?cnlid=14&id=0000124188_X7V093YZ94DZPV7F0B4PJ
    11.什麼是電腦視覺?。取自INTEL官方網站:https://www.intel.com.tw/content/www/tw/zh/internet-of-things/computer-vision/overview.html
    12.洽吧智能股份有限公司。取自新創圓夢網:https://sme.moeasmea.gov.tw/startup/modules/highlight/detail/?sId=468
    13.金融小學堂。取自金融監督管理委員會臉書專頁:https://www.facebook.com/fsc.gov.tw/posts/2629911950356616/
    14.有關SWOT分析法的真相。取自每日頭條:https://kknews.cc/zh-tw/history/3z26xao.html
    15.財富世界500大。取自維基百科:https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%B4%A2%E5%AF%8C%E4%B8%96%E7%95%8C500%E5%BC%BA
    16.洽吧智能菜鳥工程師待遇,為何媲美台積電、聯發科、google?。取自遠見:https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/70859

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2025/01/25 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 2027/01/25 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2027/01/25 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE