研究生: |
張莉崴 Li-Wei Chang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
全球環境管理技術創新:中國、日本、美國及台灣專利佈局的比較分析 Innovation in Global Environmental Management Technology: A Comparative Analysis of Patent Strategies in China, Japan, the United States, and Taiwan |
指導教授: |
耿筠
Yun Ken |
口試委員: |
李姿儀
朱默庵 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
應用科技學院 - 專利研究所 Graduate Institute of Patent |
論文出版年: | 2023 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 233 |
中文關鍵詞: | 永續發展目標 、技術發展趨勢 、環境管理技術 、綠色專利 、環境社會治理 、永續發展目標 、技術發展趨勢 |
外文關鍵詞: | Sustainable Development Goals, Technology Development Trends, Environmental Management Technology, Green Patents, ESG, Sustainable Development Goals, Technology Development Trends |
相關次數: | 點閱:70 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本論文應運而生於當今全球對環境、社會與治理(ESG)和永續發展目標(SDGs)議題的日益升溫之際。著眼於全球環境管理技術領域的創新,並針對中國、日本、美國三大經濟體在環境技術創新及專利策略的表現,同時探討我國在此全球趨勢中的策略定位與創新潛力。目的在於揭示這些國家在全球環境治理領域的角色及策略,並評估我國在環境技術發展上的機遇與挑戰。
本研究選擇Espacenet資料庫作為主要的資訊來源,並借鑒OECD Environment Working Papers的檢索策略,聚焦於空氣、水、廢棄物處理等重要環境技術領域進行分析。透過對比分析法和卡方分析,評估不同技術領域的專利活動,以全面了解全球環境技術的創新及地理市場的趨勢。
研究發現,過去近四十年間,全球在環境技術領域的專利申請量顯著增長,特別是自2000年代初期起。此趨勢反映了國際社會對於環境問題的重視和對技術創新的積極追求。中國、日本和美國在環境管理技術領域展現出顯著的領導地位,其中又以中國的專利數量尤為突出,顯示其技術創新與市場需求的活躍。此外,我國在某些領域顯示出潛在的發展空間,透過加強投資和發展,有望在全球環境治理中發揮更積極的角色。
This thesis emerges amidst the global emphasis on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It focuses on environmental management technology innovations, scrutinizing the efforts of China, Japan, the United States, and Taiwan's strategic role in this realm. The study aims to discern their contributions to global environmental governance and evaluate Taiwan's potential in technological advancements.
Utilizing the Espacenet database and a search strategy from OECD Environment Working Papers, the research concentrates on pivotal areas like air, water, and waste management technologies. Applying comparative and chi-square analyses, it gauges patent activities to unfold global environmental technology trends.
The findings reveal a marked increase in environmental technology patents over the past four decades, accelerating since the early 2000s. This surge underscores the international community's commitment to addressing environmental challenges and fostering innovation. Among the examined nations, China demonstrates a commanding presence in patent applications, signaling robust market demand and innovation. Concurrently, Taiwan exhibits emerging potential in specific sectors, indicating its growing relevance in global environmental discourse. The study underscores the urgency for Taiwan to escalate its involvement in environmental technology to align with global standards and contribute significantly to international environmental governance.
