在現今人類面臨地球環境反撲所造成的能源危機、溫室效應、氣候變遷等環境問題，使得地球的永續發展受到重視，然而建築物對於人類的生活又有直接的影響，使得永續建築、綠色建築概念便孕育而生，至今已成為全球關注的議題。過去建築產學界所接觸到的建築典範多屬於溫帶或寒帶地區國家，台灣在缺乏全球氣候環境的概念下，貿然引進歐美技術與學習構築方式，造成實際上使用的不適與大量消耗能源問題。本研究透過遊戲的進行，將真實世界的建築方式模擬為遊戲內容，遊戲參與者經由之間的交易、談判，藉此換取其所需之生產資源，再自行選擇適合的建築類型，發展因地制宜的永續建築。最後再透過實驗法探討遊戲之成效。研究結果顯示，透過遊戲的進行，有助於培養遊戲參賽者對於世界各國永續建築的了解，進而達到國際觀的教育效果。

With the emerging of environment problems, such as energy crisis, green house effect, and climate change etc, sustainable developments have become more and more important. Obviously, human life was affected by various building forms. For this reason, there has been a lot of discussion in the issues of “sustainable buildings” and “green buildings” all over the world. In Taiwan, a great deal of effort has been made on building codes and ordinances to improve energy efficiency in buildings. However, such building codes and ordinances mainly referred to the standards of temperate and boreal countries. In other words, these practices without considering climate affected factors may cause many problems of improper usage and energy consumption in the actual use of the building.
This study created a model to simulate the design and construction processes by transactions between participants to exchange their needed resources, and then choose sustainable building forms to achieve the purpose of green building. The result shows that this simulation not only could improve the participants’ perceptions of sustainable buildings, but also could be helpful to cultivate the international perspective to achieve the purpose of public education.

1.Carson, J.R.(1969).“Business games: A technique for teaching decision making”. In : R.G. Graham & C.F. Gray (Eds.), Business games handbook. American Management Association Inc.
2.Cordova, D. I., and Lepper, M. R. (1996)“Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice.” J. Educ. Psychol., 88, 715-730.
3.Hays, R.T. & Singer, M.J.(1989).“Simulation fidelity in training system design: bridging the gap between reality and training”. New York: Springer Verlag.
4.Johnston, R. T., & de Felix, W. (1993). Learning from video games. Computer in the Schools, 9, 199-233.
5.Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skilled-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311-328.
6.Köppen W. (1936), Das geographische System der Klimate (Handbuch der
Klimatologie, edited by W.Köppen and Geiger, Vol.I, part C), Berlin.
7.Leemkuil, H., Jong, T.D., Ootoes, S.(2000).“Review of educational use of games and simulations”,Knowledge management, Interactive Training System.
8.Okoroh, M.I. and Torrance V.B. (1999).” A model for subcontractor selection in refurbishment projects”.Construction Management and Economics, 17, pp.315-327.
9.Perng, Y.H., Juan, Y.K., & Chien, S.F. (2006).“Exploring the Bidding Situation for Economically Most Advantageous Tender Projects Using a Bidding Game”.Construction Engineering and Management,132, pp.1037-1042.
10.Petranek, C. F., Corey, S., & Black, R. (1992). Three levels of learning in simulations: participating, debriefing, and journal writing. Simulation & Gaming, 23(2), 74-185.
11.Peters, V., Vissers, G., & Heijne, G. (1998). The validity of games. Simulation & Gaming, 29(1), 20-30.
12.Randel, J. M., Morris, B. A., Wetzel, C. D., & Whitehill, B. V. (1992). The
effectiveness of games for educational purpose: a review of recent research. Simulation & Gaming, 23(3), 261-276.
13.Thurman, R. (1993).“Instructional simulation from a cognitive psychology viewpoint.” Educ. Tech. Re. Dev., 41(4), 75-89.
14.Victor Olgyay (1973), Design With Climate, Princeton University.
15.Wishart, J. (1990).“Cognitive factors related to user involvement with computers and their effects upon learning from an educational computer game.”Comput. Educ., 15, 145-150.
16.Zhiqiang (John) Zhai , Jonathan M.Previtali(2010), “Ancient vernacular architecture: characteristics categorization and energy performance evaluation.” Energy and Buildings, 42, 357-365.
17.Z. Yilmaz(2007), “Evaluation of energy efficient design strategies for different climatic zone: Comparison of thermal performance of buildings in temperate-humid and hot-dry climate.” Energy and Buildings, 39, 306-316.
18.林憲德(1997) 。建築風土與節能設計。詹氏書局。
19.張珩、林憲德(2000)。國外綠建築技術之比較研究-各國綠建築評估系統探討。內政部建築研究所。
20.江哲銘、李彥頤(2001)。從生態：氣候與地理多樣性發展之台灣永續建築與健康生活。
21.台灣建築報導雜誌社(2002)。永續綠建築。台灣建築報導雜誌社。
22.內政部建築研究所(2003)。綠建築解說與評估手冊2003 年更新版 。內政部建築研究所。
23.彭文正(2003)。以生命週期評估技術應用於建築耗能之研究。朝陽科技大學24.環境工程與管理研究所碩士論文。
25.李正儀(2004)。綠建築教學遊戲。國立台灣科技大學研究所碩士論文。
26.內政部建築研究所(2005)。綠建築設計技術彙編。內政部建築研究所。
27.林憲德(2006)。綠色建築。詹氏書局。
28.鄭伃晴(2007)。永續住宅整建策略遊戲。國立台灣科技大學研究所碩士論文。
29.林憲德(2009)。人居熱環境-建築風土設計的第一課。詹氏書局。
30.陳海曙(2009)。全球熱溼氣候自然通風綠建築。詹氏書局。
31.林憲德(2010)。綠建築84技術。詹氏書局。