中華民國專利法施行細則第23條第一項。
中華民國專利法第26條第一項。
台一國際智慧財產事務所(2018),〈智慧財產法院成立十年,專利有效性抗辯成立比率的統計觀察〉,《台一國際智慧財產事務所》。[Online]. Available: https://www.taie.com.tw/tc/p4-publications-detail.asp?article_code=03&article_classify_sn=64&sn=1272
白培英,〈環境議題迫人來-講求生態效益是企業因應之道〉。[Online]. Available: https://e-info.org.tw/issue/ecoeco/issue-ecoeco0010050htm
行政院環境保護署(2012),〈110年版環境白皮書〉。[Online]. Available: https://www.moenv.gov.tw/page/2369E6476D824780
行政院環境部(2023),〈環保政策〉。[Online]. Available: https://www.ey.gov.tw/state/4AC21DC94B8E19A8/bea31948-b13c-4bd7-b13b-904a50ee5730
查先進、楊鳳、武漢大學信息資源研究中心(2008),〈基於對比分析法的專利情報分析實證研究〉,《圖書館論壇》,第2008期,頁193-197+204。
時碩工業(2023),《2022年永續報告書》。[Online]. Available: https://cgc.twse.com.tw/
國家發展委員會(2022),〈台灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明〉。[Online]. Available: https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=DEE68AAD8B38BD76
張勵德,《技轉廢水處理技術 邁向零排放目標》,工業技術研究院。[Online]. Available: https://www.itri.org.tw/ListStyle.aspx?DisplayStyle=18_content&SiteID=1&MmmID=1036452026061075714&MGID=621024041216074467
陳怡如(2023),〈創新永續 水之道- 今周刊〉,Www.businesstoday.com.tw。[Online]. Available: www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/183015/post/202303210027/
經濟部智慧財產局(2023),〈2022年我國與WIPO受理發明專利申請趨勢比較分析〉。
經濟部智慧財產局,〈Toyota釋出氫燃料電池專利,新能源車市場版圖爭奪戰即將展開!〉。[Online]. Available: https://pcm.tipo.gov.tw/PCM2010/PCM/commercial/01/Toyota.aspx?aType=1&Articletype=1&aSn=463
經濟部智慧財產局(2023),〈全球半導體產業廢棄物處理之關鍵技術及專利佈局分析〉。[Online]. Available: https://topic.tipo.gov.tw/patents-tw/cp-750-930453-36daa-10html
經濟部智慧財產局(2023),〈全球半導體產業廢棄物處理之關鍵技術及專利佈局分析-以銅、矽泥及氫氣回收為例〉。
經濟部智慧財產局(2021),〈氫燃料車技術分析報告〉。[Online]. Available: https://pcm.tipo.gov.tw/PCM2010/PCM/commercial/03/Hydrogen.aspx?aType=3&Articletype=1&aSn=2215
蔡沛成(2022),〈ESG意識抬頭,財務長應積極作為企業永續發展之關鍵角色〉,Deloitte Taiwan。[Online]. Available: https://www2.deloitte.com/tw/tc/pages/sustainability-services-group/articles/ssg-update-2201-html
〔外文文獻〕
World Economic Forum. (2022). The Global Risks Report 2022. World Economic Forum. 取自https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2022/
“Patents in Environment-Related Technologies.” Www.oecd-Ilibrary.org, www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/data/patents-in-environment-related-technologies_env-tech-pat-data-en#:~:text=This%20database%20provides%20the%20latest.
Abbas, A., Zhang, L., & Khan, S. U. (2014). A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Patent Information, 37, 3-13.
Ahmad, H., Yaqub, M. & Lee, S.H. Environmental-, social-, and governance-related factors for business investment and sustainability: a scientometric review of global trends. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02921-x
Akkoyun, C., & Ersahin, N. (2020). When does information disclosure help innovation? evidence from blue sky laws. Evidence from Blue Sky Laws (April 6, 2020).
Akobeng, A. K. (2016). Understanding type I and type II errors, statistical power and sample size. Acta Paediatrica, 105(6), 605-609.
Anastas, P. T., & Zimmerman, J. B. (2021). Moving from Protection to Prosperity: Evolving the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for the next 50 years. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(5), 2779–2789. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07287
Atanassov, J. (2013). Do hostile takeovers stifle innovation? Evidence from antitakeover legislation and corporate patenting. The Journal of Finance, 68(3), 1097-1131.
Ayres, I., & Parchomovsky, G. (2007). Tradable patent rights. Stan. L. Rev., 60, 863.
Basberg, B. L. (1987). Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature. Research policy, 16(2-4), 131-141.
Baumgärtner, S., & Quaas, M. (2010). Sustainability economics—General versus specific, and conceptual versus practical. Ecological Economics, 69(11), 2056-2059.
Belloc, F. (2012). Corporate governance and innovation: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(5), 835-864.
Bentley, Diana. “How Patent Law Supports the Fight against Climate Change.” Raconteur, 2 Dec. 2021, www.raconteur.net/risk-regulation/patent-law-climate-change.
Bessen, J. (2008). The value of US patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy, 37(5), 932-945.
Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2002). Patents, real options and firm performance. The Economic Journal, 112(478), C97-C116.
Brunel, C., & Zylkin, T. (2022). Do cross‐border patents promote trade?. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 55(1), 379-418.
Campbell, R. S. (1983). Patent trends as a technological forecasting tool. World patent information, 5(3), 137-143.
Chung, D., Kwon, Y., & Kim, Z. (2023). Technology life cycle and commercialization readiness of hydrogen production technology using patent analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(33), 12139-12154.
Clarke, N. S., Jürgens, B., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2020). Blockchain patent landscaping: An expert based methodology and search query. World Patent Information, 61, 101964.
Clarke, Nigel S. “The Basics of Patent Searching.” World Patent Information, vol. 54, Sept. 2018, pp. S4–S10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2017.02.006.
Cockburn, I. M., & MacGarvie, M. J. (2009). Patents, thickets and the financing of early‐stage firms: evidence from the software industry. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(3), 729-773.
Cockburn, I. M., & MacGarvie, M. J. (2011). Entry and patenting in the software industry. Management science, 57(5), 915-933.
Cohen, Steve. “The Growing Awareness and Prominence of Environmental Sustainability.” State of the Planet, 19 Sept. 2022, news.climate.columbia.edu/2022/09/19/the-growing-awareness-and-prominence-of-environmental-sustainability/.
Compendium of WHO and Other UN Guidance on Health and Environment 2022 Update. 1 Apr. 2022.
DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter W. Powell. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields (Translated by G. Yudin).” Journal of Economic Sociology, vol. 11, no. 1, 2010, pp. 34–56, www.enriquedans.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/The_Iron_Cage_Revisted_Institutional_Isomorphism_a.pdf, https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2010-1-34-56.
European Banking Authority. (2020, December). Management and supervision of ESG risks for credit institutions and investment firms.
European Banking Authority. (2021). Management and supervision of ESG risks for credit institutions and investment firms. EBA/REP/2021/18.
European Parliament. Environment policy: General principles and basic framework.
European Patent Office. (2020). EPC - Article 41(2) - Rule 41 - Examination of European patent applications for compliance with requirements as to form. https://www.epo.org/en/legal/epc/2020/r41.html#reg.f62-note
European Patent Office. (2020). EPC - Article 47 - Rule 47 - Amendment of the European patent application. https://www.epo.org/en/legal/epc/2020/r47.html
Fu, B. R., Hsu, S. W., Liu, C. H., & Liu, Y. C. (2014). Statistical analysis of patent data relating to the organic Rankine cycle. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 986-994.
Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research policy, 31(6), 899-933.
Goldschlag, N., Lybbert, T. J., & Zolas, N. J. (2020). Tracking the technological composition of industries with algorithmic patent concordances. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 29(6), 582-602.
Griliches, Zvi. “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey.” National Bureau of Economic Research, 1 Mar. 1990, www.nber.org/papers/w3301.
Haruyama, S., Miyake, K., Kimura, T., & Kaminishi, K. (2014). A Study of Technology Trends Analysis Using Patent Search Systems. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability RISUS, 5(2), 18-35.
Haščič, I., & Migotto, M. (2015). Measuring environmental innovation using patent data.
Henry, M. D. (2013). The market effects of patent litigation.
Huang, Y., Li, R., Zou, F., Jiang, L., Porter, A. L., & Zhang, L. (2022). Technology life cycle analysis: From the dynamic perspective of patent citation networks. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 181, 121760.
Jia, N., Huang, K. G., & Man Zhang, C. (2019). Public governance, corporate governance, and firm innovation: An examination of state-owned enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1), 220-247.
Kapil, Sheeba, and Vrinda Rawal. “Sustainable Investment and Environmental, Social, and Governance Investing: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review.” Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, vol. 32, no. 4, 15 Aug. 2023, pp. 1429–1451, https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12588.
Kenney, B. (2008, April 15). Green Spot: 3P at 3M. IndustryWeek. Retrieved from https://www.industryweek.com/the-economy/environment/article/22007795/green-spot-3p-at-3m
Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2015). Patent databases for innovation studies: A comparative analysis of USPTO, EPO, JPO and KIPO. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 332-345.
Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. The economic journal, 114(495), 441-465.
Lee, H. J., & Oh, H. (2020). A study on the deduction and diffusion of promising artificial intelligence technology for sustainable industrial development. Sustainability, 12(14), 5609.
Lerner, Josh, and Amit Seru. “The Use and Misuse of Patent Data: Issues for Corporate Finance and Beyond.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3071750.
Liu, N., Shapira, P., Yue, X., & Guan, J. (2021). Mapping technological innovation dynamics in artificial intelligence domains: Evidence from a global patent analysis. Plos one, 16(12), e0262050.
Luo, Y., & Bu, J. (2018). Contextualizing international strategy by emerging market firms: A composition-based approach. Journal of World Business, 53(3), 337-355.
Oltra, V., & Saint Jean, M. (2009). Variety of technological trajectories in low emission vehicles (LEVs): a patent data analysis. Journal of Cleaner production, 17(2), 201-213.
Park, K. H. (2017). Measuring Technological Capability and Technological Catch-Up Process Using Patent Data at the National Level. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 13(1), 85-110.
Popp, David. “Lessons from Patents: Using Patents to Measure Technological Change in Environmental Models.” National Bureau of Economic Research, 1 Sept. 2003, www.nber.org/papers/w9978.
Rieuwerts, John. The Elements of Environmental Pollution. Google Books, Routledge, 2015, books.google.com.tw/books/about/The_Elements_of_Environmental_Pollution.html?id=OU3YoQEACAAJ&redir_esc=y.
Schmoch, U. (2008). Concept of a technology classification for country comparisons. Final report to the world intellectual property organisation (wipo), WIPO.
Schrijver, Nico J. ‘State Sovereignty in the Planetary Management of Natural Resources’. 1 Jan. 2021 : 13 – 20.
Serrano, C. J. (2011). Estimating the gains from trade in the market for innovation: Evidence from the transfer of patents (No. w17304). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Shunsuke, Managi. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Do Environmental, Social, and Governance Activities Improve Corporate Financial Performance? 2017.
Singh, V., Chakraborty, K., & Vincent, L. (2016). Patent database: Their importance in prior art documentation and patent search.
Sinigaglia, T., Martins, M. E. S., & Siluk, J. C. M. (2022). Technological evolution of internal combustion engine vehicle: A patent data analysis. Applied Energy, 306, 118003.
Thomas, Jacob, et al. “Meet, Beat, and Pollute.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3830867.
Trautrims, A., MacCarthy, B. L., & Okade, C. (2017). Building an innovation-based supplier portfolio: The use of patent analysis in strategic supplier selection in the automotive sector. International journal of production economics, 194, 228-236.
Tsang, Albert, et al. “Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure: A Literature Review.” The British Accounting Review, vol. 55, no. 1, Nov. 2022, p. 101149, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101149.
United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2022, July). MPEP Section 904: How to Search [R-07.2022]. Retrieved from https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s904.html
Warhurst, A., & Mitchell, P. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and the case of Summitville mine. Resources Policy, 26(2), 91-102.
Wasi, S., Tabrez, S., & Ahmad, M. (2013). Toxicological effects of major environmental pollutants: an overview. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 185, 2585-2593.
Webb, C., Dernis, H., Harhoff, D., & Hoisl, K. (2005). Analysing European and international patent citations: a set of EPO patent database building blocks.
World Intellectual Property Organization. The Bluetech Award: Tackling Air Pollution with Innovative Clean Air Technology. 取自https://www.wipo.int/ip-outreach/en/ipday/2020/case-studies/bcaa.html
Xie, Z., & Miyazaki, K. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of keyword search strategy for patent identification. World Patent Information, 35(1), 20-30.
Yang, X., & Yu, X. (2020). Preventing patent risks in artificial intelligence industry for sustainable development: A multi-level network analysis. Sustainability, 12(20), 8667.
Zhang, Qihang, et al. “Effect of Green Taxation on Pollution Emissions under ESG Concept.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 30, no. 21, 5 Apr. 2023, pp. 60196–60211, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26699-7.